BOO007-2 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 add is 93 additive_id1 is 77 additive_id2 is 76 additive_identity is 82 additive_inverse1 is 84 additive_inverse2 is 83 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_add is 92 commutativity_of_multiply is 91 distributivity1 is 90 distributivity2 is 89 distributivity3 is 88 distributivity4 is 87 inverse is 86 multiplicative_id1 is 79 multiplicative_id2 is 78 multiplicative_identity is 85 multiplicative_inverse1 is 81 multiplicative_inverse2 is 80 multiply is 95 prove_associativity is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add ?2 ?3 =?= add ?3 ?2 [3, 2] by commutativity_of_add ?2 ?3 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?5 ?6 =?= multiply ?6 ?5 [6, 5] by commutativity_of_multiply ?5 ?6 Id : 8, {_}: add (multiply ?8 ?9) ?10 =<= multiply (add ?8 ?10) (add ?9 ?10) [10, 9, 8] by distributivity1 ?8 ?9 ?10 Id : 10, {_}: add ?12 (multiply ?13 ?14) =<= multiply (add ?12 ?13) (add ?12 ?14) [14, 13, 12] by distributivity2 ?12 ?13 ?14 Id : 12, {_}: multiply (add ?16 ?17) ?18 =<= add (multiply ?16 ?18) (multiply ?17 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distributivity3 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 14, {_}: multiply ?20 (add ?21 ?22) =<= add (multiply ?20 ?21) (multiply ?20 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distributivity4 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 16, {_}: add ?24 (inverse ?24) =>= multiplicative_identity [24] by additive_inverse1 ?24 Id : 18, {_}: add (inverse ?26) ?26 =>= multiplicative_identity [26] by additive_inverse2 ?26 Id : 20, {_}: multiply ?28 (inverse ?28) =>= additive_identity [28] by multiplicative_inverse1 ?28 Id : 22, {_}: multiply (inverse ?30) ?30 =>= additive_identity [30] by multiplicative_inverse2 ?30 Id : 24, {_}: multiply ?32 multiplicative_identity =>= ?32 [32] by multiplicative_id1 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply multiplicative_identity ?34 =>= ?34 [34] by multiplicative_id2 ?34 Id : 28, {_}: add ?36 additive_identity =>= ?36 [36] by additive_id1 ?36 Id : 30, {_}: add additive_identity ?38 =>= ?38 [38] by additive_id2 ?38 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a (multiply b c) =<= multiply (multiply a b) c [] by prove_associativity Found proof, 6.095314s BOO007-4 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 add is 93 additive_id1 is 87 additive_identity is 88 additive_inverse1 is 83 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_add is 92 commutativity_of_multiply is 91 distributivity1 is 90 distributivity2 is 89 inverse is 84 multiplicative_id1 is 85 multiplicative_identity is 86 multiplicative_inverse1 is 82 multiply is 95 prove_associativity is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add ?2 ?3 =?= add ?3 ?2 [3, 2] by commutativity_of_add ?2 ?3 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?5 ?6 =?= multiply ?6 ?5 [6, 5] by commutativity_of_multiply ?5 ?6 Id : 8, {_}: add ?8 (multiply ?9 ?10) =<= multiply (add ?8 ?9) (add ?8 ?10) [10, 9, 8] by distributivity1 ?8 ?9 ?10 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?12 (add ?13 ?14) =<= add (multiply ?12 ?13) (multiply ?12 ?14) [14, 13, 12] by distributivity2 ?12 ?13 ?14 Id : 12, {_}: add ?16 additive_identity =>= ?16 [16] by additive_id1 ?16 Id : 14, {_}: multiply ?18 multiplicative_identity =>= ?18 [18] by multiplicative_id1 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: add ?20 (inverse ?20) =>= multiplicative_identity [20] by additive_inverse1 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?22 (inverse ?22) =>= additive_identity [22] by multiplicative_inverse1 ?22 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a (multiply b c) =<= multiply (multiply a b) c [] by prove_associativity Timeout ! FAILURE in 625 iterations BOO031-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 add is 95 additive_inverse is 83 associativity_of_add is 80 associativity_of_multiply is 79 b is 97 c is 96 distributivity is 92 inverse is 89 l1 is 91 l2 is 87 l3 is 90 l4 is 86 multiplicative_inverse is 81 multiply is 94 n0 is 82 n1 is 84 property3 is 88 property3_dual is 85 prove_multiply_add_property is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add (multiply ?2 ?3) (add (multiply ?3 ?4) (multiply ?4 ?2)) =>= multiply (add ?2 ?3) (multiply (add ?3 ?4) (add ?4 ?2)) [4, 3, 2] by distributivity ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: add ?6 (multiply ?7 (multiply ?6 ?8)) =>= ?6 [8, 7, 6] by l1 ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: add (add (multiply ?10 ?11) (multiply ?11 ?12)) ?11 =>= ?11 [12, 11, 10] by l3 ?10 ?11 ?12 Id : 10, {_}: multiply (add ?14 (inverse ?14)) ?15 =>= ?15 [15, 14] by property3 ?14 ?15 Id : 12, {_}: multiply ?17 (add ?18 (add ?17 ?19)) =>= ?17 [19, 18, 17] by l2 ?17 ?18 ?19 Id : 14, {_}: multiply (multiply (add ?21 ?22) (add ?22 ?23)) ?22 =>= ?22 [23, 22, 21] by l4 ?21 ?22 ?23 Id : 16, {_}: add (multiply ?25 (inverse ?25)) ?26 =>= ?26 [26, 25] by property3_dual ?25 ?26 Id : 18, {_}: add ?28 (inverse ?28) =>= n1 [28] by additive_inverse ?28 Id : 20, {_}: multiply ?30 (inverse ?30) =>= n0 [30] by multiplicative_inverse ?30 Id : 22, {_}: add (add ?32 ?33) ?34 =?= add ?32 (add ?33 ?34) [34, 33, 32] by associativity_of_add ?32 ?33 ?34 Id : 24, {_}: multiply (multiply ?36 ?37) ?38 =?= multiply ?36 (multiply ?37 ?38) [38, 37, 36] by associativity_of_multiply ?36 ?37 ?38 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a (add b c) =<= add (multiply b a) (multiply c a) [] by prove_multiply_add_property Timeout ! FAILURE in 413 iterations BOO034-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 88 b is 96 c is 94 d is 93 e is 92 f is 91 g is 90 inverse is 97 left_inverse is 85 multiply is 95 prove_single_axiom is 89 right_inverse is 84 ternary_multiply_1 is 87 ternary_multiply_2 is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply (multiply ?2 ?3 ?4) ?5 (multiply ?2 ?3 ?6) =>= multiply ?2 ?3 (multiply ?4 ?5 ?6) [6, 5, 4, 3, 2] by associativity ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?8 ?9 ?9 =>= ?9 [9, 8] by ternary_multiply_1 ?8 ?9 Id : 8, {_}: multiply ?11 ?11 ?12 =>= ?11 [12, 11] by ternary_multiply_2 ?11 ?12 Id : 10, {_}: multiply (inverse ?14) ?14 ?15 =>= ?15 [15, 14] by left_inverse ?14 ?15 Id : 12, {_}: multiply ?17 ?18 (inverse ?18) =>= ?17 [18, 17] by right_inverse ?17 ?18 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a (inverse a) b) (inverse (multiply (multiply c d e) f (multiply c d g))) (multiply d (multiply g f e) c) =>= b [] by prove_single_axiom Timeout ! FAILURE in 424 iterations BOO072-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 97 add is 96 b is 98 dn1 is 93 huntinton_1 is 95 inverse is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: inverse (add (inverse (add (inverse (add ?2 ?3)) ?4)) (inverse (add ?2 (inverse (add (inverse ?4) (inverse (add ?4 ?5))))))) =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by dn1 ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 Goal Id : 2, {_}: add b a =>= add a b [] by huntinton_1 Found proof, 0.440809s BOO073-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 add is 96 b is 97 c is 95 dn1 is 92 huntinton_2 is 94 inverse is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: inverse (add (inverse (add (inverse (add ?2 ?3)) ?4)) (inverse (add ?2 (inverse (add (inverse ?4) (inverse (add ?4 ?5))))))) =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by dn1 ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 Goal Id : 2, {_}: add (add a b) c =>= add a (add b c) [] by huntinton_2 Found proof, 95.580028s BOO076-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 b is 97 c is 96 nand is 95 prove_meredith_2_basis_2 is 94 sh_1 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: nand (nand ?2 (nand (nand ?3 ?2) ?2)) (nand ?3 (nand ?4 ?2)) =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by sh_1 ?2 ?3 ?4 Goal Id : 2, {_}: nand a (nand b (nand a c)) =<= nand (nand (nand c b) b) a [] by prove_meredith_2_basis_2 Timeout ! FAILURE in 277 iterations COL003-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 95 b_definition is 94 f is 98 prove_strong_fixed_point is 96 w is 93 w_definition is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply w ?7) ?8 =?= apply (apply ?7 ?8) ?8 [8, 7] by w_definition ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_strong_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1120 iterations COL003-12 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 96 b is 94 b_definition is 93 fixed_pt is 97 prove_strong_fixed_point is 95 strong_fixed_point is 98 w is 92 w_definition is 91 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?2) ?3) ?4 =>= apply ?2 (apply ?3 ?4) [4, 3, 2] by b_definition ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply w ?6) ?7 =?