(* *)
(**************************************************************************)
-include "logic/cprop.ma".
+(******************* SETS OVER TYPES *****************)
-nrecord powerset (A: setoid) : Type[1] ≝ { mem_op:> unary_morphism1 A CPROP }.
+include "logic/connectives.ma".
-interpretation "powerset" 'powerset A = (powerset A).
+nrecord powerclass (A: Type[0]) : Type[1] ≝ { mem: A → CProp[0] }.
-interpretation "subset construction" 'subset \eta.x =
- (mk_powerset ? (mk_unary_morphism1 ? CPROP x ?)).
+interpretation "mem" 'mem a S = (mem ? S a).
+interpretation "powerclass" 'powerset A = (powerclass A).
+interpretation "subset construction" 'subset \eta.x = (mk_powerclass ? x).
-interpretation "mem" 'mem a S = (mem_op ? S a).
+ndefinition subseteq ≝ λA.λU,V.∀a:A. a ∈ U → a ∈ V.
+interpretation "subseteq" 'subseteq U V = (subseteq ? U V).
-ndefinition subseteq ≝ λA:setoid.λU,V.∀a:A. a ∈ U → a ∈ V.
+ndefinition overlaps ≝ λA.λU,V.∃x:A.x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ V.
+interpretation "overlaps" 'overlaps U V = (overlaps ? U V).
-interpretation "subseteq" 'subseteq U V = (subseteq ? U V).
+ndefinition intersect ≝ λA.λU,V:Ω^A.{ x | x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ V }.
+interpretation "intersect" 'intersects U V = (intersect ? U V).
+
+ndefinition union ≝ λA.λU,V:Ω^A.{ x | x ∈ U ∨ x ∈ V }.
+interpretation "union" 'union U V = (union ? U V).
+
+ndefinition big_union ≝ λA,B.λT:Ω^A.λf:A → Ω^B.{ x | ∃i. i ∈ T ∧ x ∈ f i }.
+
+ndefinition big_intersection ≝ λA,B.λT:Ω^A.λf:A → Ω^B.{ x | ∀i. i ∈ T → x ∈ f i }.
-ntheorem subseteq_refl: ∀A.∀S:Ω \sup A.S ⊆ S.
- #A; #S; #x; #H; nassumption;
+ndefinition full_set: ∀A. Ω^A ≝ λA.{ x | True }.
+
+nlemma subseteq_refl: ∀A.∀S: Ω^A. S ⊆ S.
+ #A; #S; #x; #H; nassumption.
nqed.
-ntheorem subseteq_trans: ∀A.∀S1,S2,S3: Ω \sup A. S1 ⊆ S2 → S2 ⊆ S3 → S1 ⊆ S3.
- #A; #S1; #S2; #S3; #H12; #H23; #x; #H;
- napply H23; napply H12; nassumption;
+nlemma subseteq_trans: ∀A.∀S,T,U: Ω^A. S ⊆ T → T ⊆ U → S ⊆ U.
+ #A; #S; #T; #U; #H1; #H2; #x; #P; napply H2; napply H1; nassumption.
nqed.
-ndefinition powerset_setoid1: setoid → setoid1.
- #S; napply mk_setoid1
- [ napply (Ω \sup S)
- | napply mk_equivalence_relation1
- [ #A; #B; napply (∀x. iff (x ∈ A) (x ∈ B))
- | nwhd; #x; #x0; napply mk_iff; #H; nassumption
- | nwhd; #x; #y; #H; #A; napply mk_iff; #K
- [ napply (fi ?? (H ?)) | napply (if ?? (H ?)) ]
- nassumption
- | nwhd; #A; #B; #C; #H1; #H2; #H3; napply mk_iff; #H4
- [ napply (if ?? (H2 ?)); napply (if ?? (H1 ?)); nassumption
- | napply (fi ?? (H1 ?)); napply (fi ?? (H2 ?)); nassumption]##]
+include "properties/relations1.ma".
