--- /dev/null
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+
+<!DOCTYPE management [
+ <!ELEMENT management (head-links,introduction,main,other-infos,tail-links)>
+ <!ELEMENT main (project-manager,exploitation-manager,
+ work-package-leaders,
+ technical-contributors,
+ project-coordination-committee,
+ project-exploitation-board,
+ work-package-teams)>
+ <!ELEMENT project-coordination-committee (chair,member+,mandate)>
+ <!ELEMENT project-exploitation-board (chair,member+,mandate)>
+ <!ELEMENT work-package-leaders (mandate)>
+ <!ELEMENT technical-contributors (mandate)>
+
+ <!ELEMENT project-manager (mandate)>
+ <!ATTLIST project-manager
+ site CDATA #REQUIRED
+ file CDATA #REQUIRED>
+
+ <!ELEMENT exploitation-manager (mandate)>
+ <!ATTLIST exploitation-manager
+ site CDATA #REQUIRED
+ file CDATA #REQUIRED>
+
+ <!ELEMENT work-package-teams (mandate)>
+
+ <!ELEMENT chair EMPTY>
+ <!ATTLIST chair
+ site CDATA #REQUIRED
+ file CDATA #REQUIRED>
+
+ <!ELEMENT member EMPTY>
+ <!ATTLIST member
+ site CDATA #REQUIRED
+ file CDATA #REQUIRED>
+
+ <!ELEMENT mandate (#PCDATA)>
+
+ <!ELEMENT introduction (p|dl|ul)*>
+ <!ELEMENT other-infos (p|dl|ul)*>
+ <!ELEMENT head-links (p|dl|ul)*>
+ <!ELEMENT tail-links (p|dl|ul)*>
+
+
+ <!-- A subset of XHTML -->
+ <!ELEMENT p (#PCDATA|em|a)*>
+ <!ELEMENT em (#PCDATA)>
+ <!ELEMENT a (#PCDATA)>
+ <!ATTLIST a
+ href CDATA #REQUIRED>
+ <!ELEMENT dl (dt|dd)+>
+ <!ELEMENT dt (#PCDATA)>
+ <!ELEMENT dd (#PCDATA)>
+ <!ELEMENT ul (li)+>
+ <!ELEMENT ol (li)+>
+ <!ELEMENT li (#PCDATA)>
+ <!ELEMENT h1 (#PCDATA)>
+ <!ELEMENT h2 (#PCDATA)>
+]>
+
+<management>
+ <head-links>
+ <table width="550">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <a href="project-objectives.html" target="content"><img src="./../../images/PreviousArrow.gif" width="26" height="26" border="0" alt="Previous Page"/></a>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <a href="../project.html" target="content">Index</a>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <a href="contribution.html" target="content"><img src="./../../images/NextArrow.gif" width="26" height="26" border="0" alt="Next Page"/></a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+ <br/>
+ </head-links>
+ <introduction>
+ <h1>Project Management</h1>
+ <p>The Project management will be assured by the following relevant
+ roles:</p>
+ <ol>
+ <li>Project Manager</li>
+ <li>Exploitation manager</li>
+ <li>Work-package Leaders</li>
+ <li>Technical Contributors</li>
+ </ol>
+ <p>and by the following Project Bodies:</p>
+ <ol>
+ <li>Project Coordination Committee (PCC)</li>
+ <li>Project Exploitation Board</li>
+ <li>Work-package Teams.</li>
+ </ol>
+ </introduction>
+ <main>
+ <project-manager site="bologna" file="asperti">
+ <mandate>
+ The mandate of the Project Manager is to represent the Project, report to
+ the Commission, monitor overall performance of the project, ensure
+ accomplishment of the technical objectives, promote project visibility,
+ promote dissemination of project results in the relevant international
+ forums, promote acceptance of project results, administer
+ project resources and monitor project spending.
+ </mandate>
+ </project-manager>
+ <exploitation-manager site="aei" file="wegner">
+ <mandate>
+ He is responsible for coordinating exploitation activities undertaken
+ by the Project Exploitation Board (PEB) in close cooperation with the
+ Project Coordination Committee (PCC).
+ </mandate>
+ </exploitation-manager>
+ <work-package-leaders>
+ <mandate>
+ They are responsible for the performance of
+ Work-packages, and they must be committed to the Work-package for at
+ least five man months per year.
+ </mandate>
+ </work-package-leaders>
+ <technical-contributors>
+ <mandate>
+ Technical Contributors are specialised
+ staff provided by the partners. They could be either people active on
+ a stable basis into a Work-package, or people who contribute from time
+ to time on specific tasks related to the work-plan (external
+ contributors).
+ </mandate>
+ </technical-contributors>
+ <project-coordination-committee>
+ <chair site="bologna" file="asperti"/>
+ <member site="bologna" file="asperti"/>
+ <member site="dfki" file="kohlhase"/>
+ <member site="nijmegen" file="geuvers"/>
+ <member site="aei" file="schutz"/>
+ <member site="trusted-logic" file="loiseaux"/>
+ <member site="inria" file="rideau"/>
+ <mandate>
+ The PCC is chaired by the Project
+ Manager and constituted by one representative from each Partner, and
+ is the main decision body of the Consortium. It is in charge
+ of all formal decisions regarding technical direction of the work,
+ proper interrelation between Work-packages,
+ relations with IST Office, policies for promotion of results,
+ administrative arrangements.
