X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fcomponents%2Fcontent_pres%2Fcontent2pres.ml;h=97f225f62b0bc2a9b9ad5c4781ba6bbcbcba2be5;hb=63adafe5fb700c8ecf13f74fc31086c173617e86;hp=7c0ad99c476072685ce7454832f03da6dccfcb50;hpb=0e850ea466d664062ad1999e75c60b90aadaa084;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/components/content_pres/content2pres.ml b/helm/software/components/content_pres/content2pres.ml index 7c0ad99c4..97f225f62 100644 --- a/helm/software/components/content_pres/content2pres.ml +++ b/helm/software/components/content_pres/content2pres.ml @@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ let make_args_for_apply term2pres args = Some "xlink", "href", lemma.Con.lemma_uri ] in (B.b_object (P.Mi(lemma_attrs,lemma.Con.lemma_name)))::row - | Con.Term t -> - if is_first then + | Con.Term (b,t) -> + if is_first || (not b) then (term2pres t)::row - else (B.b_object (P.Mi([],"_")))::row + else (B.b_object (P.Mi([],"?")))::row | Con.ArgProof _ | Con.ArgMethod _ -> - (B.b_object (P.Mi([],"_")))::row + (B.b_object (P.Mi([],"?")))::row in if is_first then res else B.skip::res in @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ let make_args_for_apply term2pres args = make_arg_for_apply true hd (List.fold_right (make_arg_for_apply false) tl []) | _ -> assert false + let get_name = function | Some s -> s | None -> "_" @@ -131,10 +132,10 @@ let rec justification term2pres p = (B.b_kw "by")::B.b_space:: B.Text([],"(")::pres_args@[B.Text([],")")]), None else (B.b_kw "by"), - Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";proof2pres term2pres p]) + Some (B.b_toggle [B.b_kw "proof";proof2pres true term2pres p]) -and proof2pres term2pres p = - let rec proof2pres p = +and proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas is_top_down term2pres p = + let rec proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down p omit_dot = let indent = let is_decl e = (match e with @@ -149,10 +150,27 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = | Some t -> Some (term2pres t)) in let body = let presconclude = - conclude2pres p.Con.proof_conclude indent omit_conclusion in + conclude2pres + ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal: + (match skip_initial_lambdas_internal with + Some (`Later s) -> Some (`Now s) + | _ -> None) + is_top_down + p.Con.proof_name p.Con.proof_conclude indent omit_conclusion + omit_dot in let presacontext = - acontext2pres p.Con.proof_apply_context presconclude indent in - context2pres p.Con.proof_context presacontext in + acontext2pres + (p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion") + p.Con.proof_apply_context + presconclude indent + (p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion") + in + context2pres + (match skip_initial_lambdas_internal with + Some (`Now n) -> snd (HExtlib.split_nth n p.Con.proof_context) + | _ -> p.Con.proof_context) + presacontext + in match p.Con.proof_name with None -> body | Some name -> @@ -163,11 +181,11 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = let concl = make_concl ~attrs:[ Some "helm", "xref", p.Con.proof_id ] "proof of" ac in - B.b_toggle [ concl; body ] + B.b_toggle [ B.H ([], [concl; B.skip ; B.Text([],"("); + B.Object ([], P.Mi ([],name)); + B.Text([],")") ]) ; body ] in - B.V ([], - [B.Text ([],"(" ^ name ^ ")"); - B.indent action]) + B.indent action and context2pres c continuation = (* we generate a subtable for each context element, for selection @@ -201,96 +219,145 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = and ce2pres_in_proof_context_element = function | `Joint ho -> B.H ([],(List.map ce2pres_in_joint_context_element ho.Content.joint_defs)) - | (`Declaration _) as x -> ce2pres x - | (`Hypothesis _) as x -> ce2pres x + | (`Declaration _) as x -> ce2pres x + | (`Hypothesis _) as x -> ce2pres x | (`Proof _) as x -> ce2pres x - | (`Definition _) as x -> ce2pres x + | (`Definition _) as x -> ce2pres x - and ce2pres = + and ce2pres = function `Declaration d -> - (match d.Con.dec_name with - Some s -> - let ty = term2pres d.Con.dec_type in - B.H ([], - [(B.b_kw "Assume"); - B.b_space; - B.Object ([], P.Mi([],s)); - B.Text([],":"); - ty]) - | None -> - prerr_endline "NO NAME!!"; assert false) + let ty = term2pres d.Con.dec_type in + B.H ([], + [(B.b_kw "assume"); + B.b_space; + B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name d.Con.dec_name)); + B.Text([],":"); + ty; + B.Text([],".")]) | `Hypothesis h -> - (match h.Con.dec_name with - Some s -> - let ty = term2pres h.Con.dec_type in - B.H ([], - [(B.b_kw "Suppose"); - B.b_space; - B.Text([],"("); - B.Object ([], P.Mi ([],s)); - B.Text([],")"); - B.b_space; - ty]) - | None -> - prerr_endline "NO NAME!!"; assert false) + let ty = term2pres h.Con.dec_type in + B.H ([], + [(B.b_kw "suppose"); + B.b_space; + ty; + B.b_space; + B.Text([],"("); + B.Object ([], P.Mi ([],get_name h.Con.dec_name)); + B.Text([],")"); + B.Text([],".")]) | `Proof p -> - proof2pres p + proof2pres false p false | `Definition d -> - (match d.Con.def_name with - Some s -> - let term = term2pres d.Con.def_term in - B.H ([], - [ B.b_kw "Let"; B.b_space; - B.Object ([], P.Mi([],s)); - B.Text([]," = "); - term]) - | None -> - prerr_endline "NO NAME!!"; assert false) - - and acontext2pres ac continuation indent = - List.fold_right - (fun p continuation -> - let hd = - if indent then - B.indent (proof2pres p) - else - proof2pres p in - B.V([Some "helm","xref",p.Con.proof_id], - [B.H([Some "helm","xref","ace_"^p.Con.proof_id],[hd]); - continuation])) ac continuation - - and conclude2pres conclude indent omit_conclusion = + let term = term2pres d.Con.def_term in + B.H ([], + [ B.b_kw "let"; B.b_space; + B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name d.Con.def_name)); + B.Text([],Utf8Macro.unicode_of_tex "\\def"); + term]) + + and acontext2pres is_top_down ac continuation indent in_bu_conversion = + let rec aux = + function + [] -> continuation + | p::tl -> + let continuation = aux tl in + (* Applicative context get flattened and the "body" of a BU_Conversion + is put in the applicative context. Thus two different situations + are possible: + {method = "BU_Conversion"; applicative_context=[p1; ...; pn]} + {method = xxx; applicative_context = + [ p1; ...; pn; {method="BU_Conversion"} ; p_{n+1}; ... ; pm ]} + In both situations only pn must be processed in in_bu_conversion + mode + *) + let in_bu_conversion = + match tl with + [] -> in_bu_conversion + | p::_ -> p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" + in + let hd = + if indent then + B.indent (proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion) + else + proof2pres is_top_down p in_bu_conversion + in + B.V([Some "helm","xref",p.Con.proof_id], + [B.H([Some "helm","xref","ace_"^p.Con.proof_id],[hd]); + continuation]) + in aux ac + + and conclude2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal is_top_down name conclude indent omit_conclusion omit_dot = let tconclude_body = match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with - Some t when - not omit_conclusion or + Some t (*when not omit_conclusion or (* CSC: I ignore the omit_conclusion flag in this case. *) (* CSC: Is this the correct behaviour? In the stylesheets *) (* CSC: we simply generated nothing (i.e. the output type *) (* CSC: of the function should become an option. *) - conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" -> - let concl = (term2pres t) in + conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" *) -> + let concl = term2pres t in if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" then - make_concl "that is equivalent to" concl + B.b_hv [] + (make_concl "that is equivalent to" concl :: + if is_top_down then [B.b_space ; B.b_kw "done"; + B.Text([],".")] else [B.Text([],".")]) else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "FalseInd" then (* false ind is in charge to add the conclusion *) falseind conclude else - let conclude_body = conclude_aux conclude in + let prequel = + if + (not is_top_down) && + conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac" + then + let name = get_name name in + [B.V ([], + [ B.H([], + let expected = + (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with + None -> B.Text([],"NO EXPECTED!!!") + | Some c -> term2pres c) + in + [make_concl "we need to prove" expected; + B.skip; + B.Text([],"("); + B.Object ([], P.Mi ([],name)); + B.Text([],")"); + B.Text ([],".") + ])])] + else + [] in + let conclude_body = + conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude in let ann_concl = - if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion" then - make_concl "that is equivalent to" concl - else make_concl "we conclude" concl in - B.V ([], [conclude_body; ann_concl]) - | _ -> conclude_aux conclude in - if indent then - B.indent (B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id], - [tconclude_body])) - else - B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],[tconclude_body]) + if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac" + || conclude.Con.conclude_method = "ByInduction" + || conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion" + then + B.Text([],"") + else if omit_conclusion then + B.H([], [B.b_kw "done" ; B.Text([],".") ]) + else + B.b_hv [] + ((if not is_top_down || omit_dot then + (make_concl "we proved" concl) :: + if not is_top_down then + [B.b_space; B.Text([],"(previous)")] + else [] + else [B.b_kw "done"] + ) @ if not omit_dot then [B.Text([],".")] else []) + in + B.V ([], prequel @ [conclude_body; ann_concl]) + | _ -> conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude + in + if indent then + B.indent (B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id], + [tconclude_body])) + else + B.H ([Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],[tconclude_body]) - and conclude_aux conclude = + and conclude_aux ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal conclude = if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion" then let expected = (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with @@ -306,15 +373,15 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = | Some c -> (term2pres c)) in B.V ([], - [make_concl "we must prove" expected; - make_concl "or equivalently" synth; - proof2pres subproof]) + [make_concl "we need to prove" expected; + B.H ([],[make_concl "or equivalently" synth; B.Text([],".")]); + proof2pres true subproof false]) else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" then assert false else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Exact" then let arg = (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with - [Con.Term t] -> term2pres t + [Con.Term (b,t)] -> assert (not b);term2pres t | [Con.Premise p] -> (match p.Con.premise_binder with | None -> assert false; (* unnamed hypothesis ??? *) @@ -322,15 +389,17 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = | err -> assert false) in (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with None -> - B.b_h [] [B.b_kw "Consider"; B.b_space; arg] - | Some c -> let conclusion = term2pres c in - make_row - [arg; B.b_space; B.b_kw "proves"] - conclusion + B.b_h [] [B.b_kw "by"; B.b_space; arg] + | Some c -> + B.b_h [] [B.b_kw "by"; B.b_space; arg] ) else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Intros+LetTac" then (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with - [Con.ArgProof p] -> proof2pres p + [Con.ArgProof p] -> + (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with + [Con.ArgProof p] -> + proof2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal