X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=matita%2Fmatita%2Flib%2Fturing%2Fmulti_universal%2Fmatch.ma;h=76a1fc30d0a6dbd270d7c926a79b02de98239910;hb=c16905138e385d30856d587f07c396a3cab301ed;hp=b153ef8c7c5929f318a0206d623e571b133a9f32;hpb=315610badd512e271f6e99011721a3b4d3e316fc;p=helm.git diff --git a/matita/matita/lib/turing/multi_universal/match.ma b/matita/matita/lib/turing/multi_universal/match.ma index b153ef8c7..76a1fc30d 100644 --- a/matita/matita/lib/turing/multi_universal/match.ma +++ b/matita/matita/lib/turing/multi_universal/match.ma @@ -12,257 +12,409 @@ (* *) (**************************************************************************) -include "turing/turing.ma". -include "turing/inject.ma". -include "turing/while_multi.ma". +include "turing/multi_universal/compare.ma". +include "turing/multi_universal/par_test.ma". -definition compare_states ≝ initN 3. -definition comp0 : compare_states ≝ mk_Sig ?? 0 (leb_true_to_le 1 3 (refl …)). -definition comp1 : compare_states ≝ mk_Sig ?? 1 (leb_true_to_le 2 3 (refl …)). -definition comp2 : compare_states ≝ mk_Sig ?? 2 (leb_true_to_le 3 3 (refl …)). +definition Rtc_multi_true ≝ + λalpha,test,n,i.λt1,t2:Vector ? (S n). + (∃c. current alpha (nth i ? t1 (niltape ?)) = Some ? c ∧ test c = true) ∧ t2 = t1. + +definition Rtc_multi_false ≝ + λalpha,test,n,i.λt1,t2:Vector ? (S n). + (∀c. current alpha (nth i ? t1 (niltape ?)) = Some ? c → test c = false) ∧ t2 = t1. -(* - -0) (x,x) → (x,x)(R,R) → 1 - (x,y≠x) → None 2 -1) (_,_) → None 1 -2) (_,_) → None 2 - -*) - -definition trans_compare_step ≝ - λi,j.λsig:FinSet.λn. - λp:compare_states × (Vector (option sig) (S n)). - let 〈q,a〉 ≝ p in - match pi1 … q with - [ O ⇒ match nth i ? a (None ?) with - [ None ⇒ 〈comp2,null_action ? n〉 - | Some ai ⇒ match nth j ? a (None ?) with - [ None ⇒ 〈comp2,null_action ? n〉 - | Some aj ⇒ if ai == aj - then 〈comp1,change_vec ? (S n) - (change_vec ? (S n) (null_action ? n) (Some ? 〈ai,R〉) i) - (Some ? 〈aj,R〉) j〉 - else 〈comp2,null_action ? n〉 ] - ] - | S q ⇒ match q with - [ O ⇒ (* 1 *) 〈comp1,null_action ? n〉 - | S _ ⇒ (* 2 *) 〈comp2,null_action ? n〉 ] ]. - -definition compare_step ≝ - λi,j,sig,n. - mk_mTM sig n compare_states (trans_compare_step i j sig n) - comp0 (λq.q == comp1 ∨ q == comp2). - -definition R_comp_step_true ≝ - λi,j,sig,n.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). - ∃x. - current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)) = Some ? x ∧ - current ? (nth j ? int (niltape ?)) = Some ? x ∧ - outt = change_vec ?? - (change_vec ?? int - (tape_move ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)) (Some ? 〈x,R〉)) i) - (tape_move ? (nth j ? int (niltape ?)) (Some ? 〈x,R〉)) j. +lemma sem_test_char_multi : + ∀alpha,test,n,i.i ≤ n → + inject_TM ? (test_char ? test) n i ⊨ + [ tc_true : Rtc_multi_true alpha test n i, Rtc_multi_false alpha test n i ]. +#alpha #test #n #i #Hin #int +cases (acc_sem_inject … Hin (sem_test_char alpha test) int) +#k * #outc * * #Hloop #Htrue #Hfalse %{k} %{outc} % [ % +[ @Hloop +| #Hqtrue lapply (Htrue Hqtrue) * * * #c * + #Hcur #Htestc #Hnth_i #Hnth_j % + [ %{c} % // + | @(eq_vec … (niltape ?)) #i0 #Hi0 + cases (decidable_eq_nat i0 i) #Hi0i + [ >Hi0i @Hnth_i + | @sym_eq @Hnth_j @sym_not_eq // ] ] ] +| #Hqfalse lapply (Hfalse Hqfalse) * * #Htestc #Hnth_i #Hnth_j % + [ @Htestc + | @(eq_vec … (niltape ?)) #i0 #Hi0 + cases (decidable_eq_nat i0 i) #Hi0i + [ >Hi0i @Hnth_i + | @sym_eq @Hnth_j @sym_not_eq // ] ] ] +qed. -definition R_comp_step_false ≝ - λi,j:nat.