;;
*)
-
-let elim_type_tac ~term status =
- let module C = Cic in
- let module P = PrimitiveTactics in
- let module T = Tacticals in
- T.thens
- ~start: (P.cut_tac term)
- ~continuations:[ P.elim_intros_simpl_tac ~term:(C.Rel 1) ; T.id_tac ]
- status
+let elim_type_tac ~term =
+ let elim_type_tac ~term status =
+ let module C = Cic in
+ let module P = PrimitiveTactics in
+ let module T = Tacticals in
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
+ (T.thens
+ ~start: (P.cut_tac term)
+ ~continuations:[ P.elim_intros_simpl_tac ~term:(C.Rel 1) ; T.id_tac ])
+ status
+ in
+ ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (elim_type_tac ~term)
;;
title:string -> msg:string -> string list -> string list) ref)
;;
-exception IllFormedUri of string
-
-let cic_textual_parser_uri_of_string uri' =
- try
- (* Constant *)
- if String.sub uri' (String.length uri' - 4) 4 = ".con" then
- CicTextualParser0.ConUri (UriManager.uri_of_string uri')
- else
- if String.sub uri' (String.length uri' - 4) 4 = ".var" then
- CicTextualParser0.VarUri (UriManager.uri_of_string uri')
- else
- (try
- (* Inductive Type *)
- let uri'',typeno = CicTextualLexer.indtyuri_of_uri uri' in
- CicTextualParser0.IndTyUri (uri'',typeno)
- with
- _ ->
- (* Constructor of an Inductive Type *)
- let uri'',typeno,consno =
- CicTextualLexer.indconuri_of_uri uri'
- in
- CicTextualParser0.IndConUri (uri'',typeno,consno)
- )
- with
- _ -> raise (IllFormedUri uri')
-;;
-
-(*
-let constructor_uri_of_string uri =
- match cic_textual_parser_uri_of_string uri with
- CicTextualParser0.IndTyUri (uri,typeno) -> (uri,typeno,[])
- | _ -> assert false
-;;
-
-let call_back uris =
-(* N.B.: nella finestra c'e' un campo "nessuno deei precedenti, prova questo" che non ha senso? *)
-(* N.B.: in questo passaggio perdo l'informazione su exp_named_subst !!!! *)
-(* domanda: due triple possono essere diverse solo per avere exp_named_subst diverse?? *)
- let module U = UriManager in
- List.map
- (constructor_uri_of_string)
- (!interactive_user_uri_choice
- ~selection_mode:`EXTENDED ~ok:"Ok" ~enable_button_for_non_vars:false
- ~title:"Decompose" ~msg:"Please, select the Inductive Types to decompose"
- (List.map
- (function (uri,typeno,_) -> U.string_of_uri uri ^ "#1/" ^ string_of_int (typeno+1))
- uris)
- )
-;;
-*)
-
-let decompose_tac ?(uris_choice_callback=(function l -> l)) term status =
+let decompose_tac ?(uris_choice_callback=(function l -> l)) term =
+ let decompose_tac uris_choice_callback term status =
let (proof, goal) = status in
let module C = Cic in
let module R = CicReduction in
let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
let _,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let old_context_len = List.length context in
- let termty = CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context term in
-
- let rec make_list termty =
+ let termty,_ =
+ CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context term CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
+ let rec make_list termty =
(* N.B.: altamente inefficente? *)
let rec search_inductive_types urilist termty =
(* search in term the Inductive Types and return a list of uris as triples like this: (uri,typeno,exp_named_subst) *)
let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
let _,context,_ = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let old_context_len = List.length context in
- let termty = CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context term' in
+ let termty,_ =
+ CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context term'
+ CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
warn ("elim_clear termty= " ^ CicPp.ppterm termty);
match termty with
C.MutInd (uri,typeno,exp_named_subst)
| C.Appl((C.MutInd (uri,typeno,exp_named_subst))::_)
when (List.mem (uri,typeno,exp_named_subst) urilist) ->
warn ("elim " ^ CicPp.ppterm termty);
- T.then_
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
+ (T.then_
~start:(P.elim_intros_simpl_tac ~term:term')
~continuation:(
(* clear the hyp that has just been eliminated *)
- (fun status ->
+ ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (fun status ->
let (proof, goal) = status in
let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
let _,context,_ = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let new_context_len = List.length context in
warn ("newcon=" ^ (string_of_int new_context_len) ^ " & oldcon=" ^ (string_of_int old_context_len) ^ " & old_nr_of_hyp=" ^ (string_of_int nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim));
let new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim = nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim + (new_context_len - old_context_len) - 1 in
- T.then_
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
+ (T.then_
~start:(
if (term'==term) (* if it's the first application of elim, there's no need to clear the hyp *)
then begin prerr_endline ("%%%%%%% no clear"); T.id_tac end
else begin prerr_endline ("%%%%%%% clear " ^ (string_of_int (new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim))); (S.clear ~hyp:(List.nth context (new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim))) end)
- ~continuation:(elim_clear_tac ~term':(C.Rel new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim) ~nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim:new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim)
+ ~continuation:(ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (elim_clear_tac ~term':(C.Rel new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim) ~nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim:new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim)))
status
- ))
+ )))
status
| _ ->
let new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim = nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim - 1 in
warn ("fail; hyp=" ^ (string_of_int new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim));
elim_clear_tac ~term':(C.Rel new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim) ~nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim:new_nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim status
else (* no hyp to elim left in this goal *)
- T.id_tac status
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic T.id_tac status
in
elim_clear_tac ~term':term ~nr_of_hyp_still_to_elim:1 status
+ in
+ ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (decompose_tac uris_choice_callback term)
;;