open ProofEngineHelpers
open ProofEngineTypes
+exception TheTypeOfTheCurrentGoalIsAMetaICannotChooseTheRightElimiantionPrinciple
exception NotAnInductiveTypeToEliminate
-exception NotTheRightEliminatorShape
-exception NoHypothesesFound
exception WrongUriToVariable of string
(* lambda_abstract newmeta ty *)
in
(context',ty,C.LetIn(n,s,bo))
| _ as t ->
- let irl =
+ if howmany <= 0 then
+ let irl =
CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context
- in
- context, t, (C.Meta (newmeta,irl))
+ in
+ context, t, (C.Meta (newmeta,irl))
+ else
+ raise (Fail "intro(s): not enough products or let-ins")
in
collect_context context howmany ty
old_uninst,((i,canonical_context',ty')::new_uninst)
) metasenv ([],[])
-(* Auxiliary function for apply: given a type (a backbone), it returns its *)
-(* head, a META environment in which there is new a META for each hypothesis,*)
-(* a list of arguments for the new applications and the indexes of the first *)
-(* and last new METAs introduced. The nth argument in the list of arguments *)
-(* is just the nth new META. *)
-let new_metasenv_for_apply newmeta proof context ty =
- let module C = Cic in
- let module S = CicSubstitution in
- let rec aux newmeta ty =
- let ty' = (*CicReduction.whd context*) ty in
- match ty' with
- C.Cast (he,_) -> aux newmeta he
-(* CSC: patch to generate ?1 : ?2 : Type in place of ?1 : Type to simulate ?1 :< Type
- (* If the expected type is a Type, then also Set is OK ==>
- * we accept any term of type Type *)
- (*CSC: BUG HERE: in this way it is possible for the term of
- * type Type to be different from a Sort!!! *)
- | C.Prod (name,(C.Sort (C.Type _) as s),t) ->
- (* TASSI: ask CSC if BUG HERE refers to the C.Cast or C.Propd case *)
- let irl =
- CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context
- in
- let newargument = C.Meta (newmeta+1,irl) in
- let (res,newmetasenv,arguments,lastmeta) =
- aux (newmeta + 2) (S.subst newargument t)
- in
- res,
- (newmeta,[],s)::(newmeta+1,context,C.Meta (newmeta,[]))::newmetasenv,
- newargument::arguments,lastmeta
-*)
- | C.Prod (name,s,t) ->
- let irl =
- CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context
- in
- let newargument = C.Meta (newmeta,irl) in
- let (res,newmetasenv,arguments,lastmeta) =
- aux (newmeta + 1) (S.subst newargument t)
- in
- res,(newmeta,context,s)::newmetasenv,newargument::arguments,lastmeta
- | t -> t,[],[],newmeta
- in
- (* WARNING: here we are using the invariant that above the most *)
- (* recente new_meta() there are no used metas. *)
- let (res,newmetasenv,arguments,lastmeta) = aux newmeta ty in
- res,newmetasenv,arguments,lastmeta
-
(* Useful only inside apply_tac *)
let
generalize_exp_named_subst_with_fresh_metas context newmeta uri exp_named_subst
[],[] -> []
| uri::tl,[] ->
let ty =
- let o,_ = CicEnvironment.get_obj CicUniv.empty_ugraph uri in
+ let o,_ = CicEnvironment.get_obj CicUniv.empty_ugraph uri in
match o with
- C.Variable (_,_,ty,_,_) ->
- CicSubstitution.subst_vars !exp_named_subst_diff ty
- | _ -> raise (WrongUriToVariable (UriManager.string_of_uri uri))
+ C.Variable (_,_,ty,_,_) ->
+ CicSubstitution.subst_vars !exp_named_subst_diff ty
+ | _ -> raise (WrongUriToVariable (UriManager.string_of_uri uri))
in
(* CSC: patch to generate ?1 : ?2 : Type in place of ?1 : Type to simulate ?1 :< Type
(match ty with
let subst_item = uri,C.Meta (fresh_meta',[]) in
newmetasenvfragment :=
(fresh_meta,[],C.Sort (C.Type (CicUniv.fresh()))) ::
- (* TASSI: ?? *)
+ (* TASSI: ?? *)
(fresh_meta',[],C.Meta (fresh_meta,[])) :: !newmetasenvfragment ;
exp_named_subst_diff := !exp_named_subst_diff @ [subst_item] ;
subst_item::(aux (tl,[]))
new_fresh_meta,newmetasenvfragment,exp_named_subst',exp_named_subst_diff
;;
-let new_metasenv_and_unify_and_t newmeta' metasenv' proof context term' ty termty =
- let (consthead,newmetas,arguments,_) =
- new_metasenv_for_apply newmeta' proof context termty
- in
- let newmetasenv = metasenv'@newmetas in
+let new_metasenv_and_unify_and_t newmeta' metasenv' context term' ty termty goal_arity =
+ let (consthead,newmetasenv,arguments,_) =
+ saturate_term newmeta' metasenv' context termty goal_arity in
let subst,newmetasenv',_ =
- CicUnification.fo_unif newmetasenv context consthead ty CicUniv.empty_ugraph
+ CicUnification.fo_unif newmetasenv context consthead ty CicUniv.empty_ugraph
in
let t =
- if List.length newmetas = 0 then term' else Cic.Appl (term'::arguments)
+ if List.length arguments = 0 then term' else Cic.Appl (term'::arguments)
