The new coercion from SET to Type0 with higher priority really helps a lot:

[helm.git] / helm / software / matita / contribs / formal_topology / overlap / o-algebra.ma

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/contribs/formal_topology/overlap/o-algebra.ma b/helm/software/matita/contribs/formal_topology/overlap/o-algebra.ma
index 029e93258b8cdf010dafa3e94c722fd5e7933b5b..838876f93f8bef90fbe7aeb0139566863d6e1a6e 100644 (file)
--- a/helm/software/matita/contribs/formal_topology/overlap/o-algebra.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/contribs/formal_topology/overlap/o-algebra.ma
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 (**************************************************************************)
 
 include "categories.ma".
-include "logic/cprop_connectives.ma". 
 
 inductive bool : Type0 := true : bool | false : bool.
 
@@ -52,31 +51,28 @@ interpretation "unary morphism1 comprehension with proof" 'comprehension_by s \e
 (* per il set-indexing vedere capitolo BPTools (foundational tools), Sect. 0.3.4 complete
    lattices, Definizione 0.9 *)
 (* USARE L'ESISTENZIALE DEBOLE *)
-(*alias symbol "comprehension_by" = "unary morphism comprehension with proof".*)
 record OAlgebra : Type2 := {
   oa_P :> SET1;
-  oa_leq : binary_morphism1 oa_P oa_P CPROP; (* CPROP is setoid1, CPROP importante che sia small *)
+  oa_leq : binary_morphism1 oa_P oa_P CPROP;
   oa_overlap: binary_morphism1 oa_P oa_P CPROP;
-  oa_meet: ∀I:SET.unary_morphism2 (arrows2 SET1 I oa_P) oa_P;
-  oa_join: ∀I:SET.unary_morphism2 (arrows2 SET1 I oa_P) oa_P;
+  oa_meet: ∀I:SET.unary_morphism2 (I ⇒ oa_P) oa_P;
+  oa_join: ∀I:SET.unary_morphism2 (I ⇒ oa_P) oa_P;
   oa_one: oa_P;
   oa_zero: oa_P;
   oa_leq_refl: ∀a:oa_P. oa_leq a a; 
   oa_leq_antisym: ∀a,b:oa_P.oa_leq a b → oa_leq b a → a = b;
   oa_leq_trans: ∀a,b,c:oa_P.oa_leq a b → oa_leq b c → oa_leq a c;
   oa_overlap_sym: ∀a,b:oa_P.oa_overlap a b → oa_overlap b a;
-  (* Errore: = in oa_meet_inf e oa_join_sup *)
-  oa_meet_inf: ∀I.∀p_i.∀p:oa_P.oa_leq p (oa_meet I p_i) → ∀i:I.oa_leq p (p_i i);
-  oa_join_sup: ∀I.∀p_i.∀p:oa_P.oa_leq (oa_join I p_i) p → ∀i:I.oa_leq (p_i i) p;
+  oa_meet_inf: ∀I:SET.∀p_i:I ⇒ oa_P.∀p:oa_P.oa_leq p (oa_meet I p_i) = ∀i:I.oa_leq p (p_i i);
+  oa_join_sup: ∀I:SET.∀p_i:I ⇒ oa_P.∀p:oa_P.oa_leq (oa_join I p_i) p = ∀i:I.oa_leq (p_i i) p;
   oa_zero_bot: ∀p:oa_P.oa_leq oa_zero p;
   oa_one_top: ∀p:oa_P.oa_leq p oa_one;
   oa_overlap_preserves_meet_: 
       ∀p,q:oa_P.oa_overlap p q → oa_overlap p 
        (oa_meet ? { x ∈ BOOL | match x with [ true ⇒ p | false ⇒ q ] | IF_THEN_ELSE_p oa_P p q });
-  (* ⇔ deve essere =, l'esiste debole *)
   oa_join_split:
-      ∀I:SET.∀p.∀q:arrows2 SET1 I oa_P.
-       oa_overlap p (oa_join I q) ⇔ ∃i:I.oa_overlap p (q i);
+      ∀I:SET.∀p.∀q:I ⇒ oa_P.
+       oa_overlap p (oa_join I q) = ∃i:I.oa_overlap p (q i);
   (*oa_base : setoid;
   1) enum non e' il nome giusto perche' non e' suriettiva
   2) manca (vedere altro capitolo) la "suriettivita'" come immagine di insiemi di oa_base
@@ -98,16 +94,8 @@ non associative with precedence 50 for @{ 'oa_meet $p }.
 notation < "hovbox(mstyle scriptlevel 1 scriptsizemultiplier 1.7 (∧) \below (ident i ∈  I) break term 90 p)" 
 non associative with precedence 50 for @{ 'oa_meet_mk (λ${ident i}:$I.$p) }.
 
