interpretation "leibnitz's equality" 'eq t x y = (eq t x y).
+
lemma eq_rect_r:
- ∀A.∀a,x.∀p:eq ? x a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[2]. P a (refl A a) → P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a,x.∀p:eq ? x a.∀P: ∀x:A. x = a → Type[2]. P a (refl A a) → P x p.
#A #a #x #p (cases p) // qed.
lemma eq_ind_r :
- ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. x = a → Prop. P a (refl A a) → ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. x = a → Prop. P a (refl A a) →
+ ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
#A #a #P #p #x0 #p0; @(eq_rect_r ? ? ? p0) //; qed.
lemma eq_rect_Type2_r:
- ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[2]. P a (refl A a) → ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
+ ∀A.∀a.∀P: ∀x:A. eq ? x a → Type[2]. P a (refl A a) →
+ ∀x.∀p:eq ? x a.P x p.
#A #a #P #H #x #p (generalize in match H) (generalize in match P)
cases p; //; qed.
definition R1 ≝ eq_rect_Type0.
-(* useless stuff
+(* useless stuff *)
definition R2 :
∀T0:Type[0].
∀a0:T0.
@(eq_rect_Type0 ????? e3)
@(R3 ????????? e0 ? e1 ? e2)
@a4
-qed. *)
+qed.
(* TODO concrete definition by means of proof irrelevance *)
axiom streicherK : ∀T:Type[1].∀t:T.∀P:t = t → Type[2].P (refl ? t) → ∀p.P p.