--- /dev/null
+(*
+Moves
+We now define the move operation, that corresponds to the advancement of the
+state in response to the processing of an input character a. The intuition is
+clear: we have to look at points inside $e$ preceding the given character a,
+let the point traverse the character, and broadcast it. All other points must
+be removed.
+
+We can give a particularly elegant definition in terms of the
+lifted operators of the previous section:
+*)
+
+include "tutorial/chapter8.ma".
+
+let rec move (S: DeqSet) (x:S) (E: pitem S) on E : pre S ≝
+ match E with
+ [ pz ⇒ 〈 pz S, false 〉
+ | pe ⇒ 〈 ϵ, false 〉
+ | ps y ⇒ 〈 `y, false 〉
+ | pp y ⇒ 〈 `y, x == y 〉
+ | po e1 e2 ⇒ (move ? x e1) ⊕ (move ? x e2)
+ | pc e1 e2 ⇒ (move ? x e1) ⊙ (move ? x e2)
+ | pk e ⇒ (move ? x e)^⊛ ].
+
+lemma move_plus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀x:S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
+ move S x (i1 + i2) = (move ? x i1) ⊕ (move ? x i2).
+// qed.
+
+lemma move_cat: ∀S:DeqSet.∀x:S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
+ move S x (i1 · i2) = (move ? x i1) ⊙ (move ? x i2).
+// qed.
+
+lemma move_star: ∀S:DeqSet.∀x:S.∀i:pitem S.
+ move S x i^* = (move ? x i)^⊛.
+// qed.
+
+(*
+Example. Let us consider the item
+
+ (•a + ϵ)((•b)*•a + •b)b
+
+and the two moves w.r.t. the characters a and b.
+For a, we have two possible positions (all other points gets erased); the innermost
+point stops in front of the final b, while the other one broadcast inside (b^*a + b)b,
+so
+
+ move((•a + ϵ)((•b)*•a + •b)b,a) = 〈(a + ϵ)((•b)^*•a + •b)•b, false〉
+
+For b, we have two positions too. The innermost point stops in front of the final b too,
+while the other point reaches the end of b* and must go back through b*a:
+
+ move((•a + ϵ)((•b)*•a + •b)b ,b) = 〈(a + ϵ)((•b)*•a + b)•b, false〉
+
+*)
+
+definition pmove ≝ λS:DeqSet.λx:S.λe:pre S. move ? x (\fst e).
+
+lemma pmove_def : ∀S:DeqSet.∀x:S.∀i:pitem S.∀b.
+ pmove ? x 〈i,b〉 = move ? x i.
+// qed.
+
+lemma eq_to_eq_hd: ∀A.∀l1,l2:list A.∀a,b.
+ a::l1 = b::l2 → a = b.
+#A #l1 #l2 #a #b #H destruct //
+qed.
+
+(* Obviously, a move does not change the carrier of the item, as one can easily
+prove by induction on the item. *)
+
+lemma same_kernel: ∀S:DeqSet.∀a:S.∀i:pitem S.
+ |\fst (move ? a i)| = |i|.
+#S #a #i elim i //
+ [#i1 #i2 #H1 #H2 >move_cat >erase_odot //
+ |#i1 #i2 #H1 #H2 >move_plus whd in ⊢ (??%%); //
+ ]
+qed.
+
+(* Here is our first, major result, stating the correctness of the
+move operation. The proof is a simple induction on i. *)
+
+theorem move_ok:
+ ∀S:DeqSet.∀a:S.∀i:pitem S.∀w: word S.
+ \sem{move ? a i} w ↔ \sem{i} (a::w).