+ </mandate>
+ </project-coordination-committee>
+ <project-exploitation-board>
+ <chair site="aei" file="wegner"/>
+ <member site="bologna" file="asperti"/>
+ <member site="dfki" file="moschner"/>
+ <member site="nijmegen" file="geuvers"/>
+ <member site="aei" file="wegner"/>
+ <member site="trusted-logic" file="loiseaux"/>
+ <member site="inria" file="herbelin"/>
+ <mandate>
+ The PEB is chaired by the
+ Project Exploitation Manager, and composed by the Exploitation
+ Managers of each partner. It monitors the state of the art in
+ the domains of content-based information technologies, W3C activities,
+ Web publishing, and digital libraries. It is responsible for
+ planning the dissemination and exploitation strategies for the
+ consortium, to be approved by the PCC.
+ </mandate>
+ </project-exploitation-board>
+ <work-package-teams>
+ <mandate>
+ They are constituted of the technical contributors.
+ Each team is chaired by a Work-package Leader, and it is in
+ charge of carrying out the technical work described in
+ each Work-Package.
+ </mandate>
+ </work-package-teams>
+ </main>
+ <other-infos>
+ <h2>Decision Process</h2>
+ <p>Decisions is normally taken by seeking consensus. However,
+ after a reasonable amount of time has been allowed to illustrate
+ and defend of conflicting positions, in order to avoid deadlock
+ in project operational progress, the approval of two-third majority
+ of the partners is sufficient. If the decision being taken
+ is unacceptable
+ to partners found in the minority positions, the resolution of the
+ conflict will be elevated to each partner's higher executive level.
+ If no resolution is possible, than the standard ``red flag'' procedure
+ will be used, as a last resort. Either the PCC or the Project Manager
+ can initiate the conflict resolution procedure.</p>
+
+ <h2>Information Flow</h2>
+ <p>Information flow within the Project is ensured by exchange of
+ internal technical papers, notification of relevant new publications
+ technologies or standards, and reports from external meetings.
+ All technical documentation generated by the project should be
+ exchangeable in electronic format, according to a set of guidelines
+ agreed at project start-up. The project Manager enforces
+ adherence to these guidelines. Only strictly formal correspondence
+ is exchanged by ordinary mail and telefax. Urgent correspondence
+ over e-mail is sent with a request for explicit acknowledgement.</p>
+ <p>The Coordinating Partner is responsible to prepare and maintain
+ a Web page of the project and a CVS repository (also available via Web).
+ The CVS repository is meant to keep the trace of the overall
+ progress of the Project, and it is used by the PCC to monitor
+ the state of advancement of the work. Each partner periodically
+ submit reports to the prime contractor, listing all technical
+ contributions, publications, meeting attendance and other information
+ which may help in understanding the provided effort and cost figures.</p>
+ <p>The Project has established a high quality Web site for internal and
+ external communications. It has been operational as from one month of
+ the commencement date and will be maintained during the project duration.
+ The ``members only'' area includes e.g. all private deliverables,
+ progress and management reports, and cost statements. The open area
+ includes the project presentation as defined in Appendix 2 of the
+ ``Guidelines
+ for Contract Preparation'' document, all public deliverables, and any
+ relevant information suggested by the Project Exploitation Board.</p>
+
+ <h2>Quality Procedures</h2>
+ <p>For all deliverables, the following review procedure
+ is adopted: release by the Work-Package Leader, two-week review
+ period for comments by the PCC, two-week amendment period to incorporate
+ PCC recommendations, one-week balloting period for approval by the
+ PCC.</p>
+
+ <h2>Confidentiality and IPR handling</h2>
+ <p>Matters related to Confidentiality and IPR handling have been defined
+ in the ``Consortium Agreement''. As regards literature papers
+ originated from work in the Project, there are two
+ categories of papers:</p>
+ <ol>
+ <li>Project Endorsed Publications, requiring notification and approval by
+ the PCC.</li>
+ <li>Project-related publications, only requiring notification to
+ the PCC. They must contain an acknowledgement of support by the
+ project Consortium and, if required by the PCC, a disclaimer that
+ the views are not necessarily those of the Consortium.</li>
+ </ol>
+ <p>Concerning possible contributions to Standards, they are
+ directly submitted by project members.</p>
+ </other-infos>
+ <tail-links>
+ <br/>
+ <table width="550">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <a href="project-objectives.html" target="content"><img src="./../../images/PreviousArrow.gif" width="26" height="26" border="0" alt="Previous Page"/></a>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <a href="../project.html" target="content">Index</a>
+ </td>
+ <td>
+ <a href="contribution.html" target="content"><img src="./../../images/NextArrow.gif" width="26" height="26" border="0" alt="Next Page"/></a>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+ </tail-links>
+</management>