(* *)
(**************************************************************************)
-include "Q/q/q.ma".
-include "list/list.ma".
-include "cprop_connectives.ma".
-
-notation "\rationals" non associative with precedence 99 for @{'q}.
-interpretation "Q" 'q = Q.
-
-record q_f : Type ≝ {
- start : ℚ;
- bars: list (ℚ × ℚ) (* base, height *)
-}.
-
-axiom qp : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ.
-
-interpretation "Q plus" 'plus x y = (qp x y).
-
-axiom qm : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ.
-
-interpretation "Q minus" 'minus x y = (qm x y).
-
-axiom qlt : ℚ → ℚ → CProp.
-
-interpretation "Q less than" 'lt x y = (qlt x y).
-
-inductive q_comparison (a,b:ℚ) : CProp ≝
- | q_eq : a = b → q_comparison a b
- | q_lt : a < b → q_comparison a b
- | q_gt : b < a → q_comparison a b.
-
-axiom q_cmp:∀a,b:ℚ.q_comparison a b.
-
-definition qle ≝ λa,b:ℚ.a = b ∨ a < b.
-
-interpretation "Q less or equal than" 'le x y = (qle x y).
-
-notation "'nth'" with precedence 90 for @{'nth}.
-notation < "'nth' \nbsp l \nbsp d \nbsp i" with precedence 71
-for @{'nth_appl $l $d $i}.
-interpretation "list nth" 'nth = (cic:/matita/list/list/nth.con _).
-interpretation "list nth" 'nth_appl l d i = (cic:/matita/list/list/nth.con _ l d i).
-
-notation < "\rationals \sup 2" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'q2}.
-interpretation "Q x Q" 'q2 = (Prod Q Q).
-
-let rec make_list (A:Type) (def:nat→A) (n:nat) on n ≝
- match n with
- [ O ⇒ []
- | S m ⇒ def m :: make_list A def m].
-
-notation "'mk_list'" with precedence 90 for @{'mk_list}.
-interpretation "'mk_list'" 'mk_list = (make_list _).
-notation < "'mk_list' \nbsp f \nbsp n"
-with precedence 71 for @{'mk_list_appl $f $n}.
-interpretation "'mk_list' appl" 'mk_list_appl f n = (make_list _ f n).
-
-definition q0 : ℚ × ℚ ≝ 〈OQ,OQ〉.
-notation < "0 \sub \rationals" with precedence 90 for @{'q0}.
-interpretation "q0" 'q0 = q0.
-
-notation < "[ \rationals \sup 2]" with precedence 90 for @{'lq2}.
-interpretation "lq2" 'lq2 = (list (Prod Q Q)).
-notation < "[ \rationals \sup 2] \sup 2" with precedence 90 for @{'lq22}.
-interpretation "lq22" 'lq22 = (Prod (list (Prod Q Q)) (list (Prod Q Q))).
-
-
-notation "'len'" with precedence 90 for @{'len}.
-interpretation "len" 'len = length.
-notation < "'len' \nbsp l" with precedence 70 for @{'len_appl $l}.
-interpretation "len appl" 'len_appl l = (length _ l).
-
-definition eject ≝
- λP.λp:∃x:(list (ℚ × ℚ)) × (list (ℚ × ℚ)).P x.match p with [ex_introT p _ ⇒ p].
-coercion cic:/matita/dama/models/q_function/eject.con.
-definition inject ≝
- λP.λp:(list (ℚ × ℚ)) × (list (ℚ × ℚ)).λh:P p. ex_introT ? P p h.
-(*coercion inject with 0 1 nocomposites.*)
-coercion cic:/matita/dama/models/q_function/inject.con 0 1 nocomposites.
-
-definition cb0h ≝ (λl.mk_list (λi.〈\fst (nth l q0 i),OQ〉) (length ? l)).
+include "nat_ordered_set.ma".