+
+ndefinition seteq: ∀A. equivalence_relation1 (Ω^A).
+ #A; @
+ [ napply (λS,S'. S ⊆ S' ∧ S' ⊆ S)
+ | #S; @; napply subseteq_refl
+ | #S; #S'; *; #H1; #H2; @; nassumption
+ | #S; #T; #U; *; #H1; #H2; *; #H3; #H4; @; napply subseteq_trans;
+ ##[##2,5: nassumption |##1,4: ##skip |##*: nassumption]##]
nqed.
-unification hint 0 (∀A.(λx,y.True) (Ω \sup A) (carr1 (powerset_setoid1 A))).
+include "sets/setoids1.ma".
-ndefinition mem: ∀A:setoid. binary_morphism1 A (powerset_setoid1 A) CPROP.
- #A; napply mk_binary_morphism1
- [ napply (λa.λA.a ∈ A)
- | #a; #a'; #B; #B'; #Ha; #HB; napply mk_iff; #H
- [ napply (. (†Ha^-1)); (* CSC: notation for ∈ not working *)
- napply (if ?? (HB ?)); nassumption
- | napply (. (†Ha)); napply (fi ?? (HB ?)); nassumption]##]
+(* this has to be declared here, so that it is combined with carr *)
+ncoercion full_set : ∀A:Type[0]. Ω^A ≝ full_set on A: Type[0] to (Ω^?).
+
+ndefinition powerclass_setoid: Type[0] → setoid1.
+ #A; @[ napply (Ω^A)| napply seteq ]
nqed.
-unification hint 0 (∀A,x,S. (λx,y.True) (mem_op A x S) (fun21 ??? (mem A) S x)).
+include "hints_declaration.ma".
-ndefinition overlaps ≝ λA.λU,V:Ω \sup A.∃x:A.x ∈ U ∧ x ∈ V.
+alias symbol "hint_decl" = "hint_decl_Type2".
+unification hint 0 ≔ A ⊢ carr1 (mk_setoid1 (Ω^A) (eq1 (powerclass_setoid A))) ≡ Ω^A.
-interpretation "overlaps" 'overlaps U V = (overlaps ? U V).
+(************ SETS OVER SETOIDS ********************)
-ndefinition intersects ≝ λA:Type[0].λU,V:A → CProp[0]. λx. U x ∧ V x.
+include "logic/cprop.ma".
+
+nrecord ext_powerclass (A: setoid) : Type[1] ≝
+ { ext_carr:> Ω^A; (* qui pc viene dichiarato con un target preciso...
+ forse lo si vorrebbe dichiarato con un target più lasco
+ ma la sintassi :> non lo supporta *)
+ ext_prop: ∀x,x':A. x=x' → (x ∈ ext_carr) = (x' ∈ ext_carr)
+ }.
+
+notation > "𝛀 ^ term 90 A" non associative with precedence 70
+for @{ 'ext_powerclass $A }.
-interpretation "intersects" 'intersects U V = (intersects ? U V).
+notation "Ω term 90 A \atop ≈" non associative with precedence 70
+for @{ 'ext_powerclass $A }.
-(* dovrebbe essere un binario? *)
-ndefinition intersects_ok: ∀A. Ω \sup A → Ω \sup A → Ω \sup A.
- #A; #U; #V; napply mk_powerset; napply mk_unary_morphism1
- [ napply (intersects ? (mem_op ? U) (mem_op ? V))
- | #a; #a'; #H; napply mk_iff; *; #H1; #H2
- [ nwhd; napply (. ((H^-1‡#)‡(H^-1‡#))); nwhd; napply conj; nassumption
- | nwhd; napply (. ((H‡#)‡(H‡#))); nwhd; napply conj; nassumption]
+interpretation "extensional powerclass" 'ext_powerclass a = (ext_powerclass a).
+
+ndefinition Full_set: ∀A. 𝛀^A.
