X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fmatita%2Flibrary%2Fnat%2Fchebyshev.ma;h=1f50b3212642baba2caed404e5ef98d33b3cd0f7;hb=10f29fdd78ee089a9a94446207b543d33d6c851c;hp=c06675d0e2d3db98e1019496b3ed94887609fba5;hpb=fb3cf5acfd87741651c5e30ad1911a08e26f6c69;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/matita/library/nat/chebyshev.ma b/helm/software/matita/library/nat/chebyshev.ma index c06675d0e..1f50b3212 100644 --- a/helm/software/matita/library/nat/chebyshev.ma +++ b/helm/software/matita/library/nat/chebyshev.ma @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ include "nat/factorial2.ma". definition prim: nat \to nat \def \lambda n. sigma_p (S n) primeb (\lambda p.(S O)). +(* This is chebishev psi funcion *) definition A: nat \to nat \def \lambda n. pi_p (S n) primeb (\lambda p.exp p (log p n)). @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ elim (le_to_or_lt_eq ? ? (le_O_n n)) ] qed. +(* an equivalent formulation for psi *) definition A': nat \to nat \def \lambda n. pi_p (S n) primeb (\lambda p.(pi_p (log p n) (\lambda i.true) (\lambda i.p))). @@ -327,7 +329,8 @@ intro.elim q ] ] qed. - + +(* factorization of n into primes *) theorem pi_p_primeb_divides_b: \forall n. O < n \to n = pi_p (S n) (\lambda i.primeb i \land divides_b i n) (\lambda p.exp p (ord n p)). intros. @@ -505,6 +508,7 @@ apply eq_pi_p1 ] qed. +(* the factorial function *) theorem eq_fact_pi_p:\forall n. fact n = pi_p (S n) (\lambda i.leb (S O) i) (\lambda i.i). intro.elim n @@ -590,6 +594,7 @@ apply (div_mod_spec_to_eq n q ? (n \mod q) ? (n \mod q)) ] qed. +(* still another characterization of the factorial *) theorem fact_pi_p: \forall n. fact n = pi_p (S n) primeb (\lambda p.(pi_p (log p n) @@ -676,13 +681,6 @@ apply (trans_eq ? ? [apply prime_to_lt_SO. apply primeb_true_to_prime. assumption - |apply (lt_to_le_to_lt ? x) - [apply prime_to_lt_O. - apply primeb_true_to_prime. - assumption - |apply leb_true_to_le. - assumption - ] |apply le_S_S_to_le. assumption ] @@ -900,7 +898,6 @@ apply eq_pi_p1;intros [apply prime_to_lt_SO. apply primeb_true_to_prime. assumption - |apply lt_to_le.assumption |apply le_times_n. apply lt_O_S ] @@ -1016,6 +1013,34 @@ intro.cases n ] qed. +theorem lt_SO_to_le_exp_B: \forall n. S O < n \to +exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*n) \le (S(S O)) * n * B ((S(S O))*n). +intros. +apply (le_times_to_le (exp (fact n) (S(S O)))) + [apply lt_O_exp. + apply lt_O_fact + |rewrite < assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). + rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? (? % ?)). + rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). + rewrite < eq_fact_B + [rewrite < sym_times. + apply fact3. + apply lt_to_le.assumption + |assumption + ] + ] +qed. + +theorem le_exp_B: \forall n. O < n \to +exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*n) \le (S(S O)) * n * B ((S(S O))*n). +intros. +elim H + [apply le_n + |apply lt_SO_to_le_exp_B. + apply le_S_S.assumption + ] +qed. + theorem eq_A_SSO_n: \forall n.O < n \to A((S(S O))*n) = pi_p (S ((S(S O))*n)) primeb @@ -1088,7 +1113,6 @@ cut ( [apply prime_to_lt_SO. apply primeb_true_to_prime. assumption - |assumption |simplify. apply le_plus_n_r ] @@ -1142,8 +1166,7 @@ rewrite > eq_A_SSO_n assumption |cut (i\sup(S i1)≤(S(S O))*n) [apply div_mod_spec_intro - [alias id "lt_plus_to_lt_minus" = "cic:/matita/nat/map_iter_p.ma/lt_plus_to_lt_minus.con". - apply lt_plus_to_lt_minus + [apply lt_plus_to_lt_minus [assumption |simplify in ⊢ (? % ?). rewrite < plus_n_O. @@ -1199,512 +1222,468 @@ apply (trans_le ? (B((S(S O))*n)*A n)) ] qed. -(* da spostare *) -theorem times_exp: \forall n,m,p.exp n p * exp m p = exp (n*m) p. -intros.elim p - [reflexivity - |simplify.autobatch +theorem le_A_exp1: \forall n. +A(exp (S(S O)) n) \le (exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*(exp (S(S O)) n))). +intro.elim n + [simplify.apply le_S_S.apply le_O_n + |change with (A ((S(S O))*((S(S O)))\sup n1)≤ ((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*((S(S O))\sup(S n1)))). + apply (trans_le ? ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)*(exp (S(S O)) n1))))*A (exp (S(S O)) n1))) + [apply le_A_exp + |apply (trans_le ? ((S(S O))\sup((S(S O))*((S(S O)))\sup(n1))*(S(S O))\sup((S(S O))*((S(S O)))\sup(n1)))) + [apply le_times_r. + assumption + |rewrite < exp_plus_times. + simplify.rewrite < plus_n_O in ⊢ (? ? (? ? (? ? %))). + apply le_n + ] + ] ] -qed. +qed. -theorem le_exp_log: \forall p,n. O < n \to -exp p ( -log n) \le n. -intros. -apply leb_true_to_le. -unfold log. -apply (f_max_true (\lambda x.leb (exp p x) n)). -apply (ex_intro ? ? O). -split - [apply le_O_n - |apply le_to_leb_true.simplify.assumption +theorem monotonic_A: monotonic nat le A. +unfold.intros. +elim H + [apply le_n + |apply (trans_le ? (A n1)) + [assumption + |unfold A. + cut (pi_p (S n1) primeb (λp:nat.(p)\sup(log p n1)) + ≤pi_p (S n1) primeb (λp:nat.(p)\sup(log p (S n1)))) + [apply (bool_elim ? (primeb (S n1)));intro + [rewrite > (true_to_pi_p_Sn ? ? ? H3). + rewrite > times_n_SO in ⊢ (? % ?). + rewrite > sym_times. + apply le_times + [apply lt_O_exp.apply lt_O_S + |assumption + ] + |rewrite > (false_to_pi_p_Sn ? ? ? H3). + assumption + ] + |apply le_pi_p.intros. + apply le_exp + [apply prime_to_lt_O. + apply primeb_true_to_prime. + assumption + |apply le_log + [apply prime_to_lt_SO. + apply primeb_true_to_prime. + assumption + |apply le_S.apply le_n + ] + ] + ] + ] ] qed. - -theorem lt_log_n_n: \forall n. O < n \to log n < n. + +theorem le_A_exp2: \forall n. O < n \to +A(n) \le (exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)) * (S(S O)) * n)). intros. -cut (log n \le n) - [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq ? ? Hcut) - [assumption - |absurd (exp (S(S O)) n \le n) - [rewrite < H1 in ⊢ (? (? ? %) ?). +apply (trans_le ? (A (exp (S(S O)) (S(log (S(S O)) n))))) + [apply monotonic_A. + apply lt_to_le. + apply lt_exp_log. + apply le_n + |apply (trans_le ? ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*(exp (S(S O)) (S(log (S(S O)) n))))))) + [apply le_A_exp1 + |apply le_exp + [apply lt_O_S + |rewrite > assoc_times.apply le_times_r. + change with ((S(S O))*((S(S O))\sup(log (S(S O)) n))≤(S(S O))*n). + apply le_times_r. apply le_exp_log. assumption - |apply lt_to_not_le. - apply lt_m_exp_nm. - apply le_n ] ] - |unfold log.apply le_max_n ] qed. -theorem le_log_n_n: \forall n. log n \le n. -intro. -cases n - [apply le_n - |apply lt_to_le. - apply lt_log_n_n. - apply lt_O_S - ] +(* example *) +theorem A_SO: A (S O) = S O. +reflexivity. qed. -theorem lt_exp_log: \forall n. n < exp (S(S O)) (S (log n)). -intro.cases n - [simplify.apply le_S.apply le_n - |apply not_le_to_lt. - apply