X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Focaml%2Ftactics%2FequalityTactics.ml;h=5a091b7ad895cb196243c9d96c0394e8330fe1f3;hb=a7667815758ad8e3cf2a9921c0ccfb9bcb29bb54;hp=7eae7fb5c0ee402d0761dd39df7fe4050d7ad4ce;hpb=016e4c6fc449b50ac19e73eb952cfb2dc64f4398;p=helm.git

diff --git a/helm/ocaml/tactics/equalityTactics.ml b/helm/ocaml/tactics/equalityTactics.ml
index 7eae7fb5c..5a091b7ad 100644
--- a/helm/ocaml/tactics/equalityTactics.ml
+++ b/helm/ocaml/tactics/equalityTactics.ml
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ let rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
       CicUniv.empty_ugraph in 
   let (ty_eq,metasenv',arguments,fresh_meta) =
    ProofEngineHelpers.saturate_term
-    (ProofEngineHelpers.new_meta_of_proof proof) metasenv context ty_eq in
+    (ProofEngineHelpers.new_meta_of_proof proof) metasenv context ty_eq 0 in
   let equality =
    if List.length arguments = 0 then
     equality
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ let rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
         in
         let eq_ind = C.Const (ind_uri uri,[]) in
          if_right_to_left (eq_ind, ty, t2, t1) (eq_ind, ty, t1, t2)
-    | _ -> raise (PET.Fail "Rewrite: argument is not a proof of an equality") in
+    | _ -> raise (PET.Fail (lazy "Rewrite: argument is not a proof of an equality")) in
   (* now we always do as if direction was `LeftToRight *)
   let fresh_name = 
     FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name 
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ let rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
   let lifted_gty = CicSubstitution.lift 1 gty in
   let lifted_conjecture =
     metano,(Some (fresh_name,Cic.Decl ty))::context,lifted_gty in
-  let lifted_pattern = Some lifted_t1,[],CicSubstitution.lift 1 concl_pat in
+  let lifted_pattern =
+    Some (fun _ m u -> lifted_t1, m, u),[],CicSubstitution.lift 1 concl_pat
+  in
   let subst,metasenv',ugraph,_,selected_terms_with_context =
    ProofEngineHelpers.select
     ~metasenv:metasenv' ~ugraph ~conjecture:lifted_conjecture
@@ -103,11 +105,9 @@ let rewrite_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
       (PT.exact_tac ~term:exact_proof) ((curi,metasenv',pbo,pty),goal)
   in
   assert (List.length goals = 0) ;
-  let goals = List.map (fun (i,_,_) -> i) metasenv' in
   let goals =
-   List.filter
-    (fun i ->
-      not (List.exists (fun (j,_,_) -> i=j) metasenv)) goals
+   ProofEngineHelpers.compare_metasenvs ~oldmetasenv:metasenv
+    ~newmetasenv:metasenv'
   in
    (proof',goals)
  in
@@ -128,25 +128,31 @@ let rewrite_simpl_tac ~direction ~pattern equality =
 ;;
 
 let replace_tac ~pattern ~with_what =
-(*
  let replace_tac ~pattern:(wanted,hyps_pat,concl_pat) ~with_what status =
   let (proof, goal) = status in
   let module C = Cic in
   let module U = UriManager in
   let module P = PrimitiveTactics in
   let module T = Tacticals in
-  let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
+  let uri,metasenv,pbo,pty = proof in
   let (_,context,ty) as conjecture = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
   assert (hyps_pat = []); (*CSC: not implemented yet *)
   let context_len = List.length context in
-  let _,selected_terms_with_context =
-   ProofEngineHelpers.select ~metasenv ~conjecture ~pattern in
+  let subst,metasenv,u,_,selected_terms_with_context =
+   ProofEngineHelpers.select ~metasenv ~ugraph:CicUniv.empty_ugraph
+    ~conjecture ~pattern in
+  let metasenv = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst_metasenv subst metasenv in
+  let with_what, metasenv, u = with_what context metasenv u in
+  let with_what = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst with_what in
+  let pbo = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst pbo in
+  let pty = CicMetaSubst.apply_subst subst pty in
+  let status = (uri,metasenv,pbo,pty),goal in
   let ty_of_with_what,u =
    CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux'
     metasenv context with_what CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
   let whats =
    match selected_terms_with_context with
-      [] -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Replace: no term selected")
+      [] -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "Replace: no term selected"))
     | l ->
       List.map
        (fun (context_of_t,t) ->
@@ -167,7 +173,7 @@ let replace_tac ~pattern ~with_what =
             (*CSC: we could implement something stronger by completely changing
               the semantics of the tactic *)
             raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail
-             "Replace: one of the selected terms is not closed") in
+             (lazy "Replace: one of the selected terms is not closed")) in
          let ty_of_t_in_context,u = (* TASSI: FIXME *)
           CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context t_in_context
            CicUniv.empty_ugraph in
@@ -180,7 +186,7 @@ let replace_tac ~pattern ~with_what =
          else
           raise
            (ProofEngineTypes.Fail
-             "Replace: one of the selected terms and the term to be replaced with have not convertible types")
+             (lazy "Replace: one of the selected terms and the term to be replaced with have not convertible types"))
        ) l in
   let rec aux n whats status =
    match whats with
@@ -225,7 +231,6 @@ let replace_tac ~pattern ~with_what =
    aux 0 whats status
  in
    ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (replace_tac ~pattern ~with_what)
-*) assert false
 ;;
 
 
@@ -250,7 +255,7 @@ let symmetry_tac =
 	    ~term: (C.Const (LibraryObjects.sym_eq_URI uri, []))) 
 	   (proof,goal)
 
-      | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Symmetry failed")
+      | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "Symmetry failed"))
  in
   ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic symmetry_tac
 ;;
@@ -275,7 +280,7 @@ let transitivity_tac ~term =
             [PrimitiveTactics.exact_tac ~term ; T.id_tac ; T.id_tac])
           status
 
-      | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Transitivity failed")
+      | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "Transitivity failed"))
  in
   ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (transitivity_tac ~term)
 ;;