+ #A; @[ napply A | #x; #x'; #H; napply refl1]
nqed.
+ncoercion Full_set: ∀A. ext_powerclass A ≝ Full_set on A: setoid to ext_powerclass ?.
-unification hint 0 (∀A.∀U,V: Ω \sup A.∀w.(λx,y.True)
- (intersects A U V w) (fun11 ?? (mem_op ? (intersects_ok A U V)) w)).
+ndefinition ext_seteq: ∀A. equivalence_relation1 (𝛀^A).
+ #A; @
+ [ napply (λS,S'. S = S')
+ | #S; napply (refl1 ? (seteq A))
+ | #S; #S'; napply (sym1 ? (seteq A))
+ | #S; #T; #U; napply (trans1 ? (seteq A))]
+nqed.
-nlemma test: ∀A. ∀U,V: Ω \sup A. ∀x,x':A. x=x' → (U ∩ V) x → (U ∩ V) x'.
- #A; #U; #V; #x; #x'; #H; #p;
- nwhd in ⊢ (? ? % % ?);
- (* l'unification hint non funziona *)
- nchange with (? ∈ (intersects_ok ? ? ?));
- napply (. (†H^-1));
- nassumption.
+ndefinition ext_powerclass_setoid: setoid → setoid1.
+ #A; @
+ [ napply (ext_powerclass A)
+ | napply (ext_seteq A) ]
nqed.
+
+unification hint 0 ≔ A;
+ R ≟ (mk_setoid1 (𝛀^A) (eq1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A)))
+ (* ----------------------------------------------------- *) ⊢
+ carr1 R ≡ ext_powerclass A.
+interpretation "prop21 mem" 'prop2 l r = (prop21 (setoid1_of_setoid ?) (ext_powerclass_setoid ?) ? ? ???? l r).
+
(*
-ndefinition union ≝ λA.λU,V:Ω \sup A. {x | x ∈ U ∨ x ∈ V }.
+ncoercion ext_carr' : ∀A.∀x:ext_powerclass_setoid A. Ω^A ≝ ext_carr
+on _x : (carr1 (ext_powerclass_setoid ?)) to (Ω^?).
+*)
-interpretation "union" 'union U V = (union ? U V).
+nlemma mem_ext_powerclass_setoid_is_morph:
+ ∀A. binary_morphism1 (setoid1_of_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A) CPROP.
+ #A; @
+ [ napply (λx,S. x ∈ S)
+ | #a; #a'; #b; #b'; #Ha; *; #Hb1; #Hb2; @; #H;
+ ##[ napply Hb1; napply (. (ext_prop … Ha^-1)); nassumption;
+ ##| napply Hb2; napply (. (ext_prop … Ha)); nassumption;
+ ##]
+ ##]
+nqed.
+
+unification hint 0 ≔ A:setoid, x, S;
+ SS ≟ (ext_carr ? S),
+ TT ≟ (mk_binary_morphism1 ???
+ (λx:setoid1_of_setoid ?.λS:ext_powerclass_setoid ?. x ∈ S)
+ (prop21 ??? (mem_ext_powerclass_setoid_is_morph A))),
+ XX ≟ (ext_powerclass_setoid A)
+ (*-------------------------------------*) ⊢
+ fun21 (setoid1_of_setoid A) XX CPROP TT x S
+ ≡ mem A SS x.
-ndefinition singleton ≝ λA:setoid.λa:A.{b | a=b}.
+nlemma subseteq_is_morph: ∀A. binary_morphism1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A) CPROP.
+ #A; @
+ [ napply (λS,S'. S ⊆ S')
+ | #a; #a'; #b; #b'; *; #Ha1; #Ha2; *; #Hb1; #Hb2; @; #H
+ [ napply (subseteq_trans … a)
+ [ nassumption | napply (subseteq_trans … b); nassumption ]
+ ##| napply (subseteq_trans … a')
+ [ nassumption | napply (subseteq_trans … b'); nassumption ] ##]
+nqed.
