X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fcomponents%2Fng_paramodulation%2Fsuperposition.ml;h=47119d4770e25beab157df62540aa120c0d1533e;hb=2041f4fefe300f77338f6aea598f025f84db1bbc;hp=046799a775149470bd7162252b023e582ffb9e99;hpb=8bb849acb32ab6180be4ea23dbb9fe35d7300ceb;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/components/ng_paramodulation/superposition.ml b/helm/software/components/ng_paramodulation/superposition.ml index 046799a77..47119d477 100644 --- a/helm/software/components/ng_paramodulation/superposition.ml +++ b/helm/software/components/ng_paramodulation/superposition.ml @@ -11,20 +11,21 @@ (* $Id: index.mli 9822 2009-06-03 15:37:06Z tassi $ *) -module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = +module Superposition (B : Orderings.Blob) = struct module IDX = Index.Index(B) - module Unif = FoUnif.Founif(B) - module Subst = FoSubst.Subst(B) - module Order = Orderings.Orderings(B) + module Unif = FoUnif.FoUnif(B) + module Subst = FoSubst + module Order = B module Utils = FoUtils.Utils(B) module Pp = Pp.Pp(B) + module Clauses = Clauses.Clauses(B) - exception Success of B.t Terms.bag * int * B.t Terms.unit_clause + exception Success of B.t Terms.bag * int * B.t Terms.clause - let debug s = - ()(* prerr_endline s *) - ;; + let debug s = prerr_endline (Lazy.force s);; + let debug _ = ();; + let enable = true;; let rec list_first f = function | [] -> None @@ -32,12 +33,16 @@ module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = ;; let first_position pos ctx t f = + let inject_pos pos ctx = function + | None -> None + | Some (a,b,c,d) -> Some(ctx a,b,c,d,pos) + in let rec aux pos ctx = function - | Terms.Leaf _ as t -> f t pos ctx + | Terms.Leaf _ as t -> inject_pos pos ctx (f t) | Terms.Var _ -> None - | Terms.Node l as t-> - match f t pos ctx with - | Some _ as x -> x + | Terms.Node l as t-> + match f t with + | Some _ as x -> inject_pos pos ctx x | None -> let rec first pre post = function | [] -> None @@ -72,11 +77,35 @@ module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = in aux pos ctx t ;; + + let parallel_positions bag pos ctx id t f = + let rec aux bag pos ctx id = function + | Terms.Leaf _ as t -> f bag t pos ctx id + | Terms.Var _ as t -> bag,t,id + | Terms.Node (hd::l) as t-> + let bag,t,id1 = f bag t pos ctx id in + if id = id1 then + let bag, l, _, id = + List.fold_left + (fun (bag,pre,post,id) t -> + let newctx = fun x -> ctx (Terms.Node (pre@[x]@post)) in + let newpos = (List.length pre)::pos in + let bag,newt,id = aux bag newpos newctx id t in + if post = [] then bag, pre@[newt], [], id + else bag, pre @ [newt], List.tl post, id) + (bag, [hd], List.tl l, id) l + in + bag, Terms.Node l, id + else bag,t,id1 + | _ -> assert false + in + aux bag pos ctx id t + ;; - let build_clause bag filter rule t subst vl id id2 pos dir = + let build_clause bag filter rule t subst id id2 pos dir = let proof = Terms.Step(rule,id,id2,dir,pos,subst) in let t = Subst.apply_subst subst t in - if filter t then + if filter subst then let literal = match t with | Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf eq ; ty; l; r ] when B.eq B.eqP eq -> @@ -85,179 +114,474 @@ module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = | t -> Terms.Predicate t in let bag, uc = - Utils.add_to_bag bag (0, literal, vl, proof) + Terms.add_to_bag (0, [], [literal,true], Terms.vars_of_term t, proof) bag in Some (bag, uc) else ((*prerr_endline ("Filtering: " ^ Pp.pp_foterm t);*)None) ;; + let prof_build_clause = HExtlib.profile ~enable "build_clause";; + let build_clause bag filter rule t subst id id2 pos x = + prof_build_clause.HExtlib.profile (build_clause bag filter rule t subst id id2 pos) x + ;; (* ============ simplification ================= *) + let prof_demod_u = HExtlib.profile ~enable "demod.unify";; + let prof_demod_r = HExtlib.profile ~enable "demod.retrieve_generalizations";; + let prof_demod_o = HExtlib.profile ~enable "demod.compare_terms";; + let prof_demod_s = HExtlib.profile ~enable "demod.apply_subst";; - let demod table varlist subterm pos context = - let cands = IDX.DT.retrieve_generalizations table subterm in + let demod table varlist subterm = + let cands = + prof_demod_r.HExtlib.profile + (IDX.DT.retrieve_generalizations table) subterm + in list_first - (fun (dir, (id,lit,vl,_)) -> - match lit with - | Terms.Predicate _ -> assert false - | Terms.Equation (l,r,_,o) -> - let side, newside = if dir=Terms.Left2Right then l,r else r,l in - try - let subst, varlist = - Unif.unification (varlist@vl) varlist subterm side - in - if o = Terms.Incomparable then - let side = Subst.apply_subst subst side in - let newside = Subst.apply_subst subst newside in - let o = Order.compare_terms newside side in - (* Riazanov, pp. 45 (ii) *) - if o = Terms.Lt then - Some (context newside, subst, varlist, id, pos, dir) - else - ((*prerr_endline ("Filtering: " ^ - Pp.pp_foterm side ^ " =(< || =)" ^ - Pp.pp_foterm newside ^ " coming from " ^ - Pp.pp_unit_clause uc );*)None) - else - Some (context newside, subst, varlist, id, pos, dir) - with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> None) - (IDX.ClauseSet.elements cands) + (fun (dir, is_pos, pos, (id,nlit,plit,vl,_)) -> + match nlit,plit with + | [], [(lit,_)] -> + (match lit with + | Terms.Predicate _ -> assert false + | Terms.Equation (l,r,_,o) -> + let side, newside = if dir=Terms.Left2Right then l,r else r,l in + try + let subst = + prof_demod_u.HExtlib.profile + (Unif.unification (* (varlist@vl) *) varlist subterm) side + in + let side = + prof_demod_s.HExtlib.profile + (Subst.apply_subst subst) side + in + let newside = + prof_demod_s.HExtlib.profile + (Subst.apply_subst subst) newside + in + if o = Terms.Incomparable || o = Terms.Invertible then + let o = + prof_demod_o.HExtlib.profile + (Order.compare_terms newside) side in + (* Riazanov, pp. 45 (ii) *) + if o = Terms.Lt then + Some (newside, subst, id, dir) + else + ((*prerr_endline ("Filtering: " ^ + Pp.pp_foterm side ^ " =(< || =)" ^ + Pp.pp_foterm newside ^ " coming from " ^ + Pp.pp_clause uc );*)None) + else + Some (newside, subst, id, dir) + with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> None) + | _ -> None) + (IDX.ClauseSet.elements cands) + ;; + let prof_demod = HExtlib.profile ~enable "demod";; + let demod table varlist x = + prof_demod.HExtlib.profile (demod table varlist) x ;; - (* XXX: possible optimization, if the literal has a "side" already - * in normal form we should not traverse it again *) - let demodulate_once bag (id, literal, vl, pr) table = - debug ("Demodulating : " ^ (Pp.pp_unit_clause (id, literal, vl, pr))); - let t = - match literal with - | Terms.Predicate t -> t - | Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_) -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; r ] - in - match first_position [] (fun x -> x) t (demod table vl) with - | None -> None - | Some (newt, subst, varlist, id2, pos, dir) -> - build_clause bag (fun _ -> true) Terms.Demodulation - newt subst varlist id id2 pos dir + let parallel_demod table vl bag t pos ctx id = + match demod table vl t with + | None -> (bag,t,id) + | Some (newside, subst, id2, dir) -> + match build_clause bag (fun _ -> true) + Terms.Demodulation (ctx newside) subst id id2 pos dir + with + | None -> assert false + | Some (bag,(id,_,_,_,_)) -> + (bag,newside,id) ;; - let rec demodulate bag clause table = - match demodulate_once bag clause table with + let demodulate_once ~jump_to_right bag (id, nlit, plit, vl, pr) table = + match nlit,plit with + |[literal,_], [] + |[],[literal,_] -> + (match literal with + | Terms.Predicate t -> assert false + | Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_) -> + let bag,l,id1 = if jump_to_right then (bag,l,id) else + parallel_positions bag [2] + (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; x; r ]) id l + (parallel_demod table vl) + in + let jump_to_right = id1 = id in + let bag,r,id2 = + parallel_positions bag [3] + (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; x ]) id1 r + (parallel_demod table vl) + in + if id = id2 then None + else + let cl,_,_ = Terms.get_from_bag id2 bag in + Some ((bag,cl),jump_to_right)) + | _ -> assert false; + ;; + + let rec demodulate ~jump_to_right bag clause table = + match demodulate_once ~jump_to_right bag clause table with | None -> bag, clause - | Some (bag, clause) -> demodulate bag clause table + | Some ((bag, clause),r) -> demodulate ~jump_to_right:r + bag clause table + ;; + + let are_alpha_eq cl1 cl2 = + let get_term (_,nlit,plit,_,_) = + match nlit,plit with + | [], [Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_),_] -> + Terms.Node [Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l ; r] + | _ -> assert false + in + try ignore(Unif.alpha_eq (get_term cl1) (get_term cl2)) ; true + with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> false + ;; + + let demodulate bag clause table = +(* let (bag1,c1), (_,c2) =*) + demodulate ~jump_to_right:false bag clause table +(* demodulate_old ~jump_to_right:false bag clause table *) +(* in + if are_alpha_eq c1 c2 then bag1,c1 + else begin + prerr_endline (Pp.pp_clause c1); + prerr_endline (Pp.pp_clause c2); + prerr_endline "Bag :"; + prerr_endline (Pp.pp_bag bag1); + assert false + end*) + ;; + let prof_demodulate = HExtlib.profile ~enable "demodulate";; + let demodulate bag clause x = + prof_demodulate.HExtlib.profile (demodulate bag clause) x ;; (* move away *) - let is_identity_clause = function - | _, Terms.Equation (_,_,_,Terms.Eq), _, _ -> true - | _, Terms.Predicate _, _, _ -> assert false + let is_identity_clause ~unify = function + | _, [], [Terms.Equation (_,_,_,Terms.Eq),_], _, _ -> true + | _, [], [Terms.Equation (l,r,_,_),_], vl, proof when unify -> + (try ignore(Unif.unification (* vl *) [] l r); true + with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> false) | _ -> false ;; - let is_subsumed ~unify (id, lit, vl, _) table = - match lit with - | Terms.Predicate _ -> assert false - | Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_) -> - let retrieve = if unify then IDX.DT.retrieve_unifiables - else IDX.DT.retrieve_generalizations in - let lcands = retrieve table l in - let rcands = retrieve table r in - let f b c = - let dir, l, r, vl = - match c with - | (d, (_,Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_),vl,_))-> d, l, r, vl - |_ -> assert false - in - let l, r = if (dir = Terms.Left2Right) = b then l,r else r,l in - Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; r ], vl - in - let cands1 = List.map (f true) (IDX.ClauseSet.elements lcands) in - let cands2 = List.map (f false) (IDX.ClauseSet.elements rcands) in - let t = Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; r ] in - let locked_vars = if unify then [] else vl in - List.exists - (fun (c, vl1) -> - try ignore(Unif.unification (vl@vl1) locked_vars c t); true - with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> false) - (cands1 @ cands2) + let build_new_clause bag maxvar filter rule t subst id id2 pos dir = + let maxvar, _vl, subst = Utils.relocate maxvar (Terms.vars_of_term + (Subst.apply_subst subst t)) subst in + match build_clause bag filter rule t subst id id2 pos dir with + | Some (bag, c) -> Some ((bag, maxvar), c) + | None -> None + ;; + let prof_build_new_clause = HExtlib.profile ~enable "build_new_clause";; + let build_new_clause bag maxvar filter rule t subst id id2 pos x = + prof_build_new_clause.HExtlib.profile (build_new_clause bag maxvar filter + rule t subst id id2 pos) x + ;; + + let fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id rule filter res = + let (bag, maxvar), res = + HExtlib.filter_map_acc + (fun (bag, maxvar) (t,subst,id2,pos,dir) -> + build_new_clause bag maxvar filter rule t subst id id2 pos dir) + (bag, maxvar) res + in + bag, maxvar, res + ;; + + (* Tries to rewrite an equality to identity, using unit equalities in table *) + let rewrite_eq ~unify l r ty vl table = + let retrieve = if unify then IDX.DT.retrieve_unifiables + else IDX.DT.retrieve_generalizations in + let lcands = retrieve table l in + let rcands = retrieve table r in + let f b c = + let id, dir, l, r, vl = + match c with + | (d,_,_, (id,[],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_),_],vl,_))-> id, d, l, r, vl + |_ -> assert false + in + let reverse = (dir = Terms.Left2Right) = b in + let l, r, proof_rewrite_dir = if reverse then l,r,Terms.Left2Right + else r,l, Terms.Right2Left in + (id,proof_rewrite_dir,Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; r ], vl) + in + let cands1 = List.map (f true) (IDX.ClauseSet.elements