+include "models/q_shift.ma".
alias symbol "pi2" = "pair pi2".
alias symbol "pi1" = "pair pi1".
-definition rebase:
- q_f → q_f →
- ∃p:q_f × q_f.∀i.
- \fst (nth (bars (\fst p)) q0 i) =
- \fst (nth (bars (\snd p)) q0 i).
-intros (f1 f2); cases f1 (s1 l1); cases f2 (s2 l2); clear f1 f2;
-letin spec ≝ (λl1,l2:list (ℚ × ℚ).λm:nat.λz:(list (ℚ × ℚ)) × (list (ℚ × ℚ)).True);
+definition rebase_spec ≝
+ ∀l1,l2:q_f.∃p:q_f × q_f.
+ And4
+ (start (\fst p) = start (\snd p))
+ (same_bases (bars (\fst p)) (bars (\snd p)))
+ (same_values l1 (\fst p))
+ (same_values l2 (\snd p)).
+
+definition rebase_spec_simpl ≝
+ λstart.λl1,l2:list bar.λp:(list bar) × (list bar).
+ And3
+ (same_bases (\fst p) (\snd p))
+ (same_values (mk_q_f start l1) (mk_q_f start (\fst p)))
+ (same_values (mk_q_f start l2) (mk_q_f start (\snd p))).
+
+(* a local letin makes russell fail *)
+definition cb0h : list bar → list bar ≝
+ λl.mk_list (λi.〈\fst (nth l ▭ i),OQ〉) (len l).
+
+definition eject ≝
+ λP.λp:∃x:(list bar) × (list bar).P x.match p with [ex_introT p _ ⇒ p].
+coercion eject.
+definition inject ≝ λP.λp:(list bar) × (list bar).λh:P p. ex_introT ? P p h.
+coercion inject with 0 1 nocomposites.
+
+axiom devil : False.
+
+definition rebase: rebase_spec.
+intros 2 (f1 f2); cases f1 (s1 l1); cases f2 (s2 l2); clear f1 f2;
+letin spec ≝ (
+ λs.λl1,l2.λm.λz.len l1 + len l2 < m → rebase_spec_simpl s l1 l2 z);
+alias symbol "pi1" (instance 34) = "exT \fst".
+alias symbol "pi1" (instance 21) = "exT \fst".
letin aux ≝ (
-let rec aux (l1,l2:list (ℚ × ℚ)) (n:nat) on n : (list (ℚ × ℚ)) × (list (ℚ × ℚ)) ≝
+let rec aux (l1,l2:list bar) (n:nat) on n : (list bar) × (list bar) ≝
match n with
-[ O ⇒ 〈[],[]〉
-| S m ⇒
+[ O ⇒ 〈 nil ? , nil ? 〉
+| S m ⇒
match l1 with
[ nil ⇒ 〈cb0h l2, l2〉
| cons he1 tl1 ⇒
match l2 with
[ nil ⇒ 〈l1, cb0h l1〉
| cons he2 tl2 ⇒
- let base1 ≝ (\fst he1) in
- let base2 ≝ (\fst he2) in
+ let base1 ≝ Qpos (\fst he1) in
+ let base2 ≝ Qpos (\fst he2) in
let height1 ≝ (\snd he1) in
let height2 ≝ (\snd he2) in
match q_cmp base1 base2 with
- [ q_eq _ ⇒
+ [ q_eq _ ⇒
let rc ≝ aux tl1 tl2 m in
- 〈he1 :: \fst rc,he2 :: \snd rc〉
- | q_lt _ ⇒
+ 〈he1 :: \fst rc,he2 :: \snd rc〉
+ | q_lt Hp ⇒
let rest ≝ base2 - base1 in
- let rc ≝ aux tl1 (〈rest,height2〉 :: tl2) m in
- 〈〈base1,height1〉 :: \fst rc,〈base1,height2〉 :: \snd rc〉
- | q_gt _ ⇒
+ let rc ≝ aux tl1 (〈\fst (unpos rest ?),height2〉 :: tl2) m in
+ 〈〈\fst he1,height1〉 :: \fst rc,〈\fst he1,height2〉 :: \snd rc〉
+ | q_gt Hp ⇒
let rest ≝ base1 - base2 in
- let rc ≝ aux (〈rest,height1〉 :: tl1) tl2 m in
- 〈〈base2,height1〉 :: \fst rc,〈base2,height2〉 :: \snd rc〉
+ let rc ≝ aux (〈\fst (unpos rest ?),height1〉 :: tl1) tl2 m in