true p false + | _ -> assert false) | _ -> assert false) (* OLD CODE let conclusion = @@ -342,7 +411,7 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = B.V ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false"; None,"columnalign","left"], - [B.H([],[B.Object([],proof2pres p)]); + [B.H([],[B.Object([],proof2pres p false)]); B.H([],[B.Object([], (make_concl "we proved 1" conclusion))])]); | _ -> assert false) @@ -364,12 +433,13 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = | _ -> assert false) in let term1 = (match List.nth conclude.Con.conclude_args 2 with - Con.Term t -> term2pres t + Con.Term (_,t) -> term2pres t | _ -> assert false) in let term2 = (match List.nth conclude.Con.conclude_args 5 with - Con.Term t -> term2pres t + Con.Term (_,t) -> term2pres t | _ -> assert false) in +(* B.V ([], B.H ([],[ (B.b_kw "rewrite"); @@ -378,24 +448,32 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = B.b_space; term2; B.b_space; justif1]):: match justif2 with None -> [] | Some j -> [B.indent j]) +*) B.V([], [justif1 ; B.H([],[B.b_kw "we proved (" ; term2 ; B.b_kw "=" ; term1; B.b_kw ") (previous)."]); B.b_kw "by _"]) else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Eq_chain" then let justification p = - let j1,j2 = justification term2pres p in +(* + if skip_initial_lambdas <> None (* cheating *) then + [B.b_kw "by _"] + else +*) + let j1,j2 = justification term2pres p in j1 :: B.b_space :: (match j2 with Some j -> [j] | None -> []) in let rec aux args = match args with | [] -> [] - | (Con.ArgProof p)::(Con.Term t)::tl -> - B.HOV(RenderingAttrs.indent_attributes `BoxML,([B.b_kw "=";B.b_space;term2pres t;B.b_space]@justification p))::(aux tl) + | (Con.ArgProof p)::(Con.Term (_,t))::tl -> + B.HOV(RenderingAttrs.indent_attributes `BoxML,([B.b_kw + "=";B.b_space;term2pres t;B.b_space]@justification p@ + (if tl <> [] then [B.Text ([],".")] else [])))::(aux tl) | _ -> assert false in let hd = match List.hd conclude.Con.conclude_args with - | Con.Term t -> t + | Con.Term (_,t) -> t | _ -> assert false in - B.HOV([],[term2pres hd; (* B.b_space; *) + B.HOV([],[B.b_kw "conclude";B.b_space;term2pres hd; (* B.b_space; *) B.V ([],aux (List.tl conclude.Con.conclude_args))]) else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Apply" then let pres_args = @@ -416,8 +494,8 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = Con.Aux n -> B.b_kw ("aux " ^ n) | Con.Premise prem -> B.b_kw "premise" | Con.Lemma lemma -> B.b_kw "lemma" - | Con.Term t -> term2pres t - | Con.ArgProof p -> proof2pres p + | Con.Term (_,t) -> term2pres t + | Con.ArgProof p -> proof2pres true p false | Con.ArgMethod s -> B.b_kw "method" and case conclude = @@ -439,7 +517,7 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = None -> B.b_kw "the previous result" | Some n -> B.Object ([], P.Mi([],n))) | Con.Lemma lemma -> B.Object ([], P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)) - | Con.Term t -> + | Con.Term (_,t) -> term2pres t | Con.ArgProof p -> B.b_kw "a proof???" | Con.ArgMethod s -> B.b_kw "a method???") @@ -470,14 +548,14 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = None -> B.b_kw "the previous result" | Some n -> B.Object ([], P.Mi([],n))) | Con.Lemma lemma -> B.Object ([], P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)) - | Con.Term t -> + | Con.Term (_,t) -> term2pres t | Con.ArgProof p -> B.b_kw "a proof???" | Con.ArgMethod s -> B.b_kw "a method???") in (make_concl "we proceed by induction on" arg) in let to_prove = - (make_concl "to prove" proof_conclusion) in - B.V ([], induction_on::to_prove:: (make_cases args_for_cases)) + B.H ([], [make_concl "to prove" proof_conclusion ; B.Text([],".")]) in + B.V ([], induction_on::to_prove::(make_cases args_for_cases)) and make_cases l = List.map make_case l @@ -500,21 +578,20 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = (match e with `Declaration h | `Hypothesis h -> - let name = - (match h.Con.dec_name with - None -> "NO NAME???" - | Some n ->n) in + let name = get_name h.Con.dec_name in [B.b_space; + B.Text([],"("); B.Object ([], P.Mi ([],name)); B.Text([],":"); - (term2pres h.Con.dec_type)] - | _ -> [B.Text ([],"???")]) in + (term2pres h.Con.dec_type); + B.Text([],")")] + | _ -> assert false (*[B.Text ([],"???")]