* For details, see the HELM World-Wide-Web page,
* http://cs.unibo.it/helm/.
*)
+
+(* $Id$ *)
-let rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
- let rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern:(wanted,hyps_pat,concl_pat) equality status
+let rec rewrite_tac ~direction ~(pattern: ProofEngineTypes.lazy_pattern) equality =
+ let _rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern:(wanted,hyps_pat,concl_pat) equality status
=
let module C = Cic in
let module U = UriManager in
let module PEH = ProofEngineHelpers in
let module PT = PrimitiveTactics in
assert (wanted = None); (* this should be checked syntactically *)
- assert (hyps_pat = []); (*CSC: not implemented yet! *)
let proof,goal = status in
- let if_right_to_left a b =
+ let curi, metasenv, pbo, pty = proof in
+ let (metano,context,gty) = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
+ match hyps_pat with
+ he::(_::_ as tl) ->
+ PET.apply_tactic
+ (Tacticals.then_
+ (rewrite_tac ~direction
+ ~pattern:(None,[he],None) equality)
+ (rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern:(None,tl,concl_pat) equality)
+ ) status
+ | [_] as hyps_pat when concl_pat <> None ->
+ PET.apply_tactic
+ (Tacticals.then_
+ (rewrite_tac ~direction
+ ~pattern:(None,hyps_pat,None) equality)
+ (rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern:(None,[],concl_pat) equality)
+ ) status
+ | _ ->
+ let arg,dir2,tac,concl_pat,gty =
+ match hyps_pat with
+ [] -> None,true,(fun ~term _ -> PT.exact_tac term),concl_pat,gty
+ | [name,pat] ->
+ let rec find_hyp n =
+ function
+ [] -> assert false
+ | Some (Cic.Name s,Cic.Decl ty)::_ when name = s ->
+ Cic.Rel n, CicSubstitution.lift n ty
+ | Some (Cic.Name s,Cic.Def _)::_ -> assert false (*CSC: not implemented yet! But does this make any sense?*)
+ | _::tl -> find_hyp (n+1) tl
+ in
+ let arg,gty = find_hyp 1 context in
+ let dummy = "dummy" in
+ Some arg,false,
+ (fun ~term typ ->
+ Tacticals.seq
+ ~tactics:
+ [ProofEngineStructuralRules.rename name dummy;
+ PT.letin_tac
+ ~mk_fresh_name_callback:(fun _ _ _ ~typ -> Cic.Name name) term;
+ ProofEngineStructuralRules.clearbody name;
+ ReductionTactics.change_tac
+ ~pattern:
+ (None,[name,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)], None)
+ (ProofEngineTypes.const_lazy_term typ);
+ ProofEngineStructuralRules.clear dummy
+ ]),
+ Some pat,gty
+ | _::_ -> assert false
+ in
+ let if_right_to_left do_not_change a b =
match direction with
- | `RightToLeft -> a
- | `LeftToRight -> b
+ | `RightToLeft -> if do_not_change then a else b
+ | `LeftToRight -> if do_not_change then b else a
in
- let curi, metasenv, pbo, pty = proof in
- let (metano,context,gty) as conjecture = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let ty_eq,ugraph =
CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context equality
CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
let (ty_eq,metasenv',arguments,fresh_meta) =
ProofEngineHelpers.saturate_term
- (ProofEngineHelpers.new_meta_of_proof proof) metasenv context ty_eq in
+ (ProofEngineHelpers.new_meta_of_proof proof) metasenv context ty_eq 0 in
let equality =
if List.length arguments = 0 then
equality
else
C.Appl (equality :: arguments) in
- let eq_ind, ty, t1, t2 =
+ (* t1x is t2 if we are rewriting in an hypothesis *)
+ let eq_ind, ty, t1, t2, t1x =
match ty_eq with
| C.Appl [C.MutInd (uri, 0, []); ty; t1; t2]
when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI uri ->
let ind_uri =
- if_right_to_left LibraryObjects.eq_ind_URI LibraryObjects.eq_ind_r_URI
+ if_right_to_left dir2
+ LibraryObjects.eq_ind_URI LibraryObjects.eq_ind_r_URI
in
let eq_ind = C.Const (ind_uri uri,[]) in
- if_right_to_left (eq_ind, ty, t2, t1) (eq_ind, ty, t1, t2)
- | _ -> raise (PET.Fail "Rewrite: argument is not a proof of an equality") in
+ if dir2 then
+ if_right_to_left true (eq_ind,ty,t2,t1,t2) (eq_ind,ty,t1,t2,t1)
+ else
+ if_right_to_left true (eq_ind,ty,t1,t2,t2) (eq_ind,ty,t2,t1,t1)
+ | _ -> raise (PET.Fail (lazy "Rewrite: argument is not a proof of an equality")) in
(* now we always do as if direction was `LeftToRight *)
let fresh_name =
FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name
~subst:[] metasenv' context C.Anonymous ~typ:ty in
- let lifted_t1 = CicSubstitution.lift 1 t1 in
+ let lifted_t1 = CicSubstitution.lift 1 t1x in
let lifted_gty = CicSubstitution.lift 1 gty in
let lifted_conjecture =
metano,(Some (fresh_name,Cic.Decl ty))::context,lifted_gty in
- let lifted_pattern = Some lifted_t1,[],CicSubstitution.lift 1 concl_pat in
+ let lifted_pattern =
+ let lifted_concl_pat =
+ match concl_pat with
+ | None -> None
+ | Some term -> Some (CicSubstitution.lift 1 term) in
+ Some (fun _ m u -> lifted_t1, m, u),[],lifted_concl_pat
+ in
let subst,metasenv',ugraph,_,selected_terms_with_context =
ProofEngineHelpers.select
~metasenv:metasenv' ~ugraph ~conjecture:lifted_conjecture
let metasenv' = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst_metasenv subst metasenv' in
let what,with_what =
(* Note: Rel 1 does not live in the context context_of_t *)
- (* The replace_lifting_csc_0 function will take care of lifting it *)
+ (* The replace_lifting_csc 0 function will take care of lifting it *)
(* to context_of_t *)
List.fold_right
(fun (context_of_t,t) (l1,l2) -> t::l1, Cic.Rel 1::l2)
selected_terms_with_context ([],[]) in
+ let t1 = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst t1 in
+ let t2 = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst t2 in