in
subst,newmetasenv',t
-let apply_tac_verbose ~term (proof, goal) =
+let rec count_prods context ty =
+ match CicReduction.whd context ty with
+ Cic.Prod (n,s,t) -> 1 + count_prods (Some (n,Cic.Decl s)::context) t
+ | _ -> 0
+
+let apply_tac_verbose_with_subst ~term (proof, goal) =
(* Assumption: The term "term" must be closed in the current context *)
let module T = CicTypeChecker in
let module R = CicReduction in
in
let metasenv' = metasenv@newmetasenvfragment in
let termty,_ =
- CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context term CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
- let termty =
- CicSubstitution.subst_vars exp_named_subst_diff termty
+ CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context term' CicUniv.empty_ugraph
in
+ let termty =
+ CicSubstitution.subst_vars exp_named_subst_diff termty in
+ let goal_arity = count_prods context ty in
let subst,newmetasenv',t =
+ let rec add_one_argument n =
try
- new_metasenv_and_unify_and_t newmeta' metasenv' proof context term' ty
- termty
- with CicUnification.UnificationFailure _ ->
- new_metasenv_and_unify_and_t newmeta' metasenv' proof context term' ty
- (CicReduction.whd context termty)
+ new_metasenv_and_unify_and_t newmeta' metasenv' context term' ty
+ termty n
+ with CicUnification.UnificationFailure _ when n > 0 ->
+ add_one_argument (n - 1)
+ in
+ add_one_argument goal_arity
in
let in_subst_domain i = List.exists (function (j,_) -> i=j) subst in
let apply_subst = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst in
let newmetasenv'' = new_uninstantiatedmetas@old_uninstantiatedmetas in
let subst_in =
(* if we just apply the subtitution, the type is irrelevant:
- we may use Implicit, since it will be dropped *)
+ we may use Implicit, since it will be dropped *)
CicMetaSubst.apply_subst ((metano,(context,bo',Cic.Implicit None))::subst)
in
let (newproof, newmetasenv''') =
subst_meta_and_metasenv_in_proof proof metano subst_in newmetasenv''
in
- (subst_in,
- (newproof,
- List.map (function (i,_,_) -> i) new_uninstantiatedmetas))
+ (((metano,(context,bo',Cic.Implicit None))::subst)(* subst_in *), (* ALB *)
+ (newproof,
+ List.map (function (i,_,_) -> i) new_uninstantiatedmetas))
-let apply_tac ~term status = snd (apply_tac_verbose ~term status)
-let apply_tac_verbose ~term status =
+(* ALB *)
+let apply_tac_verbose_with_subst ~term status =
try
- apply_tac_verbose ~term status
+(* apply_tac_verbose ~term status *)
+ apply_tac_verbose_with_subst ~term status
(* TODO cacciare anche altre eccezioni? *)
- with CicUnification.UnificationFailure _ as e ->
- raise (Fail (Printexc.to_string e))
+ with
+ | CicUnification.UnificationFailure _ as e ->
+ raise (Fail (Printexc.to_string e))
+ | CicTypeChecker.TypeCheckerFailure _ as e ->
+ raise (Fail (Printexc.to_string e))
+
+(* ALB *)
+let apply_tac_verbose ~term status =
+ let subst, status = apply_tac_verbose_with_subst ~term status in
+ (CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst), status
+
+let apply_tac ~term status = snd (apply_tac_verbose ~term status)
(* TODO per implementare i tatticali e' necessario che tutte le tattiche
sollevino _solamente_ Fail *)
try
apply_tac ~term status
(* TODO cacciare anche altre eccezioni? *)
- with CicUnification.UnificationFailure _ as e ->
- raise (Fail (Printexc.to_string e))
+ with
+ | CicUnification.UnificationFailure _ as e ->
+ raise (Fail (Printexc.to_string e))
+ | CicTypeChecker.TypeCheckerFailure _ as e ->
+ raise (Fail (Printexc.to_string e))
in
mk_tactic (apply_tac ~term)
in
mk_tactic (intros_tac ~mk_fresh_name_callback ())
-let cut_tac?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[]) ~term=
+let cut_tac ?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[]) term =
let cut_tac
?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[])
term (proof, goal)
in
mk_tactic (cut_tac ~mk_fresh_name_callback term)
-let letin_tac ?(mk_fresh_name_callback=FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[]) ~term=
+let letin_tac ?(mk_fresh_name_callback=FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[]) term =
let letin_tac
?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[])
term (proof, goal)
let (curi,metasenv,proofbo,proofty) = proof in
let metano,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let termty,_ = T.type_of_aux' metasenv context term CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
- (* TASSI: FIXME *)
+ let (termty,metasenv',arguments,fresh_meta) =