+ 〈〈\fst he2,height1〉 :: \fst rc,〈\fst he2,height2〉 :: \snd rc〉
]]]]
-in aux); : ∀l1,l2,m.∃z.spec l1 l2 m z);
+in aux : ∀l1,l2,m.∃z.∀s.spec s l1 l2 m z); unfold spec;
+[9: clearbody aux; unfold spec in aux; clear spec;
+ cases (q_cmp s1 s2);
+ [1: cases (aux l1 l2 (S (len l1 + len l2)));
+ cases (H1 s1 (le_n ?)); clear H1;
+ exists [apply 〈mk_q_f s1 (\fst w), mk_q_f s2 (\snd w)〉] split;
+ [1,2: assumption;
+ |3: intro; apply (H3 input);
+ |4: intro; rewrite > H in H4;
+ rewrite > (H4 input) in ⊢ (? ? % ?); reflexivity;]
+ |2: letin l2' ≝ (〈\fst (unpos (s2-s1) ?),OQ〉::l2);[
+ apply q_lt_minus; rewrite > q_plus_sym; rewrite > q_plus_OQ;
+ assumption]
+ cases (aux l1 l2' (S (len l1 + len l2')));
+ cases (H1 s1 (le_n ?)); clear H1 aux;
+ exists [apply 〈mk_q_f s1 (\fst w), mk_q_f s1 (\snd w)〉] split;
+ [1: reflexivity
+ |2: assumption;
+ |3: assumption;
+ |4: intro;
+ rewrite > (initial_shift_same_values (mk_q_f s2 l2) s1 H input) in ⊢ (? ? % ?);
+ rewrite < (H4 input)in ⊢ (? ? ? %); reflexivity;]
+ |3: letin l1' ≝ (〈\fst (unpos (s1-s2) ?),OQ〉::l1);[
+ apply q_lt_minus; rewrite > q_plus_sym; rewrite > q_plus_OQ;
+ assumption]
+ cases (aux l1' l2 (S (len l1' + len l2)));
+ cases (H1 s2 (le_n ?)); clear H1 aux;
+ exists [apply 〈mk_q_f s2 (\fst w), mk_q_f s2 (\snd w)〉] split;
+ [1: reflexivity
+ |2: assumption;
+ |4: assumption;
+ |3: intro; simplify in ⊢ (? ? ? (? ? ? (? ? ? (? % ?))));
+ rewrite > (initial_shift_same_values (mk_q_f s1 l1) s2 H input) in ⊢ (? ? % ?);
+ rewrite < (H3 input) in ⊢ (? ? ? %); reflexivity;]]
+|1,2: unfold rest; apply q_lt_minus; rewrite > q_plus_sym; rewrite > q_plus_OQ;
+ assumption;
+|8: intros; cases (?:False); apply (not_le_Sn_O ? H1);
+|3: intros; generalize in match (unpos ??); intro X; cases X; clear X;
+ simplify in ⊢ (???? (??? (??? (??? (?? (? (?? (??? % ?) ?) ??)))) ?));
+ simplify in ⊢ (???? (???? (??? (??? (?? (? (?? (??? % ?) ?) ??))))));
+ clear H4; cases (aux (〈w,\snd b〉::l4) l5 n1); clear aux;
+ cut (len (〈w,\snd b〉::l4) + len l5 < n1) as K;[2:
+ simplify in H5; simplify; rewrite > sym_plus in H5; simplify in H5;
+ rewrite > sym_plus in H5; apply le_S_S_to_le; apply H5;]
+ split;
+ [1: simplify in ⊢ (? % ?); simplify in ⊢ (? ? %);
+ cases (H4 s K); clear K H4; intro input; cases input; [reflexivity]
+ simplify; apply H7;
+ |2: simplify in ⊢ (? ? %); cases (H4 s K); clear H4 K H5 spec;
+ intro;
+ (* input < s + b1 || input >= s + b1 *)
+ |3: simplify in ⊢ (? ? %);]
+|4: intros; generalize in match (unpos ??); intro X; cases X; clear X;
+ (* duale del 3 *)
+|5: intros; (* triviale, caso in cui non fa nulla *)
+|6,7: (* casi base in cui allunga la lista più corta *)
+]
+elim devil;
+qed.
