theorem plog_aux_to_Prop: \forall p,n,m. O < m \to
match plog_aux p n m with
- [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n = (exp m q)*r ].
+ [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n = m \sup q *r ].
intro.
elim p.
change with
[ O \Rightarrow pair nat nat O n
| (S a) \Rightarrow pair nat nat O n] )
with
- [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n = (exp m q)*r ].
+ [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n = m \sup q * r ].
apply nat_case (mod n m).
simplify.apply plus_n_O.
intros.
[ (pair q r) \Rightarrow pair nat nat (S q) r]
| (S a) \Rightarrow pair nat nat O n1] )
with
- [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n1 = (exp m q)*r].
+ [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n1 = m \sup q * r].
apply nat_case1 (mod n1 m).intro.
change with
match (
match (plog_aux n (div n1 m) m) with
[ (pair q r) \Rightarrow pair nat nat (S q) r])
with
- [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n1 = (exp m q)*r].
+ [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n1 = m \sup q * r].
generalize in match (H (div n1 m) m).
elim plog_aux n (div n1 m) m.
simplify.
qed.
theorem plog_aux_to_exp: \forall p,n,m,q,r. O < m \to
- (pair nat nat q r) = plog_aux p n m \to n = (exp m q)*r.
+ (pair nat nat q r) = plog_aux p n m \to n = m \sup q * r.
intros.
change with
match (pair nat nat q r) with
- [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n = (exp m q)*r ].
+ [ (pair q r) \Rightarrow n = m \sup q * r ].
rewrite > H1.
apply plog_aux_to_Prop.
assumption.
qed.
(* questo va spostato in primes1.ma *)
theorem plog_exp: \forall n,m,i. O < m \to \not (mod n m = O) \to
-\forall p. i \le p \to plog_aux p ((exp m i)*n) m = pair nat nat i n.
+\forall p. i \le p \to plog_aux p (m \sup i * n) m = pair nat nat i n.
intros 5.
elim i.
simplify.
apply nat_case p.intro.apply False_ind.apply not_le_Sn_O n1 H4.
intros.
change with
- match (mod ((exp m (S n1))*n) m) with
+ match (mod (m \sup (S n1) *n) m) with
[ O \Rightarrow
- match (plog_aux m1 (div ((exp m (S n1))*n) m) m) with
+ match (plog_aux m1 (div (m \sup (S n1) *n) m) m) with
[ (pair q r) \Rightarrow pair nat nat (S q) r]
- | (S a) \Rightarrow pair nat nat O ((exp m (S n1))*n)]
+ | (S a) \Rightarrow pair nat nat O (m \sup (S n1) *n)]
= pair nat nat (S n1) n.
-cut (mod ((exp m (S n1))*n) m) = O.
+cut (mod (m \sup (S n1)*n) m) = O.
rewrite > Hcut.
change with
-match (plog_aux m1 (div ((exp m (S n1))*n) m) m) with
+match (plog_aux m1 (div (m \sup (S n1)*n) m) m) with
[ (pair q r) \Rightarrow pair nat nat (S q) r]
= pair nat nat (S n1) n.
-cut div ((exp m (S n1))*n) m = (exp m n1)*n.
+cut div (m \sup (S n1) *n) m = m \sup n1 *n.
rewrite > Hcut1.
rewrite > H2 m1. simplify.reflexivity.
apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption.
(* div_exp *)
-change with div (m*(exp m n1)*n) m = (exp m n1)*n.
+change with div (m* m \sup n1 *n) m = m \sup n1 * n.
rewrite > assoc_times.
apply lt_O_n_elim m H.
intro.apply div_times.
apply divides_to_mod_O.
assumption.
simplify.rewrite > assoc_times.
-apply witness ? ? ((exp m n1)*n).reflexivity.
+apply witness ? ? (m \sup n1 *n).reflexivity.
qed.
theorem plog_aux_to_Prop1: \forall p,n,m. (S O) < m \to O < n \to n \le p \to