(fun _ metasenv ugraph -> ty,metasenv,ugraph))
;;
-let by_term_we_proved t ty id ty' =
- match t with
- None -> assert false
- | Some t ->
- let continuation =
- match ty' with
- None -> Tacticals.id_tac
- | Some ty' ->
- Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[id,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)],None)
- (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> ty,metasenv,ugraph)
- in
- Tacticals.thens
- ~start:
- (Tactics.cut ty
- ~mk_fresh_name_callback:(fun _ _ _ ~typ -> Cic.Name id))
- ~continuations:
- [ continuation ; Tactics.apply t ]
+let by_term_we_proved ~dbd ~universe t ty id ty' =
+ let just =
+ match t with
+ None -> Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:[] ~universe
+ | Some t -> Tactics.apply t
+ in
+ match id with
+ None ->
+ (match ty' with
+ None -> assert false
+ | Some ty' ->
+ Tacticals.then_
+ ~start:(Tactics.change
+ ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern None)
+ (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> ty,metasenv,ugraph))
+ ~continuation:just
+ )
+ | Some id ->
+ let ty',continuation =
+ match ty' with
+ None -> ty,just
+ | Some ty' ->
+ ty',
+ Tacticals.then_
+ ~start:
+ (Tactics.change
+ ~with_cast:true
+ ~pattern:(None,[id,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)],None)
+ (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> ty,metasenv,ugraph))
+ ~continuation:just
+ in
+ Tacticals.thens
+ ~start:
+ (Tactics.cut ty'
+ ~mk_fresh_name_callback:(fun _ _ _ ~typ -> Cic.Name id))
+ ~continuations:[ Tacticals.id_tac ; continuation ]
;;
-let bydone t =
- match t with
- None -> assert false
- | Some t ->
- (Tactics.apply ~term:t)
+let bydone ~dbd ~universe t =
+ let just =
+ match t with
+ None -> Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:[] ~universe
+ | Some t -> Tactics.apply t
+ in
+ just
;;
let we_need_to_prove t id ty =
- let aux status =
- let cont,cutted =
- match ty with
- None -> Tacticals.id_tac,t
- | Some ty ->
- Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[id,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)],None)
- (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> t,metasenv,ugraph), ty in
- let proof,goals =
- ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
- (Tacticals.thens
- ~start:
- (Tactics.cut cutted
- ~mk_fresh_name_callback:(fun _ _ _ ~typ -> Cic.Name id))
- ~continuations:[cont])
- status
- in
- let goals' =
- match goals with
- [fst; snd] -> [snd; fst]
- | _ -> assert false
- in
- proof,goals'
+ match id with
+ None ->
+ (match ty with
+ None -> Tacticals.id_tac (*BUG: check missing here *)
+ | Some ty ->
+ Tactics.change ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern None)
+ (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> ty,metasenv,ugraph))
+ | Some id ->
+ let aux status =
+ let cont,cutted =
+ match ty with
+ None -> Tacticals.id_tac,t
+ | Some ty ->
+ Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[id,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)],None)
+ (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> t,metasenv,ugraph), ty in
+ let proof,goals =
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
+ (Tacticals.thens
+ ~start:
+ (Tactics.cut cutted
+ ~mk_fresh_name_callback:(fun _ _ _ ~typ -> Cic.Name id))
+ ~continuations:[cont])
+ status
+ in
+ let goals' =
+ match goals with
+ [fst; snd] -> [snd; fst]
+ | _ -> assert false
+ in
+ proof,goals'
+ in
+ ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic aux
+;;
+
+let existselim ~dbd ~universe t id1 t1 id2 t2 =
+ let aux (proof, goal) =
+ let (n,metasenv,_subst,bo,ty,attrs) = proof in
+ let metano,context,_ = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
