bs_cotransitive: cotransitive ? bs_apart
}.
-notation "hvbox(a break # b)" non associative with precedence 50
+notation "hvbox(a break # b)" non associative with precedence 45
for @{ 'apart $a $b}.
-interpretation "bishop_setapartness" 'apart x y =
- (cic:/matita/dama/bishop_set/bs_apart.con _ x y).
+interpretation "bishop set apartness" 'apart x y = (bs_apart _ x y).
definition bishop_set_of_ordered_set: ordered_set → bishop_set.
intros (E); apply (mk_bishop_set E (λa,b:E. a ≰ b ∨ b ≰ a));
(* Definition 2.2 (2) *)
definition eq ≝ λA:bishop_set.λa,b:A. ¬ (a # b).
-notation "hvbox(a break ≈ b)" non associative with precedence 50
+notation "hvbox(a break \approx b)" non associative with precedence 45
for @{ 'napart $a $b}.
-interpretation "Bishop set alikeness" 'napart a b =
- (cic:/matita/dama/bishop_set/eq.con _ a b).
+interpretation "Bishop set alikeness" 'napart a b = (eq _ a b).
lemma eq_reflexive:∀E:bishop_set. reflexive ? (eq E).
intros (E); unfold; intros (x); apply bs_coreflexive;
lemma eq_sym:∀E:bishop_set.∀x,y:E.x ≈ y → y ≈ x ≝ eq_sym_.
lemma eq_trans_: ∀E:bishop_set.transitive ? (eq E).
-(* bug. intros k deve fare whd quanto basta *)
intros 6 (E x y z Exy Eyz); intro Axy; cases (bs_cotransitive ???y Axy);
[apply Exy|apply Eyz] assumption.
qed.
lemma le_le_eq: ∀E:ordered_set.∀a,b:E. a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a ≈ b.
intros (E x y L1 L2); intro H; cases H; [apply L1|apply L2] assumption;
qed.
+
+definition lt ≝ λE:ordered_set.λa,b:E. a ≤ b ∧ a # b.
+
+interpretation "ordered sets less than" 'lt a b = (lt _ a b).
+
+lemma lt_coreflexive: ∀E.coreflexive ? (lt E).
+intros 2 (E x); intro H; cases H (_ ABS);
+apply (bs_coreflexive ? x ABS);
+qed.
+
+lemma lt_transitive: ∀E.transitive ? (lt E).
+intros (E); unfold; intros (x y z H1 H2); cases H1 (Lxy Axy); cases H2 (Lyz Ayz);
+split; [apply (le_transitive ???? Lxy Lyz)] clear H1 H2;
+cases Axy (H1 H1); cases Ayz (H2 H2); [1:cases (Lxy H1)|3:cases (Lyz H2)]clear Axy Ayz;
+[1: cases (os_cotransitive ??? y H1) (X X); [cases (Lxy X)|cases (os_coreflexive ?? X)]
+|2: cases (os_cotransitive ??? x H2) (X X); [right;assumption|cases (Lxy X)]]
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_to_excess: ∀E:ordered_set.∀a,b:E. (a < b) → (b ≰ a).
+intros (E a b Lab); cases Lab (LEab Aab); cases Aab (H H);[cases (LEab H)]
+assumption;
+qed.
+
+definition bs_subset ≝ λO:bishop_set.λP,Q:O→Prop.∀x:O.P x → Q x.
+
+interpretation "bishop set subset" 'subset a b = (bs_subset _ a b).
+
+definition square_bishop_set : bishop_set → bishop_set.
+intro S; apply (mk_bishop_set (S × S));
+[1: intros (x y); apply ((\fst x # \fst y) ∨ (\snd x # \snd y));
+|2: intro x; simplify; intro; cases H (X X); clear H; apply (bs_coreflexive ?? X);
+|3: intros 2 (x y); simplify; intro H; cases H (X X); clear H; [left|right] apply (bs_symmetric ??? X);
+|4: intros 3 (x y z); simplify; intro H; cases H (X X); clear H;
+ [1: cases (bs_cotransitive ??? (\fst z) X); [left;left|right;left]assumption;
+ |2: cases (bs_cotransitive ??? (\snd z) X); [left;right|right;right]assumption;]]
+qed.
+
+notation "s 2 \atop \neq" non associative with precedence 90
+ for @{ 'square_bs $s }.
+interpretation "bishop set square" 'square x = (square_bishop_set x).
+interpretation "bishop set square" 'square_bs x = (square_bishop_set x).
\ No newline at end of file