X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fcomponents%2Ftactics%2Fparamodulation%2Fequality.ml;h=30138b378f9eac358305f3ffbcc4170e05de44c7;hb=b109559ac6795075508fd5c231a1bf2a3223031a;hp=57c440860a78dc3016ba1b3c11917861d9b13a5b;hpb=c90dd454864f9383d7b05cd060e656fbe69b52bd;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/components/tactics/paramodulation/equality.ml b/helm/software/components/tactics/paramodulation/equality.ml index 57c440860..30138b378 100644 --- a/helm/software/components/tactics/paramodulation/equality.ml +++ b/helm/software/components/tactics/paramodulation/equality.ml @@ -23,10 +23,13 @@ * http://cs.unibo.it/helm/. *) +(* let _profiler = <:profiler<_profiler>>;; *) + (* $Id: inference.ml 6245 2006-04-05 12:07:51Z tassi $ *) type rule = SuperpositionRight | SuperpositionLeft | Demodulation type uncomparable = int -> int + type equality = uncomparable * (* trick to break structural equality *) int * (* weight *) @@ -41,28 +44,32 @@ and proof = | Exact of Cic.term | Step of Subst.substitution * (rule * int*(Utils.pos*int)* Cic.term) (* subst, (rule,eq1, eq2,predicate) *) -and goal_proof = (Utils.pos * int * Subst.substitution * Cic.term) list +and goal_proof = (rule * Utils.pos * int * Subst.substitution * Cic.term) list ;; +(* the hashtbl eq_id -> proof, max_eq_id *) +type equality_bag = (int,equality) Hashtbl.t * int ref + +type goal = goal_proof * Cic.metasenv * Cic.term (* globals *) -let maxid = ref 0;; -let id_to_eq = Hashtbl.create 1024;; +let mk_equality_bag () = + Hashtbl.create 1024, ref 0 +;; -let freshid () = - incr maxid; !maxid +let freshid (_,i) = + incr i; !i ;; -let reset () = - maxid := 0; - Hashtbl.clear id_to_eq +let add_to_bag (id_to_eq,_) id eq = + Hashtbl.add id_to_eq id eq ;; let uncomparable = fun _ -> 0 -let mk_equality (weight,p,(ty,l,r,o),m) = - let id = freshid () in +let mk_equality bag (weight,p,(ty,l,r,o),m) = + let id = freshid bag in let eq = (uncomparable,weight,p,(ty,l,r,o),m,id) in - Hashtbl.add id_to_eq id eq; + add_to_bag bag id eq; eq ;; @@ -75,28 +82,63 @@ let mk_tmp_equality (weight,(ty,l,r,o),m) = let open_equality (_,weight,proof,(ty,l,r,o),m,id) = (weight,proof,(ty,l,r,o),m,id) +let string_of_rule = function + | SuperpositionRight -> "SupR" + | SuperpositionLeft -> "SupL" + | Demodulation -> "Demod" +;; + let string_of_equality ?env eq = match env with | None -> - let w, _, (ty, left, right, o), _ , id = open_equality eq in - Printf.sprintf "Id: %d, Weight: %d, {%s}: %s =(%s) %s" + let w, _, (ty, left, right, o), m , id = open_equality eq in + Printf.sprintf "Id: %d, Weight: %d, {%s}: %s =(%s) %s [%s]" id w (CicPp.ppterm ty) (CicPp.ppterm left) (Utils.string_of_comparison o) (CicPp.ppterm right) + (String.concat ", " (List.map (fun (i,_,_) -> string_of_int i) m)) +(* "..." *) | Some (_, context, _) -> let names = Utils.names_of_context context in - let w, _, (ty, left, right, o), _ , id = open_equality eq in - Printf.sprintf "Id: %d, Weight: %d, {%s}: %s =(%s) %s" + let w, _, (ty, left, right, o), m , id = open_equality eq in + Printf.sprintf "Id: %d, Weight: %d, {%s}: %s =(%s) %s [%s]" id w (CicPp.pp ty names) (CicPp.pp left names) (Utils.string_of_comparison o) (CicPp.pp right names) + (String.concat ", " (List.map (fun (i,_,_) -> string_of_int i) m)) +(* "..." *) ;; let compare (_,_,_,s1,_,_) (_,_,_,s2,_,_) = Pervasives.compare s1 s2 ;; -let proof_of_id id = +let rec max_weight_in_proof ((id_to_eq,_) as bag) current = + function + | Exact _ -> current + | Step (_, (_,id1,(_,id2),_)) -> + let eq1 = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id1 in + let eq2 = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id2 in + let (w1,p1,(_,_,_,_),_,_) = open_equality eq1 in + let (w2,p2,(_,_,_,_),_,_) = open_equality eq2 in + let current = max current w1 in + let current = max_weight_in_proof bag current p1 in + let current = max current w2 in + max_weight_in_proof bag current p2 + +let max_weight_in_goal_proof ((id_to_eq,_) as bag) = + List.fold_left + (fun current (_,_,id,_,_) -> + let eq = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id in + let (w,p,(_,_,_,_),_,_) = open_equality eq in + let current = max current w in + max_weight_in_proof bag current p) + +let max_weight bag goal_proof proof = + let current = max_weight_in_proof bag 0 proof in + max_weight_in_goal_proof bag current goal_proof + +let proof_of_id (id_to_eq,_) id = try let (_,p,(_,l,r,_),_,_) = open_equality (Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id) in p,l,r @@ -104,12 +146,7 @@ let proof_of_id id = Not_found -> assert false -let string_of_proof ?(names=[]) p gp = - let str_of_rule = function - | SuperpositionRight -> "SupR" - | SuperpositionLeft -> "SupL" - | Demodulation -> "Demod" - in +let string_of_proof ?(names=[]) bag p gp = let str_of_pos = function | Utils.Left -> "left" | Utils.Right -> "right" @@ -122,33 +159,42 @@ let string_of_proof ?(names=[]) p gp = prefix (CicPp.pp t names) | Step (subst,(rule,eq1,(pos,eq2),pred)) -> Printf.sprintf "%s%s(%s|%d with %d dir %s pred %s))\n" - prefix (str_of_rule rule) (Subst.ppsubst ~names subst) eq1 eq2 (str_of_pos pos) + prefix (string_of_rule rule) (Subst.ppsubst ~names subst) eq1 eq2 (str_of_pos pos) (CicPp.pp pred names)^ - aux (margin+1) (Printf.sprintf "%d" eq1) (fst3 (proof_of_id eq1)) ^ - aux (margin+1) (Printf.sprintf "%d" eq2) (fst3 (proof_of_id eq2)) + aux (margin+1) (Printf.sprintf "%d" eq1) (fst3 (proof_of_id bag eq1)) ^ + aux (margin+1) (Printf.sprintf "%d" eq2) (fst3 (proof_of_id bag eq2)) in aux 0 "" p ^ String.concat "\n" (List.map - (fun (pos,i,s,t) -> + (fun (r,pos,i,s,t) -> (Printf.sprintf - "GOAL: %s %d %s %s\n" + "GOAL: %s %s %d %s %s\n" (string_of_rule r) (str_of_pos pos) i (Subst.ppsubst ~names s) (CicPp.pp t names)) ^ - aux 1 (Printf.sprintf "%d " i) (fst3 (proof_of_id i))) + aux 1 (Printf.sprintf "%d " i) (fst3 (proof_of_id bag i))) gp) ;; -let rec depend eq id = +let rec depend ((id_to_eq,_) as bag) eq id seen = let (_,p,(_,_,_,_),_,ideq) = open_equality eq in - if id = ideq then true else - match p with - Exact _ -> false - | Step (_,(_,id1,(_,id2),_)) -> - let eq1 = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id1 in - let eq2 = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id2 in - depend eq1 id || depend eq2 id + if List.mem ideq seen then + false,seen + else + if id = ideq then + true,seen + else + match p with + | Exact _ -> false,seen + | Step (_,(_,id1,(_,id2),_)) -> + let seen = ideq::seen in + let eq1 = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id1 in + let eq2 = Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id2 in + let b1,seen = depend bag eq1 id seen in + if b1 then b1,seen else depend bag eq2 id seen ;; +let depend bag eq id = fst (depend bag eq id []);; + let ppsubst = Subst.ppsubst ~names:[];; (* returns an explicit named subst and a list of arguments for sym_eq_URI *) @@ -156,7 +202,7 @@ let build_ens uri termlist = let obj, _ = CicEnvironment.get_obj CicUniv.empty_ugraph uri in match obj with | Cic.Constant (_, _, _, uris, _) -> - assert (List.length uris <= List.length