λsig,n.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). - (current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)) ≠ current ? (nth j ? int (niltape ?)) ∨ - current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)) = None ? ∨ - current ? (nth j ? int (niltape ?)) = None ?) ∧ outt = int. +definition Rm_test_null_true ≝ + λalpha,n,i.λt1,t2:Vector ? (S n). + current alpha (nth i ? t1 (niltape ?)) ≠ None ? ∧ t2 = t1. + +definition Rm_test_null_false ≝ + λalpha,n,i.λt1,t2:Vector ? (S n). + current alpha (nth i ? t1 (niltape ?)) = None ? ∧ t2 = t1. -lemma comp_q0_q2_null : - ∀i,j,sig,n,v.i < S n → j < S n → - (nth i ? (current_chars ?? v) (None ?) = None ? ∨ - nth j ? (current_chars ?? v) (None ?) = None ?) → - step sig n (compare_step i j sig n) (mk_mconfig ??? comp0 v) - = mk_mconfig ??? comp2 v. -#i #j #sig #n #v #Hi #Hj -whd in ⊢ (? → ??%?); >(eq_pair_fst_snd … (trans ????)) whd in ⊢ (?→??%?); -* #Hcurrent -[ @eq_f2 - [ whd in ⊢ (??(???%)?); >Hcurrent % - | whd in ⊢ (??(???????(???%))?); >Hcurrent @tape_move_null_action ] -| @eq_f2 - [ whd in ⊢ (??(???%)?); >Hcurrent cases (nth i ?? (None sig)) // - | whd in ⊢ (??(???????(???%))?); >Hcurrent - cases (nth i ?? (None sig)) [|#x] @tape_move_null_action ] ] +lemma sem_test_null_multi : ∀alpha,n,i.i ≤ n → + inject_TM ? (test_null ?) n i ⊨ + [ tc_true : Rm_test_null_true alpha n i, Rm_test_null_false alpha n i ]. +#alpha #n #i #Hin #int +cases (acc_sem_inject … Hin (sem_test_null alpha) int) +#k * #outc * * #Hloop #Htrue #Hfalse %{k} %{outc} % [ % +[ @Hloop +| #Hqtrue lapply (Htrue Hqtrue) * * #Hcur #Hnth_i #Hnth_j % // + @(eq_vec … (niltape ?)) #i0 #Hi0 cases (decidable_eq_nat i0 i) #Hi0i + [ >Hi0i @sym_eq @Hnth_i | @sym_eq @Hnth_j @sym_not_eq // ] ] +| #Hqfalse lapply (Hfalse Hqfalse) * * #Hcur #Hnth_i #Hnth_j % + [ @Hcur + | @(eq_vec … (niltape ?)) #i0 #Hi0 cases (decidable_eq_nat i0 i) // + #Hi0i @sym_eq @Hnth_j @sym_not_eq // ] ] qed. -lemma comp_q0_q2_neq : - ∀i,j,sig,n,v.i < S n → j < S n → - nth i ? (current_chars ?? v) (None ?) ≠ nth j ? (current_chars ?? v) (None ?) → - step sig n (compare_step i j sig n) (mk_mconfig ??? comp0 v) - = mk_mconfig ??? comp2 v. -#i #j #sig #n #v #Hi #Hj lapply (refl ? (nth i ?(current_chars ?? v)(None ?))) -cases (nth i ?? (None ?)) in ⊢ (???%→?); -[ #Hnth #_ @comp_q0_q2_null // % // -| #ai #Hai lapply (refl ? (nth j ?(current_chars ?? v)(None ?))) - cases (nth j ?? (None ?)) in ⊢ (???%→?); - [ #Hnth #_ @comp_q0_q2_null // %2 // - | #aj #Haj #Hneq - whd in ⊢ (??%?); >(eq_pair_fst_snd … (trans ????)) whd in ⊢ (??%?); @eq_f2 - [ whd in match (trans ????); >Hai >Haj - whd in ⊢ (??(???%)?); >(\bf ?) // @(not_to_not … Hneq) // - | whd in match (trans ????); >Hai >Haj - whd in ⊢ (??(???????(???%))?); >(\bf ?) /2 by not_to_not/ - @tape_move_null_action -] ] -qed. +axiom comp_list: ∀S:DeqSet. ∀l1,l2:list S.∀is_endc. ∃l,tl1,tl2. + l1 = l@tl1 ∧ l2 = l@tl2 ∧ (∀c.c ∈ l = true → is_endc c = false) ∧ + ∀a,tla. tl1 = a::tla → is_endc a = true ∨ (∀b,tlb.tl2 = b::tlb → a≠b). + +axiom daemon : ∀X:Prop.X. -lemma comp_q0_q1 : - ∀i,j,sig,n,v,a.i ≠ j → i < S n → j < S n → - nth i ? (current_chars ?? v) (None ?) = Some ? a → - nth j ? (current_chars ?? v) (None ?) = Some ? a → - step sig n (compare_step i j sig n) (mk_mconfig ??? comp0 v) = - mk_mconfig ??? comp1 - (change_vec ? (S n) - (change_vec ?? v - (tape_move ? (nth i ? v (niltape ?)) (Some ? 〈a,R〉)) i) - (tape_move ? (nth j ? v (niltape ?)) (Some ? 