= apply (apply ?6 ?7) ?7 [7, 6] by w_definition ?6 ?7 Id : 8, {_}: strong_fixed_point =<= apply (apply b (apply w w)) (apply (apply b w) (apply (apply b b) b)) [] by strong_fixed_point Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt =<= apply fixed_pt (apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt) [] by prove_strong_fixed_point Timeout ! FAILURE in 1252 iterations COL003-20 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 96 b is 94 b_definition is 93 fixed_pt is 97 prove_strong_fixed_point is 95 strong_fixed_point is 98 w is 92 w_definition is 91 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?2) ?3) ?4 =>= apply ?2 (apply ?3 ?4) [4, 3, 2] by b_definition ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply w ?6) ?7 =?= apply (apply ?6 ?7) ?7 [7, 6] by w_definition ?6 ?7 Id : 8, {_}: strong_fixed_point =<= apply (apply b (apply w w)) (apply (apply b (apply b w)) (apply (apply b b) b)) [] by strong_fixed_point Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt =<= apply fixed_pt (apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt) [] by prove_strong_fixed_point Timeout ! FAILURE in 1223 iterations COL006-6 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 96 fixed_pt is 97 k is 92 k_definition is 91 prove_strong_fixed_point is 95 s is 94 s_definition is 93 strong_fixed_point is 98 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply s ?2) ?3) ?4 =?= apply (apply ?2 ?4) (apply ?3 ?4) [4, 3, 2] by s_definition ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply k ?6) ?7 =>= ?6 [7, 6] by k_definition ?6 ?7 Id : 8, {_}: strong_fixed_point =<= apply (apply s (apply k (apply (apply s (apply (apply s k) k)) (apply (apply s k) k)))) (apply (apply s (apply (apply s (apply k s)) k)) (apply k (apply (apply s (apply (apply s k) k)) (apply (apply s k) k)))) [] by strong_fixed_point Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt =<= apply fixed_pt (apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt) [] by prove_strong_fixed_point Timeout ! FAILURE in 1708 iterations COL011-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 combinator is 98 o is 95 o_definition is 94 prove_fixed_point is 96 q1 is 93 q1_definition is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply o ?3) ?4 =?= apply ?4 (apply ?3 ?4) [4, 3] by o_definition ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply (apply q1 ?6) ?7) ?8 =>= apply ?6 (apply ?8 ?7) [8, 7, 6] by q1_definition ?6 ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: ?1 =<= apply combinator ?1 [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1839 iterations COL037-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 c is 91 c_definition is 90 f is 98 prove_fixed_point is 96 s is 95 s_definition is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply s ?3) ?4) ?5 =?= apply (apply ?3 ?5) (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by s_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?7) ?8) ?9 =>= apply ?7 (apply ?8 ?9) [9, 8, 7] by b_definition ?7 ?8 ?9 Id : 8, {_}: apply (apply (apply c ?11) ?12) ?13 =>= apply (apply ?11 ?13) ?12 [13, 12, 11] by c_definition ?11 ?12 ?13 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 944 iterations COL038-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 95 b_definition is 94 f is 98 m is 93 m_definition is 92 prove_fixed_point is 96 v is 91 v_definition is 90 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply m ?7 =?= apply ?7 ?7 [7] by m_definition ?7 Id : 8, {_}: apply (apply (apply v ?9) ?10) ?11 =>= apply (apply ?11 ?9) ?10 [11, 10, 9] by v_definition ?9 ?10 ?11 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1682 iterations COL043-3 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 96 b is 94 b_definition is 93 fixed_pt is 97 h is 92 h_definition is 91 prove_strong_fixed_point is 95 strong_fixed_point is 98 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?2) ?3) ?4 =>= apply ?2 (apply ?3 ?4) [4, 3, 2] by b_definition ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply (apply h ?6) ?7) ?8 =?= apply (apply (apply ?6 ?7) ?8) ?7 [8, 7, 6] by h_definition ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: strong_fixed_point =<= apply (apply b (apply (apply b (apply (apply h (apply (apply b (apply (apply b h) (apply b b))) (apply h (apply (apply b h) (apply b b))))) h)) b)) b [] by strong_fixed_point Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt =<= apply fixed_pt (apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt) [] by prove_strong_fixed_point Timeout ! FAILURE in 1406 iterations COL044-8 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 96 b is 94 b_definition is 93 fixed_pt is 97 n is 92 n_definition is 91 prove_strong_fixed_point is 95 strong_fixed_point is 98 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?2) ?3) ?4 =>= apply ?2 (apply ?3 ?4) [4, 3, 2] by b_definition ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply (apply n ?6) ?7) ?8 =?= apply (apply (apply ?6 ?8) ?7) ?8 [8, 7, 6] by n_definition ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: strong_fixed_point =<= apply (apply b (apply (apply b (apply (apply n (apply n (apply (apply b (apply b b)) (apply n (apply (apply b b) n))))) n)) b)) b [] by strong_fixed_point Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt =<= apply fixed_pt (apply strong_fixed_point fixed_pt) [] by prove_strong_fixed_point Timeout ! FAILURE in 1249 iterations COL046-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 f is 98 m is 91 m_definition is 90 prove_fixed_point is 96 s is 95 s_definition is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply s ?3) ?4) ?5 =?= apply (apply ?3 ?5) (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by s_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?7) ?8) ?9 =>= apply ?7 (apply ?8 ?9) [9, 8, 7] by b_definition ?7 ?8 ?9 Id : 8, {_}: apply m ?11 =?= apply ?11 ?11 [11] by m_definition ?11 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1258 iterations COL049-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 95 b_definition is 94 f is 98 m is 91 m_definition is 90 prove_strong_fixed_point is 96 w is 93 w_definition is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply w ?7) ?8 =?= apply (apply ?7 ?8) ?8 [8, 7] by w_definition ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: apply m ?10 =?= apply ?10 ?10 [10] by m_definition ?10 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_strong_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1565 iterations COL057-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 c is 91 c_definition is 90 f is 98 i is 89 i_definition is 88 prove_strong_fixed_point is 96 s is 95 s_definition is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply s ?3) ?4) ?5 =?= apply (apply ?3 ?5) (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by s_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?7) ?8) ?9 =>= apply ?7 (apply ?8 ?9) [9, 8, 7] by b_definition ?7 ?8 ?9 Id : 8, {_}: apply (apply (apply c ?11) ?12) ?13 =>= apply (apply ?11 ?13) ?12 [13, 12, 11] by c_definition ?11 ?12 ?13 Id : 10, {_}: apply i ?15 =>= ?15 [15] by i_definition ?15 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply ?1 (f ?1) =<= apply (f ?1) (apply ?1 (f ?1)) [1] by prove_strong_fixed_point ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1505 iterations COL060-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 f is 98 g is 96 h is 95 prove_q_combinator is 94 t is 91 t_definition is 90 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply t ?7) ?8 =>= apply ?8 ?7 [8, 7] by t_definition ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply (apply (apply ?1 (f ?1)) (g ?1)) (h ?1) =>= apply (g ?1) (apply (f ?1) (h ?1)) [1] by prove_q_combinator ?1 Found proof, 0.103279s COL061-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 f is 98 g is 96 h is 95 prove_q1_combinator is 94 t is 91 t_definition is 90 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply t ?7) ?8 =>= apply ?8 ?7 [8, 7] by t_definition ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply (apply (apply ?1 (f ?1)) (g ?1)) (h ?1) =>= apply (f ?1) (apply (h ?1) (g ?1)) [1] by prove_q1_combinator ?1 Found proof, 0.116546s COL063-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 f is 98 g is 96 h is 95 prove_f_combinator is 94 t is 91 t_definition is 90 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply t ?7) ?8 =>= apply ?8 ?7 [8, 7] by t_definition ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply (apply (apply ?1 (f ?1)) (g ?1)) (h ?1) =>= apply (apply (h ?1) (g ?1)) (f ?1) [1] by prove_f_combinator ?1 Found proof, 1.828433s COL064-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 93 b_definition is 92 f is 98 g is 96 h is 95 prove_v_combinator is 94 t is 91 t_definition is 90 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply t ?7) ?8 =>= apply ?8 ?7 [8, 7] by t_definition ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply (apply (apply ?1 (f ?1)) (g ?1)) (h ?1) =>= apply (apply (h ?1) (f ?1)) (g ?1) [1] by prove_v_combinator ?1 Found proof, 13.759082s COL065-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 apply is 97 b is 92 b_definition is 91 f is 98 g is 96 h is 95 i is 94 prove_g_combinator is 93 t is 90 t_definition is 89 Facts Id : 4, {_}: apply (apply (apply b ?3) ?4) ?5 =>= apply ?3 (apply ?4 ?5) [5, 4, 3] by b_definition ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: apply (apply t ?7) ?8 =>= apply ?8 ?7 [8, 7] by t_definition ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: apply (apply (apply (apply ?1 (f ?1)) (g ?1)) (h ?1)) (i ?1) =>= apply (apply (f ?1) (i ?1)) (apply (g ?1) (h ?1)) [1] by prove_g_combinator ?1 Found proof, 68.133820s GRP014-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 b is 97 c is 96 group_axiom is 92 inverse is 93 multiply is 95 prove_associativity is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply ?2 (inverse (multiply (multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse ?3) (multiply (inverse ?2) ?4))) ?5) (inverse (multiply ?3 ?5)))) =>= ?4 [5, 4, 3, 2] by group_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a (multiply b c) =<= multiply (multiply a b) c [] by prove_associativity Found proof, 3.453474s GRP024-5 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 88 associativity_of_commutator is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutator is 95 identity is 92 inverse is 90 left_identity is 91 left_inverse is 89 multiply is 94 name is 87 prove_center is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: commutator ?10 ?11 =<= multiply (inverse ?10) (multiply (inverse ?11) (multiply ?10 ?11)) [11, 10] by name ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: commutator (commutator ?13 ?14) ?15 =?= commutator ?13 (commutator ?14 ?15) [15, 14, 13] by associativity_of_commutator ?13 ?14 ?15 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a (commutator b c) =<= multiply (commutator b c) a [] by prove_center Timeout ! FAILURE in 602 iterations GRP114-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 89 identity is 93 intersection is 85 intersection_associative is 79 intersection_commutative is 81 intersection_idempotent is 84 intersection_union_absorbtion is 76 inverse is 91 inverse_involution is 87 inverse_of_identity is 88 inverse_product_lemma is 86 left_identity is 92 left_inverse is 90 multiply is 95 multiply_intersection1 is 74 multiply_intersection2 is 72 multiply_union1 is 75 multiply_union2 is 73 negative_part is 96 positive_part is 97 prove_product is 94 union is 83 union_associative is 78 union_commutative is 80 union_idempotent is 82 union_intersection_absorbtion is 77 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: inverse identity =>= identity [] by inverse_of_identity Id : 12, {_}: inverse (inverse ?11) =>= ?11 [11] by inverse_involution ?11 Id : 14, {_}: inverse (multiply ?13 ?14) =<= multiply (inverse ?14) (inverse ?13) [14, 13] by inverse_product_lemma ?13 ?14 Id : 16, {_}: intersection ?16 ?16 =>= ?16 [16] by intersection_idempotent ?16 Id : 18, {_}: union ?18 ?18 =>= ?18 [18] by union_idempotent ?18 Id : 20, {_}: intersection ?20 ?21 =?= intersection ?21 ?20 [21, 20] by intersection_commutative ?20 ?21 Id : 22, {_}: union ?23 ?24 =?= union ?24 ?23 [24, 23] by union_commutative ?23 ?24 Id : 24, {_}: intersection ?26 (intersection ?27 ?28) =?= intersection (intersection ?26 ?27) ?28 [28, 27, 26] by intersection_associative ?26 ?27 ?28 Id : 26, {_}: union ?30 (union ?31 ?32) =?= union (union ?30 ?31) ?32 [32, 31, 30] by union_associative ?30 ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: union (intersection ?34 ?35) ?35 =>= ?35 [35, 34] by union_intersection_absorbtion ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: intersection (union ?37 ?38) ?38 =>= ?38 [38, 37] by intersection_union_absorbtion ?37 ?38 Id : 32, {_}: multiply ?40 (union ?41 ?42) =<= union (multiply ?40 ?41) (multiply ?40 ?42) [42, 41, 40] by multiply_union1 ?40 ?41 ?42 Id : 34, {_}: multiply ?44 (intersection ?45 ?46) =<= intersection (multiply ?44 ?45) (multiply ?44 ?46) [46, 45, 44] by multiply_intersection1 ?44 ?45 ?46 Id : 36, {_}: multiply (union ?48 ?49) ?50 =<= union (multiply ?48 ?50) (multiply ?49 ?50) [50, 49, 48] by multiply_union2 ?48 ?49 ?50 Id : 38, {_}: multiply (intersection ?52 ?53) ?54 =<= intersection (multiply ?52 ?54) (multiply ?53 ?54) [54, 53, 52] by multiply_intersection2 ?52 ?53 ?54 Id : 40, {_}: positive_part ?56 =<= union ?56 identity [56] by positive_part ?56 Id : 42, {_}: negative_part ?58 =<= intersection ?58 identity [58] by negative_part ?58 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (positive_part a) (negative_part a) =>= a [] by prove_product Timeout ! FAILURE in 1190 iterations GRP164-2 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 87 associativity_of_glb is 84 associativity_of_lub is 83 b is 97 c is 96 glb_absorbtion is 79 greatest_lower_bound is 94 idempotence_of_gld is 81 idempotence_of_lub is 82 identity is 92 inverse is 89 least_upper_bound is 95 left_identity is 90 left_inverse is 88 lub_absorbtion is 80 monotony_glb1 is 77 monotony_glb2 is 75 monotony_lub1 is 78 monotony_lub2 is 76 multiply is 91 prove_distrun is 93 symmetry_of_glb is 86 symmetry_of_lub is 85 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Goal Id : 2, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a (least_upper_bound b c) =<= least_upper_bound (greatest_lower_bound a b) (greatest_lower_bound a c) [] by prove_distrun Timeout ! FAILURE in 1400 iterations GRP167-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 89 associativity_of_glb is 84 associativity_of_lub is 83 glb_absorbtion is 79 greatest_lower_bound is 88 idempotence_of_gld is 81 idempotence_of_lub is 82 identity is 93 inverse is 91 lat4_1 is 74 lat4_2 is 73 lat4_3 is 72 lat4_4 is 71 least_upper_bound is 86 left_identity is 92 left_inverse is 90 lub_absorbtion is 80 monotony_glb1 is 77 monotony_glb2 is 75 monotony_lub1 is 78 monotony_lub2 is 76 multiply is 95 negative_part is 96 positive_part is 97 prove_lat4 is 94 symmetry_of_glb is 87 symmetry_of_lub is 85 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: positive_part ?50 =<= least_upper_bound ?50 identity [50] by lat4_1 ?50 Id : 36, {_}: negative_part ?52 =<= greatest_lower_bound ?52 identity [52] by lat4_2 ?52 Id : 38, {_}: least_upper_bound ?54 (greatest_lower_bound ?55 ?56) =<= greatest_lower_bound (least_upper_bound ?54 ?55) (least_upper_bound ?54 ?56) [56, 55, 54] by lat4_3 ?54 ?55 ?56 Id : 40, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?58 (least_upper_bound ?59 ?60) =<= least_upper_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?58 ?59) (greatest_lower_bound ?58 ?60) [60, 59, 58] by lat4_4 ?58 ?59 ?60 Goal Id : 2, {_}: a =<= multiply (positive_part a) (negative_part a) [] by prove_lat4 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1375 iterations GRP178-2 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 88 associativity_of_glb is 84 associativity_of_lub is 83 b is 97 c is 96 glb_absorbtion is 79 greatest_lower_bound is 94 idempotence_of_gld is 81 idempotence_of_lub is 82 identity is 92 inverse is 90 least_upper_bound is 86 left_identity is 91 left_inverse is 89 lub_absorbtion is 80 monotony_glb1 is 77 monotony_glb2 is 75 monotony_lub1 is 78 monotony_lub2 is 76 multiply is 95 p09b_1 is 74 p09b_2 is 73 p09b_3 is 72 p09b_4 is 71 prove_p09b is 93 symmetry_of_glb is 87 symmetry_of_lub is 85 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: greatest_lower_bound identity a =>= identity [] by p09b_1 Id : 36, {_}: greatest_lower_bound identity b =>= identity [] by p09b_2 Id : 38, {_}: greatest_lower_bound identity c =>= identity [] by p09b_3 Id : 40, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a b =>= identity [] by p09b_4 Goal Id : 2, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a (multiply b c) =>= greatest_lower_bound a c [] by prove_p09b Timeout ! FAILURE in 2472 iterations GRP181-4 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 90 associativity_of_glb is 85 associativity_of_lub is 84 b is 97 c is 72 glb_absorbtion is 80 greatest_lower_bound is 89 idempotence_of_gld is 82 idempotence_of_lub is 83 identity is 95 inverse is 92 least_upper_bound is 87 left_identity is 93 left_inverse is 91 lub_absorbtion is 81 monotony_glb1 is 78 monotony_glb2 is 76 monotony_lub1 is 79 monotony_lub2 is 77 multiply is 94 p12x_1 is 75 p12x_2 is 74 p12x_3 is 73 p12x_4 is 71 p12x_5 is 70 p12x_6 is 69 p12x_7 is 68 prove_p12x is 96 symmetry_of_glb is 88 symmetry_of_lub is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: inverse identity =>= identity [] by p12x_1 Id : 36, {_}: inverse (inverse ?51) =>= ?51 [51] by p12x_2 ?51 Id : 38, {_}: inverse (multiply ?53 ?54) =<= multiply (inverse ?54) (inverse ?53) [54, 53] by p12x_3 ?53 ?54 Id : 40, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a c =>= greatest_lower_bound b c [] by p12x_4 Id : 42, {_}: least_upper_bound a c =>= least_upper_bound b c [] by p12x_5 Id : 44, {_}: inverse (greatest_lower_bound ?58 ?59) =<= least_upper_bound (inverse ?58) (inverse ?59) [59, 58] by p12x_6 ?58 ?59 Id : 46, {_}: inverse (least_upper_bound ?61 ?62) =<= greatest_lower_bound (inverse ?61) (inverse ?62) [62, 61] by p12x_7 ?61 ?62 Goal Id : 2, {_}: a =>= b [] by prove_p12x Timeout ! FAILURE in 1207 iterations GRP183-4 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 89 associativity_of_glb is 86 associativity_of_lub is 85 glb_absorbtion is 81 greatest_lower_bound is 94 idempotence_of_gld is 83 idempotence_of_lub is 84 identity is 97 inverse is 95 least_upper_bound is 96 left_identity is 91 left_inverse is 90 lub_absorbtion is 82 monotony_glb1 is 79 monotony_glb2 is 77 monotony_lub1 is 80 monotony_lub2 is 78 multiply is 92 p20x_1 is 76 p20x_3 is 75 prove_20x is 93 symmetry_of_glb is 88 symmetry_of_lub is 87 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: inverse identity =>= identity [] by p20x_1 Id : 36, {_}: inverse (inverse ?51) =>= ?51 [51] by p20x_1 ?51 Id : 38, {_}: inverse (multiply ?53 ?54) =<= multiply (inverse ?54) (inverse ?53) [54, 53] by p20x_3 ?53 ?54 Goal Id : 2, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (least_upper_bound a identity) (least_upper_bound (inverse a) identity) =>= identity [] by prove_20x Timeout ! FAILURE in 933 iterations GRP184-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 89 associativity_of_glb is 86 associativity_of_lub is 85 glb_absorbtion is 81 greatest_lower_bound is 95 idempotence_of_gld is 83 idempotence_of_lub is 84 identity is 97 inverse is 94 least_upper_bound is 96 left_identity is 91 left_inverse is 90 lub_absorbtion is 82 monotony_glb1 is 79 monotony_glb2 is 77 monotony_lub1 is 80 monotony_lub2 is 78 multiply is 93 prove_p21 is 92 symmetry_of_glb is 88 symmetry_of_lub is 87 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound a identity) (inverse (greatest_lower_bound a identity)) =>= multiply (inverse (greatest_lower_bound a identity)) (least_upper_bound a identity) [] by prove_p21 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1398 iterations GRP184-3 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 89 associativity_of_glb is 86 associativity_of_lub is 85 glb_absorbtion is 81 greatest_lower_bound is 95 idempotence_of_gld is 83 idempotence_of_lub is 84 identity is 97 inverse is 94 least_upper_bound is 96 left_identity is 91 left_inverse is 90 lub_absorbtion is 82 monotony_glb1 is 79 monotony_glb2 is 77 monotony_lub1 is 80 monotony_lub2 is 78 multiply is 93 prove_p21x is 92 symmetry_of_glb is 88 symmetry_of_lub is 87 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound a identity) (inverse (greatest_lower_bound a identity)) =>= multiply (inverse (greatest_lower_bound a identity)) (least_upper_bound a identity) [] by prove_p21x Timeout ! FAILURE in 1398 iterations GRP185-2 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 89 associativity_of_glb is 85 associativity_of_lub is 84 b is 97 glb_absorbtion is 80 greatest_lower_bound is 88 idempotence_of_gld is 82 idempotence_of_lub is 83 identity is 95 inverse is 91 least_upper_bound is 94 left_identity is 92 left_inverse is 90 lub_absorbtion is 81 monotony_glb1 is 78 monotony_glb2 is 76 monotony_lub1 is 79 monotony_lub2 is 77 multiply is 96 p22a_1 is 75 p22a_2 is 74 p22a_3 is 73 prove_p22a is 93 symmetry_of_glb is 87 symmetry_of_lub is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: inverse identity =>= identity [] by p22a_1 Id : 36, {_}: inverse (inverse ?51) =>= ?51 [51] by p22a_2 ?51 Id : 38, {_}: inverse (multiply ?53 ?54) =<= multiply (inverse ?54) (inverse ?53) [54, 53] by p22a_3 ?53 ?54 Goal Id : 2, {_}: least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound (multiply a b) identity) (multiply (least_upper_bound a identity) (least_upper_bound b identity)) =>= multiply (least_upper_bound a identity) (least_upper_bound b identity) [] by prove_p22a Timeout ! FAILURE in 944 iterations GRP185-3 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 88 associativity_of_glb is 85 associativity_of_lub is 84 b is 97 glb_absorbtion is 80 greatest_lower_bound is 93 idempotence_of_gld is 82 idempotence_of_lub is 83 identity is 95 inverse is 90 least_upper_bound is 94 left_identity is 91 left_inverse is 89 lub_absorbtion is 81 monotony_glb1 is 78 monotony_glb2 is 76 monotony_lub1 is 79 monotony_lub2 is 77 multiply is 96 prove_p22b is 92 symmetry_of_glb is 87 symmetry_of_lub is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Goal Id : 2, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (least_upper_bound (multiply a b) identity) (multiply (least_upper_bound a identity) (least_upper_bound b identity)) =>= least_upper_bound (multiply a b) identity [] by prove_p22b Timeout ! FAILURE in 1232 iterations GRP186-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 88 associativity_of_glb is 85 associativity_of_lub is 84 b is 97 glb_absorbtion is 80 greatest_lower_bound is 92 idempotence_of_gld is 82 idempotence_of_lub is 83 identity is 95 inverse is 93 least_upper_bound is 94 left_identity is 90 left_inverse is 89 lub_absorbtion is 81 monotony_glb1 is 78 monotony_glb2 is 76 monotony_lub1 is 79 monotony_lub2 is 77 multiply is 96 prove_p23 is 91 symmetry_of_glb is 87 symmetry_of_lub is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Goal Id : 2, {_}: least_upper_bound (multiply a b) identity =<= multiply a (inverse (greatest_lower_bound a (inverse b))) [] by prove_p23 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1205 iterations GRP186-2 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 88 associativity_of_glb is 85 associativity_of_lub is 84 b is 97 glb_absorbtion is 80 greatest_lower_bound is 92 idempotence_of_gld is 82 idempotence_of_lub is 83 identity is 95 inverse is 93 least_upper_bound is 94 left_identity is 90 left_inverse is 89 lub_absorbtion is 81 monotony_glb1 is 78 monotony_glb2 is 76 monotony_lub1 is 79 monotony_lub2 is 77 multiply is 96 p23_1 is 75 p23_2 is 74 p23_3 is 73 prove_p23 is 91 symmetry_of_glb is 87 symmetry_of_lub is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: inverse identity =>= identity [] by p23_1 Id : 36, {_}: inverse (inverse ?51) =>= ?51 [51] by p23_2 ?51 Id : 38, {_}: inverse (multiply ?53 ?54) =<= multiply (inverse ?54) (inverse ?53) [54, 53] by p23_3 ?53 ?54 Goal Id : 2, {_}: least_upper_bound (multiply a b) identity =<= multiply a (inverse (greatest_lower_bound a (inverse b))) [] by prove_p23 Timeout ! FAILURE in 964 iterations GRP187-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 associativity is 90 associativity_of_glb is 85 associativity_of_lub is 84 b is 97 glb_absorbtion is 80 greatest_lower_bound is 89 idempotence_of_gld is 82 idempotence_of_lub is 83 identity is 94 inverse is 92 least_upper_bound is 87 left_identity is 93 left_inverse is 91 lub_absorbtion is 81 monotony_glb1 is 78 monotony_glb2 is 76 monotony_lub1 is 79 monotony_lub2 is 77 multiply is 96 p33_1 is 75 prove_p33 is 95 symmetry_of_glb is 88 symmetry_of_lub is 86 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11 Id : 12, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14 Id : 14, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 16, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =?= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 18, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24 Id : 20, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26 Id : 22, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29 Id : 24, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32 Id : 26, {_}: multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36) =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36) [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36 Id : 28, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40 Id : 30, {_}: multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44 =<= least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44) [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44 Id : 32, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48 Id : 34, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (least_upper_bound a (inverse a)) (least_upper_bound b (inverse b)) =>= identity [] by p33_1 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a b =>= multiply b a [] by prove_p33 Timeout ! FAILURE in 1541 iterations GRP200-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 b is 97 c is 95 identity is 93 left_division is 90 left_division_multiply is 88 left_identity is 92 left_inverse is 83 moufang1 is 82 multiply is 96 multiply_left_division is 89 multiply_right_division is 86 prove_moufang2 is 94 right_division is 87 right_division_multiply is 85 right_identity is 91 right_inverse is 84 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?4 identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply ?6 (left_division ?6 ?7) =>= ?7 [7, 6] by multiply_left_division ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: left_division ?9 (multiply ?9 ?10) =>= ?10 [10, 9] by left_division_multiply ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: multiply (right_division ?12 ?13) ?13 =>= ?12 [13, 12] by multiply_right_division ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: right_division (multiply ?15 ?16) ?16 =>= ?15 [16, 15] by right_division_multiply ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: multiply ?18 (right_inverse ?18) =>= identity [18] by right_inverse ?18 Id : 18, {_}: multiply (left_inverse ?20) ?20 =>= identity [20] by left_inverse ?20 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (multiply ?22 (multiply ?23 ?24)) ?22 =?