+
+unification hint 0 ≔ A,a,a'
+ (*-----------------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
+ eq_rel ? (eq A) a a' ≡ eq_rel1 ? (eq1 (setoid1_of_setoid A)) a a'.
+
+nlemma intersect_is_ext: ∀A. 𝛀^A → 𝛀^A → 𝛀^A.
+ #A; #S; #S'; @ (S ∩ S');
+ #a; #a'; #Ha; @; *; #H1; #H2; @
+ [##1,2: napply (. Ha^-1‡#); nassumption;
+##|##3,4: napply (. Ha‡#); nassumption]
+nqed.
+
+alias symbol "hint_decl" = "hint_decl_Type1".
+unification hint 0 ≔
+ A : setoid, B,C : ext_powerclass A;
+ R ≟ (mk_ext_powerclass ? (B ∩ C) (ext_prop ? (intersect_is_ext ? B C)))
+
+ (* ------------------------------------------*) ⊢
+ ext_carr A R ≡ intersect ? (ext_carr ? B) (ext_carr ? C).
+
+nlemma intersect_is_morph:
+ ∀A. binary_morphism1 (powerclass_setoid A) (powerclass_setoid A) (powerclass_setoid A).
+ #A; @ (λS,S'. S ∩ S');
+ #a; #a'; #b; #b'; *; #Ha1; #Ha2; *; #Hb1; #Hb2; @; #x; nnormalize; *; #Ka; #Kb; @
+ [ napply Ha1; nassumption
+ | napply Hb1; nassumption
+ | napply Ha2; nassumption
+ | napply Hb2; nassumption]
+nqed.
+
+alias symbol "hint_decl" = "hint_decl_Type1".
+unification hint 0 ≔
+ A : Type[0], B,C : Ω^A;
+ R ≟ (mk_binary_morphism1 …
+ (λS,S'.S ∩ S')
+ (prop21 … (intersect_is_morph A)))
+ ⊢
+ fun21 (powerclass_setoid A) (powerclass_setoid A) (powerclass_setoid A) R B C
+ ≡ intersect ? B C.
+
+interpretation "prop21 ext" 'prop2 l r = (prop21 (ext_powerclass_setoid ?) (ext_powerclass_setoid ?) ? ? ???? l r).
+
+nlemma intersect_is_ext_morph:
+ ∀A. binary_morphism1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A).
+ #A; @ (intersect_is_ext …); nlapply (prop21 … (intersect_is_morph A));
+#H; #a; #a'; #b; #b'; #H1; #H2; napply H; nassumption;
+nqed.
-interpretation "singleton" 'singl a = (singleton ? a).*)
+unification hint 1 ≔
+ A:setoid, B,C : 𝛀^A;
+ R ≟ (mk_binary_morphism1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A)
+ (λS,S':carr1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A).
+ mk_ext_powerclass A (S∩S') (ext_prop A (intersect_is_ext ? S S')))
+ (prop21 … (intersect_is_ext_morph A))) ,
+ BB ≟ (ext_carr ? B),
+ CC ≟ (ext_carr ? C)
+ (* ------------------------------------------------------*) ⊢
+ ext_carr A
+ (fun21
+ (ext_powerclass_setoid A)
+ (ext_powerclass_setoid A)
+ (ext_powerclass_setoid A) R B C) ≡
+ intersect (carr A) BB CC.
(*
-(* qui non funziona una cippa *)
-ndefinition image: ∀A,B. (carr A → carr B) → Ω \sup A → Ω \sup B ≝
- λA,B:setoid.λf:carr A → carr B.λSa:Ω \sup A.
- {y | ∃x. x ∈ Sa ∧ eq_rel (carr B) (eq B) ? ?(*(f x) y*)}.