lcands) in + let cands2 = List.map (f false) (IDX.ClauseSet.elements rcands) in + let t = Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; r ] in + let locked_vars = if unify then [] else vl in + let rec aux = function + | [] -> None + | (id2,dir,c,vl1)::tl -> + try + let subst = Unif.unification (* (vl@vl1) *) locked_vars c t in + Some (id2, dir, subst) + with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> aux tl + in + aux (cands1 @ cands2) + ;; + + let is_subsumed ~unify bag maxvar (id, nlit, plit, vl, _) table = + match nlit,plit with + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,_) ,_]-> + (match rewrite_eq ~unify l r ty vl table with + | None -> None + | Some (id2, dir, subst) -> + let id_t = Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; r; r ] in + build_new_clause bag maxvar (fun _ -> true) + Terms.Superposition id_t subst id id2 [2] dir) + | _ -> assert false + ;; + let prof_is_subsumed = HExtlib.profile ~enable "is_subsumed";; + let is_subsumed ~unify bag maxvar c x = + prof_is_subsumed.HExtlib.profile (is_subsumed ~unify bag maxvar c) x + ;; + (* id refers to a clause proving contextl l = contextr r *) + + let rec deep_eq ~unify l r ty pos contextl contextr table acc = + match acc with + | None -> None + | Some(bag,maxvar,(id,nlit,plit,vl,p),subst) -> + let l = Subst.apply_subst subst l in + let r = Subst.apply_subst subst r in + try + let subst1 = Unif.unification (* vl *) [] l r in + let lit = + match nlit,plit with + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,o),_] -> + Terms.Equation (FoSubst.apply_subst subst1 l, + FoSubst.apply_subst subst1 r, ty, o) + | _ -> assert false + in + Some(bag,maxvar,(id,[],[lit,true],vl,p),Subst.concat subst1 subst) + with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> + match rewrite_eq ~unify l r ty vl table with + | Some (id2, dir, subst1) -> + let newsubst = Subst.concat subst1 subst in + let id_t = + FoSubst.apply_subst newsubst + (Terms.Node[Terms.Leaf B.eqP;ty;contextl r;contextr r]) + in + (match + build_new_clause bag maxvar (fun _ -> true) + Terms.Superposition id_t + subst1 id id2 (pos@[2]) dir + with + | Some ((bag, maxvar), c) -> + Some(bag,maxvar,c,newsubst) + | None -> assert false) + | None -> + match l,r with + | Terms.Node (a::la), Terms.Node (b::lb) when + a = b && List.length la = List.length lb -> + let acc,_,_,_ = + List.fold_left2 + (fun (acc,pre,postl,postr) a b -> + let newcl = + fun x -> contextl(Terms.Node (pre@(x::postl))) in + let newcr = + fun x -> contextr(Terms.Node (pre@(x::postr))) in + let newpos = List.length pre::pos in + let footail l = + if l = [] then [] else List.tl l in + (deep_eq ~unify a b ty + newpos newcl newcr table acc,pre@[b], + footail postl, footail postr)) + (acc,[a],List.tl la,List.tl lb) la lb + in acc + | _,_ -> None + ;; + let prof_deep_eq = HExtlib.profile ~enable "deep_eq";; + let deep_eq ~unify l r ty pos contextl contextr table x = + prof_deep_eq.HExtlib.profile (deep_eq ~unify l r ty pos contextl contextr table) x + ;; + + let rec orphan_murder bag acc i = + match Terms.get_from_bag i bag with + | (_,_,_,_,Terms.Exact _),discarded,_ -> (discarded,acc) + | (_,_,_,_,Terms.Step (_,i1,i2,_,_,_)),true,_ -> (true,acc) + | (_,_,_,_,Terms.Step (_,i1,i2,_,_,_)),false,_ -> + if (List.mem i acc) then (false,acc) + else match orphan_murder bag acc i1 with + | (true,acc) -> (true,acc) + | (false,acc) -> + let (res,acc) = orphan_murder bag acc i2 in + if res then res,acc else res,i::acc + ;; + + let orphan_murder bag actives cl = + let (id,_,_,_,_) = cl in + let actives = List.map (fun (i,_,_,_,_) -> i) actives in + let (res,_) = orphan_murder bag actives id in + if res then debug (lazy "Orphan murdered"); res + ;; + let prof_orphan_murder = HExtlib.profile ~enable "orphan_murder";; + let orphan_murder bag actives x = + prof_orphan_murder.HExtlib.profile (orphan_murder bag actives) x ;; (* demodulate and check for subsumption *) - let simplify table bag clause = - let bag, clause = demodulate bag clause table in - if is_identity_clause clause then None + let simplify table maxvar bag clause = + if is_identity_clause ~unify:false clause then bag,None + (* else if orphan_murder