else (B.b_kw "by"),
Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";proof2pres true term2pres p])
-and proof2pres is_top_down term2pres p =
- let rec proof2pres is_top_down p omit_dot =
+and proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas is_top_down term2pres p =
+ let rec proof2pres ?(skip_initial_lambdas_internal=false) is_top_down p omit_dot =
+ prerr_endline p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method;
let indent =
let is_decl e =
(match e with
| Some t -> Some (term2pres t)) in
let body =
let presconclude =
- conclude2pres is_top_down p.Con.proof_conclude indent omit_conclusion
+ conclude2pres ~skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down p.Con.proof_conclude indent omit_conclusion
omit_dot in
let presacontext =
acontext2pres
(p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion")
- p.Con.proof_apply_context presconclude indent
+ p.Con.proof_apply_context
+ presconclude indent
(p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion")
in
- context2pres p.Con.proof_context presacontext
- in
+ context2pres
+ (if skip_initial_lambdas_internal then [] else p.Con.proof_context)
+ presacontext
+ in
match p.Con.proof_name with
None -> body
| Some name ->
[B.H([Some "helm","xref","ace_"^p.Con.proof_id],[hd]);
continuation])) ac continuation
- and conclude2pres is_top_down conclude indent omit_conclusion omit_dot =
+ and conclude2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down conclude indent omit_conclusion omit_dot =
let tconclude_body =
match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
Some t (*when not omit_conclusion or
(* false ind is in charge to add the conclusion *)
falseind conclude
else
- let conclude_body = conclude_aux conclude in
+ let conclude_body =
+ conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude in
let ann_concl =
if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac"
|| conclude.Con.conclude_method = "ByInduction"
((if not is_top_down || omit_dot then [make_concl "we proved" concl; B.Text([],if not is_top_down then "(previous)" else "")] else [B.Text([],"done")]) @ if not omit_dot then [B.Text([],".")] else [])
in
B.V ([], [conclude_body; ann_concl])
- | _ -> conclude_aux conclude
+ | _ -> conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude
in
if indent then
B.indent (B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],
else
B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],[tconclude_body])
- and conclude_aux conclude =
+ and conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude =
if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion" then
let expected =
(match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
)
else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac" then
(match conclude.Con.conclude_args with
- [Con.ArgProof p] -> proof2pres true p false
+ [Con.ArgProof p] -> proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal true p false
| _ -> assert false)
(* OLD CODE
let conclusion =
*) B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw ") (previous)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Eq_chain" then
let justification p =
- let j1,j2 = justification term2pres p in
+ if skip_initial_lambdas <> None (* cheating *) then
+ [B.b_kw "by _"]
+ else
+ let j1,j2 = justification term2pres p in
j1 :: B.b_space :: (match j2 with Some j -> [j] | None -> [])
in
let rec aux args =
match args with
| [] -> []
| (Con.ArgProof p)::(Con.Term t)::tl ->
- B.HOV(RenderingAttrs.indent_attributes `BoxML,([B.b_kw "=";B.b_space;term2pres t;B.b_space]@justification p))::(aux tl)
+ B.HOV(RenderingAttrs.indent_attributes `BoxML,([B.b_kw
+ "=";B.b_space;term2pres t;B.b_space]@justification p@
+ (if tl <> [] then [B.Text ([],".")] else [])))::(aux tl)
| _ -> assert false
in
let hd =
| Con.Term t -> t
| _ -> assert false
in
- B.HOV([],[term2pres hd; (* B.b_space; *)
+ B.HOV([],[B.Text ([],"conclude");B.b_space;term2pres hd; (* B.b_space; *)
B.V ([],aux (List.tl conclude.Con.conclude_args))])
else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Apply" then
let pres_args =
| _ -> assert false
in
- proof2pres is_top_down p false
+ proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal:skip_initial_lambdas is_top_down p false
exception ToDo
| `Inductive ind -> inductive2pres term2pres ind
| _ -> assert false (* ZACK or raise ToDo? *)
-let content2pres term2pres (id,params,metasenv,obj) =
+let content2pres
+ ?skip_initial_lambdas ?(skip_thm_and_qed=false) term2pres
+ (id,params,metasenv,obj)
+=
match obj with
| `Def (Content.Const, thesis, `Proof p) ->
let name = get_name p.Content.proof_name in
+ let proof = proof2pres true term2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas p in
+ if skip_thm_and_qed then
+ proof
+ else
B.b_v
[Some "helm","xref","id"]
- ([ B.b_h [] (B.b_kw ("theorem " ^ name) :: params2pres params @ [B.b_kw ":"]);
+ ([ B.b_h [] (B.b_kw ("theorem " ^ name) ::
+ params2pres params @ [B.b_kw ":"]);
B.indent (term2pres thesis) ; B.b_kw "." ] @
metasenv2pres term2pres metasenv @
- [proof2pres true term2pres p ; B.b_kw "qed."])
+ [proof ; B.b_kw "qed."])
| `Def (_, ty, `Definition body) ->
let name = get_name body.Content.def_name in
B.b_v
:: List.map (joint_def2pres term2pres) joint.Content.joint_defs)
| _ -> raise ToDo
-let content2pres ~ids_to_inner_sorts =
- content2pres
+let content2pres
+ ?skip_initial_lambdas ?skip_thm_and_qed ~ids_to_inner_sorts
+=
+ content2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas ?skip_thm_and_qed
(fun ?(prec=90) annterm ->
let ast, ids_to_uris =
TermAcicContent.ast_of_acic ids_to_inner_sorts annterm
projects / helm.git / blobdiff