context-free parallel reduction on closures is confluent!

[helm.git] / matita / matita / lib / basics / logic.ma

diff --git a/matita/matita/lib/basics/logic.ma b/matita/matita/lib/basics/logic.ma
index c80fa31f55c5469a97212e3c49431360e3e805fa..70e743e993ac96c12cdbf7a4a56cdc23bc8280b6 100644 (file)
--- a/matita/matita/lib/basics/logic.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/lib/basics/logic.ma
@@ -153,7 +153,28 @@ inductive ex2 (A:Type[0]) (P,Q:A →Prop) : Prop ≝
 definition iff :=
  λ A,B. (A → B) ∧ (B → A).
 
-interpretation "iff" 'iff a b = (iff a b).  
+interpretation "iff" 'iff a b = (iff a b).
+
+lemma iff_sym: ∀A,B. A ↔ B → B ↔ A.
+#A #B * /3/ qed.
+
+lemma iff_trans:∀A,B,C. A ↔ B → B ↔ C → A ↔ C.
+#A #B #C * #H1 #H2 * #H3 #H4 % /3/ qed.
+
+lemma iff_not: ∀A,B. A ↔ B → ¬A ↔ ¬B.
+#A #B * #H1 #H2 % /3/ qed.
+
+lemma iff_and_l: ∀A,B,C. A ↔ B → C ∧ A ↔ C ∧ B.
+#A #B #C * #H1 #H2 % * /3/ qed.  
+
+lemma iff_and_r: ∀A,B,C. A ↔ B → A ∧ C ↔ B ∧ C.
+#A #B #C * #H1 #H2 % * /3/ qed.  
+
+lemma iff_or_l: ∀A,B,C. A ↔ B → C ∨ A ↔ C ∨ B.
+#A #B #C * #H1 #H2 % * /3/ qed.  
+
+lemma iff_or_r: ∀A,B,C. A ↔ B → A ∨ C ↔ B ∨ C.
+#A #B #C * #H1 #H2 % * /3/ qed.  
 
 (* cose per destruct: da rivedere *) 
 
@@ -242,10 +263,10 @@ definition eqProp ≝ λA:Prop.eq A.
 
 (* Example to avoid indexing and the consequential creation of ill typed
    terms during paramodulation *)
-example lemmaK : ∀A.∀x:A.∀h:x=x. eqProp ? h (refl A x).
+lemma lemmaK : ∀A.∀x:A.∀h:x=x. eqProp ? h (refl A x).
 #A #x #h @(refl ? h: eqProp ? ? ?).
-qed.
+qed-.
 
 theorem streicherK : ∀T:Type[2].∀t:T.∀P:t = t → Type[3].P (refl ? t) → ∀p.P p.
  #T #t #P #H #p >(lemmaK T t p) @H
-qed.
+qed-.