+
+include "Q/q/qtimes.ma".
+
+let rec area (l:list bar) on l ≝
+ match l with
+ [ nil ⇒ OQ
+ | cons he tl ⇒ area tl + Qpos (\fst he) * ⅆ[OQ,\snd he]].
+
+alias symbol "pi1" = "exT \fst".
+alias symbol "minus" = "Q minus".
+alias symbol "exists" = "CProp exists".
+definition minus_spec_bar ≝
+ λf,g,h:list bar.
+ same_bases f g → len f = len g →
+ ∀s,i:ℚ. \snd (\fst (value (mk_q_f s h) i)) =
+ \snd (\fst (value (mk_q_f s f) i)) - \snd (\fst (value (mk_q_f s g) i)).
+
+definition minus_spec ≝
+ λf,g:q_f.
+ ∃h:q_f.
+ ∀i:ℚ. \snd (\fst (value h i)) =
+ \snd (\fst (value f i)) - \snd (\fst (value g i)).
+
+definition eject_bar : ∀P:list bar → CProp.(∃l:list bar.P l) → list bar ≝
+ λP.λp.match p with [ex_introT x _ ⇒ x].
+definition inject_bar ≝ ex_introT (list bar).
+
+coercion inject_bar with 0 1 nocomposites.
+coercion eject_bar with 0 0 nocomposites.
+
+lemma minus_q_f : ∀f,g. minus_spec f g.
+intros;
+letin aux ≝ (
+ let rec aux (l1, l2 : list bar) on l1 ≝
+ match l1 with
+ [ nil ⇒ []
+ | cons he1 tl1 ⇒
+ match l2 with
+ [ nil ⇒ []
+ | cons he2 tl2 ⇒ 〈\fst he1, \snd he1 - \snd he2〉 :: aux tl1 tl2]]
+ in aux : ∀l1,l2 : list bar.∃h.minus_spec_bar l1 l2 h);
+[2: intros 4; simplify in H3; destruct H3;
+|3: intros 4; simplify in H3; cases l1 in H2; [2: intro X; simplify in X; destruct X]
+ intros; rewrite > (value_OQ_e (mk_q_f s []) i); [2: reflexivity]
+ rewrite > q_elim_minus; rewrite > q_plus_OQ; reflexivity;
+|1: cases (aux l2 l3); unfold in H2; intros 4;
+ simplify in ⊢ (? ? (? ? ? (? ? ? (? % ?))) ?);
+ cases (q_cmp i (s + Qpos (\fst b)));
+
+
+
+definition excess ≝
+ λf,g.∃i.\snd (\fst (value f i)) < \snd (\fst (value g i)).
-cases (q_cmp s1 s2);
-[1: apply (mk_q_f s1);
-|2: apply (mk_q_f s1); cases l2;
- [1: letin l2' ≝ (
-[1: (* offset: the smallest one *)
- cases