+ let t2, metasenv, _ = t2 (Some (Cic.Name id1, Cic.Decl t1) :: context) metasenv CicUniv.oblivion_ugraph in
+ let proof' = (n,metasenv,_subst,bo,ty,attrs) in
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic (
+ Tacticals.thens
+ ~start:(Tactics.cut (Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (UriManager.uri_of_string "cic:/matita/logic/connectives/ex.ind", 0, []); t1 ; Cic.Lambda (Cic.Name id1, t1, t2)]))
+ ~continuations:
+ [ Tactics.elim_intros (Cic.Rel 1)
+ ~mk_fresh_name_callback:
+ (let i = ref 0 in
+ fun _ _ _ ~typ ->
+ incr i;
+ if !i = 1 then Cic.Name id1 else Cic.Name id2) ;
+ (match t with
+ None -> Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:[] ~universe
+ | Some t -> Tactics.apply t)
+ ]) (proof', goal)
in
ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic aux
;;
-let existselim t id1 t1 id2 t2 =
-(*BUG: t1 and t2 not used *)
-(*PARSING BUG: t2 is parsed in the current context, but it may
- have occurrences of id1 in it *)
+let andelim t id1 t1 id2 t2 =
Tactics.elim_intros t
- ~mk_fresh_name_callback:
- (let i = ref 0 in
- fun _ _ _ ~typ ->
- incr i;
- if !i = 1 then Cic.Name id1 else Cic.Name id2)
+ ~mk_fresh_name_callback:
+ (let i = ref 0 in
+ fun _ _ _ ~typ ->
+ incr i;
+ if !i = 1 then Cic.Name id1 else Cic.Name id2)
-let andelim = existselim;;
-
-let rewritingstep lhs rhs just conclude =
+let rewritingstep ~dbd ~universe lhs rhs just last_step =
let aux ((proof,goal) as status) =
- let (curi,metasenv,proofbo,proofty) = proof in
- let _,context,_ = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
+ let (curi,metasenv,_subst,proofbo,proofty, attrs) = proof in
+ let _,context,gty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let eq,trans =
match LibraryObjects.eq_URI () with
- None -> assert false (*TODO*)
+ None -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "You need to register the default equality first. Please use the \"default\" command"))
| Some uri ->
Cic.MutInd (uri,0,[]), Cic.Const (LibraryObjects.trans_eq_URI ~eq:uri,[])
in
let ty,_ =
CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context rhs CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
- let just =
+ let just' =
match just with
- None -> assert false (*TOOD*)
- | Some just -> just
+ `Auto params ->
+ let params =
+ if not (List.exists (fun (k,_) -> k = "timeout") params) then
+ ("timeout","3")::params
+ else params
+ in
+ let params' =
+ if not (List.exists (fun (k,_) -> k = "paramodulation") params) then
+ ("paramodulation","1")::params
+ else params
+ in
+ if params = params' then
+ Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params ~universe
+ else
+ Tacticals.first
+ [Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params ~universe ;
+ Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:params' ~universe]
+ | `Term just ->
+ let ty,_ =
+ CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context just
+ CicUniv.empty_ugraph
+ in
+ Tactics.solve_rewrite
+ ~universe:(Universe.index Universe.empty
+ (Universe.key ty) just) ~steps:1 ()
+ (* Tactics.apply just *)
+ | `Proof ->
+ Tacticals.id_tac
in
- match lhs with
- None ->
- let plhs,prhs =
- match
- fst
- (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context (Cic.Rel 1)
- CicUniv.empty_ugraph)
- with
- Cic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs
- | _ -> assert false in
- let last_hyp_name =
- match context with
- (Some (Cic.Name id,_))::_ -> id
- | _ -> assert false
- in
- (match conclude with
- None ->
- ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
- (Tacticals.thens
- ~start:(Tactics.apply ~term:trans)
- ~continuations:
- [ Tactics.apply prhs ;
- Tactics.apply (Cic.Rel 1) ;
- Tactics.apply just]) status