termlist); + (* assert (List.length uris <= List.length termlist); *) let rec aux = function | [], tl -> [], tl | (uri::uris), (term::tl) -> @@ -179,7 +225,8 @@ let mk_trans uri ty t1 t2 t3 p12 p23 = ;; let mk_eq_ind uri ty what pred p1 other p2 = - Cic.Appl [Cic.Const (uri, []); ty; what; pred; p1; other; p2] + let ens, args = build_ens uri [ty; what; pred; p1; other; p2] in + Cic.Appl (Cic.Const (uri, ens) :: args) ;; let p_of_sym ens tl = @@ -196,6 +243,13 @@ let open_trans ens tl = | _ -> assert false ;; +let open_sym ens tl = + let args = List.map snd ens @ tl in + match args with + | [ty;l;r;p] -> ty,l,r,p + | _ -> assert false +;; + let open_eq_ind args = match args with | [ty;l;pred;pl;r;pleqr] -> ty,l,pred,pl,r,pleqr @@ -204,9 +258,9 @@ let open_eq_ind args = let open_pred pred = match pred with - | Cic.Lambda (_,ty,(Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (uri, 0,_);_;l;r])) + | Cic.Lambda (_,_,(Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (uri, 0,_);ty;l;r])) when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI uri -> ty,uri,l,r - | _ -> prerr_endline (CicPp.ppterm pred); assert false + | _ -> Utils.debug_print (lazy (CicPp.ppterm pred)); assert false ;; let is_not_fixed t = @@ -214,8 +268,49 @@ let is_not_fixed t = CicSubstitution.subst (Cic.Rel 1) t ;; - -let canonical t = +let canonical t context menv = + let remove_cycles t = + let is_transitive = + function + Cic.Appl (Cic.Const (uri_trans,_)::_) + when LibraryObjects.is_trans_eq_URI uri_trans -> + true + | _ -> false in + let rec collect = + function + Cic.Appl (Cic.Const (uri_trans,ens)::tl) + when LibraryObjects.is_trans_eq_URI uri_trans -> + let ty,l,m,r,p1,p2 = open_trans ens tl in + (if is_transitive p1 then fst (collect p1) else [l,p1]) @ + (if is_transitive p2 then fst (collect p2) else [m,p2]), + (r, uri_trans, ty) + | t -> assert false in + let rec cut_to_last_duplicate l acc = + function + [] -> List.rev acc + | (l',p)::tl when l=l' -> +if acc <> [] then +Utils.debug_print (lazy ("!!! RISPARMIO " ^ string_of_int (List.length acc) ^ " PASSI")); + cut_to_last_duplicate l [l',p] tl + | (l',p)::tl -> + cut_to_last_duplicate l ((l',p)::acc) tl + in + let rec rebuild = + function + (l,_)::_::_ as steps, ((r,uri_trans,ty) as last) -> + (match cut_to_last_duplicate l [] steps with + (l,p1)::((m,_)::_::_ as tl) -> + mk_trans uri_trans ty l m r p1 (rebuild (tl,last)) + | [l,p1 ; m,p2] -> mk_trans uri_trans ty l m r p1 p2 + | [l,p1] -> p1 + | [] -> assert false) + | _ -> assert false + in + if is_transitive t then + rebuild (collect t) + else + t + in let rec remove_refl t = match t with | Cic.Appl (((Cic.Const(uri_trans,ens))::tl) as args) @@ -232,74 +327,66 @@ let canonical t = Cic.LetIn (name,remove_refl bo,remove_refl rest) | _ -> t in - let rec canonical t = + let rec canonical_trough_lambda context = function + | Cic.Lambda(name,ty,bo) -> + let context' = (Some (name,Cic.Decl ty))::context in + Cic.Lambda(name,ty,canonical_trough_lambda context' bo) + | t -> canonical context t + + and canonical context t = match t with - | Cic.LetIn(name,bo,rest) -> Cic.LetIn(name,canonical bo,canonical rest) + | Cic.LetIn(name,bo,rest) -> + let bo = canonical_trough_lambda context bo in + let context' = (Some (name,Cic.Def (bo,None)))::context in + Cic.LetIn(name,bo,canonical context' rest) | Cic.Appl (((Cic.Const(uri_sym,ens))::tl) as args) when LibraryObjects.is_sym_eq_URI uri_sym -> (match p_of_sym ens tl with | Cic.Appl ((Cic.Const(uri,ens))::tl) when LibraryObjects.is_sym_eq_URI uri -> - canonical (p_of_sym