= multiply (multiply ?22 ?23) (multiply ?24 ?22) [24, 23, 22] by moufang1 ?22 ?23 ?24 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply (multiply a b) c) b =>= multiply a (multiply b (multiply c b)) [] by prove_moufang2 Timeout ! FAILURE in 712 iterations GRP202-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 b is 97 c is 96 identity is 93 left_division is 90 left_division_multiply is 88 left_identity is 92 left_inverse is 83 moufang3 is 82 multiply is 95 multiply_left_division is 89 multiply_right_division is 86 prove_moufang1 is 94 right_division is 87 right_division_multiply is 85 right_identity is 91 right_inverse is 84 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?4 identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply ?6 (left_division ?6 ?7) =>= ?7 [7, 6] by multiply_left_division ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: left_division ?9 (multiply ?9 ?10) =>= ?10 [10, 9] by left_division_multiply ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: multiply (right_division ?12 ?13) ?13 =>= ?12 [13, 12] by multiply_right_division ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: right_division (multiply ?15 ?16) ?16 =>= ?15 [16, 15] by right_division_multiply ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: multiply ?18 (right_inverse ?18) =>= identity [18] by right_inverse ?18 Id : 18, {_}: multiply (left_inverse ?20) ?20 =>= identity [20] by left_inverse ?20 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (multiply (multiply ?22 ?23) ?22) ?24 =?= multiply ?22 (multiply ?23 (multiply ?22 ?24)) [24, 23, 22] by moufang3 ?22 ?23 ?24 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a (multiply b c)) a =>= multiply (multiply a b) (multiply c a) [] by prove_moufang1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 674 iterations GRP404-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a2 is 95 b2 is 98 inverse is 97 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_2 is 94 single_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply ?2 (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply ?2 ?3)) ?4)) (inverse (multiply ?3 (multiply (inverse ?3) ?3))))) =>= ?4 [4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply (inverse b2) b2) a2 =>= a2 [] by prove_these_axioms_2 Timeout ! FAILURE in 342 iterations GRP405-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a3 is 98 b3 is 97 c3 is 95 inverse is 93 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_3 is 94 single_axiom is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply ?2 (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply ?2 ?3)) ?4)) (inverse (multiply ?3 (multiply (inverse ?3) ?3))))) =>= ?4 [4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a3 b3) c3 =>= multiply a3 (multiply b3 c3) [] by prove_these_axioms_3 Found proof, 234.971871s GRP422-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a2 is 95 b2 is 98 inverse is 97 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_2 is 94 single_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply ?2 (inverse (multiply (inverse ?3) (multiply (inverse ?4) (inverse (multiply (inverse ?4) ?4))))))) (multiply ?2 ?4)) =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply (inverse b2) b2) a2 =>= a2 [] by prove_these_axioms_2 Found proof, 14.541466s GRP423-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a3 is 98 b3 is 97 c3 is 95 inverse is 93 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_3 is 94 single_axiom is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply ?2 (inverse (multiply (inverse ?3) (multiply (inverse ?4) (inverse (multiply (inverse ?4) ?4))))))) (multiply ?2 ?4)) =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a3 b3) c3 =>= multiply a3 (multiply b3 c3) [] by prove_these_axioms_3 Found proof, 12.056212s GRP444-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a3 is 98 b3 is 97 c3 is 95 inverse is 93 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_3 is 94 single_axiom is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: inverse (multiply ?2 (multiply ?3 (multiply (multiply ?4 (inverse ?4)) (inverse (multiply ?5 (multiply ?2 ?3)))))) =>= ?5 [5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a3 b3) c3 =>= multiply a3 (multiply b3 c3) [] by prove_these_axioms_3 Found proof, 21.164993s GRP452-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a2 is 95 b2 is 98 divide is 93 inverse is 97 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_2 is 94 single_axiom is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: divide (divide (divide ?2 ?2) (divide ?2 (divide ?3 (divide (divide (divide ?2 ?2) ?2) ?4)))) ?4 =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?6 ?7 =<= divide ?6 (divide (divide ?8 ?8) ?7) [8, 7, 6] by multiply ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: inverse ?10 =<= divide (divide ?11 ?11) ?10 [11, 10] by inverse ?10 ?11 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply (inverse b2) b2) a2 =>= a2 [] by prove_these_axioms_2 Found proof, 0.549585s GRP453-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a3 is 98 b3 is 97 c3 is 95 divide is 93 inverse is 91 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_3 is 94 single_axiom is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: divide (divide (divide ?2 ?2) (divide ?2 (divide ?3 (divide (divide (divide ?2 ?2) ?2) ?4)))) ?4 =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?6 ?7 =<= divide ?6 (divide (divide ?8 ?8) ?7) [8, 7, 6] by multiply ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: inverse ?10 =<= divide (divide ?11 ?11) ?10 [11, 10] by inverse ?10 ?11 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a3 b3) c3 =>= multiply a3 (multiply b3 c3) [] by prove_these_axioms_3 Found proof, 0.716819s GRP471-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a3 is 98 b3 is 97 c3 is 95 divide is 93 inverse is 92 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_3 is 94 single_axiom is 91 Facts Id : 4, {_}: divide (inverse (divide ?2 (divide ?3 (divide ?4 ?5)))) (divide (divide ?5 ?4) ?2) =>= ?3 [5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?7 ?8 =<= divide ?7 (inverse ?8) [8, 7] by multiply ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a3 b3) c3 =>= multiply a3 (multiply b3 c3) [] by prove_these_axioms_3 Found proof, 115.504740s GRP477-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a3 is 98 b3 is 97 c3 is 95 divide is 93 inverse is 92 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_3 is 94 single_axiom is 91 Facts Id : 4, {_}: divide (inverse (divide (divide (divide ?2 ?3) ?4) (divide ?5 ?4))) (divide ?3 ?2) =>= ?5 [5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 Id : 6, {_}: multiply ?7 ?8 =<= divide ?7 (inverse ?8) [8, 7] by multiply ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply a3 b3) c3 =>= multiply a3 (multiply b3 c3) [] by prove_these_axioms_3 Found proof, 11.020022s GRP506-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a2 is 95 b2 is 98 inverse is 97 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_2 is 94 single_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply ?2 ?3)) (multiply ?3 ?2))) (multiply (inverse (multiply ?4 ?5)) (multiply ?4 (inverse (multiply (multiply ?6 (inverse ?7)) (inverse ?5))))))) ?7 =>= ?6 [7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply (inverse b2) b2) a2 =>= a2 [] by prove_these_axioms_2 Timeout ! FAILURE in 184 iterations GRP508-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 b is 97 inverse is 94 multiply is 96 prove_these_axioms_4 is 95 single_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply (inverse (multiply ?2 ?3)) (multiply ?3 ?2))) (multiply (inverse (multiply ?4 ?5)) (multiply ?4 (inverse (multiply (multiply ?6 (inverse ?7)) (inverse ?5))))))) ?7 =>= ?6 [7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply a b =>= multiply b a [] by prove_these_axioms_4 Timeout ! FAILURE in 183 iterations LAT080-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 join is 95 meet is 97 prove_normal_axioms_1 is 96 single_axiom is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: join (meet (join (meet ?2 ?3) (meet ?3 (join ?2 ?3))) ?4) (meet (join (meet ?2 (join (join (meet ?5 ?3) (meet ?3 ?6)) ?3)) (meet (join (meet ?3 (meet (meet (join ?5 (join ?3 ?6)) (join ?7 ?3)) ?3)) (meet ?8 (join ?3 (meet (meet (join ?5 (join ?3 ?6)) (join ?7 ?3)) ?3)))) (join ?2 (join (join (meet ?5 ?3) (meet ?3 ?6)) ?3)))) (join (join (meet ?2 ?3) (meet ?3 (join ?2 ?3))) ?4)) =>= ?3 [8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a a =>= a [] by prove_normal_axioms_1 Found proof, 13.776911s LAT087-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 b is 97 join is 95 meet is 96 prove_normal_axioms_8 is 94 single_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: join (meet (join (meet ?2 ?3) (meet ?3 (join ?2 ?3))) ?4) (meet (join (meet ?2 (join (join (meet ?5 ?3) (meet ?3 ?6)) ?3)) (meet (join (meet ?3 (meet (meet (join ?5 (join ?3 ?6)) (join ?7 ?3)) ?3)) (meet ?8 (join ?3 (meet (meet (join ?5 (join ?3 ?6)) (join ?7 ?3)) ?3)))) (join ?2 (join (join (meet ?5 ?3) (meet ?3 ?6)) ?3)))) (join (join (meet ?2 ?3) (meet ?3 (join ?2 ?3))) ?4)) =>= ?3 [8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 ?8 Goal Id : 2, {_}: join a (meet a b) =>= a [] by prove_normal_axioms_8 Found proof, 13.866156s LAT093-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 97 b is 98 join is 94 meet is 96 prove_wal_axioms_2 is 95 single_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: join (meet (join (meet ?2 ?3) (meet ?3 (join ?2 ?3))) ?4) (meet (join (meet ?2 (join (join (meet ?3 ?5) (meet ?6 ?3)) ?3)) (meet (join (meet ?3 (meet (meet (join ?3 ?5) (join ?6 ?3)) ?3)) (meet ?7 (join ?3 (meet (meet (join ?3 ?5) (join ?6 ?3)) ?3)))) (join ?2 (join (join (meet ?3 ?5) (meet ?6 ?3)) ?3)))) (join (join (meet ?2 ?3) (meet ?3 (join ?2 ?3))) ?4)) =>= ?3 [7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2] by single_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet b a =>= meet a b [] by prove_wal_axioms_2 Found proof, 13.533964s LAT138-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H7 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H6 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?26 ?28)) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?26 (join (meet ?26 ?27) (meet ?28 (join ?26 ?27))))) [28, 27, 26] by equation_H7 ?26 ?27 ?28 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join (meet a (join b (meet a c))) (meet c (join a b))) [] by prove_H6 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations LAT140-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H21 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H2 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: join (meet ?26 ?27) (meet ?26 ?28) =<= meet ?26 (join (meet ?27 (join ?26 (meet ?27 ?28))) (meet ?28 (join ?26 ?27))) [28, 27, 26] by equation_H21 ?26 ?27 ?28 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join b (meet c (join (meet a (join b c)) (meet b c)))) [] by prove_H2 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations LAT146-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 89 absorption2 is 88 associativity_of_join is 84 associativity_of_meet is 85 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 86 commutativity_of_meet is 87 d is 95 equation_H34 is 83 idempotence_of_join is 90 idempotence_of_meet is 91 join is 93 meet is 94 prove_H28 is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 ?29)) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?27 (meet ?29 (join ?27 ?28))))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H34 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a (meet c d))) =<= meet a (join b (meet c (meet d (join a (meet b d))))) [] by prove_H28 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations LAT148-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H34 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H7 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 ?29)) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?27 (meet ?29 (join ?27 ?28))))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H34 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join b (meet a (join (meet a b) (meet c (join a b))))) [] by prove_H7 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations LAT152-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H40 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H6 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?26 ?29))) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?29 (meet ?28 (join ?26 ?27))))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H40 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join (meet a (join b (meet a c))) (meet c (join a b))) [] by prove_H6 Timeout ! FAILURE in 249 iterations LAT156-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H49 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H6 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?26 ?29))) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (join (meet ?26 ?28) (meet ?28 (join ?27 ?29)))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H49 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join (meet a (join b (meet a c))) (meet c (join a b))) [] by prove_H6 Timeout ! FAILURE in 249 iterations LAT159-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H50 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H7 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?26 ?29))) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?26 (meet ?28 (join ?27 ?29))))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H50 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join b (meet a (join (meet a b) (meet c (join a b))))) [] by prove_H7 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations LAT164-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H76 is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 94 meet is 95 prove_H6 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?27 ?29))) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?29 (meet ?26 ?27)))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H76 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a c)) =<= meet a (join (meet a (join b (meet a c))) (meet c (join a b))) [] by prove_H6 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations LAT165-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 89 absorption2 is 88 associativity_of_join is 84 associativity_of_meet is 85 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 86 commutativity_of_meet is 87 d is 95 equation_H76 is 83 idempotence_of_join is 90 idempotence_of_meet is 91 join is 94 meet is 93 prove_H77 is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?27 ?29))) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?29 (meet ?26 ?27)))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H76 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet c (join b d))) =<= meet a (join b (meet c (join d (meet a (meet b c))))) [] by prove_H77 Timeout ! FAILURE in 269 iterations LAT166-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 89 absorption2 is 88 associativity_of_join is 84 associativity_of_meet is 85 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 86 commutativity_of_meet is 87 d is 95 equation_H77 is 83 idempotence_of_join is 90 idempotence_of_meet is 91 join is 94 meet is 93 prove_H78 is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?27 ?29))) =<= meet ?26 (join ?27 (meet ?28 (join ?29 (meet ?26 (meet ?27 ?28))))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H77 ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet c (join b d))) =<= meet a (join b (meet c (join d (meet b (join a d))))) [] by prove_H78 Timeout ! FAILURE in 269 iterations LAT169-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H21_dual is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 95 meet is 94 prove_H58 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: meet (join ?26 ?27) (join ?26 ?28) =<= join ?26 (meet (join ?27 (meet ?26 (join ?27 ?28))) (join ?28 (meet ?26 ?27))) [28, 27, 26] by equation_H21_dual ?26 ?27 ?28 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b c) =<= meet a (join b (meet (join a b) (join c (meet a b)))) [] by prove_H58 Timeout ! FAILURE in 268 iterations LAT170-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 90 absorption2 is 89 associativity_of_join is 85 associativity_of_meet is 86 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 87 commutativity_of_meet is 88 equation_H49_dual is 84 idempotence_of_join is 91 