*)) in dec@p) args [] in let pattern = B.H ([], - (B.b_kw "Case"::B.b_space::name::pattern_aux)@ + (B.b_kw "case"::B.b_space::name::pattern_aux)@ [B.b_space; - B.Text([], Utf8Macro.unicode_of_tex "\\Rightarrow")]) in + B.Text([], ".")]) in let subconcl = (match p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with None -> B.b_kw "No conclusion!!!" @@ -530,20 +607,20 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = `Hypothesis h -> let name = (match h.Con.dec_name with - None -> "no name" + None -> "useless" | Some s -> s) in B.indent (B.H ([], - [B.Text([],"("); + [term2pres h.Con.dec_type; + B.b_space; + B.Text([],"("); B.Object ([], P.Mi ([],name)); B.Text([],")"); - B.b_space; - term2pres h.Con.dec_type])) + B.Text([],".")])) | _ -> assert false in let hyps = List.map make_hyp indhyps in text::hyps) in - (* let acontext = - acontext2pres_old p.Con.proof_apply_context true in *) - let body = conclude2pres p.Con.proof_conclude true false in + let body = + conclude2pres true p.Con.proof_name p.Con.proof_conclude true true false in let presacontext = let acontext_id = match p.Con.proof_apply_context with @@ -552,8 +629,12 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = in B.Action([None,"type","toggle"], [ B.indent (add_xref acontext_id (B.b_kw "Proof")); - acontext2pres p.Con.proof_apply_context body true]) in - B.V ([], pattern::asubconcl::induction_hypothesis@[presacontext]) + acontext2pres + (p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion") + p.Con.proof_apply_context body true + (p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion") + ]) in + B.V ([], pattern::induction_hypothesis@[B.H ([],[asubconcl;B.Text([],".")]);presacontext]) | _ -> assert false and falseind conclude = @@ -581,7 +662,6 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = [ B.Object ([], P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)); B.skip; B.b_kw "is contradictory, hence" ] | _ -> assert false) in - (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} in *) make_row arg proof_conclusion and andind conclude = @@ -605,28 +685,26 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = | _ -> assert false) in match proof.Con.proof_context with `Hypothesis hyp1::`Hypothesis hyp2::tl -> - let get_name hyp = - (match hyp.Con.dec_name with - None -> "_" - | Some s -> s) in let preshyp1 = B.H ([], [B.Text([],"("); - B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name hyp1)); + B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name hyp1.Con.dec_name)); B.Text([],")"); B.skip; term2pres hyp1.Con.dec_type]) in let preshyp2 = B.H ([], [B.Text([],"("); - B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name hyp2)); + B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name hyp2.Con.dec_name)); B.Text([],")"); B.skip; term2pres hyp2.Con.dec_type]) in - (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} in *) - let body = conclude2pres proof.Con.proof_conclude false true in + let body = + conclude2pres false proof.Con.proof_name proof.Con.proof_conclude + false true false in let presacontext = - acontext2pres proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false in + acontext2pres false proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false false + in B.V ([], [B.H ([],arg@[B.skip; B.b_kw "we have"]); @@ -647,29 +725,27 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = match proof.Con.proof_context with `Declaration decl::`Hypothesis