-(*
-notation < "hovbox(a ∧ b)" left associative with precedence 35
-for @{ 'oa_meet_mk (λ${ident i}:$_.match $i with [ true ⇒ $a | false ⇒ $b ]) }.
-*)
 notation > "hovbox(∧ f)" non associative with precedence 60
 for @{ 'oa_meet $f }.
-(*
-notation > "hovbox(a ∧ b)" left associative with precedence 50
-for @{ 'oa_meet (mk_unary_morphism BOOL ? (λx__:bool.match x__ with [ true ⇒ $a | false ⇒ $b ]) (IF_THEN_ELSE_p ? $a $b)) }.
-*)
 interpretation "o-algebra meet" 'oa_meet f = 
   (fun12 __ (oa_meet __) f).
 interpretation "o-algebra meet with explicit function" 'oa_meet_mk f = 
@@ -134,9 +122,7 @@ intros; split;
   intro x; simplify; cases x; simplify; assumption;]
 qed.
 
-notation "hovbox(a ∧ b)" left associative with precedence 35
-for @{ 'oa_meet_bin $a $b }.
-interpretation "o-algebra binary meet" 'oa_meet_bin a b = 
+interpretation "o-algebra binary meet" 'and a b = 
   (fun21 ___ (binary_meet _) a b).
 
 coercion Type1_OF_OAlgebra nocomposites.
@@ -171,7 +157,7 @@ definition hint5: OAlgebra → objs2 SET1.
 qed.
 coercion hint5.
 
-record ORelation (P,Q : OAlgebra) : Type ≝ {
+record ORelation (P,Q : OAlgebra) : Type2 ≝ {
   or_f_ : P ⇒ Q;
   or_f_minus_star_ : P ⇒ Q;
   or_f_star_ : Q ⇒ P;
@@ -188,14 +174,14 @@ constructor 1;
 | constructor 1;
    (* tenere solo una uguaglianza e usare la proposizione 9.9 per
       le altre (unicita' degli aggiunti e del simmetrico) *)
-   [ apply (λp,q. And4 (eq2 ? (or_f_minus_star_ ?? p) (or_f_minus_star_ ?? q)) 
+   [ apply (λp,q. And42 (eq2 ? (or_f_minus_star_ ?? p) (or_f_minus_star_ ?? q)) 
              (eq2 ? (or_f_minus_ ?? p) (or_f_minus_ ?? q)) 
              (eq2 ? (or_f_ ?? p) (or_f_ ?? q)) 
              (eq2 ? (or_f_star_ ?? p) (or_f_star_ ?? q))); 
    | whd; simplify; intros; repeat split; intros; apply refl2;
-   | whd; simplify; intros; cases H; clear H; split; 
+   | whd; simplify; intros; cases a; clear a; split; 
      intro a; apply sym1; generalize in match a;assumption;
-   | whd; simplify; intros; cases H; cases H1; clear H H1; split; intro a;
+   | whd; simplify; intros; cases a; cases a1; clear a a1; split; intro a;
      [ apply (.= (e a)); apply e4;
      | apply (.= (e1 a)); apply e5;
      | apply (.= (e2 a)); apply e6;
@@ -335,3 +321,18 @@ lemma setoid1_of_OA: OA → setoid1.
  intro; apply (oa_P t);
 qed.
 coercion setoid1_of_OA.
+
+lemma SET1_of_OA: OA → SET1.
+ intro; whd; apply (setoid1_of_OA t);
+qed.
+coercion SET1_of_OA.
+
+lemma objs2_SET1_OF_OA: OA → objs2 SET1.
+ intro; whd; apply (setoid1_of_OA t);
+qed.
+coercion objs2_SET1_OF_OA.
+
+lemma Type_OF_category2_OF_SET1_OF_OA: OA → Type_OF_category2 SET1.
+ intro; apply (oa_P t);
+qed.
+coercion Type_OF_category2_OF_SET1_OF_OA.