+ ProofEngineHelpers.saturate_term
+ (ProofEngineHelpers.new_meta_of_proof proof) metasenv context termty 0 in
+ let term = if arguments = [] then term else Cic.Appl (term::arguments) in
let uri,exp_named_subst,typeno,args =
match termty with
C.MutInd (uri,typeno,exp_named_subst) -> (uri,exp_named_subst,typeno,[])
let eliminator_uri =
let buri = U.buri_of_uri uri in
let name =
- let o,_ = CicEnvironment.get_obj CicUniv.empty_ugraph uri in
+ let o,_ = CicEnvironment.get_obj CicUniv.empty_ugraph uri in
match o with
C.InductiveDefinition (tys,_,_,_) ->
let (name,_,_,_) = List.nth tys typeno in
name
| _ -> assert false
in
- let ty_ty,_ = T.type_of_aux' metasenv context ty CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
- (* TASSI: FIXME *)
+ let ty_ty,_ = T.type_of_aux' metasenv' context ty CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
let ext =
match ty_ty with
C.Sort C.Prop -> "_ind"
| C.Sort C.Set -> "_rec"
| C.Sort C.CProp -> "_rec"
| C.Sort (C.Type _)-> "_rect"
+ | C.Meta (_,_) -> raise TheTypeOfTheCurrentGoalIsAMetaICannotChooseTheRightElimiantionPrinciple
| _ -> assert false
in
U.uri_of_string (buri ^ "/" ^ name ^ ext ^ ".con")
in
let eliminator_ref = C.Const (eliminator_uri,exp_named_subst) in
let ety,_ =
- T.type_of_aux' metasenv context eliminator_ref CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
+ T.type_of_aux' metasenv' context eliminator_ref CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
let rec find_args_no =
function
C.Prod (_,_,t) -> 1 + find_args_no t
C.Appl (eliminator_ref :: make_tl term (args_no - 1))
in
let metasenv', term_to_refine' =
- CicMkImplicit.expand_implicits metasenv [] context term_to_refine in
- let refined_term,_,metasenv'',_ = (* TASSI: FIXME *)
+ CicMkImplicit.expand_implicits metasenv' [] context term_to_refine in
+ let refined_term,_,metasenv'',_ =
CicRefine.type_of_aux' metasenv' context term_to_refine'
- CicUniv.empty_ugraph
+ CicUniv.empty_ugraph
in
let new_goals =
ProofEngineHelpers.compare_metasenvs
mk_tactic (elim_tac ~term)
;;
-let elim_intros_tac ~term =
- Tacticals.then_ ~start:(elim_tac ~term)
- ~continuation:(intros_tac ())
+let elim_intros_tac ?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[])
+ ?depth ?using what =
+ Tacticals.then_ ~start:(elim_tac ~term:what)
+ ~continuation:(intros_tac ~mk_fresh_name_callback ?howmany:depth ())
;;
(* The simplification is performed only on the conclusion *)
-let elim_intros_simpl_tac ~term =
- Tacticals.then_ ~start:(elim_tac ~term)
+let elim_intros_simpl_tac ?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[])
+ ?depth ?using what =
+ Tacticals.then_ ~start:(elim_tac ~term:what)
~continuation:
(Tacticals.thens
- ~start:(intros_tac ())
+ ~start:(intros_tac ~mk_fresh_name_callback ?howmany:depth ())
~continuations:
- [ReductionTactics.simpl_tac ~also_in_hypotheses:false ~terms:None])
+ [ReductionTactics.simpl_tac
+ ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern None)])
;;
-
-exception NotConvertible
-
-(*CSC: Bug (or feature?). [with_what] is parsed in the context of the goal, *)
-(*CSC: while [what] can have a richer context (because of binders) *)
-(*CSC: So it is _NOT_ possible to use those binders in the [with_what] term. *)
-(*CSC: Is that evident? Is that right? Or should it be changed? *)
-let change_tac ~what ~with_what =
- let change_tac ~what ~with_what (proof, goal) =
- let curi,metasenv,pbo,pty = proof in
- let metano,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
- (* are_convertible works only on well-typed terms *)
- let _,u =
- CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context with_what
- CicUniv.empty_ugraph
- in (* TASSI: FIXME *)
- let b,_ =
- CicReduction.are_convertible context what with_what u
- in
- if b then
- begin
- let replace =
- ProofEngineReduction.replace
- ~equality:(==) ~what:[what] ~with_what:[with_what]
- in
- let ty' = replace ty in
- let context' =
- List.map
- (function
- Some (name,Cic.Def (t,None))->
- Some (name,Cic.Def ((replace t),None))
- | Some (name,Cic.Decl t) -> Some (name,Cic.Decl (replace t))
- | None -> None
- | Some (_,Cic.Def (_,Some _)) -> assert false
- ) context
- in
- let metasenv' =
- List.map
- (function
- (n,_,_) when n = metano -> (metano,context',ty')
- | _ as t -> t
- ) metasenv
- in
- (curi,metasenv',pbo,pty), [metano]
- end
- else
- raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Not convertible")
- in
- mk_tactic (change_tac ~what ~with_what)
-