(* *)
(**************************************************************************)
-include "datatypes/pairs.ma".
-include "datatypes/bool.ma".
+include "datatypes/pairs-setoids.ma".
+include "datatypes/bool-setoids.ma".
+include "datatypes/list-setoids.ma".
include "sets/sets.ma".
+(*
ninductive Admit : CProp[0] ≝ .
naxiom admit : Admit.
+*)
-(* single = is for the abstract equality of setoids, == is for concrete
- equalities (that may be lifted to the setoid level when needed *)
-notation < "hvbox(a break mpadded width -50% (=)= b)" non associative with precedence 45 for @{ 'eq_low $a $b }.
-notation > "a == b" non associative with precedence 45 for @{ 'eq_low $a $b }.
-
-
-(* XXX move to lists.ma *)
-ninductive list (A:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
- | nil: list A
- | cons: A -> list A -> list A.
-
-nlet rec eq_list (A : setoid) (l1, l2 : list A) on l1 : CProp[0] ≝
-match l1 with
-[ nil ⇒ match l2 return λ_.CProp[0] with [ nil ⇒ True | _ ⇒ False ]
-| cons x xs ⇒ match l2 with [ nil ⇒ False | cons y ys ⇒ x = y ∧ eq_list ? xs ys]].
-
-interpretation "eq_list" 'eq_low a b = (eq_list ? a b).
-
-ndefinition LIST : setoid → setoid.
-#S; @(list S); @(eq_list S);
-##[ #l; nelim l; //; #; @; //;
-##| #l1; nelim l1; ##[ #y; ncases y; //] #x xs H y; ncases y; ##[*] #y ys; *; #; @; /2/;
-##| #l1; nelim l1; ##[ #l2 l3; ncases l2; ncases l3; /3/; #z zs y ys; *]
- #x xs H l2 l3; ncases l2; ncases l3; /2/; #z zs y yz; *; #H1 H2; *; #H3 H4; @; /3/;##]
-nqed.
-
-alias symbol "hint_decl" (instance 1) = "hint_decl_Type1".
-unification hint 0 ≔ S : setoid;
- T ≟ carr S,
- P1 ≟ refl ? (eq0 (LIST S)),
- P2 ≟ sym ? (eq0 (LIST S)),
- P3 ≟ trans ? (eq0 (LIST S)),
- X ≟ mk_setoid (list S) (mk_equivalence_relation ? (eq_list T) P1 P2 P3)
-(*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
- carr X ≡ list T.
-
-unification hint 0 ≔ S:setoid,a,b:list S;
- R ≟ eq0 (LIST S),
- L ≟ (list S)
-(* -------------------------------------------- *) ⊢
- eq_list S a b ≡ eq_rel L R a b.
-
-notation "hvbox(hd break :: tl)"
- right associative with precedence 47
- for @{'cons $hd $tl}.
-
-notation "[ list0 x sep ; ]"
- non associative with precedence 90
- for ${fold right @'nil rec acc @{'cons $x $acc}}.
-
-notation "hvbox(l1 break @ l2)"
- right associative with precedence 47
- for @{'append $l1 $l2 }.
-
-interpretation "nil" 'nil = (nil ?).
-interpretation "cons" 'cons hd tl = (cons ? hd tl).
+(* XXX move somewere else *)
+ndefinition if': ∀A,B:CPROP. A = B → A → B.
+#A B; *; /2/. nqed.
-nlet rec append A (l1: list A) l2 on l1 ≝
- match l1 with
- [ nil ⇒ l2
- | cons hd tl ⇒ hd :: append A tl l2 ].
+ncoercion if : ∀A,B:CPROP. ∀p:A = B. A → B ≝ if' on _p : eq_rel1 ???? to ∀_:?.?.
-interpretation "append" 'append l1 l2 = (append ? l1 l2).
+(* XXX move to list-setoids-theory.ma *)
ntheorem append_nil: ∀A:setoid.∀l:list A.l @ [] = l.
#A;#l;nelim l;//; #a;#l1;#IH;nnormalize;/2/;nqed.
ntheorem associative_append: ∀A:setoid.associative (list A) (append A).
#A;#x;#y;#z;nelim x[ napply (refl ???) |#a;#x1;#H;nnormalize;/2/]nqed.
-nlet rec flatten S (l : list (list S)) on l : list S ≝
-match l with [ nil ⇒ [ ] | cons w tl ⇒ w @ flatten ? tl ].
-
(* end move to list *)
+
+(* XXX to undestand what I want inside Alpha
+ the eqb part should be split away, but when available it should be
+ possible to obtain a leibnitz equality on lemmas proved on setoids
+*)
interpretation "iff" 'iff a b = (iff a b).