bag actives clause then bag,None *) + else let bag, clause = demodulate bag clause table in + if is_identity_clause ~unify:false clause then bag,None else - if is_subsumed ~unify:false clause table then None - else Some (bag, clause) + match is_subsumed ~unify:false bag maxvar clause table with + | None -> bag, Some clause + | Some _ -> bag, None ;; - let simplification_step ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag new_clause = + let simplify table maxvar bag clause = + match simplify table maxvar bag clause with + | bag, None -> + let (id,_,_,_,_) = clause in + let (_,_,iter) = Terms.get_from_bag id bag in + Terms.replace_in_bag (clause,true,iter) bag, None + | bag, Some clause -> bag, Some clause + (*let (id,_,_,_) = clause in + if orphan_murder bag clause then + Terms.M.add id (clause,true) bag, Some clause + else bag, Some clause*) + ;; + let prof_simplify = HExtlib.profile ~enable "simplify";; + let simplify table maxvar bag x = + prof_simplify.HExtlib.profile (simplify table maxvar bag ) x + ;; + + let one_pass_simplification new_clause (alist,atable) bag maxvar = + match simplify atable maxvar bag new_clause with + | bag,None -> bag,None (* new_clause has been discarded *) + | bag,(Some clause) -> + let ctable = IDX.index_clause IDX.DT.empty clause in + let bag, alist, atable = + List.fold_left + (fun (bag, alist, atable) c -> + match simplify ctable maxvar bag c with + |bag,None -> (bag,alist,atable) + (* an active clause as been discarded *) + |bag,Some c1 -> + bag, c :: alist, IDX.index_clause atable c) + (bag,[],IDX.DT.empty) alist + in + bag, Some (clause, (alist,atable)) + ;; + let prof_one_pass_simplification = HExtlib.profile ~enable "one_pass_simplification";; + let one_pass_simplification new_clause t bag x = + prof_one_pass_simplification.HExtlib.profile (one_pass_simplification new_clause t bag ) x + ;; + + let simplification_step ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag maxvar new_clause = let atable1 = - if new_cl then atable else - IDX.index_unit_clause atable cl + if new_cl then atable else + IDX.index_clause atable cl in - match simplify atable1 bag new_clause with - | None -> (Some cl, None) - | Some (bag, clause) -> - let ctable = IDX.index_unit_clause IDX.DT.empty clause in - let bag, newa, alist, atable = - List.fold_left - (fun (bag, newa, alist, atable as acc) c -> - match simplify ctable bag c with - |None -> acc - |Some (bag, c1) -> - if (c1 == c) then - bag, newa, c :: alist, - IDX.index_unit_clause atable c - else - bag, c1 :: newa, alist, atable) - (bag,[],[],IDX.DT.empty) alist - in - if new_cl then - (Some cl, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa, bag)) - else - match simplify ctable bag cl with - | None -> - (None, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa, bag)) - | Some (bag,cl1) -> - (Some cl1, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa, bag)) - ;; - - let keep_simplified cl (alist,atable) bag = + (* Simplification of new_clause with : * + * - actives and cl if new_clause is not cl * + * - only actives otherwise *) + match + simplify atable1 maxvar bag new_clause with + | bag,None -> bag,(Some cl, None) (* new_clause has been discarded *) + | bag,Some clause -> + (* Simplification of each active clause with clause * + * which is the simplified form of new_clause *) + let ctable = IDX.index_clause IDX.DT.empty clause in + let bag, newa, alist, atable = + List.fold_left + (fun (bag, newa, alist, atable) c -> + match simplify ctable maxvar bag c with + |bag,None -> (bag, newa, alist, atable) + (* an active clause as been discarded *) + |bag,Some c1 -> + if (c1 == c) then + bag, newa, c :: alist, + IDX.index_clause atable c + else + bag, c1 :: newa, alist, atable) + (bag,[],[],IDX.DT.empty) alist + in + if new_cl then + bag, (Some cl, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa)) + else + (* if new_clause is not cl, we simplify cl with clause *) + match simplify ctable maxvar bag cl with + | bag,None -> + (* cl has been discarded *) + bag,(None, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa)) + | bag,Some cl1 -> + bag,(Some cl1, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa)) + ;; + let