ens tl) + canonical context (p_of_sym ens tl) | Cic.Appl ((Cic.Const(uri_trans,ens))::tl) when LibraryObjects.is_trans_eq_URI uri_trans -> let ty,l,m,r,p1,p2 = open_trans ens tl in mk_trans uri_trans ty r m l - (canonical (mk_sym uri_sym ty m r p2)) - (canonical (mk_sym uri_sym ty l m p1)) - | Cic.Appl (((Cic.Const(uri_ind,ens)) as he)::tl) - when LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_URI uri_ind || - LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_r_URI uri_ind -> - let ty, what, pred, p1, other, p2 = - match tl with - | [ty;what;pred;p1;other;p2] -> ty, what, pred, p1, other, p2 - | _ -> assert false + (canonical context (mk_sym uri_sym ty m r p2)) + (canonical context (mk_sym uri_sym ty l m p1)) + | Cic.Appl (([Cic.Const(uri_feq,ens);ty1;ty2;f;x;y;p])) + when LibraryObjects.is_eq_f_URI uri_feq -> + let eq = LibraryObjects.eq_URI_of_eq_f_URI uri_feq in + let eq_f_sym = + Cic.Const (LibraryObjects.eq_f_sym_URI ~eq, []) in - let pred,l,r = - match pred with - | Cic.Lambda (name,s,Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd(uri,0,ens);ty;l;r]) - when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI uri -> - Cic.Lambda - (name,s,Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd(uri,0,ens);ty;r;l]),l,r - | _ -> - prerr_endline (CicPp.ppterm pred); - assert false - in - let l = CicSubstitution.subst what l in - let r = CicSubstitution.subst what r in - Cic.Appl - [he;ty;what;pred; - canonical (mk_sym uri_sym ty l r p1);other;canonical p2] + let rc = Cic.Appl [eq_f_sym;ty1;ty2;f;x;y;p] in + Utils.debug_print (lazy ("CANONICAL " ^ CicPp.ppterm rc)); + rc | Cic.Appl [Cic.MutConstruct (uri, 0, 1,_);_;_] as t when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI uri -> t - | _ -> Cic.Appl (List.map canonical args)) - | Cic.Appl l -> Cic.Appl (List.map canonical l) + | _ -> Cic.Appl (List.map (canonical context) args)) + | Cic.Appl l -> Cic.Appl (List.map (canonical context) l) | _ -> t in - remove_refl (canonical t) + remove_cycles (remove_refl (canonical context t)) ;; -let ty_of_lambda = function - | Cic.Lambda (_,ty,_) -> ty - | _ -> assert false -;; - let compose_contexts ctx1 ctx2 = ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting - ~equality:(=) ~what:[Cic.Rel 1] ~with_what:[ctx2] ~where:ctx1 + ~equality:(fun _ ->(=)) ~context:[] ~what:[Cic.Implicit(Some `Hole)] ~with_what:[ctx2] ~where:ctx1 ;; let put_in_ctx ctx t = ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting - ~equality:(=) ~what:[Cic.Rel 1] ~with_what:[t] ~where:ctx + ~equality:(fun _ -> (=)) ~context:[] ~what:[Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole)] ~with_what:[t] ~where:ctx ;; let mk_eq uri ty l r = - Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd(uri,0,[]);ty;l;r] + let ens, args = build_ens uri [ty; l; r] in + Cic.Appl (Cic.MutInd(uri,0,ens) :: args) ;; let mk_refl uri ty t = - Cic.Appl [Cic.MutConstruct(uri,0,1,[]);ty;t] + let ens, args = build_ens uri [ty; t] in + Cic.Appl (Cic.MutConstruct(uri,0,1,ens) :: args) ;; let open_eq = function @@ -308,19 +395,43 @@ let open_eq = function | _ -> assert false ;; +let mk_feq uri_feq ty ty1 left pred right t = + let ens, args = build_ens uri_feq [ty;ty1;pred;left;right;t] in + Cic.Appl (Cic.Const(uri_feq,ens) :: args) +;; + +let rec look_ahead aux = function + | Cic.Appl ((Cic.Const(uri_ind,ens))::tl) as t + when LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_URI uri_ind || + LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_r_URI uri_ind -> + let ty1,what,pred,p1,other,p2 = open_eq_ind tl in + let ty2,eq,lp,rp = open_pred pred in + let hole = Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole) in + let ty2 = CicSubstitution.subst hole ty2 in + aux ty1 (CicSubstitution.subst other lp) (CicSubstitution.subst other rp) hole ty2 t + | Cic.Lambda (n,s,t) -> Cic.Lambda (n,s,look_ahead aux t) + | t -> t +;; + let contextualize uri ty left right t = - (* aux [uri] [ty] [left] [right] [ctx] [t] + let hole = Cic.Implicit (Some `Hole) in + (* aux [uri] [ty] [left] [right] [ctx] [ctx_ty] [t] * * the parameters validate this invariant * t: eq(uri) ty left right * that is used only by the base case * - * ctx is a term with an open (Rel 1). (Rel 1) is the empty context + * ctx is a term with an hole. Cic.Implicit(Some `Hole) is the empty context + * ctx_ty is the type of ctx *) - let rec aux uri ty left right ctx_d = function + let rec aux uri ty left right ctx_d ctx_ty t = + match t with + | Cic.Appl ((Cic.Const(uri_sym,ens))::tl) + when LibraryObjects.is_sym_eq_URI uri_sym -> + let ty,l,r,p = open_sym ens tl in + mk_sym uri_sym ty l r (aux uri ty l r ctx_d ctx_ty p) | Cic.LetIn (name,body,rest) -> - (* we should go in body *) - Cic.LetIn (name,body,aux uri ty left right ctx_d rest) + Cic.LetIn (name,look_ahead (aux uri) body, aux uri ty left right ctx_d ctx_ty rest) | Cic.Appl ((Cic.Const(uri_ind,ens))::tl) when LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_URI uri_ind || LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_r_URI uri_ind -> @@ -331,12 +442,13 @@ let contextualize uri ty left right t = let is_not_fixed_lp = is_not_fixed lp in let avoid_eq_ind = LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_URI uri_ind in (* extract the context and the fixed term from the predicate *) - let m, ctx_c = + let m, ctx_c, ty2 = let m, ctx_c = if is_not_fixed_lp then rp,lp else lp,rp in (* they were under a lambda *) - let m = CicSubstitution.subst (Cic.Implicit None) m in - let ctx_c = CicSubstitution.subst (Cic.Rel 1) ctx_c in - m, ctx_c + let m = CicSubstitution.subst hole m in + let ctx_c = CicSubstitution.subst hole ctx_c in + let ty2 = CicSubstitution.subst hole ty2 in + m, ctx_c, ty2 in (* create the compound context and put the terms under it *) let ctx_dc = compose_contexts ctx_d ctx_c in @@ -348,18 +460,18 @@ let contextualize uri ty left right t = let c_what = put_in_ctx ctx_c what in (* now put the proofs in the compound context *) let p1 = (* p1: dc_what = d_m *) - if is_not_fixed_lp then - aux uri ty1 c_what m ctx_d p1 + if is_not_fixed_lp then + aux uri ty2 c_what m ctx_d ctx_ty p1 else - mk_sym uri_sym ty d_m dc_what - (aux uri ty1 m c_what ctx_d p1) + mk_sym uri_sym ctx_ty d_m dc_what + (aux uri ty2 m c_what ctx_d ctx_ty p1) in let p2 = (* p2: dc_other = dc_what *) if avoid_eq_ind then - mk_sym uri_sym ty dc_what dc_other - (aux uri ty1 what other ctx_dc p2) - else - aux uri ty1 other what ctx_dc p2 + mk_sym uri_sym ctx_ty dc_what dc_other + (aux uri ty1 what other ctx_dc ctx_ty p2) + else + aux uri ty1 other what ctx_dc ctx_ty p2 in (* if pred = \x.C[x]=m --> t : C[other]=m --> trans other what m if pred = \x.m=C[x] --> t : m=C[other] --> trans m what other *) @@ -368,37 +480,49 @@ let contextualize uri ty left right t = dc_other,dc_what,d_m,p2,p1 else d_m,dc_what,dc_other, - (mk_sym uri_sym ty dc_what d_m p1), - (mk_sym uri_sym ty dc_other dc_what p2) + (mk_sym uri_sym ctx_ty dc_what d_m p1), + (mk_sym uri_sym ctx_ty dc_other dc_what p2) in - mk_trans uri_trans ty a b c paeqb pbeqc + mk_trans uri_trans ctx_ty a b c paeqb pbeqc + | t when