-ninductive eq (A:Type[0]) (x:A) : A → CProp[0] ≝ refl: eq A x x.
+ninductive eq (A:Type[0]) (x:A) : A → CProp[0] ≝ erefl: eq A x x.
nlemma eq_rect_Type0_r':
- ∀A.∀a,x.∀p:eq ? x a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[0]. P a (refl A a) → P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a,x.∀p:eq ? x a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[0]. P a (erefl A a) → P x p.
#A; #a; #x; #p; ncases p; #P; #H; nassumption.
nqed.
nlemma eq_rect_Type0_r:
- ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[0]. P a (refl A a) → ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[0]. P a (erefl A a) → ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
#A; #a; #P; #p; #x0; #p0; napply (eq_rect_Type0_r' ??? p0); nassumption.
nqed.
nlemma eq_rect_CProp0_r':
- ∀A.∀a,x.∀p:eq ? x a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → CProp[0]. P a (refl A a) → P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a,x.∀p:eq ? x a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → CProp[0]. P a (erefl A a) → P x p.
#A; #a; #x; #p; ncases p; #P; #H; nassumption.
nqed.
nlemma eq_rect_CProp0_r:
- ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → CProp[0]. P a (refl A a) → ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → CProp[0]. P a (erefl A a) → ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
#A; #a; #P; #p; #x0; #p0; napply (eq_rect_CProp0_r' ??? p0); nassumption.
nqed.
-(* XXX move to bool *)
-interpretation "bool eq" 'eq_low a b = (eq bool a b).
-
-ndefinition BOOL : setoid.
-@bool; @(eq bool); ncases admit.nqed.
-
-alias symbol "hint_decl" (instance 1) = "hint_decl_Type1".
-alias id "refl" = "cic:/matita/ng/properties/relations/refl.fix(0,1,3)".
-unification hint 0 ≔ ;
- P1 ≟ refl ? (eq0 BOOL),
- P2 ≟ sym ? (eq0 BOOL),
- P3 ≟ trans ? (eq0 BOOL),
- X ≟ mk_setoid bool (mk_equivalence_relation ? (eq bool) P1 P2 P3)
-(*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
- carr X ≡ bool.
-
-unification hint 0 ≔ a,b;
- R ≟ eq0 BOOL,
- L ≟ bool
-(* -------------------------------------------- *) ⊢
- eq bool a b ≡ eq_rel L R a b.
-
nrecord Alpha : Type[1] ≝ {
acarr :> setoid;
eqb: acarr → acarr → bool;
}.
interpretation "eqb" 'eq_low a b = (eqb ? a b).
+(* end alpha *)
+(* re *)
ninductive re (S: Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
z: re S
| e: re S
| o: re S → re S → re S
| k: re S → re S.
+notation < "a \sup ⋇" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pk $a}.
+notation > "a ^ *" non associative with precedence 75 for @{ 'pk $a}.
+interpretation "star" 'pk a = (k ? a).
+interpretation "or" 'plus a b = (o ? a b).
+
+notation "a · b" non associative with precedence 60 for @{ 'pc $a $b}.
+interpretation "cat" 'pc a b = (c ? a b).
+
+(* to get rid of \middot *)
+ncoercion c : ∀S.∀p:re S. re S → re S ≝ c on _p : re ? to ∀_:?.?.
+
+notation < "a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}.
+notation > "` term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}.
+interpretation "atom" 'ps a = (s ? a).
+
+notation "ϵ" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'epsilon }.
+interpretation "epsilon" 'epsilon = (e ?).
+
+notation "0" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'empty_r }.
+interpretation "empty" 'empty_r = (z ?).
+
+notation > "'lang' S" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ Ω^(list $S) }.
+notation > "'Elang' S" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 𝛀^(list $S) }.
+
+(* setoid support for re *)
+
nlet rec eq_re (S:Alpha) (a,b : re S) on a : CProp[0] ≝
match a with
[ z ⇒ match b with [ z ⇒ True | _ ⇒ False]
| c r1 r2 ⇒ match b with [ c s1 s2 ⇒ eq_re ? r1 s1 ∧ eq_re ? r2 s2 | _ ⇒ False]
| o r1 r2 ⇒ match b with [ o s1 s2 ⇒ eq_re ? r1 s1 ∧ eq_re ? r2 s2 | _ ⇒ False]
| k r1 ⇒ match b with [ k r2 ⇒ eq_re ? r1 r2 | _ ⇒ False]].
+
+interpretation "eq_re" 'eq_low a b = (eq_re ? a b).
ndefinition RE : Alpha → setoid.
#A; @(re A); @(eq_re A);
#r2 r3; /3/; ##]##]
nqed.
-alias symbol "hint_decl" (instance 1) = "hint_decl_Type1".
