(* Note: this is used in the closure proof *)
lemma fqup_fpbg:
- â\88\80G1,G2,L1,L2,T1,T2. â\9dªG1,L1,T1â\9d« â¬\82+ â\9dªG2,L2,T2â\9d« â\86\92 â\9dªG1,L1,T1â\9d« > â\9dªG2,L2,T2â\9d«.
+ â\88\80G1,G2,L1,L2,T1,T2. â\9d¨G1,L1,T1â\9d© â¬\82+ â\9d¨G2,L2,T2â\9d© â\86\92 â\9d¨G1,L1,T1â\9d© > â\9d¨G2,L2,T2â\9d©.
#G1 #G2 #L1 #L2 #T1 #T2 #H elim (fqup_inv_step_sn … H) -H
/3 width=5 by fpbc_fpbs_fpbg, fqus_fpbs, fqu_fpbc/
qed.
(* Note: this is used in the closure proof *)
lemma fqup_fpbg_trans (G) (L) (T):
- â\88\80G1,L1,T1. â\9dªG1,L1,T1â\9d« â¬\82+ â\9dªG,L,Tâ\9d« →
- â\88\80G2,L2,T2. â\9dªG,L,Tâ\9d« > â\9dªG2,L2,T2â\9d« â\86\92 â\9dªG1,L1,T1â\9d« > â\9dªG2,L2,T2â\9d«.
+ â\88\80G1,L1,T1. â\9d¨G1,L1,T1â\9d© â¬\82+ â\9d¨G,L,Tâ\9d© →
+ â\88\80G2,L2,T2. â\9d¨G,L,Tâ\9d© > â\9d¨G2,L2,T2â\9d© â\86\92 â\9d¨G1,L1,T1â\9d© > â\9d¨G2,L2,T2â\9d©.
/3 width=5 by fpbs_fpbg_trans, fqup_fpbs/ qed-.