- ##[##2: napply (f x); ##|##3: napply y]
- #a; #a'; #H; nwhd; nnormalize; (* per togliere setoid1_of_setoid *) napply (mk_iff ????);
- *; #x; #Hx; napply (ex_intro … x)
- [ napply (. (#‡(#‡#)));
-
-ndefinition counter_image: ∀A,B. (A → B) → Ω \sup B → Ω \sup A ≝
+alias symbol "hint_decl" = "hint_decl_Type2".
+unification hint 0 ≔
+ A : setoid, B,C : 𝛀^A ;
+ CC ≟ (ext_carr ? C),
+ BB ≟ (ext_carr ? B),
+ C1 ≟ (carr1 (powerclass_setoid (carr A))),
+ C2 ≟ (carr1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A))
+ ⊢
+ eq_rel1 C1 (eq1 (powerclass_setoid (carr A))) BB CC ≡
+ eq_rel1 C2 (eq1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A)) B C.
+
+unification hint 0 ≔
+ A, B : CPROP ⊢ iff A B ≡ eq_rel1 ? (eq1 CPROP) A B.
+
+nlemma test: ∀U.∀A,B:𝛀^U. A ∩ B = A →
+ ∀x,y. x=y → x ∈ A → y ∈ A ∩ B.
+ #U; #A; #B; #H; #x; #y; #K; #K2;
+ alias symbol "prop2" = "prop21 mem".
+ alias symbol "invert" = "setoid1 symmetry".
+ napply (. K^-1‡H);
+ nassumption;
+nqed.
+
+
+nlemma intersect_ok: ∀A. binary_morphism1 (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A) (ext_powerclass_setoid A).
+ #A; @
+ [ #S; #S'; @
+ [ napply (S ∩ S')
+ | #a; #a'; #Ha;
+ nwhd in ⊢ (? ? ? % %); @; *; #H1; #H2; @
+ [##1,2: napply (. Ha^-1‡#); nassumption;
+ ##|##3,4: napply (. Ha‡#); nassumption]##]
+ ##| #a; #a'; #b; #b'; #Ha; #Hb; nwhd; @; #x; nwhd in ⊢ (% → %); #H
+ [ alias symbol "invert" = "setoid1 symmetry".
+ alias symbol "refl" = "refl".
+alias symbol "prop2" = "prop21".
+napply (. ((#‡Ha^-1)‡(#‡Hb^-1))); nassumption
+ | napply (. ((#‡Ha)‡(#‡Hb))); nassumption ]##]
+nqed.
+
+(* unfold if intersect, exposing fun21 *)
+alias symbol "hint_decl" = "hint_decl_Type1".
+unification hint 0 ≔
+ A : setoid, B,C : ext_powerclass A ⊢
+ pc A (fun21 …
+ (mk_binary_morphism1 …
+ (λS,S':qpowerclass_setoid A.mk_qpowerclass ? (S ∩ S') (mem_ok' ? (intersect_ok ? S S')))
+ (prop21 … (intersect_ok A)))
+ B
+ C)
+ ≡ intersect ? (pc ? B) (pc ? C).
+
+nlemma test: ∀A:setoid. ∀U,V:qpowerclass A. ∀x,x':setoid1_of_setoid A. x=x' → x ∈ U ∩ V → x' ∈ U ∩ V.
+ #A; #U; #V; #x; #x'; #H; #p; napply (. (H^-1‡#)); nassumption.
+nqed.
+*)
+
+ndefinition image: ∀A,B. (carr A → carr B) → Ω^A → Ω^B ≝
+ λA,B:setoid.λf:carr A → carr B.λSa:Ω^A.
+ {y | ∃x. x ∈ Sa ∧ eq_rel (carr B) (eq B) (f x) y}.
+
+ndefinition counter_image: ∀A,B. (carr A → carr B) → Ω^B → Ω^A ≝
λA,B,f,Sb. {x | ∃y. y ∈ Sb ∧ f x = y}.
+
+(******************* compatible equivalence relations **********************)
+
+nrecord compatible_equivalence_relation (A: setoid) : Type[1] ≝
+ { rel:> equivalence_relation A;
+ compatibility: ∀x,x':A. x=x' → rel x x'
+ }.