-alias id "carr" = "cic:/matita/ng/sets/setoids/carr.fix(0,0,1)".
unification hint 0 ≔ A : Alpha;
S ≟ acarr A,
T ≟ carr S,
(* -------------------------------------------- *) ⊢
eq_re A a b ≡ eq_rel L R a b.
-notation < "a \sup ⋇" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pk $a}.
-notation > "a ^ *" non associative with precedence 75 for @{ 'pk $a}.
-interpretation "star" 'pk a = (k ? a).
-interpretation "or" 'plus a b = (o ? a b).
-
-notation "a · b" non associative with precedence 60 for @{ 'pc $a $b}.
-interpretation "cat" 'pc a b = (c ? a b).
-
-(* to get rid of \middot *)
-ncoercion c : ∀S.∀p:re S. re S → re S ≝ c on _p : re ? to ∀_:?.?.
-
-notation < "a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}.
-notation > "` term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}.
-interpretation "atom" 'ps a = (s ? a).
-
-notation "ϵ" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'epsilon }.
-interpretation "epsilon" 'epsilon = (e ?).
-
-notation "0" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'empty_r }.
-interpretation "empty" 'empty_r = (z ?).
-
-notation > "'lang' S" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ Ω^(list $S) }.
-notation > "'Elang' S" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 𝛀^(list $S) }.
+nlemma c_is_morph : ∀A:Alpha.(re A) ⇒_0 (re A) ⇒_0 (re A).
+#A; napply (mk_binary_morphism … (λs1,s2:re A. s1 · s2));
+#a; nelim a;
+##[##1,2: #a' b b'; ncases a'; nnormalize; /2/ by conj;
+##|#x a' b b'; ncases a'; /2/ by conj;
+##|##4,5: #r1 r2 IH1 IH2 a'; ncases a'; nnormalize; /2/ by conj;
+##|#r IH a'; ncases a'; nnormalize; /2/ by conj; ##]
+nqed.
+
+(* XXX This is the good format for hints about morphisms, fix the others *)
+alias symbol "hint_decl" (instance 1) = "hint_decl_Type0".
+unification hint 0 ≔ S:Alpha, A,B:re S;
+ MM ≟ mk_unary_morphism ??
+ (λA:re S.mk_unary_morphism ?? (λB.A · B) (prop1 ?? (c_is_morph S A)))
+ (prop1 ?? (c_is_morph S)),
+ T ≟ RE S
+(*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
+ fun1 T T (fun1 T (unary_morph_setoid T T) MM A) B ≡ A · B.
+
+nlemma o_is_morph : ∀A:Alpha.(re A) ⇒_0 (re A) ⇒_0 (re A).
+#A; napply (mk_binary_morphism … (λs1,s2:re A. s1 + s2));
+#a; nelim a;
+##[##1,2: #a' b b'; ncases a'; nnormalize; /2/ by conj;
+##|#x a' b b'; ncases a'; /2/ by conj;
+##|##4,5: #r1 r2 IH1 IH2 a'; ncases a'; nnormalize; /2/ by conj;
+##|#r IH a'; ncases a'; nnormalize; /2/ by conj; ##]
+nqed.
+
+unification hint 0 ≔ S:Alpha, A,B:re S;
+ MM ≟ mk_unary_morphism ??
+ (λA:re S.mk_unary_morphism ?? (λB.A + B) (prop1 ?? (o_is_morph S A)))
+ (prop1 ?? (o_is_morph S)),
+ T ≟ RE S
+(*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
+ fun1 T T (fun1 T (unary_morph_setoid T T) MM A) B ≡ A + B.
+
+(* end setoids support for re *)
nlet rec conjunct S (l : list (list S)) (L : lang S) on l: CProp[0] ≝
match l with [ nil ⇒ True | cons w tl ⇒ w ∈ L ∧ conjunct ? tl L ].
-ndefinition sing_lang : ∀A:setoid.∀x:A.Ω^A ≝ λS.λx.{ w | x = w }.
-interpretation "sing lang" 'singl x = (sing_lang ? x).
-
interpretation "subset construction with type" 'comprehension t \eta.x =
(mk_powerclass t x).
notation "𝐋 term 70 E" non associative with precedence 75 for @{'L_re $E}.
interpretation "in_l" 'L_re E = (L_re ? E).
-notation "a || b" left associative with precedence 30 for @{'orb $a $b}.
-ndefinition orb ≝ λa,b:bool. match a with [ true ⇒ true | _ ⇒ b ].
-interpretation "orb" 'orb a b = (orb a b).
-
ninductive pitem (S: Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
pz: pitem S
| pe: pitem S
| po: pitem S → pitem S → pitem S
| pk: pitem S → pitem S.
