B.H([],
(B.b_kw "by")::B.b_space::
B.Text([],"(")::pres_args@[B.Text([],")")]), None
- else (B.b_kw "by"),
- Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";proof2pres true term2pres p])
+ else
+ (*(B.b_kw "by"),
+ Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";proof2pres true term2pres p])*)
+ proof2pres true term2pres p, None
and proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas is_top_down term2pres p =
let rec proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down p omit_dot =
term])
and acontext2pres is_top_down ac continuation indent in_bu_conversion =
- List.fold_right
- (fun p continuation ->
+ let rec aux =
+ function
+ [] -> continuation
+ | p::tl ->
+ let continuation = aux tl in
+ (* Applicative context get flattened and the "body" of a BU_Conversion
+ is put in the applicative context. Thus two different situations
+ are possible:
+ {method = "BU_Conversion"; applicative_context=[p1; ...; pn]}
+ {method = xxx; applicative_context =
+ [ p1; ...; pn; {method="BU_Conversion"} ; p_{n+1}; ... ; pm ]}
+ In both situations only pn must be processed in in_bu_conversion
+ mode
+ *)
+ let in_bu_conversion =
+ match tl with
+ [] -> in_bu_conversion
+ | p::_ -> p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion"
+ in
let hd =
if indent then
B.indent (proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion)
else
proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion
in
- B.V([Some "helm","xref",p.Con.proof_id],
- [B.H([Some "helm","xref","ace_"^p.Con.proof_id],[hd]);
- continuation])) ac continuation
+ B.V([Some "helm","xref",p.Con.proof_id],
+ [B.H([Some "helm","xref","ace_"^p.Con.proof_id],[hd]);
+ continuation])
+ in aux ac
and conclude2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down name conclude indent omit_conclusion omit_dot =
let tconclude_body =
else
[] in
let conclude_body =
- conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude in
+ conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down conclude in
let ann_concl =
if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac"
|| conclude.Con.conclude_method = "ByInduction"
B.Text([],"")
else if omit_conclusion then
B.H([], [B.b_kw "done" ; B.Text([],".") ])
- else B.b_hv []
- ((if not is_top_down || omit_dot then [make_concl "we proved"
- concl; B.Text([],if not is_top_down then "(previous)" else "")]
- else [B.b_kw "done"]) @ if not omit_dot then [B.Text([],".")] else [])
+ else
+ B.b_hv []
+ ((if not is_top_down || omit_dot then
+ (make_concl "we proved" concl) ::
+ if not is_top_down then
+ [B.b_space; B.Text([],"(previous)")]
+ else []
+ else [B.b_kw "done"]
+ ) @ if not omit_dot then [B.Text([],".")] else [])
in
- B.V ([], prequel @ [conclude_body; ann_concl])
- | _ -> conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude
+ B.V ([], prequel @ [conclude_body; ann_concl])
+ | _ -> conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down conclude
in
if indent then
B.indent (B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],
else
B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],[tconclude_body])
- and conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude =
+ and conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down conclude =
if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion" then
let expected =
(match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
andind conclude
else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "FalseInd") then
falseind conclude
- else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Rewrite") then
+ else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteLR"
+ || conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteRL" then
let justif1,justif2 =
(match (List.nth conclude.Con.conclude_args 6) with
Con.ArgProof p -> justification term2pres p
B.b_space; term2;
B.b_space; justif1])::
match justif2 with None -> [] | Some j -> [B.indent j])
-*) B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw ") (previous)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
+*)
+ if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteLR" && is_top_down)
+ || (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "RewriteRL" && not is_top_down) then
+ B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term1 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term2; B.b_kw ") (equality)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
+ else
+ B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw ") (equality)."]); B.b_kw "by _"])
+(*CSC: bad idea
+ B.V([], [B.H([],[B.b_kw "obtain fooo " ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw "by" ; B.b_kw "proof" ; B.Text([],"."); justif1])]) *)
else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Eq_chain" then
let justification p =
(*
| _ -> assert false in
let hyps = List.map make_hyp indhyps in
text::hyps) in
- (* let acontext =
- acontext2pres_old p.Con.proof_apply_context true in *)
let body =
conclude2pres true p.Con.proof_name p.Con.proof_conclude true true false in
let presacontext =
[ B.Object ([], P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)); B.skip;
B.b_kw "is contradictory, hence" ]
| _ -> assert false) in
- (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} false in *)
make_row arg proof_conclusion
and andind conclude =
B.Text([],")");
B.skip;
term2pres hyp2.Con.dec_type]) in
- (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} false in *)
- let body= conclude2pres false proof.Con.proof_name proof.Con.proof_conclude false true false in
+ let body =
+ conclude2pres false proof.Con.proof_name proof.Con.proof_conclude
+ false true false in
let presacontext =
acontext2pres false proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false false
in
B.Text([],")");
B.skip;
term2pres hyp.Con.dec_type]) in
- (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} false in *)
- let body= conclude2pres false proof.Con.proof_name proof.Con.proof_conclude false true false in
+ let body =
+ conclude2pres false proof.Con.proof_name proof.Con.proof_conclude
+ false true false in
let presacontext =
acontext2pres false proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false false
in
projects / helm.git / blobdiff