〈a,R〉)) j). -#i #j #sig #n #v #a #Heq #Hi #Hj #Ha1 #Ha2 -whd in ⊢ (??%?); >(eq_pair_fst_snd … (trans ????)) whd in ⊢ (??%?); @eq_f2 -[ whd in match (trans ????); - >Ha1 >Ha2 whd in ⊢ (??(???%)?); >(\b ?) // -| whd in match (trans ????); - >Ha1 >Ha2 whd in ⊢ (??(???????(???%))?); >(\b ?) // - change with (change_vec ?????) in ⊢ (??(???????%)?); - <(change_vec_same … v j (niltape ?)) in ⊢ (??%?); - <(change_vec_same … v i (niltape ?)) in ⊢ (??%?); - >pmap_change >pmap_change >tape_move_null_action - @eq_f2 // @eq_f2 // >nth_change_vec_neq // -] -qed. +definition match_test ≝ λsrc,dst.λsig:DeqSet.λn,is_endc.λv:Vector ? n. + match (nth src (option sig) v (None ?)) with + [ None ⇒ false + | Some x ⇒ notb ((is_endc x) ∨ (nth dst (DeqOption sig) v (None ?) == None ?))]. -lemma sem_comp_step : - ∀i,j,sig,n.i ≠ j → i < S n → j < S n → - compare_step i j sig n ⊨ - [ comp1: R_comp_step_true i j sig n, - R_comp_step_false i j sig n ]. -#i #j #sig #n #Hneq #Hi #Hj #int -lapply (refl ? (current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)))) -cases (current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?))) in ⊢ (???%→?); -[ #Hcuri %{2} % - [| % [ % - [ whd in ⊢ (??%?); >comp_q0_q2_null /2/ % comp_q0_q2_null /2/ %2 Ha >Hcurj % % % #H destruct (H) ] ] - | #b #Hb %{2} cases (true_or_false (a == b)) #Hab - [ % - [| % [ % - [whd in ⊢ (??%?); >(comp_q0_q1 … a Hneq Hi Hj) // - [>(\P Hab) (\P Hab) %{b} % // % // <(\P Hab) // ] - | * #H @False_ind @H % - ] ] - | % - [| % [ % - [whd in ⊢ (??%?); >comp_q0_q2_neq // - <(nth_vec_map ?? (current …) i ? int (niltape ?)) - <(nth_vec_map ?? (current …) j ? int (niltape ?)) >Ha >Hb - @(not_to_not ??? (\Pf Hab)) #H destruct (H) % - | normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) ] - | #_ % // % % >Ha >Hb @(not_to_not ??? (\Pf Hab)) #H destruct (H) % ] ] +definition match_step ≝ λsrc,dst,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc. + compare src dst sig n is_endc · + (ifTM ?? (partest sig n (match_test src dst sig ? is_endc)) + (single_finalTM ?? + (parmove src dst sig n L is_startc · (inject_TM ? (move_r ?) n dst))) + (nop …) + partest1). + +definition R_match_step_false ≝ + λsrc,dst,sig,n,is_endc.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). + ∀ls,x,xs,end,rs. + nth src ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls x (xs@end::rs) → + (∀c0. memb ? c0 (x::xs) = true → is_endc c0 = false) → is_endc end = true → + ((current sig (nth dst (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) = None ?) ∧ outt = int) ∨ + (∃ls0,rs0,xs0. nth dst ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls0 x rs0 ∧ + xs = rs0@xs0 ∧ + current sig (nth dst (tape sig) outt (niltape sig)) = None ?) ∨ + (∃ls0,rs0. + nth dst ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls0 x (xs@rs0) ∧ + ∀rsj,c. + rs0 = c::rsj → + outt = change_vec ?? + (change_vec ?? int (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls) end rs) src) + (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls0) c rsj) dst). + +definition R_match_step_true ≝ + λsrc,dst,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). + ∀s.current sig (nth src (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) = Some ? s → + current sig (nth dst (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) ≠ None ? ∧ + (is_startc s = true → + (∀c.c ∈ right ? (nth src (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) = true → is_startc c = false) → + (∀s1.current sig (nth dst (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) = Some ? s1 → s ≠ s1 → + outt = change_vec ?? int + (tape_move … (nth dst ? int (niltape ?)) (Some ? 