in
C.CoFix (i, substitutedfl)
and substaux_in_exp_named_subst params exp_named_subst' m =
- (*CSC: Idea di Andrea di ordinare compatibilmente con l'ordine dei params
- let ens' =
- List.map (function (uri,t) -> uri, unwind_aux m t) exp_named_subst' @
- (*CSC: qui liftiamo tutti gli ens anche se magari me ne servono la meta'!!! *)
- List.map (function (uri,t) -> uri, CicSubstitution.lift m t) ens
- in
- let rec filter_and_lift =
- function
- [] -> []
- | uri::tl ->
- let r = filter_and_lift tl in
- (try
- (uri,(List.assq uri ens'))::r
- with
- Not_found -> r
- )
- in
- filter_and_lift params
- *)
-
- (*CSC: invece di concatenare sarebbe meglio rispettare l'ordine dei params *)
- (*CSC: e' vero???? una veloce prova non sembra confermare la teoria *)
-
- (*CSC: codice copiato e modificato dalla cicSubstitution.subst_vars *)
- (*CSC: codice altamente inefficiente *)
+ (*CSC: codice copiato e modificato dalla cicSubstitution.subst_vars *)
let rec filter_and_lift already_instantiated =
function
[] -> []
(uri,CicSubstitution.lift m (RS.from_ens_for_unwind ~unwind t)) ::
(filter_and_lift (uri::already_instantiated) tl)
| _::tl -> filter_and_lift already_instantiated tl
-(*
- | (uri,_)::tl ->
-debug_print (lazy ("---- SKIPPO " ^ UriManager.string_of_uri uri)) ;
-if List.for_all (function (uri',_) -> not (UriManager.eq uri uri'))
-exp_named_subst' then debug_print (lazy "---- OK1") ;
-debug_print (lazy ("++++ uri " ^ UriManager.string_of_uri uri ^ " not in " ^ String.concat " ; " (List.map UriManager.string_of_uri params))) ;
-if List.mem uri params then debug_print (lazy "---- OK2") ;
- filter_and_lift tl
-*)
in
- List.map (function (uri,t) -> uri, unwind_aux m t) exp_named_subst' @
- (filter_and_lift [] (List.rev ens))
+ let res =
+ List.map (function (uri,t) -> uri, unwind_aux m t) exp_named_subst' @
+ (filter_and_lift [] (List.rev ens))
+ in
+ let rec reorder =
+ function
+ [] -> []
+ | uri::tl ->
+ let he =
+ try
+ [uri,List.assoc uri res]
+ with
+ Not_found -> []
+ in
+ he@reorder tl
+ in
+ reorder params
in
unwind_aux m t
*)
aux test_equality_only context t1 term' ugraph
with CicUtil.Subst_not_found _ -> false,ugraph)
- (* TASSI: CONSTRAINTS *)
- | (C.Sort (C.Type t1), C.Sort (C.Type t2)) when test_equality_only ->
+ | (C.Sort (C.Type t1), C.Sort (C.Type t2))
+ | (C.Sort (C.CProp t1), C.Sort (C.CProp t2)) when test_equality_only ->
(try
true,(CicUniv.add_eq t2 t1 ugraph)
with CicUniv.UniverseInconsistency _ -> false,ugraph)
- (* TASSI: CONSTRAINTS *)
- | (C.Sort (C.Type t1), C.Sort (C.Type t2)) ->
+ | (C.Sort (C.Type t1), C.Sort (C.Type t2))
+ | (C.Sort (C.CProp t1), C.Sort (C.CProp t2)) ->
+ (try
+ true,(CicUniv.add_ge t2 t1 ugraph)
+ with CicUniv.UniverseInconsistency _ -> false,ugraph)
+ | (C.Sort (C.CProp t1), C.Sort (C.Type t2)) when not test_equality_only ->
+ (try
+ true,(CicUniv.add_gt t2 t1 ugraph)
+ with CicUniv.UniverseInconsistency _ -> false,ugraph)
+ | (C.Sort (C.Type t1), C.Sort (C.CProp t2)) when not test_equality_only ->
(try
true,(CicUniv.add_ge t2 t1 ugraph)
with CicUniv.UniverseInconsistency _ -> false,ugraph)
- (* TASSI: CONSTRAINTS *)
- | (C.Sort s1, C.Sort (C.Type _)) -> (not test_equality_only),ugraph
- (* TASSI: CONSTRAINTS *)
+ | (C.Sort s1, C.Sort (C.Type _))
+ | (C.Sort s1, C.Sort (C.CProp _)) -> (not test_equality_only),ugraph
| (C.Sort s1, C.Sort s2) -> (s1 = s2),ugraph
| (C.Prod (name1,s1,t1), C.Prod(_,s2,t2)) ->
let b',ugraph' = aux true context s1 s2 ugraph in
else
false,ugraph
| (C.Lambda (name1,s1,t1), C.Lambda(_,s2,t2)) ->
- let b',ugraph' = aux test_equality_only context s1 s2 ugraph in
+ let b',ugraph' = aux true context s1 s2 ugraph in
if b' then
aux test_equality_only ((Some (name1, (C.Decl s1)))::context)
t1 t2 ugraph'