ctx_d = hole -> t | t -> - let uri_sym = LibraryObjects.sym_eq_URI ~eq:uri in - let uri_ind = LibraryObjects.eq_ind_URI ~eq:uri in +(* let uri_sym = LibraryObjects.sym_eq_URI ~eq:uri in *) +(* let uri_ind = LibraryObjects.eq_ind_URI ~eq:uri in *) + + let uri_feq = LibraryObjects.eq_f_URI ~eq:uri in let pred = - (* ctx_d will go under a lambda, but put_in_ctx substitutes Rel 1 *) - let ctx_d = CicSubstitution.lift_from 2 1 ctx_d in (* bleah *) - let r = put_in_ctx ctx_d (CicSubstitution.lift 1 left) in - let l = ctx_d in - let lty = CicSubstitution.lift 1 ty in - Cic.Lambda (Cic.Name "foo",ty,(mk_eq uri lty l r)) +(* let r = CicSubstitution.lift 1 (put_in_ctx ctx_d left) in *) + let l = + let ctx_d = CicSubstitution.lift 1 ctx_d in + put_in_ctx ctx_d (Cic.Rel 1) + in +(* let lty = CicSubstitution.lift 1 ctx_ty in *) +(* Cic.Lambda (Cic.Name "foo",ty,(mk_eq uri lty l r)) *) + Cic.Lambda (Cic.Name "foo",ty,l) in - let d_left = put_in_ctx ctx_d left in - let d_right = put_in_ctx ctx_d right in - let refl_eq = mk_refl uri ty d_left in - mk_sym uri_sym ty d_right d_left - (mk_eq_ind uri_ind ty left pred refl_eq right t) +(* let d_left = put_in_ctx ctx_d left in *) +(* let d_right = put_in_ctx ctx_d right in *) +(* let refl_eq = mk_refl uri ctx_ty d_left in *) +(* mk_sym uri_sym ctx_ty d_right d_left *) +(* (mk_eq_ind uri_ind ty left pred refl_eq right t) *) + (mk_feq uri_feq ty ctx_ty left pred right t) in - let empty_context = Cic.Rel 1 in - aux uri ty left right empty_context t + aux uri ty left right hole ty t ;; let contextualize_rewrites t ty = let eq,ty,l,r = open_eq ty in contextualize eq ty l r t ;; - -let build_proof_step lift subst p1 p2 pos l r pred = + +let add_subst subst = + function + | Exact t -> Exact (Subst.apply_subst subst t) + | Step (s,(rule, id1, (pos,id2), pred)) -> + Step (Subst.concat subst s,(rule, id1, (pos,id2), pred)) +;; + +let build_proof_step eq lift subst p1 p2 pos l r pred = let p1 = Subst.apply_subst_lift lift subst p1 in let p2 = Subst.apply_subst_lift lift subst p2 in let l = CicSubstitution.lift lift l in @@ -415,21 +539,41 @@ let build_proof_step lift subst p1 p2 pos l r pred = let what, other = if pos = Utils.Left then l,r else r,l in + let p = match pos with | Utils.Left -> - mk_eq_ind (Utils.eq_ind_URI ()) ty what pred p1 other p2 + mk_eq_ind (LibraryObjects.eq_ind_URI ~eq) ty what pred p1 other p2 | Utils.Right -> - mk_eq_ind (Utils.eq_ind_r_URI ()) ty what pred p1 other p2 + mk_eq_ind (LibraryObjects.eq_ind_r_URI ~eq) ty what pred p1 other p2 + in + p ;; -let parametrize_proof p l r ty = - let parameters = CicUtil.metas_of_term p -@ CicUtil.metas_of_term l -@ CicUtil.metas_of_term r -in (* ?if they are under a lambda? *) +let parametrize_proof p l r = + let uniq l = HExtlib.list_uniq (List.sort (fun (i,_) (j,_) -> Pervasives.compare i j) l) in + let mot = CicUtil.metas_of_term_set in + let parameters = uniq (mot p @ mot l @ mot r) in + (* ?if they are under a lambda? *) +(* let parameters = HExtlib.list_uniq (List.sort Pervasives.compare parameters) in +*) + (* resorts l such that *hopefully* dependencies can be inferred *) + let guess_dependency p l = + match p with + | Cic.Appl ((Cic.Const(uri_ind,ens))::tl) + when LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_URI uri_ind || + LibraryObjects.is_eq_ind_r_URI uri_ind -> + let ty,_,_,_,_,_ = open_eq_ind tl in + let metas = CicUtil.metas_of_term ty in + let nondep, dep = + List.partition (fun (i,_) -> List.exists (fun (j,_) -> j=i) metas) l + in + nondep@dep + | _ -> l + in + let parameters = guess_dependency p parameters in let what = List.map (fun (i,l) -> Cic.Meta (i,l)) parameters in let with_what, lift_no = List.fold_right (fun _ (acc,n) -> ((Cic.Rel n)::acc),n+1) what ([],1) @@ -437,18 +581,18 @@ in (* ?if they are under a lambda? *) let p = CicSubstitution.lift (lift_no-1) p in let p = ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting - ~equality:(fun t1 t2 -> match t1,t2 with Cic.Meta (i,_),Cic.Meta(j,_) -> i=j | _ -> false) ~what ~with_what ~where:p - in - let ty_of_m _ = ty (*function - | Cic.Meta (i,_) -> List.assoc i menv - | _ -> assert false *) + ~equality:(fun _ t1 t2 -> + match t1,t2 with Cic.Meta (i,_),Cic.Meta(j,_) -> i=j | _ -> false) + ~context:[] + ~what ~with_what ~where:p in + let ty_of_m _ = Cic.Implicit (Some `Type) in let args, proof,_ = List.fold_left (fun (instance,p,n) m -> (instance@[m], Cic.Lambda - (Cic.Name ("x"^string_of_int n), + (Cic.Name ("X"^string_of_int n), CicSubstitution.lift (lift_no - n - 1) (ty_of_m m), p), n+1)) @@ -459,9 +603,9 @@ in (* ?if they are under a lambda? *) proof, instance ;; -let wfo goalproof proof = +let wfo bag goalproof proof id = let rec aux acc id = - let p,_,_ = proof_of_id id in + let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag id in match p with | Exact _ -> if (List.mem id acc) then acc else id :: acc | Step (_,(_,id1, (_,id2), _)) -> @@ -471,98 +615,186 @@ let wfo goalproof proof = in let acc = match proof with - | Exact _ -> [] - | Step (_,(_,id1, (_,id2), _)) -> aux (aux [] id1) id2 + | Exact _ -> [id] + | Step (_,(_,id1, (_,id2), _)) -> aux (aux [id] id1) id2 in - List.fold_left (fun acc (_,id,_,_) -> aux acc id) acc goalproof + List.fold_left (fun acc (_,_,id,_,_) -> aux acc id) acc goalproof ;; -let string_of_id names id = +let string_of_id (id_to_eq,_) names id = + if id = 0 then "" else try - let (_,p,(_,l,r,_),_,_) = open_equality (Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id) in + let (_,p,(t,l,r,_),m,_) = open_equality (Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id) in match p with | Exact t -> - Printf.sprintf "%d = %s: %s = %s" id + Printf.sprintf "%d = %s: %s = %s [%s]" id (CicPp.pp t names) (CicPp.pp l names) (CicPp.pp r names) - | Step (_,(step,id1, (_,id2), _) ) -> - Printf.sprintf "%6d: %s %6d %6d %s = %s" id - (if step = SuperpositionRight then "SupR" else "Demo") - id1 id2 (CicPp.pp l names) (CicPp.pp r names) +(* "..." *) + (String.concat ", " (List.map (fun (i,_,_) -> string_of_int i) m)) + | Step (_,(step,id1, (dir,id2), p) ) -> + Printf.sprintf "%6d: %s %6d %6d %s =(%s) %s [%s]" id + (string_of_rule step) + id1 id2 (CicPp.pp l names) (CicPp.pp t names) (CicPp.pp r names) + (String.concat ", " (List.map (fun (i,_,_) -> string_of_int i) m)) + (*"..."*) with Not_found -> assert false -let pp_proof names goalproof proof = - String.concat "\n" (List.map (string_of_id names) (wfo goalproof proof)) ^ - "\ngoal is demodulated with " ^ - (String.concat " " - ((List.map (fun (_,i,_,_) -> string_of_int i) goalproof))) +let pp_proof bag names goalproof proof subst id initial_goal = + String.concat "\n" (List.map (string_of_id bag names) (wfo bag goalproof proof id)) ^ + "\ngoal:\n " ^ + (String.concat "\n " + (fst (List.fold_right + (fun (r,pos,i,s,pred) (acc,g) -> + let _,_,left,right = open_eq g in + let ty = + match pos with + | Utils.Left -> CicReduction.head_beta_reduce (Cic.Appl[pred;right]) + | Utils.Right -> CicReduction.head_beta_reduce (Cic.Appl[pred;left]) + in + let ty = Subst.apply_subst s ty in + ("("^ string_of_rule r ^ " " ^ string_of_int