X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=matita%2Fmatita%2Fhelp%2FC%2Fhtml%2Fsec_declarative_tactics.html;fp=matita%2Fmatita%2Fhelp%2FC%2Fhtml%2Fsec_declarative_tactics.html;h=bc750f2820d95086bb44bc9b7852e898cddeb95c;hb=9d5a0d55e331b348d44b6d50d3d67e62b60a0e18;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hpb=7b6ca76a0ed511b288b654729c9758277dbcd352;p=helm.git diff --git a/matita/matita/help/C/html/sec_declarative_tactics.html b/matita/matita/help/C/html/sec_declarative_tactics.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bc750f282 --- /dev/null +++ b/matita/matita/help/C/html/sec_declarative_tactics.html @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +
Table of Contents
+
Table 8.1. tactics
tactic | ::= | + = term [auto_params | using term | using once term | proof] [done] + |
 | | | assume id : + sterm |
 | | | by induction hypothesis we know term ( id ) |
 | | | case id [( id : term )] ⦠[( id : term )] |
 | | | conclude term |
 | | | justification done |
 | | | justification let id + : term such that term + ( id ) |
 | | | let id = term |
 | | | obtain id term |
 | | | suppose term ( id + ) |
 | | | + that is equivalent to term + |
 | | | the thesis becomes term |
 | | | we need to prove term + [(id + )] + |
 | | | we proceed by cases on term to prove term |
 | | | we proceed by induction on term to prove term |
 | | | justification we proved term + [( id + )] + |
+
+