leb_false_to_not_le. - apply (lt_max_to_false ? (S n1) (S (log (S n1)))) - [apply le_S_S.apply le_n - |apply lt_log_n_n.apply lt_O_S - ] - ] +theorem A_SSO: A (S(S O)) = S (S O). +reflexivity. qed. -theorem f_false_to_le_max: \forall f,n,p. (∃i:nat.i≤n∧f i=true) \to -(\forall m. p < m \to f m = false) -\to max n f \le p. -intros. -apply not_lt_to_le.intro. -apply not_eq_true_false. -rewrite < (H1 ? H2). -apply sym_eq. -apply f_max_true. -assumption. +theorem A_SSSO: A (S(S(S O))) = S(S(S(S(S(S O))))). +reflexivity. qed. -theorem log_times1: \forall n,m. O < n \to O < m \to -log (n*m) \le S(log n+log m). -intros. -unfold in ⊢ (? (% ?) ?). -apply f_false_to_le_max - [apply (ex_intro ? ? O). - split - [apply le_O_n - |apply le_to_leb_true. - simplify. - rewrite > times_n_SO. - apply le_times;assumption - ] - |intros. - apply lt_to_leb_false. - apply (lt_to_le_to_lt ? ((exp (S(S O)) (S(log n)))*(exp (S(S O)) (S(log m))))) - [apply lt_times;apply lt_exp_log - |rewrite < exp_plus_times. - apply le_exp - [apply lt_O_S - |simplify. - rewrite < plus_n_Sm. - assumption - ] - ] - ] +theorem A_SSSSO: A (S(S(S(S O)))) = S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S O))))))))))). +reflexivity. qed. - -theorem log_times: \forall n,m.log (n*m) \le S(log n+log m). -intros. -cases n - [apply le_O_n - |cases m - [rewrite < times_n_O. - apply le_O_n - |apply log_times1;apply lt_O_S + +(* da spostare *) +theorem or_eq_eq_S: \forall n.\exists m. +n = (S(S O))*m \lor n = S ((S(S O))*m). +intro.elim n + [apply (ex_intro ? ? O). + left.reflexivity + |elim H.elim H1 + [apply (ex_intro ? ? a). + right.apply eq_f.assumption + |apply (ex_intro ? ? (S a)). + left.rewrite > H2. + apply sym_eq. + apply times_SSO ] ] qed. -theorem log_exp: \forall n,m.O < m \to -log ((exp (S(S O)) n)*m)=n+log m. +(* a better result *) +theorem le_A_exp3: \forall n. S O < n \to +A(n) \le exp (pred n) (S(S O))*(exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)) * n)). +intro. +apply (nat_elim1 n). intros. -unfold log in ⊢ (? ? (% ?) ?). -apply max_spec_to_max. -unfold max_spec. -split - [split - [elim n - [simplify. - rewrite < plus_n_O. - apply le_log_n_n - |simplify. - rewrite < plus_n_O. - rewrite > times_plus_l. - apply (trans_le ? (S((S(S O))\sup(n1)*m))) - [apply le_S_S.assumption - |apply (lt_O_n_elim ((S(S O))\sup(n1)*m)) - [rewrite > (times_n_O O) in ⊢ (? % ?). - apply lt_times - [apply lt_O_exp. - apply lt_O_S - |assumption +elim (or_eq_eq_S m). +elim H2 + [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq (S O) a) + [rewrite > H3 in ⊢ (? % ?). + apply (trans_le ? ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)*a)))*A a)) + [apply le_A_exp + |apply (trans_le ? (((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*a)* + ((pred a)\sup((S(S O)))*((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*a)))) + [apply le_times_r. + apply H + [rewrite > H3. + rewrite > times_n_SO in ⊢ (? % ?). + rewrite > sym_times. + apply lt_times_l1 + [apply lt_to_le.assumption + |apply le_n + ] + |assumption + ] + |rewrite > sym_times. + rewrite > assoc_times. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + apply (trans_le ? + (pred a\sup((S(S O)))*(S(S O))\sup(S(S O))*(S(S O))\sup((S(S O))*m))) + [rewrite > assoc_times. + apply le_times_r. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + apply le_exp + [apply lt_O_S + |rewrite < H3. + simplify. + rewrite < plus_n_O. + apply le_S.apply le_S. + apply le_n + ] + |apply le_times_l. + rewrite > times_exp. + apply monotonic_exp1. + rewrite > H3. + rewrite > sym_times. + cases a + [apply le_n + |simplify. + rewrite < plus_n_Sm. + apply le_S. + apply le_n ] - |intro.simplify.apply le_S_S. - apply le_plus_n ] ] ] - |simplify. - apply le_to_leb_true. - rewrite > exp_plus_times. - apply le_times_r. - apply le_exp_log. - assumption - ] - |intros. - simplify. - apply lt_to_leb_false. - apply (lt_to_le_to_lt ? ((exp (S(S O)) n)*(exp (S(S O)) (S(log m))))) - [apply lt_times_r1 - [apply lt_O_exp.apply lt_O_S - |apply lt_exp_log. + |rewrite < H4 in H3. + simplify in H3. + rewrite > H3. + simplify. + apply le_S_S.apply le_S_S.apply le_O_n + |apply not_lt_to_le.intro. + apply (lt_to_not_le ? ? H1). + rewrite > H3. + apply (le_n_O_elim a) + [apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption + |apply le_O_n ] - |rewrite < exp_plus_times. - apply le_exp - [apply lt_O_S - |rewrite < plus_n_Sm. - assumption + ] + |elim (le_to_or_lt_eq O a (le_O_n ?)) + [apply (trans_le ? (A ((S(S O))*(S a)))) + [apply monotonic_A. + rewrite > H3. + rewrite > times_SSO. + apply le_n_Sn + |apply (trans_le ? ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)*(S a))))*A (S a))) + [apply le_A_exp + |apply (trans_le ? (((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*S a)* + (a\sup((S(S O)))*((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*(S a))))) + [apply le_times_r. + apply H + [rewrite > H3. + apply le_S_S. + simplify. + rewrite > plus_n_SO. + apply le_plus_r. + rewrite < plus_n_O. + assumption + |apply le_S_S.assumption + ] + |rewrite > sym_times. + rewrite > assoc_times. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + apply (trans_le ? + (a\sup((S(S O)))*(S(S O))\sup(S(S O))*(S(S O))\sup((S(S O))*m))) + [rewrite > assoc_times. + apply le_times_r. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + apply le_exp + [apply lt_O_S + |rewrite > times_SSO. + rewrite < H3. + simplify. + rewrite < plus_n_Sm. + rewrite < plus_n_O. + apply le_n + ] + |apply le_times_l. + rewrite > times_exp. + apply monotonic_exp1. + rewrite > H3. + rewrite > sym_times. + apply le_n + ] + ] + ] ] + |rewrite < H4 in H3.simplify in H3. + apply False_ind. + apply (lt_to_not_le ? ? H1). + rewrite > H3. + apply le_n ] ] qed. -theorem log_SSO: \forall n. O < n \to -log ((S(S O))*n) = S (log n). -intros. -change with (log ((exp (S(S O)) (S O))*n)=S (log n)). -rewrite > log_exp.reflexivity.assumption. -qed. - -theorem or_eq_S: \forall n.\exists m. -(n = (S(S O))*m) \lor (n = S((S(S O))*m)). +theorem le_A_exp4: \forall n. S O < n \to +A(n) \le exp (pred n) (S(S O))*(exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)) * (pred n))). intro. -elim n - [apply (ex_intro ? ? O).left.apply times_n_O - |elim H.elim H1 - [apply (ex_intro ? ? a).right.apply eq_f.assumption - |apply (ex_intro ? ? (S a)).left. - rewrite > H2.simplify. - rewrite < plus_n_O. - rewrite < plus_n_Sm. - reflexivity - ] - ] -qed. - -theorem lt_O_to_or_eq_S: \forall n.O < n \to \exists m.m < n \land -((n = (S(S O))*m) \lor (n = S((S(S O))*m))). -intros. -elim (or_eq_S n). -elim H1 - [apply (ex_intro ? ? a).split - [rewrite > H2. - rewrite > times_n_SO in ⊢ (? % ?). - rewrite > sym_times. - apply lt_times_l1 - [apply (divides_to_lt_O a n ? ?) - [assumption - |apply (witness a n (S (S O))). - rewrite > sym_times. - assumption +apply (nat_elim1 n). +intros. +elim (or_eq_eq_S m). +elim H2 + [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq (S O) a) + [rewrite > H3 in ⊢ (? % ?). + apply (trans_le ? ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)*a)))*A a)) + [apply le_A_exp + |apply (trans_le ? (((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*a)* + ((pred a)\sup((S(S O)))*((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*(pred a))))) + [apply le_times_r. + apply H + [rewrite > H3. + rewrite > times_n_SO in ⊢ (? % ?). + rewrite > sym_times. + apply lt_times_l1 + [apply lt_to_le.assumption + |apply le_n + ] + |assumption + ] + |rewrite > sym_times. + rewrite > assoc_times. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + apply (trans_le ? + (pred a\sup((S(S O)))*(S(S O))\sup(S(S O))*(S(S O))\sup((S(S O))*(pred m)))) + [rewrite > assoc_times. + apply le_times_r. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + apply le_exp + [apply lt_O_S + |rewrite < H3. + simplify. + rewrite < plus_n_O. + apply le_S.apply le_S. + rewrite < plus_n_O; + apply le_S_S_to_le; + rewrite > plus_n_Sm in \vdash (? ? %); + rewrite < S_pred; + [change in \vdash (? % ?) with ((S (pred a + pred a)) + m); + apply le_plus_l; + apply le_S_S_to_le; + rewrite < S_pred; + [rewrite > plus_n_Sm;rewrite > sym_plus; + rewrite > plus_n_Sm; + rewrite > H3;simplify in \vdash (? ? %); + rewrite < plus_n_O;rewrite < S_pred; + [apply le_n + |apply lt_to_le;assumption] + |apply lt_to_le;assumption] + |apply lt_to_le;assumption]] + |apply le_times_l. + rewrite > times_exp. + apply monotonic_exp1. + rewrite > H3. + rewrite > sym_times. + cases a + [apply le_n + |simplify. + rewrite < plus_n_Sm. + apply le_S. + apply le_n + ] + ] ] - |apply le_n ] - |left.assumption + |rewrite < H4 in H3. + simplify in H3. + rewrite > H3. + simplify. + apply le_S_S.apply le_S_S.apply le_O_n + |apply not_lt_to_le.intro. + apply (lt_to_not_le ? ? H1). + rewrite > H3. + apply (le_n_O_elim a) + [apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption + |apply le_O_n + ] ] - |apply (ex_intro ? ? a).split - [rewrite > H2. - apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? ((S(S O))*a)) - [rewrite > times_n_SO in ⊢ (? % ?). - rewrite > sym_times. - apply le_times_l. + |elim (le_to_or_lt_eq O a (le_O_n ?)) + [apply (trans_le ? (A ((S(S O))*(S a)))) + [apply monotonic_A. + rewrite > H3. + rewrite > times_SSO. apply le_n_Sn - |apply le_n + |apply (trans_le ? ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)*(S a))))*A (S a))) + [apply le_A_exp + |apply (trans_le ? (((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*S a)* + (a\sup((S(S O)))*((S(S O)))\sup((S(S O))*a)))) + [apply le_times_r. + apply (trans_le ? ? ? (H (S a) ? ?)); + [rewrite > H3. + apply le_S_S. + simplify. + rewrite > plus_n_SO. + apply le_plus_r. + rewrite < plus_n_O. + assumption + |apply le_S_S.assumption + |simplify in ⊢ (? (? (? % ?) ?) ?); + apply le_times_r;apply le_exp; + [apply le_S;apply le_n + |apply le_times_r;simplify;apply le_n] + ] + |rewrite > sym_times. + rewrite > assoc_times. + rewrite < exp_plus_times. + rewrite > H3; + change in ⊢ (? ? (? (? % ?) ?)) with ((S (S O))*a); + rewrite < times_exp; + rewrite < sym_times in \vdash (? ? (? % ?)); + rewrite > assoc_times; + apply le_times_r; + rewrite < times_n_Sm in ⊢ (? (? ? (? ? %)) ?); + rewrite > sym_plus in \vdash (? (? ? %) ?); + rewrite > assoc_plus in \vdash (? (? ? %) ?); + rewrite > exp_plus_times;apply le_times_r; + rewrite < distr_times_plus in ⊢ (? (? ? %) ?); + simplify in ⊢ (? ? (? ? (? ? %)));rewrite < plus_n_O; + apply le_n + ] + ] ] - |right.assumption + |rewrite < H4 in H3.simplify in H3. + apply False_ind. + apply (lt_to_not_le ? ? H1). + rewrite > H3. + apply le_n ] ] qed. -theorem factS: \forall n. fact (S n) = (S n)*(fact n). -intro.simplify.reflexivity. -qed. - -theorem exp_S: \forall n,m. exp m (S n) = m*exp m n. -intros.reflexivity. -qed. - -lemma times_SSO: \forall n.(S(S O))*(S n) = S(S((S(S O))*n)). -intro.simplify.rewrite < plus_n_Sm.reflexivity. -qed. -theorem fact1: \forall n. -fact ((S(S O))*n) \le (exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*n))*(fact n)*(fact n). +theorem eq_sigma_pi_SO_n: \forall n. +sigma_p n (\lambda i.true) (\lambda i.S O) = n. intro.elim n - [rewrite < times_n_O.apply le_n - |rewrite > times_SSO. - rewrite > factS. - rewrite > factS. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite > factS. - apply (trans_le ? (((S(S O))*(S n1))*((S(S O))*(S n1))*(fact (((S(S O))*n1))))) - [apply le_times_l. - rewrite > times_SSO. - apply le_times_r. - apply le_n_Sn - |rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > exp_S. - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply le_times_r. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite < sym_times in ⊢ (? (? (? % ?) ?) ?). - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > exp_S. - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply le_times_r. - rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply le_times_r. - rewrite < assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite < assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite < sym_times in ⊢ (? ? (? (? % ?) ?)). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply le_times_r. - rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? (? ? %)). - rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - assumption + [reflexivity + |rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn + [rewrite > H.reflexivity + |reflexivity ] ] qed. -theorem monotonic_log: monotonic nat le log. -unfold monotonic.intros. -elim (le_to_or_lt_eq ? ? H) 0 - [cases x;intro - [apply le_O_n - |apply lt_S_to_le. - apply (lt_exp_to_lt (S(S O))) - [apply le_n - |apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? (S n)) - [apply le_exp_log. - apply lt_O_S - |apply (trans_lt ? y) - [assumption - |apply lt_exp_log - ] - ] - ] - ] - |intro.rewrite < H1.apply le_n - ] +theorem leA_prim: \forall n. +exp n (prim n) \le A n * pi_p (S n) primeb (λp:nat.p). +intro. +unfold prim. +rewrite < (exp_sigma_p (S n) n primeb). +unfold A. +rewrite < times_pi_p. +apply le_pi_p. +intros. +rewrite > sym_times. +change in ⊢ (? ? %) with (exp i (S (log i n))). +apply lt_to_le. +apply lt_exp_log. +apply prime_to_lt_SO. +apply primeb_true_to_prime. +assumption. qed. -theorem lt_O_fact: \forall n. O < fact n. -intro.elim n - [simplify.apply lt_O_S - |rewrite > factS. - rewrite > (times_n_O O). - apply lt_times - [apply lt_O_S - |assumption +theorem le_prim_log : \forall n,b.S O < b \to +log b (A n) \leq prim n * (S (log b n)). +intros;apply (trans_le ? ? ? ? (log_exp1 ? ? ? ?)) + [apply le_log + [assumption + |apply le_Al] + |assumption] +qed. + + +(* the inequalities *) +theorem le_exp_priml: \forall n. O < n \to +exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*n) \le exp ((S(S O))*n) (S(prim ((S(S O))*n))). +intros. +apply (trans_le ? ((((S(S O))*n*(B ((S(S O))*n)))))) + [apply le_exp_B.assumption + |change in ⊢ (? ? %) with ((((S(S O))*n))*(((S(S O))*n))\sup (prim ((S(S O))*n))). + apply le_times_r. + apply (trans_le ? (A ((S(S O))*n))) + [apply le_B_A + |apply le_Al ] ] qed. -theorem fact2: \forall n.O < n \to -(exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*n))*(fact n)*(fact n) < fact (S((S(S O))*n)). -intros.elim H - [simplify.apply le_S.apply le_n - |rewrite > times_SSO. - rewrite > factS. - rewrite > factS. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite > factS. - rewrite < times_SSO in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply (trans_lt ? (((S(S O))*S n1)*((S(S O))*S n1*(S ((S(S O))*n1))!))) - [rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > exp_S. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - apply lt_times_r. - rewrite > exp_S. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply lt_times_r. - rewrite > sym_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - apply lt_times_r. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? (? (? % ?) ?) ?). - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > assoc_times. - rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? %). - apply lt_times_r. - rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite < sym_times. - rewrite < assoc_times. - assumption - |apply lt_times_l1 - [rewrite > (times_n_O O) in ⊢ (? % ?). - apply lt_times - [rewrite > (times_n_O O) in ⊢ (? % ?). - apply lt_times - [apply lt_O_S - |apply lt_O_S - ] - |apply lt_O_fact - ] - |apply le_n +theorem le_priml: \forall n. O < n \to +(S(S O))*n \le (S (log (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*n)))*S(prim ((S(S O))*n)). +intros. +rewrite < (eq_log_exp (S(S O))) in ⊢ (? % ?) + [apply (trans_le ? ((log (S(S O)) (exp ((S(S O))*n) (S(prim ((S(S O))*n))))))) + [apply le_log + [apply le_n + |apply le_exp_priml.assumption ] + |rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? ? %). + apply log_exp1. + apply le_n ] + |apply le_n ] qed. -theorem lt_O_log: \forall n. S O < n \to O < log n. -intros.elim H - [simplify.apply lt_O_S - |apply (lt_to_le_to_lt ? (log n1)) - [assumption - |apply monotonic_log. - apply le_n_Sn +theorem le_exp_primr: \forall n. S O < n \to +exp n (prim n) \le exp (pred n) ((S(S O))*(S(S O)))*(exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*(S(S O)) * n)). +intros. +apply (trans_le ? (exp (A n) (S(S O)))) + [change in ⊢ (? ? %) with ((A n)*((A n)*(S O))). + rewrite < times_n_SO. + apply leA_r2 + |apply (trans_le ? (exp (exp (pred n) (S(S O))*(exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O)) * n))) (S(S O)))) + [apply monotonic_exp1. + apply le_A_exp3. + assumption + |rewrite < times_exp. + rewrite > exp_exp_times. + rewrite > exp_exp_times. + rewrite > sym_times in ⊢ (? (? ? (? ? %)) ?). + rewrite < assoc_times in ⊢ (? (? ? (? ? %)) ?). + apply le_n ] ] qed. -theorem log_fact_SSSO: log (fact (S(S(S O)))) = S (S O). -reflexivity. -qed. - -lemma exp_SSO_SSO: exp (S(S O)) (S(S O)) = S(S(S(S O))). -reflexivity. -qed. -(* -theorem log_fact_SSSSO: log (fact (S(S(S(S O))))) = S(S(S(S O))). -reflexivity. -qed. -*) -theorem log_fact_SSSSSO: log (fact (S(S(S(S(S O)))))) = S(S(S(S O))). -reflexivity. -qed. - -theorem bof_bof: \forall n.