prof_simplification_step = HExtlib.profile ~enable "simplification_step";; + let simplification_step ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag maxvar x = + prof_simplification_step.HExtlib.profile (simplification_step ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag maxvar) x + ;; + + let keep_simplified cl (alist,atable) bag maxvar = let rec keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag newc = - if new_cl then - match simplification_step ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag cl with - | (None, _) -> assert false - | (Some _, None) -> None - | (Some _, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa, bag)) -> - keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl:(cl!=clause) clause (alist,atable) - bag (newa@newc) - else - match newc with - | [] -> Some (cl, bag, (alist,atable)) - | hd::tl -> - match simplification_step ~new_cl cl - (alist,atable) bag hd with - | (None,None) -> assert false - | (Some _,None) -> - keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag tl - | (None, Some _) -> None - | (Some cl1, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa, bag)) -> - let alist,atable = - (clause::alist, IDX.index_unit_clause atable clause) - in - keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl:(cl!=cl1) cl1 (alist,atable) - bag (newa@tl) + if new_cl then + match simplification_step ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag maxvar cl with + | _,(None, _) -> assert false + | bag,(Some _, None) -> bag,None + | bag,(Some _, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa)) -> + keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl:(cl!=clause) clause (alist,atable) + bag (newa@newc) + else + match newc with + | [] -> bag, Some (cl, (alist,atable)) + | hd::tl -> + match simplification_step ~new_cl cl + (alist,atable) bag maxvar hd with + | _,(None,None) -> assert false + | bag,(Some _,None) -> + keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl cl (alist,atable) bag tl + | bag,(None, Some _) -> bag,None + | bag,(Some cl1, Some (clause, (alist,atable), newa)) -> + let alist,atable = + (clause::alist, IDX.index_clause atable clause) + in + keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl:(cl!=cl1) cl1 (alist,atable) + bag (newa@tl) in - keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl:true cl (alist,atable) bag [] - ;; - + keep_simplified_aux ~new_cl:true cl (alist,atable) bag [] + ;; + let prof_keep_simplified = HExtlib.profile ~enable "keep_simplified";; + let keep_simplified cl t bag x = + prof_keep_simplified.HExtlib.profile (keep_simplified cl t bag) x + ;; + (* this is like simplify but raises Success *) - let simplify_goal maxvar table bag clause = - let bag, clause = demodulate bag clause table in - if (is_identity_clause clause) || (is_subsumed ~unify:true clause table) + let simplify_goal ~no_demod maxvar table bag g_actives clause = + let bag, clause = + if no_demod then bag, clause else demodulate bag clause table + in + if List.exists (are_alpha_eq clause) g_actives then None else + if (is_identity_clause ~unify:true clause) then raise (Success (bag, maxvar, clause)) - else bag, clause + else + let (id,nlit,plit,vl,_) = clause in + if vl = [] then Some (bag,clause) + else + let l,r,ty = + match nlit,plit with + | [],[Terms.Equation(l,r,ty,_),_] -> l,r,ty + | _ -> assert false + in + match deep_eq ~unify:true l r ty [] (fun x -> x) (fun x -> x) + table (Some(bag,maxvar,clause,Subst.id_subst)) with + | None -> Some (bag,clause) + | Some (bag,maxvar,cl,subst) -> + prerr_endline "Goal subsumed"; + raise (Success (bag,maxvar,cl)) +(* + else match is_subsumed ~unify:true bag maxvar clause table with + | None -> Some (bag, clause) + | Some ((bag,maxvar),c) -> + prerr_endline "Goal subsumed"; + raise (Success (bag,maxvar,c)) +*) + ;; + + let prof_simplify_goal = HExtlib.profile ~enable "simplify_goal";; + let simplify_goal ~no_demod maxvar table bag g_actives x = + prof_simplify_goal.HExtlib.profile ( simplify_goal ~no_demod maxvar table bag g_actives) x ;; (* =================== inference ===================== *) @@ -265,81 +589,72 @@ module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = (* this