cicUtil: we moved here pp_term from proceduralHelpers

[helm.git] / helm / software / matita / contribs / procedural / Coq / Logic / Berardi.mma

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/contribs/procedural/Coq/Logic/Berardi.mma b/helm/software/matita/contribs/procedural/Coq/Logic/Berardi.mma
index e8f8fe95cef16f3c1744358cc826cf6e67999dc5..05f71a4f3b2cb3417b5ca0fa585173acc35bc4bb 100644 (file)
--- a/helm/software/matita/contribs/procedural/Coq/Logic/Berardi.mma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/contribs/procedural/Coq/Logic/Berardi.mma
@@ -16,25 +16,27 @@
 
 include "Coq.ma".
 
-(*#**********************************************************************)
+include "Init/Prelude.ma".
 
-(*  v      *   The Coq Proof Assistant  /  The Coq Development Team    *)
+(*#***********************************************************************)
 
-(* <O___,, *        INRIA-Rocquencourt  &  LRI-CNRS-Orsay              *)
+(*  v      *   The Coq Proof Assistant  /  The Coq Development Team     *)
 
-(*   \VV/  *************************************************************)
+(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
 
-(*    //   *      This file is distributed under the terms of the      *)
+(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
 
-(*         *       GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1       *)
+(*    //   *      This file is distributed under the terms of the       *)
 
-(*#**********************************************************************)
+(*         *       GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1        *)
 
-(*i $Id: Berardi.v,v 1.5 2003/11/29 17:28:33 herbelin Exp $ i*)
+(*#***********************************************************************)
+
+(*i $Id: Berardi.v,v 1.5.2.2 2004/08/03 17:42:43 herbelin Exp $ i*)
 
 (*#* This file formalizes Berardi's paradox which says that in
    the calculus of constructions, excluded middle (EM) and axiom of
-   choice (AC) implie proof irrelevenace (PI).
+   choice (AC) imply proof irrelevance (PI).
    Here, the axiom of choice is not necessary because of the use
    of inductive types.
 <<