hyp::tl | `Hypothesis decl::`Hypothesis hyp::tl -> - let get_name decl = - (match decl.Con.dec_name with - None -> "_" - | Some s -> s) in let presdecl = B.H ([], [(B.b_kw "let"); B.skip; - B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name decl)); + B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name decl.Con.dec_name)); B.Text([],":"); term2pres decl.Con.dec_type]) in let suchthat = B.H ([], [(B.b_kw "such that"); B.skip; B.Text([],"("); - B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name hyp)); + B.Object ([], P.Mi([],get_name hyp.Con.dec_name)); B.Text([],")"); B.skip; term2pres hyp.Con.dec_type]) in - (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} in *) - let body = conclude2pres proof.Con.proof_conclude false true in + let body = + conclude2pres false proof.Con.proof_name proof.Con.proof_conclude + false true false in let presacontext = - acontext2pres proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false in + acontext2pres false proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false false + in B.V ([], [presdecl; @@ -678,7 +754,12 @@ and proof2pres term2pres p = | _ -> assert false in - proof2pres p + proof2pres + ?skip_initial_lambdas_internal: + (match skip_initial_lambdas with + None -> Some (`Later 0) (* we already printed theorem: *) + | Some n -> Some (`Later n)) + is_top_down p false exception ToDo @@ -729,7 +810,7 @@ let conjecture2pres term2pres (id, n, context, ty) = None -> "_" | Some n -> n)) ; B.b_text [] (Utf8Macro.unicode_of_tex "\\Assign"); - proof2pres term2pres p]) + proof2pres true term2pres p]) (List.rev context)) ] :: [ B.b_h [] [ B.b_text [] (Utf8Macro.unicode_of_tex "\\vdash"); @@ -794,26 +875,35 @@ let joint_def2pres term2pres def = | `Inductive ind -> inductive2pres term2pres ind | _ -> assert false (* ZACK or raise ToDo? *) -let content2pres term2pres (id,params,metasenv,obj) = +let content2pres + ?skip_initial_lambdas ?(skip_thm_and_qed=false) term2pres + (id,params,metasenv,obj) += match obj with | `Def (Content.Const, thesis, `Proof p) -> let name = get_name p.Content.proof_name in + let proof = proof2pres true term2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas p in + if skip_thm_and_qed then + proof + else B.b_v [Some "helm","xref","id"] - ([ B.b_h [] (B.b_kw ("Proof " ^ name) :: params2pres params); - B.b_kw "Thesis:"; - B.indent (term2pres thesis) ] @ + ([ B.b_h [] (B.b_kw ("theorem " ^ name) :: + params2pres params @ [B.b_kw ":"]); + B.H ([],[B.indent (term2pres thesis) ; B.b_kw "." ])] @ metasenv2pres term2pres metasenv @ - [proof2pres term2pres p]) + [proof ; B.b_kw "qed."]) | `Def (_, ty, `Definition body) -> let name = get_name body.Content.def_name in B.b_v [Some "helm","xref","id"] - ([B.b_h [] (B.b_kw ("Definition " ^ name) :: params2pres params); - B.b_kw "Type:"; + ([B.b_h [] + (B.b_kw ("definition " ^ name) :: params2pres params @ [B.b_kw ":"]); B.indent (term2pres ty)] @ metasenv2pres term2pres metasenv @ - [B.b_kw "Body:"; term2pres body.Content.def_term]) + [B.b_kw ":="; + B.indent (term2pres body.Content.def_term); + B.b_kw "."]) | `Decl (_, `Declaration decl) | `Decl (_, `Hypothesis decl) -> let name = get_name decl.Content.dec_name in @@ -829,13 +919,14 @@ let content2pres term2pres (id,params,metasenv,obj) = :: List.map (joint_def2pres term2pres) joint.Content.joint_defs) | _ -> raise ToDo -let content2pres ~ids_to_inner_sorts = - content2pres - (fun annterm -> +let content2pres + ?skip_initial_lambdas ?skip_thm_and_qed ~ids_to_inner_sorts += + content2pres ?skip_initial_lambdas ?skip_thm_and_qed + (fun ?(prec=90) annterm -> let ast, ids_to_uris = TermAcicContent.ast_of_acic ids_to_inner_sorts annterm in - CicNotationPres.box_of_mpres - (CicNotationPres.render ids_to_uris + CicNotationPres.box_of_mpres + (CicNotationPres.render ids_to_uris ~prec (TermContentPres.pp_ast ast))) -