- | Some name ->
- let mk_fresh_name_callback =
- fun metasenv context _ ~typ ->
- FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[]
- metasenv context name ~typ
- in
- ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
- (Tacticals.thens
- ~start:(Tactics.cut ~mk_fresh_name_callback
- (Cic.Appl [eq ; ty ; plhs ; rhs]))
- ~continuations:
- [ Tactics.clear ~hyps:[last_hyp_name] ;
- Tacticals.thens
- ~start:(Tactics.apply ~term:trans)
- ~continuations:
- [ Tactics.apply prhs ;
- Tactics.apply (Cic.Rel 1) ;
- Tactics.apply just]
- ]) status)
- | Some lhs ->
- match conclude with
- None -> ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic (Tactics.apply just) status
- | Some name ->
+ let plhs,prhs,prepare =
+ match lhs with
+ None ->
+ let plhs,prhs =
+ match gty with
+ Cic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs
+ | _ -> assert false
+ in
+ plhs,prhs,
+ (fun continuation ->
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic continuation status)
+ | Some (None,lhs) ->
+ let plhs,prhs =
+ match gty with
+ Cic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs
+ | _ -> assert false
+ in
+ (*CSC: manca check plhs convertibile con lhs *)
+ plhs,prhs,
+ (fun continuation ->
+ ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic continuation status)
+ | Some (Some name,lhs) ->
+ let newmeta = CicMkImplicit.new_meta metasenv [] in
+ let irl =
+ CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context in
+ let plhs = lhs in
+ let prhs = Cic.Meta(newmeta,irl) in
+ plhs,prhs,
+ (fun continuation ->
+ let metasenv = (newmeta, context, ty)::metasenv in
let mk_fresh_name_callback =
- fun metasenv context _ ~typ ->
- FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[]
- metasenv context name ~typ
+ fun metasenv context _ ~typ ->
+ FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[] metasenv context
+ (Cic.Name name) ~typ
in
+ let proof = curi,metasenv,_subst,proofbo,proofty, attrs in
+ let proof,goals =
ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic
(Tacticals.thens
- ~start:
- (Tactics.cut ~mk_fresh_name_callback
- (Cic.Appl [eq ; ty ; lhs ; rhs]))
- ~continuations:[ Tacticals.id_tac ; Tactics.apply just ]) status
+ ~start:(Tactics.cut ~mk_fresh_name_callback
+ (Cic.Appl [eq ; ty ; lhs ; prhs]))
+ ~continuations:[Tacticals.id_tac ; continuation]) (proof,goal)
+ in
+ let goals =
+ match just,goals with
+ `Proof, [g1;g2;g3] -> [g2;g3;newmeta;g1]
+ | _, [g1;g2] -> [g2;newmeta;g1]
+ | _ -> assert false
+ in
+ proof,goals)
+ in
+ let continuation =
+ if last_step then
+ (*CSC:manca controllo sul fatto che rhs sia convertibile con prhs*)
+ just'
+ else
+ Tacticals.thens
+ ~start:(Tactics.apply ~term:(Cic.Appl [trans;ty;plhs;rhs;prhs]))
+ ~continuations:[just' ; Tacticals.id_tac]
+ in
+ prepare continuation
in
ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic aux
;;
-let we_proceed_by_induction_on t pat =
+let we_proceed_by_cases_on t pat =
(*BUG here: pat unused *)
- Tactics.elim_intros ~depth:0 t
+ Tactics.cases_intros t
+;;
+
+let we_proceed_by_induction_on t pat =
+ let pattern = None, [], Some pat in
+ Tactics.elim_intros ~depth:0 (*~pattern*) t
;;
let case id ~params =
let thesisbecomes t =
let ty = None in
- (*BUG here: missing check on t *)
match ty with
- None -> Tacticals.id_tac
+ None ->
+ Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[],Some (Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)))
+ (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> t,metasenv,ugraph)
| Some ty ->
+ (*BUG here: missing check on t *)
Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[],Some (Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)))
(fun _ metasenv ugraph -> ty,metasenv,ugraph)
;;