(B.b_kw "by")::B.b_space::
B.Text([],"(")::pres_args@[B.Text([],")")]), None
else
- (*(B.b_kw "by"),
- Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";proof2pres true term2pres p])*)
- proof2pres true term2pres p, None
+ B.H([],[B.b_kw "by"; B.b_space; B.b_kw "proof"]),
+ Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";B.indent (proof2pres true term2pres p)])
and proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas is_top_down term2pres p =
- let rec proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down p omit_dot =
+ let rec proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down p in_bu_conversion =
let indent =
let is_decl e =
(match e with
let body =
let presconclude =
conclude2pres
- ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal:
- (match skip_initial_lambdas_internal with
- Some (`Later s) -> Some (`Now s)
- | _ -> None)
- is_top_down
- p.Con.proof_name p.Con.proof_conclude indent omit_conclusion
- omit_dot in
+ ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal:
+ (match skip_initial_lambdas_internal with
+ Some (`Later s) -> Some (`Now s)
+ | _ -> None)
+ is_top_down p.Con.proof_name p.Con.proof_conclude indent
+ omit_conclusion in_bu_conversion in
let presacontext =
acontext2pres
- (p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion")
- p.Con.proof_apply_context
- presconclude indent
+ (if p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" then
+ is_top_down
+ else
+ false)
+ p.Con.proof_apply_context
+ presconclude indent
(p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion")
in
context2pres
| _ -> p.Con.proof_context)
presacontext
in
+let body = B.V([],[B.b_kw ("(*<<" ^ p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method ^ (if is_top_down then "(TD)" else "(NTD)") ^ "*)"); body; B.b_kw "(*>>*)"]) in
match p.Con.proof_name with
None -> body
| Some name ->
[] -> in_bu_conversion
| p::_ -> p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion"
in
- let hd =
- if indent then
- B.indent (proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion)
- else
- proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion
- in
- B.V([Some "helm","xref",p.Con.proof_id],
+ let hd = proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion in
+ let hd = if indent then B.indent hd else hd in
+ B.V([Some "helm","xref",p.Con.proof_id],
[B.H([Some "helm","xref","ace_"^p.Con.proof_id],[hd]);
continuation])
in aux ac
- and conclude2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down name conclude indent omit_conclusion omit_dot =
+ and conclude2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down name conclude indent omit_conclusion in_bu_conversion =
let tconclude_body =
match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
Some t (*when not omit_conclusion or
if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac"
|| conclude.Con.conclude_method = "ByInduction"
|| conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion"
+ || conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Eq_chain"
then
B.Text([],"")
else if omit_conclusion then
B.H([], [B.b_kw "done" ; B.Text([],".") ])
else
B.b_hv []
- ((if not is_top_down || omit_dot then
+ ((if not is_top_down || in_bu_conversion then
(make_concl "we proved" concl) ::
if not is_top_down then
let name = get_name ~default:"previous" name in
[B.b_space; B.Text([],"(" ^ name ^ ")")]
else []
else [B.b_kw "done"]
- ) @ if not omit_dot then [B.Text([],".")] else [])
+ ) @ if not in_bu_conversion then [B.Text([],".")] else [])
in
B.V ([], prequel @ [conclude_body; ann_concl])
| _ -> conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down conclude
(match (List.nth conclude.Con.conclude_args 6) with
Con.ArgProof p -> justification term2pres p
| _ -> assert false) in
+ let justif =
+ match justif2 with
+ None -> justif1
+ | Some j -> j
+ in
let term1 =
(match List.nth conclude.Con.conclude_args 2 with
Con.Term (_,t) -> term2pres t
B.b_space; justif1])::
match justif2 with None -> [] | Some j -> [B.indent j])
*)
- if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteLR" && is_top_down)
- || (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteRL" && not is_top_down) then
- B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term1 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term2; B.b_kw ") (equality)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
- else
- B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw ") (equality)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
+ if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteLR" && is_top_down)
+ || (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteRL" && not is_top_down) then
+ B.V([], [justif ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term1 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term2; B.b_kw ") (equality)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
+ else
+ B.V([], [justif ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw ") (equality)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
(*CSC: bad idea
B.V([], [B.H([],[B.b_kw "obtain fooo " ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw "by" ; B.b_kw "proof" ; B.Text([],"."); justif1])]) *)
else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Eq_chain" then
let justification p =
-(*
- if skip_initial_lambdas <> None (* cheating *) then
- [B.b_kw "by _"]
- else
-*)
- let j1,j2 = justification term2pres p in
- j1 :: B.b_space :: (match j2 with Some j -> [j] | None -> [])
+ let j1,j2 = justification term2pres p in
+ [j1], match j2 with Some j -> [j] | None -> []
in
let rec aux args =
match args with
| [] -> []
| (Con.ArgProof p)::(Con.Term (_,t))::tl ->
- B.HOV(RenderingAttrs.indent_attributes `BoxML,([B.b_kw
- "=";B.b_space;term2pres t;B.b_space]@justification p@
- (if tl <> [] then [B.Text ([],".")] else [])))::(aux tl)
+ let justif1,justif2 = justification p in
+ B.HOV(RenderingAttrs.indent_attributes `BoxML,([B.b_kw
+ "=";B.b_space;term2pres t;B.b_space]@justif1@
+ (if tl <> [] then [B.Text ([],".")] else [B.b_space; B.b_kw "done" ; B.Text([],".")])@
+ justif2))::(aux tl)
| _ -> assert false
in
let hd =
projects / helm.git / blobdiff