(* *)
(**************************************************************************)
-include "sandwich_corollary.ma".
+include "sequence.ma".
-(* 3.19 *)
-definition supremum ≝
- λR.λml:mlattice R.λxn:sequence ml.λx:ml.
- increasing ? xn → upper_bound ? xn x ∧ xn ⇝ x.
+definition upper_bound ≝ λO:excess.λa:sequence O.λu:O.∀n:nat.a n ≤ u.
-definition infimum ≝
- λR.λml:mlattice R.λxn:sequence ml.λx:ml.
- decreasing ? xn → lower_bound ? xn x ∧ xn ⇝ x.
-
-(* 3.20 *)
-lemma supremum_uniq:
- ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀xn:sequence ml.increasing ? xn → (* BUG again the wrong coercion is chosen *)
- ∀x,y:apart_of_metric_space ? ml.supremum ?? xn x → supremum ?? xn y → x ≈ y.
-intros (R ml xn Hxn x y Sx Sy);
-elim (Sx Hxn) (_ Hx); elim (Sy Hxn) (_ Hy);
-apply (tends_uniq ?? xn ?? Hx Hy);
-qed.
+definition weak_sup ≝
+ λO:excess.λs:sequence O.λx.
+ upper_bound ? s x ∧ (∀y:O.upper_bound ? s y → x ≤ y).
-definition shift : ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀xn:sequence ml.nat → sequence ml ≝
- λR.λml:mlattice R.λxn:sequence ml.λm:nat.λn.xn (n+m).
-
-definition ank ≝
- λR.λml:mlattice R.λxn:sequence ml.λk:nat.
- let rec ank_aux (i : nat) ≝
- match i with
- [ O ⇒ (shift ?? xn k) O
- | S n1 ⇒ (shift ?? xn k) (S n1) ∧ ank_aux n1]
- in ank_aux.
-
-definition bnk ≝
- λR.λml:mlattice R.λxn:sequence ml.λk:nat.
- let rec bnk_aux (i : nat) ≝
- match i with
- [ O ⇒ (shift ?? xn k) O
- | S n1 ⇒ (shift ?? xn k) (S n1) ∨ bnk_aux n1]
- in bnk_aux.
-
-lemma ank_decreasing:
- ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀xn:sequence ml.∀m.decreasing ? (ank ?? xn m).
-intros (R ml xn m); unfold; intro n; simplify; apply lem;
-qed.
+definition strong_sup ≝
+ λO:excess.λs:sequence O.λx.upper_bound ? s x ∧ (∀y:O.x ≰ y → ∃n.s n ≰ y).
+
+definition increasing ≝ λO:excess.λa:sequence O.∀n:nat.a n ≤ a (S n).
+
+notation < "x \nbsp 'is_upper_bound' \nbsp s" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'upper_bound $_ $s $x}.
+notation < "x \nbsp 'is_lower_bound' \nbsp s" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'lower_bound $_ $s $x}.
+notation < "s \nbsp 'is_increasing'" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'increasing $_ $s}.
+notation < "s \nbsp 'is_decreasing'" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'decreasing $_ $s}.
+notation < "x \nbsp 'is_strong_sup' \nbsp s" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'strong_sup $_ $s $x}.
+notation < "x \nbsp 'is_strong_inf' \nbsp s" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'strong_inf $_ $s $x}.
-(* 3.26 *)
-lemma ankS:
- ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀xn:sequence ml.∀k,n:nat.
- ((ank ?? xn k) (S n)) ≈ (xn k ∧ ank ?? xn (S k) n).
-intros (R ml xn k n); elim n; simplify; [apply meet_comm]
-simplify in H; apply (Eq≈ ? (feq_ml ???? (H))); clear H;
-apply (Eq≈ ? (meet_assoc ????));
-apply (Eq≈ ?? (eq_sym ??? (meet_assoc ????)));
-apply feq_mr; rewrite > sym_plus in ⊢ (? ? ? (? ? ? (? (? %))));
-simplify; rewrite > sym_plus in ⊢ (? ? ? (? ? ? (? (? %))));
-apply meet_comm;
-qed.
-
-
-
\ No newline at end of file
+notation > "x 'is_upper_bound' s 'in' e" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'upper_bound $e $s $x}.
+notation > "x 'is_lower_bound' s 'in' e" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'lower_bound $e $s $x}.
+notation > "s 'is_increasing' 'in' e" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'increasing $e $s}.
+notation > "s 'is_decreasing' 'in' e" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'decreasing $e $s}.
+notation > "x 'is_strong_sup' s 'in' e" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'strong_sup $e $s $x}.
+notation > "x 'is_strong_inf' s 'in' e" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'strong_inf $e $s $x}.
+
+interpretation "Excess upper bound" 'upper_bound e s x = (cic:/matita/infsup/upper_bound.con e s x).
+interpretation "Excess lower bound" 'lower_bound e s x = (cic:/matita/infsup/upper_bound.con (cic:/matita/excess/dual_exc.con e) s x).
+interpretation "Excess increasing" 'increasing e s = (cic:/matita/infsup/increasing.con e s).
+interpretation "Excess decreasing" 'decreasing e s = (cic:/matita/infsup/increasing.con (cic:/matita/excess/dual_exc.con e) s).
+interpretation "Excess strong sup" 'strong_sup e s x = (cic:/matita/infsup/strong_sup.con e s x).
+interpretation "Excess strong inf" 'strong_inf e s x = (cic:/matita/infsup/strong_sup.con (cic:/matita/excess/dual_exc.con e) s x).
+
+lemma strong_sup_is_weak:
+ ∀O:excess.∀s:sequence O.∀x:O.strong_sup ? s x → weak_sup ? s x.
+intros (O s x Ssup); elim Ssup (Ubx M); clear Ssup; split; [assumption]
+intros 3 (y Uby E); cases (M ? E) (n En); unfold in Uby; cases (Uby ? En);
+qed.