is OK for both the sup_left and sup_right inference steps *) let superposition table varlist subterm pos context = let cands = IDX.DT.retrieve_unifiables table subterm in + debug (lazy (string_of_int (IDX.ClauseSet.cardinal cands) ^ " candidates found")); HExtlib.filter_map - (fun (dir, (id,lit,vl,_ (*as uc*))) -> - match lit with - | Terms.Predicate _ -> assert false - | Terms.Equation (l,r,_,o) -> - let side, newside = if dir=Terms.Left2Right then l,r else r,l in + (fun (dir, _, _, (id,nlit,plit,vl,_ (*as uc*))) -> + match nlit,plit with + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,_,o),_] -> + (let side, newside = if dir=Terms.Left2Right then l,r else r,l in try - let subst, varlist = - Unif.unification (varlist@vl) [] subterm side - in - if o = Terms.Incomparable then + let subst = + Unif.unification (* (varlist@vl)*) [] subterm side + in + if o = Terms.Incomparable || o = Terms.Invertible then let side = Subst.apply_subst subst side in let newside = Subst.apply_subst subst newside in let o = Order.compare_terms side newside in (* XXX: check Riazanov p. 33 (iii) *) if o <> Terms.Lt && o <> Terms.Eq then - Some (context newside, subst, varlist, id, pos, dir) + Some (context newside, subst, id, pos, dir) else ((*prerr_endline ("Filtering: " ^ Pp.pp_foterm side ^ " =(< || =)" ^ - Pp.pp_foterm newside ^ " coming from " ^ - Pp.pp_unit_clause uc );*)None) + Pp.pp_foterm newside);*)None) else - Some (context newside, subst, varlist, id, pos, dir) + Some (context newside, subst, id, pos, dir) with FoUnif.UnificationFailure _ -> None) + | _ -> assert false) (IDX.ClauseSet.elements cands) ;; - let build_new_clause bag maxvar filter rule t subst vl id id2 pos dir = - let maxvar, vl, relocsubst = Utils.relocate maxvar vl in - let subst = Subst.concat relocsubst subst in - match build_clause bag filter rule t subst vl id id2 pos dir with - | Some (bag, c) -> Some ((bag, maxvar), c) - | None -> None - ;; - - - let fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id rule filter res = - let (bag, maxvar), res = - HExtlib.filter_map_acc - (fun (bag, maxvar) (t,subst,vl,id2,pos,dir) -> - build_new_clause bag maxvar filter rule t subst vl id id2 pos dir) - (bag, maxvar) res - in - bag, maxvar, res - ;; - (* Superposes selected equation with equalities in table *) - let superposition_with_table bag maxvar (id,selected,vl,_) table = - match selected with - | Terms.Predicate _ -> assert false - | Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Lt) -> + let superposition_with_table bag maxvar (id,nlit,plit,vl,_) table = + match nlit,plit with + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Lt),_] -> fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id Terms.Superposition (fun _ -> true) (all_positions [3] (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; x ]) - r (superposition table vl)) - | Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Gt) -> + r (superposition table vl)) + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Invertible),_] + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Gt),_] -> fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id Terms.Superposition (fun _ -> true) (all_positions [2] (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; x; r ]) l (superposition table vl)) - | Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Incomparable) -> - fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id Terms.Superposition - (function (* Riazanov: p.33 condition (iv) *) - | Terms.Node [Terms.Leaf eq; ty; l; r ] when B.eq B.eqP eq -> - Order.compare_terms l r <> Terms.Eq - | _ -> assert false) - ((all_positions [3] - (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; x ]) - r (superposition table vl)) @ - (all_positions [2] - (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; x; r ]) - l (superposition table vl))) + | [],[Terms.Equation (l,r,ty,Terms.Incomparable),_] -> + let filtering avoid subst = (* Riazanov: p.33 condition (iv) *) + let l = Subst.apply_subst subst l in + let r = Subst.apply_subst subst r in + let o = Order.compare_terms l r in + o <> avoid && o <> Terms.Eq + in + let bag, maxvar,r_terms = + fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id