+#S #a #i elim i
+ [normalize /2/
+ |normalize /2/
+ |normalize /2/
+ |normalize #x #w cases (true_or_false (a==x)) #H >H normalize
+ [>(\P H) % [* // #bot @False_ind //| #H1 destruct /2/]
+ |% [@False_ind |#H1 cases (\Pf H) #H2 @H2 destruct //]
+ ]
+ |#i1 #i2 #HI1 #HI2 #w >move_cat
+ @iff_trans[|@sem_odot] >same_kernel >sem_cat_w
+ @iff_trans[||@(iff_or_l … (HI2 w))] @iff_or_r
+ @iff_trans[||@iff_sym @deriv_middot //]
+ @cat_ext_l @HI1
+ |#i1 #i2 #HI1 #HI2 #w >(sem_plus S i1 i2) >move_plus >sem_plus_w
+ @iff_trans[|@sem_oplus]
+ @iff_trans[|@iff_or_l [|@HI2]| @iff_or_r //]
+ |#i1 #HI1 #w >move_star
+ @iff_trans[|@sem_ostar] >same_kernel >sem_star_w
+ @iff_trans[||@iff_sym @deriv_middot //]
+ @cat_ext_l @HI1
+ ]
+qed.
+
+(* The move operation is generalized to strings in the obvious way. *)
+
+notation > "x ↦* E" non associative with precedence 60 for @{moves ? $x $E}.
+
+let rec moves (S : DeqSet) w e on w : pre S ≝
+ match w with
+ [ nil ⇒ e
+ | cons x w' ⇒ w' ↦* (move S x (\fst e))].
+
+lemma moves_empty: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e:pre S.
+ moves ? [ ] e = e.
+// qed.
+
+lemma moves_cons: ∀S:DeqSet.∀a:S.∀w.∀e:pre S.
+ moves ? (a::w) e = moves ? w (move S a (\fst e)).
+// qed.
+
+lemma moves_left : ∀S,a,w,e.
+ moves S (w@(a::[])) e = move S a (\fst (moves S w e)).
+#S #a #w elim w // #x #tl #Hind #e >moves_cons >moves_cons //
+qed.
+
+lemma not_epsilon_sem: ∀S:DeqSet.∀a:S.∀w: word S. ∀e:pre S.
+ iff ((a::w) ∈ e) ((a::w) ∈ \fst e).
+#S #a #w * #i #b cases b normalize
+ [% /2/ * // #H destruct |% normalize /2/]
+qed.
+
+lemma same_kernel_moves: ∀S:DeqSet.∀w.∀e:pre S.
+ |\fst (moves ? w e)| = |\fst e|.
+#S #w elim w //
+qed.
+
+theorem decidable_sem: ∀S:DeqSet.∀w: word S. ∀e:pre S.
+ (\snd (moves ? w e) = true) ↔ \sem{e} w.
+#S #w elim w
+ [* #i #b >moves_empty cases b % /2/
+ |#a #w1 #Hind #e >moves_cons
+ @iff_trans [||@iff_sym @not_epsilon_sem]
+ @iff_trans [||@move_ok] @Hind
+ ]
+qed.
+
+(* It is now clear that we can build a DFA D_e for e by taking pre as states,
+and move as transition function; the initial state is •(e) and a state 〈i,b〉 is
+final if and only if b is true. The fact that states in D_e are finite is obvious:
+in fact, their cardinality is at most 2^{n+1} where n is the number of symbols in
+e. This is one of the advantages of pointed regular expressions w.r.t. derivatives,
+whose finite nature only holds after a suitable quotient.
+
+Let us discuss a couple of examples.
+
+Example.
+Below is the DFA associated with the regular expression (ac+bc)*.
+
+DFA for (ac+bc)
+
+The graphical description of the automaton is the traditional one, with nodes for
+states and labelled arcs for transitions. Unreachable states are not shown.
+Final states are emphasized by a double circle: since a state 〈e,b〉 is final if and
+only if b is true, we may just label nodes with the item.
+The automaton is not minimal: it is easy to see that the two states corresponding to
+the items (a•c +bc)* and (ac+b•c)* are equivalent (a way to prove it is to observe
+that they define the same language!). In fact, an important property of pres e is that
+each state has a clear semantics, given in terms of the specification e and not of the
+behaviour of the automaton. As a consequence, the construction of the automaton is not
+only direct, but also extremely intuitive and locally verifiable.