+ let equality = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst equality in
let abstr_gty =
ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting_csc 0
~equality:(==) ~what ~with_what:with_what ~where:lifted_gty in
let abstr_gty = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst abstr_gty in
- let t1 = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst t1 in
- let t2 = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst t2 in
- let equality = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst equality in
- let gty' = CicSubstitution.subst t2 abstr_gty in
- let irl = CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context in
- let metasenv' = (fresh_meta,context,gty')::metasenv' in
let pred = C.Lambda (fresh_name, ty, abstr_gty) in
+ (* The argument is either a meta if we are rewriting in the conclusion
+ or the hypothesis if we are rewriting in an hypothesis *)
+ let metasenv',arg,newtyp =
+ match arg with
+ None ->
+ let gty' = CicSubstitution.subst t2 abstr_gty in
+ let irl =
+ CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context in
+ let metasenv' = (fresh_meta,context,gty')::metasenv' in
+ metasenv', C.Meta (fresh_meta,irl), Cic.Rel (-1) (* dummy term, never used *)
+ | Some arg ->
+ let gty' = CicSubstitution.subst t1 abstr_gty in
+ metasenv,arg,gty'
+ in
let exact_proof =
- C.Appl [eq_ind ; ty ; t2 ; pred ; C.Meta (fresh_meta,irl) ; t1 ;equality]
+ C.Appl [eq_ind ; ty ; t2 ; pred ; arg ; t1 ;equality]
in
let (proof',goals) =
PET.apply_tactic
- (PT.exact_tac ~term:exact_proof) ((curi,metasenv',pbo,pty),goal)
+ (tac ~term:exact_proof newtyp) ((curi,metasenv',pbo,pty),goal)
in
- assert (List.length goals = 0) ;
let goals =
- ProofEngineHelpers.compare_metasenvs ~oldmetasenv:metasenv
- ~newmetasenv:metasenv'
+ goals@(ProofEngineHelpers.compare_metasenvs ~oldmetasenv:metasenv
+ ~newmetasenv:metasenv')
in
(proof',goals)
in
- ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality)
+ ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (_rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality)
let rewrite_simpl_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (rewrite_simpl_tac ~direction ~pattern equality)
;;
-let replace_tac ~pattern ~with_what =
- let replace_tac ~pattern:(wanted,hyps_pat,concl_pat) ~with_what status =
+let replace_tac ~(pattern: ProofEngineTypes.lazy_pattern) ~with_what =
+ let replace_tac ~(pattern: ProofEngineTypes.lazy_pattern) ~with_what status =
+ let _wanted, hyps_pat, concl_pat = pattern in
let (proof, goal) = status in
let module C = Cic in
let module U = UriManager in
ProofEngineHelpers.select ~metasenv ~ugraph:CicUniv.empty_ugraph
~conjecture ~pattern in
let metasenv = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst_metasenv subst metasenv in
+ let with_what, metasenv, u = with_what context metasenv u in
let with_what = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst with_what in
let pbo = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst pbo in
let pty = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst pty in
metasenv context with_what CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
let whats =
match selected_terms_with_context with
- [] -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Replace: no term selected")
+ [] -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "Replace: no term selected"))
| l ->
List.map
(fun (context_of_t,t) ->
(*CSC: we could implement something stronger by completely changing
the semantics of the tactic *)
raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail
- "Replace: one of the selected terms is not closed") in
+ (lazy "Replace: one of the selected terms is not closed")) in
let ty_of_t_in_context,u = (* TASSI: FIXME *)
CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context t_in_context
CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
ty_of_with_what ty_of_t_in_context u in
if b then
let concl_pat_for_t = ProofEngineHelpers.pattern_of ~term:ty [t] in
- let pattern_for_t = None,[],concl_pat_for_t in
+ let pattern_for_t = None,[],Some concl_pat_for_t in
t_in_context,pattern_for_t
else
raise
(ProofEngineTypes.Fail
- "Replace: one of the selected terms and the term to be replaced with have not convertible types")
+ (lazy "Replace: one of the selected terms and the term to be replaced with have not convertible types"))
) l in
let rec aux n whats status =
match whats with
[] -> ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic T.id_tac status
- | (what,pattern)::tl ->
+ | (what,lazy_pattern)::tl ->
let what = CicSubstitution.lift n what in
let with_what = CicSubstitution.lift n with_what in
let ty_of_with_what = CicSubstitution.lift n ty_of_with_what in
~continuations:[
T.then_
~start:(
- rewrite_tac ~direction:`LeftToRight ~pattern (C.Rel 1))
+ rewrite_tac ~direction:`LeftToRight ~pattern:lazy_pattern (C.Rel 1))
~continuation:(
T.then_
~start:(
~term: (C.Const (LibraryObjects.sym_eq_URI uri, [])))
(proof,goal)
- | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Symmetry failed")
+ | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "Symmetry failed"))
in
ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic symmetry_tac
;;
[PrimitiveTactics.exact_tac ~term ; T.id_tac ; T.id_tac])
status
- | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Transitivity failed")
+ | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "Transitivity failed"))
in
ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (transitivity_tac ~term)
;;