4 <!ELEMENT minutes (about,participant*,presentation*,entry*)>
6 <!ELEMENT about (#PCDATA)>
8 <!ELEMENT entry (#PCDATA)>
10 author CDATA #IMPLIED>
12 <!ELEMENT presentation (#PCDATA|ul)*>
13 <!ATTLIST presentation
14 media (blackboard|slides) #REQUIRED
17 author CDATA #REQUIRED>
19 <!ELEMENT participant (#PCDATA)>
26 <!ELEMENT li (#PCDATA|ul)*>
30 <about>the Kick-Off</about>
31 <participant site="bologna" file="asperti"/>
32 <participant site="bologna" file="sacerdoti"/>
33 <participant site="inria" file="herbelin"/>
34 <participant site="inria" file="rideau"/>
35 <participant site="inria" file="pottier"/>
36 <participant site="inria" file="werner"/>
37 <participant site="nijmegen" file="geuvers"/>
38 <participant site="nijmegen" file="wiedijk"/>
39 <participant site="dfki" file="moschner"/>
40 <participant site="trusted-logic" file="gimenez"/>
41 <participant site="aei" file="schutz"/>
42 <participant site="aei" file="wegner"/>
43 <participant site="aei" file="velden"/>
44 <participant site="aei" file="kelley"/>
45 <participant site="aei" file="weyher"/>
46 <participant site="aei" file="pollney"/>
47 <presentation site="bologna" author="asperti" media="blackboard">
48 A comparison of the aims and approaches of HELM and OpenMath.
50 <presentation site="inria" author="pottier"
51 media="slides" slides="kick-off/lemme2.ppt">
52 Presentation of the work of Sophia-Antipolis: Project Lemme;
53 PCoq (an interface to the Coq system based on Aioli [for tree management],
54 PPML [a sort of stylesheet language] and Figue [rendering engine]).
56 <presentation site="inria" author="herbelin"
57 media="slides" slides="kick-off/MoWGLI-LogiCal.ps">
58 Presentation of the work of Rocquencourt: Coq (proof assistant) and its
61 <li>Classification of theories:
63 <li>Actually based only on the affiliation of the author.</li>
64 <li>We should have classifications based on subject, theme, author, etc.</li>
69 <li>By pattern. Problem: the patterns (n < m+1) and (n <= m) are
70 differents but denote the same thing.</li>
71 <li>By isomorphisms. Problem: we can capture just a few of them.</li>
74 <li>Proof Rendering in Natural Language: still too many detailed.
75 Views at different levels of detail can probably help.
80 <presentation site="nijmegen" author="geuvers" media="slides">
81 Presentation of the work of Nijmegen; why Nijmegen is interested in MOWGLI;
82 planned contributions to MOWGLI.
84 <presentation site="aei" author="wegner" media="blackboard">
85 Presentation of the projects in which he is envolved or that he is
86 coordinating; interest in metadata; problems related to having papers
87 in electronic form. His main contribution will be providing links to
90 <presentation site="aei" author="schutz"
91 media="slides" slides="kick-off/AIP_Intro.ppt">
92 Presentation of the work done at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational
93 Physics; presentation of Living Reviews in Relativity and expectations
94 from MOWGLI (i.e. searching, rendering, interoperability). He points out
95 how Living Reviews in Relativity already provide a notion of versioning;
96 how hyperlinks are managed (often opening pop-ups). He finally presents
97 some data that show that on-line browsing of papers really happens.
99 <presentation site="trusted-logic" author="gimenez" media="blackboard">
100 Presentation of the work done at Trusted Logic. Brief introduction to
101 the Common Criteria Software: lot of documentation must be produced for
102 third (and fourth!) parties evaluation; formal evaluation is one goal
103 (not yet reached). The main problems Trusted Logic meets are:
105 <li>Presentation</li>
106 <li>Managing thousands of definitions/theorems and links between them</li>
107 <li>Evaluators needs: hiding/displaying information; different views on the
108 same proofs/definitions; metadata; backpointers (which lemmas are
109 used in a theorem)</li>
110 <li>Interoperability with other software tools</li>
111 <li>Proofs mantainance</li>
113 A final remark is that Trusted Logic is just interested in provability
114 (and proof-scripts) and not in proofs (i.e. lambda-terms or natural
115 language description of them).
117 <presentation site="dfki" author="moschner" media="slides">
118 Presentation of the work done at DFKI. Contributions to MOWGLI: OMDoc
119 (to encode mathematical documents) and/or MBase (to distribute mathematical
120 documents) and metadata.
122 <entry author="aei/wegner">
123 Whenever someone is going to make a talk, he must report this to him.
126 To reach an agreement on the consortium agreement, Trusted Logic will
127 send a completely filled-in, light version of the agreement to everybody.
128 If the agreement will not satisfy everybody up to minor modifications,
129 we will go for the heavy proposal.
131 <entry author="nijmegen/geuvers">
132 The members of the PCC are responsible to communicate the name of the
133 site responsible for every WP.
136 There will be two mailing lists. The first one (for everybody) is
137 the one already created. The second one will be an administrative
141 All the meetings have already been scheduled: the first one will be held
142 in Nijmegen from the 17th to the 19th of July. The others will be
143 in Bertinoro (just after MKM03), Sophia (October 2003), Saarbrucken
146 <entry author="trusted-logic/gimenez">
147 It will be simpler to have PCC meetings by phones.
149 <entry author="aei/wegner">
150 During the plenary meetings, sub-meetings will be organized to discuss
153 <entry author="bologna/asperti">
154 Every Package Leader must submit a contribution to the deliverable 0.a.
156 <entry author="aei/wegner">
157 It is better to use a task-force of external experts to comment on
160 <entry author="aei/wegner">
161 The set of requirements must be ordered by importance (useful if some of
162 them are not fulfilled).
165 A long discussion on the topic of deliverable 1.c showed that there is
166 some mismatch in the vocabulary of the participants.
168 <entry author="bologna/asperti">
169 The choice between MathML and OpenMath is quite difficult, because
170 there are really no strong pro and cons in favor or against any of them.
172 <entry author="aei/schutz">
173 Maybe not having browsers supporting MathML is not a huge problem.