〈s1,R〉)) dst ∧ is_endc s = false) ∧ + (∀ls,x,xs,ci,cj,rs,ls0,rs0. + nth src ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls x (xs@ci::rs) → + nth dst ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls0 x (xs@cj::rs0) → + (∀c0. memb ? c0 (x::xs) = true → is_endc c0 = false) → + ci ≠ cj → + (outt = change_vec ?? int + (tape_move … (nth dst ? int (niltape ?)) (Some ? 〈x,R〉)) dst ∧ is_endc ci = false))). +(* ∧ + (rs0 = [ ] → + outt = change_vec ?? + (change_vec ?? int (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls) ci rs) src) + (mk_tape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls0) (None ?) [ ]) dst)). *) + +lemma sem_match_step : + ∀src,dst,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc.src ≠ dst → src < S n → dst < S n → + match_step src dst sig n is_startc is_endc ⊨ + [ inr ?? (inr ?? (inl … (inr ?? start_nop))) : + R_match_step_true src dst sig n is_startc is_endc, + R_match_step_false src dst sig n is_endc ]. +#src #dst #sig #n #is_startc #is_endc #Hneq #Hsrc #Hdst +@(acc_sem_seq_app sig n … (sem_compare src dst sig n is_endc Hneq Hsrc Hdst) + (acc_sem_if ? n … (sem_partest sig n (match_test src dst sig ? is_endc)) + (sem_seq … + (sem_parmoveL ???? is_startc Hneq Hsrc Hdst) + (sem_inject … dst (le_S_S_to_le … Hdst) (sem_move_r ? ))) + (sem_nop …))) +[#ta #tb #tc * #Hcomp1 #Hcomp2 * #td * * #Htest #Htd >Htd -Htd + * #te * #Hte #Htb whd + #s #Hcurta_src % + [ lapply (refl ? (current ? (nth dst ? ta (niltape ?)))) + cases (current ? (nth dst ? ta (niltape ?))) in ⊢ (???%→%); + [| #c #_ % #Hfalse destruct (Hfalse) ] + #Hcurta_dst >Hcomp1 in Htest; [| %2 %2 //] + whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); change with (current ? (niltape ?)) in match (None ?); + Hcurta_src whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); Hcurta_dst cases (is_endc s) normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) + | #Hstart #Hnotstart % + [ #s1 #Hcurta_dst #Hneqss1 -Hcomp2 + cut (tc = ta) + [@Hcomp1 %2 %1 %1 >Hcurta_src >Hcurta_dst @(not_to_not … Hneqss1) #H destruct (H) //] + #H destruct (H) -Hcomp1 cases Hte #_ -Hte #Hte + cut (te = ta) [@Hte %1 %1 %{s} % //] -Hte #H destruct (H) % + [cases Htb * #_ #Hmove #Hmove1 @(eq_vec … (niltape … )) + #i #Hi cases (decidable_eq_nat i dst) #Hidst + [ >Hidst >nth_change_vec // cases (current_to_midtape … Hcurta_dst) + #ls * #rs #Hta_mid >(Hmove … Hta_mid) >Hta_mid cases rs // + | >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] @sym_eq @Hmove1 @sym_not_eq // ] + | whd in Htest:(??%?); >(nth_vec_map ?? (current sig)) in Hcurta_src; #Hcurta_src + >Hcurta_src in Htest; whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); + cases (is_endc s) // whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); #H @sym_eq // + ] + |#ls #x #xs #ci #cj #rs #ls0 #rs00 #Htasrc_mid #Htadst_mid #Hnotendc #Hcicj + cases (Hcomp2 … Htasrc_mid Htadst_mid Hnotendc) [ * #H destruct (H) ] + * #cj' * #rs0' * #Hcjrs0 destruct (Hcjrs0) -Hcomp2 #Hcomp2 + lapply (Hcomp2 (or_intror ?? Hcicj)) -Hcomp2 #Htc % + [ cases Hte -Hte #Hte #_ whd in Hte; + >Htasrc_mid in Hcurta_src; whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); #H destruct (H) + lapply (Hte ls ci (reverse ? xs) rs s ??? ls0 cj' (reverse ? xs) s rs0' (refl ??) ?) // + [ >Htc >nth_change_vec // + | #c0 #Hc0 @(Hnotstart c0) >Htasrc_mid cases (orb_true_l … Hc0) -Hc0 #Hc0 + [@memb_append_l2 >(\P Hc0) @memb_hd + |@memb_append_l1 <(reverse_reverse …xs) @memb_reverse // + ] + | >Htc >change_vec_commute // >nth_change_vec // ] -Hte + >Htc >change_vec_commute // >change_vec_change_vec + >change_vec_commute [|@sym_not_eq //] >change_vec_change_vec #Hte + >Hte in Htb; * * #_ >reverse_reverse #Htbdst1 #Htbdst2 -Hte @(eq_vec … (niltape ?)) + #i #Hi cases (decidable_eq_nat i dst) #Hidst + [ >Hidst >nth_change_vec // >(Htbdst1 ls0 s (xs@cj'::rs0')) + [| >nth_change_vec // ] + >Htadst_mid cases xs // + | >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq // ] + nth_change_vec_neq [| @sym_not_eq // ] + change_vec_same % ] + | >Hcurta_src in Htest; whd in ⊢(??%?→?); + >Htc >change_vec_commute // + change with (current ? (niltape ?)) in match (None ?); + nth_change_vec // whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); + cases (is_endc ci) whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); #H destruct (H) % ] + ] + ] +|#intape #outtape #ta * #Hcomp1 #Hcomp2 * #tb * * #Hc #Htb + whd in ⊢ (%→?); #Hout >Hout >Htb whd + #ls #c_src #xs #end #rs #Hmid_src #Hnotend #Hend + lapply (current_to_midtape sig (nth dst ? intape (niltape ?))) + cases (current … (nth dst ? intape (niltape ?))) in Hcomp1; + [#Hcomp1 #_ %1 % % [% | @Hcomp1 %2 %2 % ] + |#c_dst cases (true_or_false (c_src == c_dst)) #Hceq + [#_ #Hmid_dst cases (Hmid_dst c_dst (refl …)) -Hmid_dst + #ls_dst * #rs_dst #Hmid_dst + cases (comp_list … (xs@end::rs) rs_dst is_endc) #xs1 * #rsi * #rsj * * * + #Hrs_src #Hrs_dst #Hnotendxs1 #Hneq >Hrs_dst in Hmid_dst; #Hmid_dst + cut (∃r1,rs1.rsi = r1::rs1) [@daemon] * #r1 * #rs1 #Hrs1 >Hrs1 in Hrs_src; + #Hrs_src >Hrs_src in Hmid_src; #Hmid_src <(\P Hceq) in Hmid_dst; #Hmid_dst + lapply (Hcomp2 ??????? Hmid_src Hmid_dst ?) + [ #c0 #Hc0 cases (orb_true_l … Hc0) -Hc0 #Hc0 + [ >(\P Hc0) @Hnotend @memb_hd | @Hnotendxs1 //] ] + * + [ * #Hrsj >Hrsj #Hta % %2 >Hta >nth_change_vec // + %{ls_dst} %{xs1} cut (∃xs0.xs = xs1@xs0) + [lapply Hnotendxs1 -Hnotendxs1 lapply Hrs_src lapply xs elim xs1 + [ #l #_ #_ %{l} % + | #x2 #xs2 #IH * + [ whd in ⊢ (??%%→?); #H destruct (H) #Hnotendxs2 + >Hnotendxs2 in Hend; [ #H destruct (H) |@memb_hd ] + | #x2' #xs2' whd in ⊢ (??%%→?); #H destruct (H) + #Hnotendxs2 cases (IH xs2' e0 ?) + [ #xs0 #Hxs2 %{xs0} @eq_f // + |#c #Hc @Hnotendxs2 @memb_cons // ] + ] + ] + ] * #xs0 #Hxs0 %{xs0} % [ % + [ >Hmid_dst >Hrsj >append_nil % + | @Hxs0 ] + | cases (reverse ? xs1) // ] + | * #cj * #rs2 * #Hrsj #Hta lapply (Hta ?) + [ cases (Hneq ?? Hrs1) /2/ #Hr1 %2 @(Hr1 ?? Hrsj) ] -Hta #Hta + %2 >Hta in Hc; whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); + change with (current ? (niltape ?)) in match (None ?); + nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] >nth_change_vec // + whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); #Hc cut (is_endc r1 = true) + [ cases (is_endc r1) in Hc; whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); // + change with (current ? (niltape ?)) in match (None ?); + nth_change_vec // normalize #H destruct (H) ] + #Hendr1 cut (xs = xs1) + [ lapply Hnotendxs1 lapply Hnotend lapply Hrs_src lapply xs1 + -Hnotendxs1 -Hnotend -Hrs_src -xs1 elim xs + [ * normalize in ⊢ (%→?); // + #x2 #xs2 normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #Heq destruct (Heq) #_ #Hnotendxs1 + lapply (Hnotendxs1 ? (memb_hd …)) >Hend #H destruct (H) + | #x2 #xs2 #IH * + [ normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #Heq destruct (Heq) #Hnotendc + >Hnotendc in Hendr1; [| @memb_cons @memb_hd ] + normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) + | #x3 #xs3 normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #Heq destruct (Heq) + #Hnotendc #Hnotendcxs1 @eq_f @IH + [ @(cons_injective_r … Heq) + | #c0 #Hc0 @Hnotendc cases (orb_true_l … Hc0) -Hc0 #Hc0 + [ >(\P Hc0) @memb_hd + | @memb_cons @memb_cons // ] + | #c #Hc @Hnotendcxs1 @memb_cons // ] + ] + ] + | #Hxsxs1 destruct (Hxsxs1) >Hmid_dst %{ls_dst} %{rsj} % // + #rsj0 #c >Hrsj #Hrsj0 destruct (Hrsj0) + lapply (append_l2_injective … Hrs_src) // #Hrs' destruct (Hrs') % + ] + ] + |#Hcomp1 #Hsrc cases (Hsrc ? (refl ??)) -Hsrc #ls0 * #rs0 #Hdst + @False_ind lapply (Hcomp1 ?) [%2 %1 %1 >Hmid_src normalize + @(not_to_not ??? (\Pf Hceq)) #H destruct //] #Hintape >Hintape in Hc; + whd in ⊢(??%?→?); >Hmid_src + change with (current ? (niltape ?)) in match (None ?); + Hmid_src whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); + >(Hnotend c_src) [|@memb_hd] + change with (current ? (niltape ?)) in match (None ?); + Hmid_src whd in ⊢ (??%?→?); >Hdst normalize #H destruct (H) + ] ] ] qed. -definition compare ≝ λi,j,sig,n. - whileTM … (compare_step i j sig n) comp1. +definition match_m ≝ λsrc,dst,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc. + whileTM … (match_step src dst sig n is_startc is_endc) + (inr ?? (inr ?? (inl … (inr ?? start_nop)))). + +definition R_match_m ≝ + λsrc,dst,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). +(* (current sig (nth dst (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) = None ? → outt = int) ∧ *) + ∀ls,x,xs,end,rs. + nth src ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls x (xs@end::rs) → + (∀c0. memb ? c0 (x::xs) = true → is_endc c0 = false) → is_endc end = true → + (current sig (nth dst (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) = None ? → outt = int) ∧ + (is_startc x = true → + (∀ls0,x0,rs0. + nth dst ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls0 x0 rs0 → + (∃l,l1.x0::rs0 = l@x::xs@l1 ∧ + ∀cj,l2.l1=cj::l2 → + outt = change_vec ?? + (change_vec ?? int (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls) end rs) src) + (midtape sig ((reverse ? (l@x::xs))@ls0) cj l2) dst) ∨ + ∀l,l1.x0::rs0 ≠ l@x::xs@l1)). -definition R_compare ≝ - λi,j,sig,n.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). - (current sig (nth i (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) - ≠current sig (nth j (tape sig) int (niltape sig)) → - outt = int) ∧ - (∀ls,x,xs,ci,rs,ls0,cj,rs0. +(* +definition R_match_m ≝ + λi,j,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc.λint,outt: Vector (tape sig) (S n). + (((∃x.current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)) = Some ? x ∧ is_endc x = true) ∨ + current ? (nth i ? int (niltape ?)) = None ? ∨ + current ? (nth j ? int (niltape ?)) = None ?) → outt = int) ∧ + (∀ls,x,xs,ci,rs,ls0,x0,rs0. + (∀x. is_startc x ≠ is_endc x) → + is_startc x = true → is_endc ci = true → + (∀z. memb ? z (x::xs) = true → is_endc x = false) → nth i ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls x (xs@ci::rs) → - nth j ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls0 x (xs@cj::rs0) → ci ≠ cj → - outt = change_vec ?? - (change_vec ?? int (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls) ci rs) i) - (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls0) cj rs0) j). + nth j ? int (niltape ?) = midtape sig ls0 x0 rs0 → + (∃l,l1.x0::rs0 = l@x::xs@l1 ∧ + ∀cj,l2.l1=cj::l2 → + outt = change_vec ?? + (change_vec ?? int (midtape sig (reverse ? xs@x::ls) ci rs) i) + (midtape sig ((reverse ? (l@x::xs))@ls0) cj l2) j) ∨ + ∀l,l1.x0::rs0 ≠ l@x::xs@l1). +*) -lemma wsem_compare : ∀i,j,sig,n.i ≠ j → i < S n → j < S n → - compare i j sig n ⊫ R_compare i j sig n. -#i #j #sig #n #Hneq #Hi #Hj #ta #k #outc #Hloop -lapply (sem_while … (sem_comp_step i j sig n Hneq Hi Hj) … Hloop) // +(* +axiom sub_list_dec: ∀A.