+interpretation "pstar" 'pk a = (pk ? a).
+interpretation "por" 'plus a b = (po ? a b).
+interpretation "pcat" 'pc a b = (pc ? a b).
+notation < ".a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}.
+notation > "`. term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}.
+interpretation "ppatom" 'pp a = (pp ? a).
+(* to get rid of \middot *)
+ncoercion pc : ∀S.∀p:pitem S. pitem S → pitem S ≝ pc on _p : pitem ? to ∀_:?.?.
+interpretation "patom" 'ps a = (ps ? a).
+interpretation "pepsilon" 'epsilon = (pe ?).
+interpretation "pempty" 'empty_r = (pz ?).
+
+(* setoids for pitem *)
nlet rec eq_pitem (S : Alpha) (p1, p2 : pitem S) on p1 : CProp[0] ≝
match p1 with
[ pz ⇒ match p2 with [ pz ⇒ True | _ ⇒ False]
(* -------------------------------------------- *) ⊢
eq_pitem S a b ≡ eq_rel L (eq0 R) a b.
-(* XXX move to pair.ma *)
-nlet rec eq_pair (A, B : setoid) (a : A × B) (b : A × B) on a : CProp[0] ≝
- match a with [ mk_pair a1 a2 ⇒
- match b with [ mk_pair b1 b2 ⇒ a1 = b1 ∧ a2 = b2 ]].
-
-interpretation "eq_pair" 'eq_low a b = (eq_pair ?? a b).
-
-nlemma PAIR : ∀A,B:setoid. setoid.
-#A B; @(A × B); @(eq_pair …);
-##[ #ab; ncases ab; #a b; @; napply #;
-##| #ab cd; ncases ab; ncases cd; #a1 a2 b1 b2; *; #E1 E2;
- @; napply (?^-1); //;
-##| #a b c; ncases a; ncases b; ncases c; #c1 c2 b1 b2 a1 a2;
- *; #E1 E2; *; #E3 E4; @; ##[ napply (.= E1); //] napply (.= E2); //.##]
-nqed.
-
-alias symbol "hint_decl" (instance 1) = "hint_decl_Type1".
-unification hint 0 ≔ AA, BB;
- A ≟ carr AA, B ≟ carr BB,
- P1 ≟ refl ? (eq0 (PAIR AA BB)),
- P2 ≟ sym ? (eq0 (PAIR AA BB)),
- P3 ≟ trans ? (eq0 (PAIR AA BB)),
- R ≟ mk_setoid (A × B) (mk_equivalence_relation ? (eq_pair …) P1 P2 P3)
-(*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*)⊢
- carr R ≡ A × B.
-
-unification hint 0 ≔ S1,S2,a,b;
- R ≟ PAIR S1 S2,
- L ≟ (pair S1 S2)
-(* -------------------------------------------- *) ⊢
- eq_pair S1 S2 a b ≡ eq_rel L (eq0 R) a b.
+(* end setoids for pitem *)
-(* end move to pair *)
-
ndefinition pre ≝ λS.pitem S × bool.
notation "\fst term 90 x" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'fst $x}.
notation > "\snd term 90 x" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'snd $x}.
interpretation "snd" 'snd x = (snd ? ? x).
-interpretation "pstar" 'pk a = (pk ? a).
-interpretation "por" 'plus a b = (po ? a b).
-interpretation "pcat" 'pc a b = (pc ? a b).
-notation < ".a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}.
-notation > "`. term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}.
-interpretation "ppatom" 'pp a = (pp ? a).
-(* to get rid of \middot *)
-ncoercion pc : ∀S.∀p:pitem S. pitem S → pitem S ≝ pc on _p : pitem ? to ∀_:?.?.
-interpretation "patom" 'ps a = (ps ? a).
-interpretation "pepsilon" 'epsilon = (pe ?).
-interpretation "pempty" 'empty_r = (pz ?).
-
notation > "|term 19 e|" non associative with precedence 70 for @{forget ? $e}.
nlet rec forget (S: Alpha) (l : pitem S) on l: re S ≝
match l with
| pc E1 E2 ⇒ (|E1| · |E2|)
| po E1 E2 ⇒ (|E1| + |E2|)
| pk E ⇒ |E|^* ].
+
notation < "|term 19 e|" non associative with precedence 70 for @{'forget $e}.
interpretation "forget" 'forget a = (forget ? a).
notation "𝐋\sub(\p) term 70 E" non associative with precedence 75 for @{'L_pi $E}.
interpretation "in_pl" 'L_pi E = (L_pi ? E).
-(* The caml, as some patches for it *)
-ncoercion setoid1_of_setoid : ∀s:setoid. setoid1 ≝ setoid1_of_setoid on _s: setoid to setoid1.