+
+ndefinition quotient: ∀A. compatible_equivalence_relation A → setoid.
+ #A; #R; @ A R;
+nqed.
+
+(******************* first omomorphism theorem for sets **********************)
+
+ndefinition eqrel_of_morphism:
+ ∀A,B. unary_morphism A B → compatible_equivalence_relation A.
+ #A; #B; #f; @
+ [ @
+ [ napply (λx,y. f x = f y)
+ | #x; napply refl | #x; #y; napply sym | #x; #y; #z; napply trans]
+##| #x; #x'; #H; nwhd; alias symbol "prop1" = "prop1".
+napply (.= (†H)); napply refl ]
+nqed.
+
+ndefinition canonical_proj: ∀A,R. unary_morphism A (quotient A R).
+ #A; #R; @
+ [ napply (λx.x) | #a; #a'; #H; napply (compatibility … R … H) ]
+nqed.
+
+ndefinition quotiented_mor:
+ ∀A,B.∀f:unary_morphism A B.
+ unary_morphism (quotient … (eqrel_of_morphism … f)) B.
+ #A; #B; #f; @
+ [ napply f | #a; #a'; #H; nassumption]
+nqed.
+
+nlemma first_omomorphism_theorem_functions1:
+ ∀A,B.∀f: unary_morphism A B.
+ ∀x. f x = quotiented_mor … (canonical_proj … (eqrel_of_morphism … f) x).
+ #A; #B; #f; #x; napply refl;
+nqed.
+
+ndefinition surjective ≝
+ λA,B.λS: ext_powerclass A.λT: ext_powerclass B.λf:unary_morphism A B.
+ ∀y. y ∈ T → ∃x. x ∈ S ∧ f x = y.
+
+ndefinition injective ≝
+ λA,B.λS: ext_powerclass A.λf:unary_morphism A B.
+ ∀x,x'. x ∈ S → x' ∈ S → f x = f x' → x = x'.
+
+nlemma first_omomorphism_theorem_functions2:
+ ∀A,B.∀f: unary_morphism A B.
+ surjective … (Full_set ?) (Full_set ?) (canonical_proj ? (eqrel_of_morphism … f)).
+ #A; #B; #f; nwhd; #y; #Hy; @ y; @ I ; napply refl;
+ (* bug, prova @ I refl *)
+nqed.
+
+nlemma first_omomorphism_theorem_functions3:
+ ∀A,B.∀f: unary_morphism A B.
+ injective … (Full_set ?) (quotiented_mor … f).
+ #A; #B; #f; nwhd; #x; #x'; #Hx; #Hx'; #K; nassumption.
+nqed.
+
+nrecord isomorphism (A, B : setoid) (S: ext_powerclass A) (T: ext_powerclass B) : Type[0] ≝
+ { iso_f:> unary_morphism A B;
+ f_closed: ∀x. x ∈ S → iso_f x ∈ T;
+ f_sur: surjective … S T iso_f;
+ f_inj: injective … S iso_f
+ }.
+
+(*
+nrecord isomorphism (A, B : setoid) (S: qpowerclass A) (T: qpowerclass B) : CProp[0] ≝
+ { iso_f:> unary_morphism A B;
+ f_closed: ∀x. x ∈ pc A S → fun1 ?? iso_f x ∈ pc B T}.
+
+
+ncheck (λA:?.
+ λB:?.
+ λS:?.
+ λT:?.
+ λxxx:isomorphism A B S T.
+ match xxx
+ return λxxx:isomorphism A B S T.
+ ∀x: carr A.
+ ∀x_72: mem (carr A) (pc A S) x.
+ mem (carr B) (pc B T) (fun1 A B ((λ_.?) A B S T xxx) x)
+ with [ mk_isomorphism _ yyy ⇒ yyy ] ).
+
+ ;
+ }.
*)
projects / helm.git / blobdiff