X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fcomponents%2Ftactics%2Fdeclarative.ml;h=3a24b0d5fd737624da42532c8d4bba173b998f51;hb=bd277786d78d49594b3ada1c3c9c28cba5dc03b9;hp=1604d92d8029af62abb68fb4f79b0121bd97311a;hpb=73284b016dc2c195491ab3442457ec9fb76b576f;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/components/tactics/declarative.ml b/helm/software/components/tactics/declarative.ml index 1604d92d8..3a24b0d5f 100644 --- a/helm/software/components/tactics/declarative.ml +++ b/helm/software/components/tactics/declarative.ml @@ -34,16 +34,18 @@ let assume id t = ;; let suppose t id ty = +(*BUG: ty not used *) Tacticals.then_ ~start: (Tactics.intros ~howmany:1 ~mk_fresh_name_callback:(fun _ _ _ ~typ -> Cic.Name id) ()) ~continuation: - (Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[id,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)],None) - (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> t,metasenv,ugraph)) + (Tactics.change ~pattern:(None,[id,Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)],None) + (fun _ metasenv ugraph -> t,metasenv,ugraph)) ;; let by_term_we_proved t ty id ty' = +(*BUG: ty' not used *) match t with None -> assert false | Some t -> @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@ let bydone t = ;; let we_need_to_prove t id ty = +(*BUG: ty not used *) let aux status = let proof,goals = ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic @@ -80,10 +83,98 @@ let we_need_to_prove t id ty = ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic aux ;; -let prova _ = assert false -;; -let bywehave _ = assert false +let existselim t id1 t1 id2 t2 = +(*BUG: t1 and t2 not used *) +(*PARSING BUG: t2 is parsed in the current context, but it may + have occurrences of id1 in it *) + Tactics.elim_intros t + ~mk_fresh_name_callback: + (let i = ref 0 in + fun _ _ _ ~typ -> + incr i; + if !i = 1 then Cic.Name id1 else Cic.Name id2) + +let andelim = existselim;; + +let rewritingstep lhs rhs just conclude = + let aux ((proof,goal) as status) = + let (curi,metasenv,proofbo,proofty) = proof in + let _,context,_ = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in + let eq,trans = + match LibraryObjects.eq_URI () with + None -> assert false (*TODO*) + | Some uri -> + Cic.MutInd (uri,0,[]), Cic.Const (LibraryObjects.trans_eq_URI ~eq:uri,[]) + in + let ty,_ = + CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context rhs CicUniv.empty_ugraph in + let just = + match just with + None -> assert false (*TOOD*) + | Some just -> just + in + match lhs with + None -> + let plhs,prhs = + match + fst + (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context (Cic.Rel 1) + CicUniv.empty_ugraph) + with + Cic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs + | _ -> assert false in + let last_hyp_name = + match context with + (Some (Cic.Name id,_))::_ -> id + | _ -> assert false + in + (match conclude with + None -> + ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic + (Tacticals.thens + ~start:(Tactics.apply ~term:trans) + ~continuations: + [ Tactics.apply prhs ; + Tactics.apply (Cic.Rel 1) ; + Tactics.apply just]) status + | Some name -> + let mk_fresh_name_callback = + fun metasenv context _ ~typ -> + FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[] + metasenv context name ~typ + in + ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic + (Tacticals.thens + ~start:(Tactics.cut ~mk_fresh_name_callback + (Cic.Appl [eq ; ty ; plhs ; rhs])) + ~continuations: + [ Tactics.clear ~hyps:[last_hyp_name] ; + Tacticals.thens + ~start:(Tactics.apply ~term:trans) + ~continuations: + [ Tactics.apply prhs ; + Tactics.apply (Cic.Rel 1) ; + Tactics.apply just] + ]) status) + | Some lhs -> + match conclude with + None -> ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic (Tactics.apply just) status + | Some name -> + let mk_fresh_name_callback = + fun metasenv context _ ~typ -> + FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[] + metasenv context name ~typ + in + ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic + (Tacticals.thens + ~start: + (Tactics.cut ~mk_fresh_name_callback + (Cic.Appl [eq ; ty ; lhs ; rhs])) + ~continuations:[ Tacticals.id_tac ; Tactics.apply just ]) status + in + ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic aux ;; + let case _ = assert false ;; let thesisbecomes _ = assert false @@ -92,4 +183,3 @@ let byinduction _ = assert false ;; let we_proceed_by_induction_on _ = assert false ;; -let let1 _ = assert false