-
-alias symbol "hint_decl" (instance 1) = "hint_decl_CProp2".
-unification hint 0 ≔ S : setoid, x,y;
- SS ≟ LIST S,
- TT ≟ setoid1_of_setoid SS
-(*-----------------------------------------*) ⊢
- eq_list S x y ≡ eq_rel1 ? (eq1 TT) x y.
-
-unification hint 0 ≔ SS : setoid;
- S ≟ carr SS,
- TT ≟ setoid1_of_setoid (LIST SS)
-(*-----------------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
- list S ≡ carr1 TT.
-
-(* XXX Ex setoid support *)
-nlemma Sig: ∀S,T:setoid.∀P: S → (T → CPROP).
- ∀y,z:T.y = z → (∀x.y=z → P x y = P x z) → (Ex S (λx.P x y)) =_1 (Ex S (λx.P x z)).
-#S T P y z Q E; @; *; #x Px; @x; nlapply (E x Q); *; /2/; nqed.
-
-notation "∑" non associative with precedence 90 for @{Sig ?????}.
-
-nlemma test : ∀S:setoid. ∀ee: S ⇒_1 S ⇒_1 CPROP.
- ∀x,y:setoid1_of_setoid S.x =_1 y → (Ex S (λw.ee x w ∧ True)) =_1 (Ex S (λw.ee y w ∧ True)).
-#S m x y E;
-napply (.=_1 (∑ E (λw,H.(H ╪_1 #)╪_1 #))).
-napply #.
-nqed.
-
-nlemma test2 : ∀S:setoid. ∀ee: S ⇒_1 S ⇒_1 CPROP.
- ∀x,y:setoid1_of_setoid S.x =_1 y →
- (True ∧ (Ex S (λw.ee x w ∧ True))) =_1 (True ∧ (Ex S (λw.ee y w ∧ True))).
-#S m x y E;
-napply (.=_1 #╪_1(∑ E (λw,H.(H ╪_1 #) ╪_1 #))).
-napply #.
-nqed.
-
-nlemma ex_setoid : ∀S:setoid.(S ⇒_1 CPROP) → setoid.
-#T P; @ (Ex T (λx:T.P x)); @;
-##[ #H1 H2; napply True |##*: //; ##]
-nqed.
-
-unification hint 0 ≔ T,P ; S ≟ (ex_setoid T P) ⊢
- Ex T (λx:T.P x) ≡ carr S.
-
-nlemma test3 : ∀S:setoid. ∀ee: S ⇒_1 S ⇒_1 CPROP.
- ∀x,y:setoid1_of_setoid S.x =_1 y →
- ((Ex S (λw.ee x w ∧ True) ∨ True)) =_1 ((Ex S (λw.ee y w ∧ True) ∨ True)).
-#S m x y E;
-napply (.=_1 (∑ E (λw,H.(H ╪_1 #) ╪_1 #)) ╪_1 #).
-napply #.
-nqed.
-(* Ex setoid support end *)
-
+(* set support for 𝐋\p *)
ndefinition L_pi_ext : ∀S:Alpha.∀r:pitem S.Elang S.
#S r; @(𝐋\p r); #w1 w2 E; nelim r;
##[ ##1,2: /2/;
##| #x; @; *;
##| #x; @; #H; nchange in H with ([?] =_0 ?); ##[ napply ((.=_0 H) E); ##]
napply ((.=_0 H) E^-1);
-##| #e1 e2 H1 H2;
+##| #e1 e2 H1 H2; (*
nchange in match (w1 ∈ 𝐋\p (?·?)) with ((∃_.?)∨?);
- nchange in match (w2 ∈ 𝐋\p (?·?)) with ((∃_.?)∨?);
+ nchange in match (w2 ∈ 𝐋\p (?·?)) with ((∃_.?)∨?); good! *)
napply (.= (#‡H2));
- napply (.=_1 (∑ E (λx1,H1.∑ E (λx2,H2.?)))╪_1 #); ##[
- ncut ((w1 = (x1@x2)) = (w2 = (x1@x2)));##[
- @; #X; ##[ napply ((.= H1^-1) X) | napply ((.= H2) X) ] ##] #X;
- napply ( (X‡#)‡#); ##]
- napply #;
-##| #e1 e2 H1 H2;
- nnormalize in ⊢ (???%%);
- napply (H1‡H2);
-##| #e H; nnormalize in ⊢ (???%%);
- napply (.=_1 (∑ E (λx1,H1.∑ E (λx2,H2.?)))); ##[
- ncut ((w1 = (x1@x2)) = (w2 = (x1@x2)));##[
- @; #X; ##[ napply ((.= H1^-1) X) | napply ((.= H2) X) ] ##] #X;
- napply ((X‡#)‡#); ##]
- napply #;##]
+ ncut (∀x1,x2. (w1 = (x1@x2)) = (w2 = (x1@x2)));##[
+ #x1 x2; @; #X; ##[ napply ((.= E^-1) X) | napply ((.= E) X) ] ##] #X;
+ napply ((∑w1,w2. X w1 w2 / H ; (H╪_1#)╪_1#) ╪_1 #);
+##| #e1 e2 H1 H2; napply (H1‡H2); (* good! *)
+##| #e H;
+ ncut (∀x1,x2.(w1 = (x1@x2)) = (w2 = (x1@x2)));##[
+ #x1 x2; @; #X; ##[ napply ((.= E^-1) X) | napply ((.= E) X) ] ##] #X;
+ (* nnormalize in ⊢ (???%%); good! (but a bit too hard) *)
+ napply (∑w1,w2. X w1 w2 / H ; (H╪_1#)╪_1#);
+##]
nqed.