(S(S(S(S O)))) < n \to -n \le (S(S(S(S(S(S(S(S O)))))))) \to log (fact n) < n*log n - n. -intros. -elim H - [rewrite > factS in ⊢ (? (? %) ?). - rewrite > factS in ⊢ (? (? (? ? %)) ?). - rewrite < assoc_times in ⊢ (? (? %) ?). - rewrite < sym_times in ⊢ (? (? (? % ?)) ?). - rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? (? %) ?). - change with (exp (S(S O)) (S(S O))) in ⊢ (? (? (? % ?)) ?). - -theorem bof: \forall n.(S(S(S(S O))))) < n \to log (fact n) < n*log n - n. -intro.apply (nat_elim1 n). -intros. -elim (lt_O_to_or_eq_S m) - [elim H2.clear H2. - elim H4.clear H4. - rewrite > H2. - apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? (log ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*a))*(fact a)*(fact a)))) - [apply monotonic_log. - apply fact1 - |rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? (? %) ?). - rewrite > log_exp. - apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? ((S(S O))*a+S(log a!+log a!))) - [apply le_plus_r. - apply log_times - |rewrite > plus_n_Sm. - rewrite > log_SSO. - rewrite < times_n_Sm. - apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? ((S(S O))*a+(log a!+(a*log a-a)))) - [apply le_plus_r. - apply le_plus_r. - apply H.assumption - |apply (lt_to_le_to_lt ? ((S(S O))*a+((a*log a-a)+(a*log a-a)))) - [apply lt_plus_r. - apply lt_plus_l. - apply H. - assumption. - |rewrite > times_SSO_n. - rewrite > distr_times_minus. - rewrite > sym_plus. - rewrite > plus_minus - [rewrite > sym_plus. - rewrite < assoc_times. - apply le_n - |rewrite < assoc_times. - rewrite > times_n_SO in ⊢ (? % ?). - apply le_times - [apply le_n - |apply lt_O_log. - apply (lt_times_n_to_lt_r (S(S O))) - [apply lt_O_S - |rewrite < times_n_SO. - rewrite < H2. - assumption - ] - ] - ] - ] - - . - ] - | - rewrite < eq_plus_minus_minus_plus. - - rewrite > assoc_plus. - apply lt_plus_r. - rewrite > plus_n_O in ⊢ (? (? (? ? (? ? %))) ?). - change with - (S((S(S O))*a+((S(S O))*log a!)) < (S(S O))*a*log ((S(S O))*a)-(S(S O))*a+k*log ((S(S O))*a)). - apply (trans_lt ? (S ((S(S O))*a+(S(S O))*(a*log a-a+k*log a)))) - [apply le_S_S. - apply lt_plus_r. - apply lt_times_r. - apply H. - assumption - | - -theorem stirling: \forall n,k.k \le n \to -log (fact n) < n*log n - n + k*log n. -intro. -apply (nat_elim1 n). -intros. -elim (lt_O_to_or_eq_S m) - [elim H2.clear H2. - elim H4.clear H4. - rewrite > H2. - apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? (log ((exp (S(S O)) ((S(S O))*a))*(fact a)*(fact a)))) - [apply monotonic_log. - apply fact1 - |rewrite > assoc_times in ⊢ (? (? %) ?). - rewrite > log_exp. - apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? ((S(S O))*a+S(log a!+log a!))) - [apply le_plus_r. - apply log_times - |rewrite < plus_n_Sm. - rewrite > plus_n_O in ⊢ (? (? (? ? (? ? %))) ?). - change with - (S((S(S O))*a+((S(S O))*log a!)) < (S(S O))*a*log ((S(S O))*a)-(S(S O))*a+k*log ((S(S O))*a)). - apply (trans_lt ? (S ((S(S O))*a+(S(S O))*(a*log a-a+k*log a)))) - [apply le_S_S. - apply lt_plus_r. - apply lt_times_r. - apply H. - assumption - | - - [ - - a*log a-a+k*log a - -*) \ No newline at end of file