Terms.Superposition + (filtering Terms.Gt) + (all_positions [3] + (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; l; x ]) + r (superposition table vl)) + in + let bag, maxvar, l_terms = + fold_build_new_clause bag maxvar id Terms.Superposition + (filtering Terms.Lt) + (all_positions [2] + (fun x -> Terms.Node [ Terms.Leaf B.eqP; ty; x; r ]) + l (superposition table vl)) + in + bag, maxvar, r_terms @ l_terms | _ -> assert false ;; @@ -349,14 +664,14 @@ module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = (* We demodulate actives clause with current until all * * active clauses are reduced w.r.t each other *) (* let bag, (alist,atable) = keep_simplified (alist,atable) bag [current] in *) - let ctable = IDX.index_unit_clause IDX.DT.empty current in + let ctable = IDX.index_clause IDX.DT.empty current in (* let bag, (alist, atable) = let bag, alist = HExtlib.filter_map_acc (simplify ctable) bag alist in - bag, (alist, List.fold_left IDX.index_unit_clause IDX.DT.empty alist) + bag, (alist, List.fold_left IDX.index_clause IDX.DT.empty alist) in*) - debug "Simplified active clauses with fact"; + debug (lazy "Simplified active clauses with fact"); (* We superpose active clauses with current *) let bag, maxvar, new_clauses = List.fold_left @@ -367,47 +682,61 @@ module Superposition (B : Terms.Blob) = bag, maxvar, newc @ acc) (bag, maxvar, []) alist in - debug "First superpositions"; - (* We add current to active clauses so that it can be * - * superposed with itself *) + debug (lazy "First superpositions"); + (* We add current to active clauses so that it can be * + * superposed with itself *) let alist, atable = - current :: alist, IDX.index_unit_clause atable current + current :: alist, IDX.index_clause atable current in - debug "Indexed"; - let fresh_current, maxvar = Utils.fresh_unit_clause maxvar current in - (* We need to put fresh_current into the bag so that all * - * variables clauses refer to are known. *) - let bag, fresh_current = Utils.add_to_bag bag fresh_current in - (* We superpose current with active clauses *) + debug (lazy "Indexed"); + let fresh_current, maxvar = Clauses.fresh_clause maxvar current in + (* We need to put fresh_current into the bag so that all * + * variables clauses refer to are known. *) + let bag, fresh_current = Terms.add_to_bag fresh_current bag in + (* We superpose current with active clauses *) let bag, maxvar, additional_new_clauses = superposition_with_table bag maxvar fresh_current atable in - debug "Another superposition"; + debug (lazy "Another superposition"); let new_clauses = new_clauses @ additional_new_clauses in + debug (lazy (Printf.sprintf "Demodulating %d clauses" + (List.length new_clauses))); let bag, new_clauses = - HExtlib.filter_map_acc (simplify atable) bag new_clauses + HExtlib.filter_map_monad (simplify atable maxvar) bag new_clauses in - debug "Demodulated new clauses"; + debug (lazy "Demodulated new clauses"); bag, maxvar, (alist, atable), new_clauses ;; + let prof_ir = HExtlib.profile ~enable "infer_right";; + let infer_right bag maxvar current t = + prof_ir.HExtlib.profile (infer_right bag maxvar current) t + ;; + let infer_left bag maxvar goal (_alist, atable) = - (* We superpose the goal with active clauses *) - let bag, maxvar, new_goals = + (* We superpose the goal with active clauses *) + if (match goal with (_,_,_,[],_) -> true | _ -> false) then bag, maxvar, [] + else + let bag, maxvar, new_goals = superposition_with_table bag maxvar goal atable in - (* We demodulate the goal with active clauses *) + debug (lazy "Superposed goal with active clauses"); + (* We simplify the new goals with active clauses *) let bag, new_goals = List.fold_left (fun (bag, acc) g -> - let bag, g = demodulate bag g atable in - bag, g :: acc) + match simplify_goal ~no_demod:false maxvar atable bag [] g with + | None -> assert false + | Some (bag,g) -> bag,g::acc) (bag, []) new_goals in + debug (lazy "Simplified new goals with active clauses"); bag, maxvar, List.rev new_goals ;; - end - - + let prof_il = HExtlib.profile ~enable "infer_left";; + let infer_left bag maxvar goal t = + prof_il.HExtlib.profile (infer_left bag maxvar goal) t + ;; + end