unification hint 0 ≔ S : Alpha,e : pitem S;
X ≟ (mk_ext_powerclass SS (𝐋\p e) (ext_prop SS (L_pi_ext S e)))
(*-----------------------------------------------------------------*)⊢
ext_carr SS X ≡ 𝐋\p e.
+
+(* end set support for 𝐋\p *)
ndefinition epsilon ≝
λS:Alpha.λb.match b return λ_.lang S with [ true ⇒ { [ ] } | _ ⇒ ∅ ].
nlemma append_eq_nil : ∀S:setoid.∀w1,w2:list S. [ ] = w1 @ w2 → w1 = [ ].
#S w1; ncases w1; //. nqed.
-(* lemma 12 *)
+(* lemma 12 *) (* XXX: a case where Leibnitz equality could be exploited for H *)
nlemma epsilon_in_true : ∀S:Alpha.∀e:pre S. [ ] ∈ 𝐋\p e = (\snd e = true).
-#S r; ncases r; #e b; @; ##[##2: #H; nrewrite > H; @2; /2/; ##] ncases b;//;
-*; ##[##2:*] nelim e;
+#S r; ncases r; #e b; @; ##[##2: #H; ncases b in H; ##[##2:*] #; @2; /2/; ##]
+ncases b; //; *; ##[##2:*] nelim e;
##[ ##1,2: *; ##| #c; *; ##| #c; *| ##7: #p H;
##| #r1 r2 H G; *; ##[##2: nassumption; ##]
##| #r1 r2 H1 H2; *; /2/ by {}]
##| napply (.= (cup0 ? {[]})^-1); napply cupC; ##]
nqed.
-(* XXX move somewere else *)
-ndefinition if': ∀A,B:CPROP. A = B → A → B.
-#A B; *; /2/. nqed.
-
-ncoercion if : ∀A,B:CPROP. ∀p:A = B. A → B ≝ if' on _p : eq_rel1 ???? to ∀_:?.?.
-
(* theorem 16: 2 *)
nlemma oplus_cup : ∀S:Alpha.∀e1,e2:pre S.𝐋\p (e1 ⊕ e2) = 𝐋\p e1 ∪ 𝐋\p e2.
-#S r1; ncases r1; #e1 b1 r2; ncases r2; #e2 b2;
+#S r1; ncases r1; #e1 b1 r2; ncases r2; #e2 b2; (* oh my!
nwhd in ⊢ (???(??%)?);
nchange in ⊢(???%?) with (𝐋\p (e1 + e2) ∪ ϵ (b1 || b2));
-nchange in ⊢(???(??%?)?) with (𝐋\p (e1) ∪ 𝐋\p (e2));
+nchange in ⊢(???(??%?)?) with (𝐋\p (e1) ∪ 𝐋\p (e2)); *)
napply (.=_1 #╪_1 (epsilon_or ???));
napply (.=_1 (cupA…)^-1);
napply (.=_1 (cupA…)╪_1#);
(* XXX problem: auto does not find # (refl) when it has a concrete == *)
nlemma odotEt : ∀S:Alpha.∀e1,e2:pitem S.∀b2:bool.
〈e1,true〉 ⊙ 〈e2,b2〉 = 〈e1 · \fst (•e2),b2 || \snd (•e2)〉.
-#S e1 e2 b2; ncases b2; nnormalize; @; //; @; napply refl; nqed.
+#S e1 e2 b2; ncases b2; @; /3/ by refl, conj, I; nqed.
+(*
nlemma LcatE : ∀S:Alpha.∀e1,e2:pitem S.
𝐋\p (e1 · e2) = 𝐋\p e1 · 𝐋 |e2| ∪ 𝐋\p e2. //; nqed.
