apply_subst_gen ~appl_fun s t
;;
+let profiler = HExtlib.profile "U/CicMetaSubst.apply_subst"
+let apply_subst s t =
+ profiler.HExtlib.profile (apply_subst s) t
+
+
let rec apply_subst_context subst context =
(*
incr apply_subst_context_counter;
function
C.Rel m ->
if m <=k then
- C.Rel m (*CSC: che succede se c'e' un Def? Dovrebbe averlo gia' *)
- (*CSC: deliftato la regola per il LetIn *)
- (*CSC: FALSO! La regola per il LetIn non lo fa *)
+ C.Rel m
else
(try
match List.nth context (m-k-1) with
Some (_,C.Def (t,_)) ->
(*CSC: Hmmm. This bit of reduction is not in the spirit of *)
(*CSC: first order unification. Does it help or does it harm? *)
+ (*CSC: ANSWER: it hurts performances since it is possible to *)
+ (*CSC: have an exponential explosion of the size of the proof.*)
+ (*CSC: However, without this bit of reduction some "apply" in *)
+ (*CSC: the library fail (e.g. nat/nth_prime.ma). *)
deliftaux k (S.lift m t)
| Some (_,C.Decl t) ->
C.Rel ((position (m-k) l) + k)
(List.map
(function Some t -> ppterm subst t | None -> "_") l
)))); *)
- raise (Uncertain (lazy (sprintf
+ let msg = (lazy (sprintf
"Error trying to abstract %s over [%s]: the algorithm only tried to abstract over bound variables"
(ppterm subst t)
(String.concat "; "
(List.map
(function Some t -> ppterm subst t | None -> "_")
- l)))))
+ l))))
+ in
+ if
+ (*CSC: WARNING: if we are working up to reduction (I do not think so),
+ the following test should be replaced with "all the terms in l are
+ meta-closed" *)
+ not
+ (List.exists (function Some (Cic.Meta _) -> true | _ -> false ) l)
+ then
+ raise (MetaSubstFailure msg)
+ else
+ raise (Uncertain msg)
in
let (metasenv, subst) = restrict subst !to_be_restricted metasenv in
res, metasenv, subst