∀l,ls:list A. + ∃l1,l2. l = l1@ls@l2 ∨ ∀l1,l2. l ≠ l1@ls@l2. +*) + +lemma wsem_match_m : ∀src,dst,sig,n,is_startc,is_endc. +src ≠ dst → src < S n → dst < S n → + match_m src dst sig n is_startc is_endc ⊫ R_match_m src dst sig n is_startc is_endc. +#src #dst #sig #n #is_startc #is_endc #Hneq #Hsrc #Hdst #ta #k #outc #Hloop +lapply (sem_while … (sem_match_step src dst sig n is_startc is_endc Hneq Hsrc Hdst) … Hloop) // -Hloop * #tb * #Hstar @(star_ind_l ??????? Hstar) -Hstar -[ #tc whd in ⊢ (%→?); * * [ * - [ #Hcicj #Houtc % - [ #_ @Houtc - | #ls #x #xs #ci #rs #ls0 #cj #rs0 #Hnthi #Hnthj - >Hnthi in Hcicj; >Hnthj normalize in ⊢ (%→?); * #H @False_ind @H % - ] - | #Hci #Houtc % - [ #_ @Houtc - | #ls #x #xs #ci #rs #ls0 #cj #rs0 #Hnthi >Hnthi in Hci; - normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) ] ] - | #Hcj #Houtc % - [ #_ @Houtc - | #ls #x #xs #ci #rs #ls0 #cj #rs0 #_ #Hnthj >Hnthj in Hcj; - normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) ] ] - | #tc #td #te * #x * * #Hci #Hcj #Hd #Hstar #IH #He lapply (IH He) -IH * - #IH1 #IH2 % - [ >Hci >Hcj * #H @False_ind @H % - | #ls #c0 #xs #ci #rs #ls0 #cj #rs0 cases xs - [ #Hnthi #Hnthj #Hcicj >IH1 - [ >Hd @eq_f3 // - [ @eq_f3 // >(?:c0=x) [ >Hnthi % ] - >Hnthi in Hci;normalize #H destruct (H) % - | >(?:c0=x) [ >Hnthj % ] - >Hnthi in Hci;normalize #H destruct (H) % ] - | >Hd >nth_change_vec // >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] - >nth_change_vec // >Hnthi >Hnthj normalize @(not_to_not ??? Hcicj) - #H destruct (H) % ] - | #x0 #xs0 #Hnthi #Hnthj #Hcicj - >(IH2 (c0::ls) x0 xs0 ci rs (c0::ls0) cj rs0 … Hcicj) - [ >Hd >change_vec_commute in ⊢ (??%?); // - >change_vec_change_vec >change_vec_commute in ⊢ (??%?); // - @sym_not_eq // - | >Hd >nth_change_vec // >Hnthj normalize - >Hnthi in Hci;normalize #H destruct (H) % - | >Hd >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] >Hnthi - >nth_change_vec // normalize - >Hnthi in Hci;normalize #H destruct (H) % +[ #tc #Hfalse #ls #x #xs #end #rs #Hmid_src #Hnotend #Hend + cases (Hfalse … Hmid_src Hnotend Hend) -Hfalse + [(* current dest = None *) * + [ * #Hcur_dst #Houtc % + [#_ >Houtc // + |#Hstart #ls0 #x0 #rs0 #Hmid_dst >Hmid_dst in Hcur_dst; + normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) + ] + | * #ls0 * #rs0 * #xs0 * * #Htc_dst #Hrs0 #HNone % + [ >Htc_dst normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) + | #Hstart #ls1 #x1 #rs1 >Htc_dst #H destruct (H) + >Hrs0 cases xs0 + [ % %{[ ]} %{[ ]} % [ >append_nil >append_nil %] + #cj #ls2 #H destruct (H) + | #x2 #xs2 %2 #l #l1 % #Habs lapply (eq_f ?? (length ?) ?? Habs) + >length_append whd in ⊢ (??%(??%)→?); >length_append + >length_append normalize >commutative_plus whd in ⊢ (???%→?); + #H destruct (H) lapply e0 >(plus_n_O (|rs1|)) in ⊢ (??%?→?); + >associative_plus >associative_plus + #e1 lapply (injective_plus_r ??? e1) whd in ⊢ (???