+*)
nlemma cup_dotD : ∀S:Alpha.∀p,q,r:lang S.(p ∪ q) · r = (p · r) ∪ (q · r).
#S p q r; napply ext_set; #w; nnormalize; @;
nlemma erase_star : ∀S:Alpha.∀e1:pitem S.𝐋 |e1|^* = 𝐋 |e1^*|. //; nqed.
-ndefinition substract := λS:Alpha.λp,q:lang S.{ w | w ∈ p ∧ ¬ w ∈ q }.
-interpretation "substract" 'minus a b = (substract ? a b).
-
-FINQUI: manca ext per substract
+nlemma mem_single : ∀S:setoid.∀a,b:S. a ∈ {(b)} → a = b.
+#S a b; nnormalize; /2/; nqed.
-nlemma memnil : ∀S:Alpha.∀a:list S. a ∈ {[]} → a = [ ].
-#S a; ncases a; //; nqed.
-
-nlemma cup_sub: ∀S:Alpha.∀a,b:Elang S. ¬ ([]∈ a) → a ∪ (b - {[]}) = (a ∪ b) - {[]}.
-#S a b c; napply ext_set; #w; @;
-##[ *; ##[ #wa; @; ##[@;//] #H; napply c; napply (. ?╪_0?);
- napply (. (memnil ?? H)^-1‡#);
-/4/; *; /4/; nqed.
+nlemma cup_sub: ∀S.∀A,B:𝛀^S.∀x. ¬ (x ∈ A) → A ∪ (B - {(x)}) = (A ∪ B) - {(x)}.
+#S A B x H; napply ext_set; #w; @;
+##[ *; ##[ #wa; @; ##[@;//] #H2; napply H; napply (. (mem_single ??? H2)^-1╪_1#); //]
+ *; #wb nwn; @; ##[@2;//] //;
+##| *; *; ##[ #wa nwn; @; //] #wb nwn; @2; @; //;##]
+nqed.
-nlemma sub0 : ∀S.∀a:word S → Prop. a - {} = a.
-#S a; napply extP; #w; nnormalize; @; /3/; *; //; nqed.
+nlemma sub0 : ∀S.∀a:Ω^S. a - ∅ = a.
+#S a; napply ext_set; #w; nnormalize; @; /3/; *; //; nqed.
-nlemma subK : ∀S.∀a:word S → Prop. a - a = {}.
-#S a; napply extP; #w; nnormalize; @; *; /2/; nqed.
+nlemma subK : ∀S.∀a:Ω^S. a - a = ∅.
+#S a; napply ext_set; #w; nnormalize; @; *; /2/; nqed.
-nlemma subW : ∀S.∀a,b:word S → Prop.∀w.(a - b) w → a w.
+nlemma subW : ∀S.∀a,b:Ω^S.∀w.w ∈ (a - b) → w ∈ a.
#S a b w; nnormalize; *; //; nqed.
-nlemma erase_bull : ∀S.∀a:pitem S. .|\fst (•a)| = .|a|.
+nlemma erase_bull : ∀S:Alpha.∀a:pitem S. |\fst (•a)| = |a|.
#S a; nelim a; // by {};
-##[ #e1 e2 IH1 IH2; nchange in ⊢ (???%) with (.|e1| · .|e2|);
- nrewrite < IH1; nrewrite < IH2;
- nchange in ⊢ (??(??%)?) with (\fst (•e1 ⊙ 〈e2,false〉));
- ncases (•e1); #e3 b; ncases b; nnormalize;
- ##[ ncases (•e2); //; ##| nrewrite > IH2; //]
-##| #e1 e2 IH1 IH2; nchange in ⊢ (???%) with (.|e1| + .|e2|);
- nrewrite < IH2; nrewrite < IH1;
- nchange in ⊢ (??(??%)?) with (\fst (•e1 ⊕ •e2));
- ncases (•e1); ncases (•e2); //;
-##| #e IH; nchange in ⊢ (???%) with (.|e|^* ); nrewrite < IH;
- nchange in ⊢ (??(??%)?) with (\fst (•e))^*; //; ##]
+##[ #e1 e2 IH1 IH2;
+ napply (?^-1);
+ napply (.=_0 (IH1^-1)╪_0 (IH2^-1));
+ nchange in match (•(e1 · ?)) with (?⊙?);
+ ncases (•e1); #e3 b; ncases b; ##[ nnormalize; ncases (•e2); /3/ by refl, conj]
+ napply (.=_0 #╪_0 (IH2)); //;
+##| #e1 e2 IH1 IH2; napply (?^-1);
+ napply (.=_0 (IH1^-1)╪_0(IH2^-1));
+ nchange in match (•(e1+?)) with (?⊕?);
+ ncases (•e1); ncases (•e2); //]
nqed.