idempotence_of_meet is 92 join is 95 meet is 94 prove_H58 is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: join ?26 (meet ?27 (join ?28 (meet ?26 ?29))) =<= join ?26 (meet ?27 (meet (join ?26 ?28) (join ?28 (meet ?27 ?29)))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H49_dual ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b c) =<= meet a (join b (meet (join a b) (join c (meet a b)))) [] by prove_H58 Timeout ! FAILURE in 269 iterations LAT173-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 89 absorption2 is 88 associativity_of_join is 84 associativity_of_meet is 85 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 86 commutativity_of_meet is 87 d is 95 equation_H76_dual is 83 idempotence_of_join is 90 idempotence_of_meet is 91 join is 94 meet is 93 prove_H40 is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: join ?26 (meet ?27 (join ?28 (meet ?27 ?29))) =<= join ?26 (meet ?27 (join ?28 (meet ?29 (join ?26 ?27)))) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H76_dual ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet c (join a d))) =<= meet a (join b (meet c (join d (meet c (join a b))))) [] by prove_H40 Timeout ! FAILURE in 269 iterations LAT175-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorption1 is 89 absorption2 is 88 associativity_of_join is 84 associativity_of_meet is 85 b is 97 c is 96 commutativity_of_join is 86 commutativity_of_meet is 87 d is 95 equation_H79_dual is 83 idempotence_of_join is 90 idempotence_of_meet is 91 join is 93 meet is 94 prove_H32 is 92 Facts Id : 4, {_}: meet ?2 ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by idempotence_of_meet ?2 Id : 6, {_}: join ?4 ?4 =>= ?4 [4] by idempotence_of_join ?4 Id : 8, {_}: meet ?6 (join ?6 ?7) =>= ?6 [7, 6] by absorption1 ?6 ?7 Id : 10, {_}: join ?9 (meet ?9 ?10) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by absorption2 ?9 ?10 Id : 12, {_}: meet ?12 ?13 =?= meet ?13 ?12 [13, 12] by commutativity_of_meet ?12 ?13 Id : 14, {_}: join ?15 ?16 =?= join ?16 ?15 [16, 15] by commutativity_of_join ?15 ?16 Id : 16, {_}: meet (meet ?18 ?19) ?20 =?= meet ?18 (meet ?19 ?20) [20, 19, 18] by associativity_of_meet ?18 ?19 ?20 Id : 18, {_}: join (join ?22 ?23) ?24 =?= join ?22 (join ?23 ?24) [24, 23, 22] by associativity_of_join ?22 ?23 ?24 Id : 20, {_}: join ?26 (meet ?27 (join ?28 (meet ?26 ?29))) =<= join ?26 (meet (join ?26 (meet ?27 (join ?26 ?28))) (join ?28 ?29)) [29, 28, 27, 26] by equation_H79_dual ?26 ?27 ?28 ?29 Goal Id : 2, {_}: meet a (join b (meet a (meet c d))) =<= meet a (join b (meet c (join (meet a d) (meet b d)))) [] by prove_H32 Timeout ! FAILURE in 250 iterations RNG009-7 Fatal error: exception Assert_failure("tptp_cnf.ml", 4, 25) RNG019-6 Order == is 100 _ is 99 add is 94 additive_identity is 91 additive_inverse is 85 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 82 associativity_for_addition is 78 associator is 93 commutativity_for_addition is 79 commutator is 75 distribute1 is 81 distribute2 is 80 left_additive_identity is 90 left_additive_inverse is 84 left_alternative is 76 left_multiplicative_zero is 87 multiply is 88 prove_linearised_form1 is 92 right_additive_identity is 89 right_additive_inverse is 83 right_alternative is 77 right_multiplicative_zero is 86 u is 96 v is 95 x is 98 y is 97 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Goal Id : 2, {_}: associator x y (add u v) =<= add (associator x y u) (associator x y v) [] by prove_linearised_form1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 393 iterations RNG019-7 Order == is 100 _ is 99 add is 94 additive_identity is 91 additive_inverse is 85 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 82 associativity_for_addition is 78 associator is 93 commutativity_for_addition is 79 commutator is 75 distribute1 is 81 distribute2 is 80 distributivity_of_difference1 is 71 distributivity_of_difference2 is 70 distributivity_of_difference3 is 69 distributivity_of_difference4 is 68 inverse_product1 is 73 inverse_product2 is 72 left_additive_identity is 90 left_additive_inverse is 84 left_alternative is 76 left_multiplicative_zero is 87 multiply is 88 product_of_inverses is 74 prove_linearised_form1 is 92 right_additive_identity is 89 right_additive_inverse is 83 right_alternative is 77 right_multiplicative_zero is 86 u is 96 v is 95 x is 98 y is 97 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Id : 34, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?44) (additive_inverse ?45) =>= multiply ?44 ?45 [45, 44] by product_of_inverses ?44 ?45 Id : 36, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?47) ?48 =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47] by inverse_product1 ?47 ?48 Id : 38, {_}: multiply ?50 (additive_inverse ?51) =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?50 ?51) [51, 50] by inverse_product2 ?50 ?51 Id : 40, {_}: multiply ?53 (add ?54 (additive_inverse ?55)) =<= add (multiply ?53 ?54) (additive_inverse (multiply ?53 ?55)) [55, 54, 53] by distributivity_of_difference1 ?53 ?54 ?55 Id : 42, {_}: multiply (add ?57 (additive_inverse ?58)) ?59 =<= add (multiply ?57 ?59) (additive_inverse (multiply ?58 ?59)) [59, 58, 57] by distributivity_of_difference2 ?57 ?58 ?59 Id : 44, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?61) (add ?62 ?63) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?62)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?63)) [63, 62, 61] by distributivity_of_difference3 ?61 ?62 ?63 Id : 46, {_}: multiply (add ?65 ?66) (additive_inverse ?67) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?65 ?67)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?66 ?67)) [67, 66, 65] by distributivity_of_difference4 ?65 ?66 ?67 Goal Id : 2, {_}: associator x y (add u v) =<= add (associator x y u) (associator x y v) [] by prove_linearised_form1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 546 iterations RNG020-6 Order == is 100 _ is 99 add is 95 additive_identity is 91 additive_inverse is 85 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 82 associativity_for_addition is 78 associator is 93 commutativity_for_addition is 79 commutator is 75 distribute1 is 81 distribute2 is 80 left_additive_identity is 90 left_additive_inverse is 84 left_alternative is 76 left_multiplicative_zero is 87 multiply is 88 prove_linearised_form2 is 92 right_additive_identity is 89 right_additive_inverse is 83 right_alternative is 77 right_multiplicative_zero is 86 u is 97 v is 96 x is 98 y is 94 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Goal Id : 2, {_}: associator x (add u v) y =<= add (associator x u y) (associator x v y) [] by prove_linearised_form2 Timeout ! FAILURE in 398 iterations RNG026-6 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 add is 92 additive_identity is 90 additive_inverse is 91 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 82 associativity_for_addition is 78 associator is 93 b is 97 c is 95 commutativity_for_addition is 79 commutator is 75 d is 94 distribute1 is 81 distribute2 is 80 left_additive_identity is 88 left_additive_inverse is 84 left_alternative is 76 left_multiplicative_zero is 86 multiply is 96 prove_teichmuller_identity is 89 right_additive_identity is 87 right_additive_inverse is 83 right_alternative is 77 right_multiplicative_zero is 85 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Goal Id : 2, {_}: add (add (associator (multiply a b) c d) (associator a b (multiply c d))) (additive_inverse (add (add (associator a (multiply b c) d) (multiply a (associator b c d))) (multiply (associator a b c) d))) =>= additive_identity [] by prove_teichmuller_identity Timeout ! FAILURE in 406 iterations RNG027-7 Order == is 100 _ is 99 add is 92 additive_identity is 93 additive_inverse is 87 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 84 associativity_for_addition is 80 associator is 77 commutativity_for_addition is 81 commutator is 76 cx is 97 cy is 96 cz is 98 distribute1 is 83 distribute2 is 82 distributivity_of_difference1 is 72 distributivity_of_difference2 is 71 distributivity_of_difference3 is 70 distributivity_of_difference4 is 69 inverse_product1 is 74 inverse_product2 is 73 left_additive_identity is 91 left_additive_inverse is 86 left_alternative is 78 left_multiplicative_zero is 89 multiply is 95 product_of_inverses is 75 prove_right_moufang is 94 right_additive_identity is 90 right_additive_inverse is 85 right_alternative is 79 right_multiplicative_zero is 88 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Id : 34, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?44) (additive_inverse ?45) =>= multiply ?44 ?45 [45, 44] by product_of_inverses ?44 ?45 Id : 36, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?47) ?48 =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47] by inverse_product1 ?47 ?48 Id : 38, {_}: multiply ?50 (additive_inverse ?51) =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?50 ?51) [51, 50] by inverse_product2 ?50 ?51 Id : 40, {_}: multiply ?53 (add ?54 (additive_inverse ?55)) =<= add (multiply ?53 ?54) (additive_inverse (multiply ?53 ?55)) [55, 54, 53] by distributivity_of_difference1 ?53 ?54 ?55 Id : 42, {_}: multiply (add ?57 (additive_inverse ?58)) ?59 =<= add (multiply ?57 ?59) (additive_inverse (multiply ?58 ?59)) [59, 58, 57] by distributivity_of_difference2 ?57 ?58 ?59 Id : 44, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?61) (add ?62 ?63) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?62)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?63)) [63, 62, 61] by distributivity_of_difference3 ?61 ?62 ?63 Id : 46, {_}: multiply (add ?65 ?66) (additive_inverse ?67) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?65 ?67)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?66 ?67)) [67, 66, 65] by distributivity_of_difference4 ?65 ?66 ?67 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply cz (multiply cx (multiply cy cx)) =<= multiply (multiply (multiply cz cx) cy) cx [] by prove_right_moufang Timeout ! FAILURE in 538 iterations RNG028-9 Order == is 100 _ is 99 add is 91 additive_identity is 92 additive_inverse is 86 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 83 associativity_for_addition is 79 associator is 94 commutativity_for_addition is 80 commutator is 76 distribute1 is 82 distribute2 is 81 distributivity_of_difference1 is 72 distributivity_of_difference2 is 71 distributivity_of_difference3 is 70 distributivity_of_difference4 is 69 inverse_product1 is 74 inverse_product2 is 73 left_additive_identity is 90 left_additive_inverse is 85 left_alternative is 77 left_multiplicative_zero is 88 multiply is 96 product_of_inverses is 75 prove_left_moufang is 93 right_additive_identity is 89 right_additive_inverse is 84 right_alternative is 78 right_multiplicative_zero is 87 x is 98 y is 97 z is 95 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Id : 34, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?44) (additive_inverse ?45) =>= multiply ?44 ?45 [45, 44] by product_of_inverses ?44 ?45 Id : 36, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?47) ?48 =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47] by inverse_product1 ?47 ?48 Id : 38, {_}: multiply ?50 (additive_inverse ?51) =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?50 ?51) [51, 50] by inverse_product2 ?50 ?51 Id : 40, {_}: multiply ?53 (add ?54 (additive_inverse ?55)) =<= add (multiply ?53 ?54) (additive_inverse (multiply ?53 ?55)) [55, 54, 53] by distributivity_of_difference1 ?53 ?54 ?55 Id : 42, {_}: multiply (add ?57 (additive_inverse ?58)) ?59 =<= add (multiply ?57 ?59) (additive_inverse (multiply ?58 ?59)) [59, 58, 57] by distributivity_of_difference2 ?57 ?58 ?59 Id : 44, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?61) (add ?62 ?63) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?62)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?63)) [63, 62, 61] by distributivity_of_difference3 ?61 ?62 ?63 Id : 46, {_}: multiply (add ?65 ?66) (additive_inverse ?67) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?65 ?67)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?66 ?67)) [67, 66, 65] by distributivity_of_difference4 ?65 ?66 ?67 Goal Id : 2, {_}: associator x (multiply y x) z =<= multiply x (associator x y z) [] by prove_left_moufang Timeout ! FAILURE in 537 iterations RNG029-7 Order == is 100 _ is 99 add is 92 additive_identity is 93 additive_inverse is 87 additive_inverse_additive_inverse is 84 associativity_for_addition is 80 associator is 77 commutativity_for_addition is 81 commutator is 76 distribute1 is 83 distribute2 is 82 distributivity_of_difference1 is 72 distributivity_of_difference2 is 71 distributivity_of_difference3 is 70 distributivity_of_difference4 is 69 inverse_product1 is 74 inverse_product2 is 73 left_additive_identity is 91 left_additive_inverse is 86 left_alternative is 78 left_multiplicative_zero is 89 multiply is 96 product_of_inverses is 75 prove_middle_moufang is 94 right_additive_identity is 90 right_additive_inverse is 85 right_alternative is 79 right_multiplicative_zero is 88 x is 98 y is 97 z is 95 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add additive_identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_additive_identity ?2 Id : 6, {_}: add ?4 additive_identity =>= ?4 [4] by right_additive_identity ?4 Id : 8, {_}: multiply additive_identity ?6 =>= additive_identity [6] by left_multiplicative_zero ?6 Id : 10, {_}: multiply ?8 additive_identity =>= additive_identity [8] by right_multiplicative_zero ?8 Id : 12, {_}: add (additive_inverse ?10) ?10 =>= additive_identity [10] by left_additive_inverse ?10 Id : 14, {_}: add ?12 (additive_inverse ?12) =>= additive_identity [12] by right_additive_inverse ?12 Id : 16, {_}: additive_inverse (additive_inverse ?14) =>= ?14 [14] by additive_inverse_additive_inverse ?14 Id : 18, {_}: multiply ?16 (add ?17 ?18) =<= add (multiply ?16 ?17) (multiply ?16 ?18) [18, 17, 16] by distribute1 ?16 ?17 ?18 Id : 20, {_}: multiply (add ?20 ?21) ?22 =<= add (multiply ?20 ?22) (multiply ?21 ?22) [22, 21, 20] by distribute2 ?20 ?21 ?22 Id : 22, {_}: add ?24 ?25 =?= add ?25 ?24 [25, 24] by commutativity_for_addition ?24 ?25 Id : 24, {_}: add ?27 (add ?28 ?29) =?= add (add ?27 ?28) ?29 [29, 28, 27] by associativity_for_addition ?27 ?28 ?29 Id : 26, {_}: multiply (multiply ?31 ?32) ?32 =?= multiply ?31 (multiply ?32 ?32) [32, 31] by right_alternative ?31 ?32 Id : 28, {_}: multiply (multiply ?34 ?34) ?35 =?= multiply ?34 (multiply ?34 ?35) [35, 34] by left_alternative ?34 ?35 Id : 30, {_}: associator ?37 ?38 ?39 =<= add (multiply (multiply ?37 ?38) ?39) (additive_inverse (multiply ?37 (multiply ?38 ?39))) [39, 38, 37] by associator ?37 ?38 ?39 Id : 32, {_}: commutator ?41 ?42 =<= add (multiply ?42 ?41) (additive_inverse (multiply ?41 ?42)) [42, 41] by commutator ?41 ?42 Id : 34, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?44) (additive_inverse ?45) =>= multiply ?44 ?45 [45, 44] by product_of_inverses ?44 ?45 Id : 36, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?47) ?48 =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47] by inverse_product1 ?47 ?48 Id : 38, {_}: multiply ?50 (additive_inverse ?51) =>= additive_inverse (multiply ?50 ?51) [51, 50] by inverse_product2 ?50 ?51 Id : 40, {_}: multiply ?53 (add ?54 (additive_inverse ?55)) =<= add (multiply ?53 ?54) (additive_inverse (multiply ?53 ?55)) [55, 54, 53] by distributivity_of_difference1 ?53 ?54 ?55 Id : 42, {_}: multiply (add ?57 (additive_inverse ?58)) ?59 =<= add (multiply ?57 ?59) (additive_inverse (multiply ?58 ?59)) [59, 58, 57] by distributivity_of_difference2 ?57 ?58 ?59 Id : 44, {_}: multiply (additive_inverse ?61) (add ?62 ?63) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?62)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?61 ?63)) [63, 62, 61] by distributivity_of_difference3 ?61 ?62 ?63 Id : 46, {_}: multiply (add ?65 ?66) (additive_inverse ?67) =<= add (additive_inverse (multiply ?65 ?67)) (additive_inverse (multiply ?66 ?67)) [67, 66, 65] by distributivity_of_difference4 ?65 ?66 ?67 Goal Id : 2, {_}: multiply (multiply x y) (multiply z x) =<= multiply (multiply x (multiply y z)) x [] by prove_middle_moufang Timeout ! FAILURE in 537 iterations RNG035-7 Fatal error: exception Assert_failure("tptp_cnf.ml", 4, 25) ROB006-1 Order == is 100 _ is 99 a is 98 absorbtion is 88 add is 95 associativity_of_add is 92 b is 97 c is 90 commutativity_of_add is 93 d is 89 negate is 96 prove_huntingtons_axiom is 94 robbins_axiom is 91 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add ?2 ?3 =?= add ?3 ?2 [3, 2] by commutativity_of_add ?2 ?3 Id : 6, {_}: add (add ?5 ?6) ?7 =?= add ?5 (add ?6 ?7) [7, 6, 5] by associativity_of_add ?5 ?6 ?7 Id : 8, {_}: negate (add (negate (add ?9 ?10)) (negate (add ?9 (negate ?10)))) =>= ?9 [10, 9] by robbins_axiom ?9 ?10 Id : 10, {_}: add c d =>= d [] by absorbtion Goal Id : 2, {_}: add (negate (add a (negate b))) (negate (add (negate a) (negate b))) =>= b [] by prove_huntingtons_axiom Timeout ! FAILURE in 163 iterations ROB006-2 Order == is 100 _ is 99 absorbtion is 90 add is 98 associativity_of_add is 95 c is 92 commutativity_of_add is 96 d is 91 negate is 94 prove_idempotence is 97 robbins_axiom is 93 Facts Id : 4, {_}: add ?3 ?4 =?= add ?4 ?3 [4, 3] by commutativity_of_add ?3 ?4 Id : 6, {_}: add (add ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= add ?6 (add ?7 ?8) [8, 7, 6] by associativity_of_add ?6 ?7 ?8 Id : 8, {_}: negate (add (negate (add ?10 ?11)) (negate (add ?10 (negate ?11)))) =>= ?10 [11, 10] by robbins_axiom ?10 ?11 Id : 10, {_}: add c d =>= d [] by absorbtion Goal Id : 2, {_}: add ?1 ?1 =>= ?1 [1] by prove_idempotence ?1 Timeout ! FAILURE in 253 iterations