%→?); + #e2 destruct (e2) ] -]]] -qed. - -lemma terminate_compare : ∀i,j,sig,n,t. - i ≠ j → i < S n → j < S n → - compare i j sig n ↓ t. -#i #j #sig #n #t #Hneq #Hi #Hj -@(terminate_while … (sem_comp_step …)) // -<(change_vec_same … t i (niltape ?)) -cases (nth i (tape sig) t (niltape ?)) -[ % #t1 * #x * * >nth_change_vec // normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #Hx destruct -|2,3: #a0 #al0 % #t1 * #x * * >nth_change_vec // normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #Hx destruct -| #ls #c #rs lapply c -c lapply ls -ls lapply t -t elim rs - [#t #ls #c % #t1 * #x * * >nth_change_vec // normalize in ⊢ (%→?); - #H1 destruct (H1) #Hxsep >change_vec_change_vec #Ht1 % - #t2 * #x0 * * >Ht1 >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] - >nth_change_vec // normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) - |#r0 #rs0 #IH #t #ls #c % #t1 * #x * * >nth_change_vec // - normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) #Hcur - >change_vec_change_vec >change_vec_commute // #Ht1 >Ht1 @IH + ] + ] + |* #ls0 * #rs0 * #Hmid_dst #HFalse % + [ >Hmid_dst normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H) + | #Hstart #ls1 #x1 #rs1 >Hmid_dst #H destruct (H) + %1 %{[ ]} %{rs0} % [%] #cj #l2 #Hnotnil + >reverse_cons >associative_append @(HFalse ?? Hnotnil) + ] ] -] -qed. +|#ta #tb #tc #Htrue #Hstar #IH #Hout lapply (IH Hout) -IH -Hout #IH whd + #ls #x #xs #end #rs #Hmid_src #Hnotend #Hend + lapply (refl ? (current ? (nth dst ? ta (niltape ?)))) + cases (current ? (nth dst ? ta (niltape ?))) in ⊢ (???%→?); + [#Hmid_dst % + [#_ whd in Htrue; >Hmid_src in Htrue; #Htrue + cases (Htrue x (refl … )) -Htrue * #Htaneq #_ + @False_ind >Hmid_dst in Htaneq; /2/ + |#Hstart #ls0 #x0 #rs0 #Hmid_dst2 >Hmid_dst2 in Hmid_dst; normalize in ⊢ (%→?); + #H destruct (H) + ] + | #c #Hcurta_dst % [ >Hcurta_dst #H destruct (H) ] + #Hstart #ls0 #x0 #rs0 #Hmid_dst >Hmid_dst in Hcurta_dst; normalize in ⊢ (%→?); + #H destruct (H) whd in Htrue; >Hmid_src in Htrue; #Htrue + cases (Htrue x (refl …)) -Htrue #_ #Htrue cases (Htrue Hstart ?) -Htrue + [2: #z #membz @daemon (*aggiungere l'ipotesi*)] + cases (true_or_false (x==c)) #eqx + [ #_ #Htrue cases (comp_list ? (xs@end::rs) rs0 is_endc) + #x1 * #tl1 * #tl2 * * * #Hxs #Hrs0 #Hnotendx1 + cases tl1 in Hxs; + [>append_nil #Hx1 @daemon (* absurd by Hx1 e notendx1 *)] + #ci -tl1 #tl1 #Hxs #H cases (H … (refl … )) + [(* this is absurd, since Htrue conlcudes is_endc ci =false *) + #Hend_ci @daemon (* lapply(Htrue … (refl …)) -Htrue *) + |cases tl2 in Hrs0; + [ + | #cj #tl2' #Hrs0 #Hcomp lapply (Htrue ls x x1 ci cj tl1 ls0 tl2' ????) + [ @(Hcomp ?? (refl ??)) + | #c0 #Hc0 cases (orb_true_l … Hc0) #Hc0 + [ @Hnotend >(\P Hc0) @memb_hd + | @Hnotendx1 // ] + | >Hmid_dst >Hrs0 >(\P eqx) % + | >Hxs % + | * #Htb >Htb #Hendci %2 >Hrs0 >Hxs + cases (IH ls x xs end rs ? Hnotend Hend) [| + STOP + -lemma sem_compare : ∀i,j,sig,n. - i ≠ j → i < S n → j < S n → - compare i j sig n ⊨ R_compare i j sig n. -#i #j #sig #n #Hneq #Hi #Hj @WRealize_to_Realize /2/ + + >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] >nth_change_vec // + + >Hrs0 in Hmid_dst; #Hmid_dst + cases(Htrue ???????? Hmid_dst) -Htrue #Htb #Hendx + whd in IH; + cases(IH ls x xs end rs ? Hstart Hnotend Hend) + [* #H1 #H2 >Htb in H1; >nth_change_vec // + >Hmid_dst cases rs0 [2: #a #tl normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #H destruct (H)] + #_ %2 @daemon (* si dimostra *) + |@daemon + |>Htb >nth_change_vec_neq [|@sym_not_eq //] @Hmid_src + ] + ] + ] +] qed.