-nlemma eta_lp : ∀S.∀p:pre S.𝐋\p p = 𝐋\p 〈\fst p, \snd p〉.
+(*
+nlemma eta_lp : ∀S:Alpha.∀p:pre S. 𝐋\p p = 𝐋\p 〈\fst p, \snd p〉.
#S p; ncases p; //; nqed.
+*)
-nlemma epsilon_dot: ∀S.∀p:word S → Prop. {[]} · p = p.
-#S e; napply extP; #w; nnormalize; @; ##[##2: #Hw; @[]; @w; /3/; ##]
-*; #w1; *; #w2; *; *; #defw defw1 Hw2; nrewrite < defw; nrewrite < defw1;
-napply Hw2; nqed.
+(* XXX coercion ext_carr non applica *)
+nlemma epsilon_dot: ∀S:Alpha.∀p:Elang S. {[]} · (ext_carr ? p) = p.
+#S e; napply ext_set; #w; @; ##[##2: #Hw; @[]; @w; @; //; @; //; napply #; (* XXX auto *) ##]
+*; #w1; *; #w2; *; *; #defw defw1 Hw2;
+napply (. defw╪_1#);
+napply (. ((defw1 : [ ] = ?)^-1 ╪_0 #)╪_1#);
+napply Hw2;
+nqed.
(* theorem 16: 1 → 3 *)
-nlemma odot_dot_aux : ∀S.∀e1,e2: pre S.
- 𝐋\p (•(\fst e2)) = 𝐋\p (\fst e2) ∪ 𝐋 .|\fst e2| →
- 𝐋\p (e1 ⊙ e2) = 𝐋\p e1 · 𝐋 .|\fst e2| ∪ 𝐋\p e2.
+nlemma odot_dot_aux : ∀S:Alpha.∀e1,e2: pre S.
+ 𝐋\p (•(\fst e2)) = 𝐋\p (\fst e2) ∪ 𝐋 |\fst e2| →
+ 𝐋\p (e1 ⊙ e2) = 𝐋\p e1 · 𝐋 |\fst e2| ∪ 𝐋\p e2.
#S e1 e2 th1; ncases e1; #e1' b1'; ncases b1';
-##[ nwhd in ⊢ (??(??%)?); nletin e2' ≝ (\fst e2); nletin b2' ≝ (\snd e2);
+##[ nchange in match (〈?,true〉⊙?) with 〈?,?〉;
+ nletin e2' ≝ (\fst e2); nletin b2' ≝ (\snd e2);
nletin e2'' ≝ (\fst (•(\fst e2))); nletin b2'' ≝ (\snd (•(\fst e2)));
- nchange in ⊢ (??%?) with (?∪?);
- nchange in ⊢ (??(??%?)?) with (?∪?);
- nchange in match (𝐋\p 〈?,?〉) with (?∪?);
- nrewrite > (epsilon_or …); nrewrite > (cupC ? (ϵ ?)…);
- nrewrite > (cupA …);nrewrite < (cupA ?? (ϵ?)…);
- nrewrite > (?: 𝐋\p e2'' ∪ ϵ b2'' = 𝐋\p e2' ∪ 𝐋 .|e2'|); ##[##2:
- nchange with (𝐋\p 〈e2'',b2''〉 = 𝐋\p e2' ∪ 𝐋 .|e2'|);
- ngeneralize in match th1;
- nrewrite > (eta_lp…); #th1; nrewrite > th1; //;##]
+ napply (.=_1 (# ╪_1 (epsilon_or …))); (* XXX … is too slow if combined with .= *)
+ nchange in match b2'' with b2''; (* XXX some unfoldings happened *)
+ nchange in match b2' with b2';
+ napply (.=_1 (# ╪_1 (cupC …))); napply (.=_1 (cupA …));
+ napply (.=_1 (# ╪_1 (cupA …)^-1)); (* XXX slow, but not because of disamb! *)
+ ncut (𝐋\p e2'' ∪ ϵ b2'' = 𝐋\p e2' ∪ 𝐋 |e2'|); ##[
+ nchange with (𝐋\p 〈e2'',b2''〉 = 𝐋\p e2' ∪ 𝐋 |e2'|);
+ napply (?^-1); napply (.=_1 th1^-1); //;##] #E;
+ napply (.=_1 (# ╪_1 (E ╪_1 #)));
+ STOP
+
nrewrite > (eta_lp ? e2);
nchange in match (𝐋\p 〈\fst e2,?〉) with (𝐋\p e2'∪ ϵ b2');
nrewrite > (cup_dotD …); nrewrite > (epsilon_dot…);
projects / helm.git / blobdiff