+
+Let us consider a more complex case.
+
+Example.
+Starting form the regular expression (a+ϵ)(b*a + b)b, we obtain the following automaton.
+
+DFA for (a+ϵ)(b*a + b)b
+
+Remarkably, this DFA is minimal, testifying the small number of states produced by our
+technique (the pair of states 6-8 and 7-9 differ for the fact that 6 and 7
+are final, while 8 and 9 are not).
+
+
+Move to pit
+.
+
+We conclude this chapter with a few properties of the move opertions in relation
+with the pit state. *)
+
+definition pit_pre ≝ λS.λi.〈blank S (|i|), false〉.
+
+(* The following function compute the list of characters occurring in a given
+item i. *)
+
+let rec occur (S: DeqSet) (i: re S) on i ≝
+ match i with
+ [ z ⇒ [ ]
+ | e ⇒ [ ]
+ | s y ⇒ y::[]
+ | o e1 e2 ⇒ unique_append ? (occur S e1) (occur S e2)
+ | c e1 e2 ⇒ unique_append ? (occur S e1) (occur S e2)
+ | k e ⇒ occur S e].
+
+(* If a symbol a does not occur in i, then move(i,a) gets to the
+pit state. *)
+
+lemma not_occur_to_pit: ∀S,a.∀i:pitem S. memb S a (occur S (|i|)) ≠ true →
+ move S a i = pit_pre S i.
+#S #a #i elim i //
+ [#x normalize cases (a==x) normalize // #H @False_ind /2/
+ |#i1 #i2 #Hind1 #Hind2 #H >move_cat
+ >Hind1 [2:@(not_to_not … H) #H1 @sublist_unique_append_l1 //]
+ >Hind2 [2:@(not_to_not … H) #H1 @sublist_unique_append_l2 //] //
+ |#i1 #i2 #Hind1 #Hind2 #H >move_plus
+ >Hind1 [2:@(not_to_not … H) #H1 @sublist_unique_append_l1 //]
+ >Hind2 [2:@(not_to_not … H) #H1 @sublist_unique_append_l2 //] //
+ |#i #Hind #H >move_star >Hind //
+ ]
+qed.
+
+(* We cannot escape form the pit state. *)
+
+lemma move_pit: ∀S,a,i. move S a (\fst (pit_pre S i)) = pit_pre S i.
+#S #a #i elim i //
+ [#i1 #i2 #Hind1 #Hind2 >move_cat >Hind1 >Hind2 //
+ |#i1 #i2 #Hind1 #Hind2 >move_plus >Hind1 >Hind2 //
+ |#i #Hind >move_star >Hind //
+ ]
+qed.
+
+lemma moves_pit: ∀S,w,i. moves S w (pit_pre S i) = pit_pre S i.
+#S #w #i elim w //
+qed.
+
+(* If any character in w does not occur in i, then moves(i,w) gets
+to the pit state. *)
+
+lemma to_pit: ∀S,w,e. ¬ sublist S w (occur S (|\fst e|)) →
+ moves S w e = pit_pre S (\fst e).
+#S #w elim w
+ [#e * #H @False_ind @H normalize #a #abs @False_ind /2/
+ |#a #tl #Hind #e #H cases (true_or_false (memb S a (occur S (|\fst e|))))
+ [#Htrue >moves_cons whd in ⊢ (???%); <(same_kernel … a)
+ @Hind >same_kernel @(not_to_not … H) #H1 #b #memb cases (orb_true_l … memb)
+ [#H2 >(\P H2) // |#H2 @H1 //]
+ |#Hfalse >moves_cons >not_occur_to_pit // >Hfalse /2/
+ ]
+ ]
+qed.
\ No newline at end of file
projects / helm.git / blobdiff