i^") -> " + ^ CicPp.pp ty names) :: acc,ty) goalproof ([],initial_goal)))) ^ + "\nand then subsumed by " ^ string_of_int id ^ " when " ^ Subst.ppsubst subst +;; + +module OT = + struct + type t = int + let compare = Pervasives.compare + end + +module M = Map.Make(OT) + +let rec find_deps bag m i = + if M.mem i m then m + else + let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag i in + match p with + | Exact _ -> M.add i [] m + | Step (_,(_,id1,(_,id2),_)) -> + let m = find_deps bag m id1 in + let m = find_deps bag m id2 in + (* without the uniq there is a stack overflow doing concatenation *) + let xxx = [id1;id2] @ M.find id1 m @ M.find id2 m in + let xxx = HExtlib.list_uniq (List.sort Pervasives.compare xxx) in + M.add i xxx m +;; + +let topological_sort bag l = + (* build the partial order relation *) + let m = List.fold_left (fun m i -> find_deps bag m i) M.empty l in + let m = (* keep only deps inside l *) + List.fold_left + (fun m' i -> + M.add i (List.filter (fun x -> List.mem x l) (M.find i m)) m') + M.empty l + in + let m = M.map (fun x -> Some x) m in + (* utils *) + let keys m = M.fold (fun i _ acc -> i::acc) m [] in + let split l m = List.filter (fun i -> M.find i m = Some []) l in + let purge l m = + M.mapi + (fun k v -> if List.mem k l then None else + match v with + | None -> None + | Some ll -> Some (List.filter (fun i -> not (List.mem i l)) ll)) + m + in + let rec aux m res = + let keys = keys m in + let ok = split keys m in + let m = purge ok m in + let res = ok @ res in + if ok = [] then res else aux m res + in + let rc = List.rev (aux m []) in + rc ;; + (* returns the list of ids that should be factorized *) -let get_duplicate_step_in_wfo l p = +let get_duplicate_step_in_wfo bag l p = let ol = List.rev l in let h = Hashtbl.create 13 in - let add i n = - let p,_,_ = proof_of_id i in + (* NOTE: here the n parameter is an approximation of the dependency + between equations. To do things seriously we should maintain a + dependency graph. This approximation is not perfect. *) + let add i = + let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag i in match p with | Exact _ -> true | _ -> - try let (pos,no) = Hashtbl.find h i in Hashtbl.replace h i (pos,no+1);false - with Not_found -> Hashtbl.add h i (n,1);true + try + let no = Hashtbl.find h i in + Hashtbl.replace h i (no+1); + false + with Not_found -> Hashtbl.add h i 1;true in - let rec aux n = function - | Exact _ -> n + let rec aux = function + | Exact _ -> () | Step (_,(_,i1,(_,i2),_)) -> - let go_on_1 = add i1 n in - let go_on_2 = add i2 n in - max - (if go_on_1 then aux (n+1) (let p,_,_ = proof_of_id i1 in p) else n+1) - (if go_on_2 then aux (n+1) (let p,_,_ = proof_of_id i2 in p) else n+1) - in - let i = aux 0 p in - let _ = - List.fold_left - (fun acc (_,id,_,_) -> aux acc (let p,_,_ = proof_of_id id in p)) - i ol + let go_on_1 = add i1 in + let go_on_2 = add i2 in + if go_on_1 then aux (let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag i1 in p); + if go_on_2 then aux (let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag i2 in p) in + aux p; + List.iter + (fun (_,_,id,_,_) -> aux (let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag id in p)) + ol; (* now h is complete *) - let proofs = Hashtbl.fold (fun k (pos,count) acc->(k,pos,count)::acc) h [] in - let proofs = List.filter (fun (_,_,c) -> c > 1) proofs in - let proofs = - List.sort (fun (_,c1,_) (_,c2,_) -> Pervasives.compare c2 c1) proofs - in - List.map (fun (i,_,_) -> i) proofs + let proofs = Hashtbl.fold (fun k count acc-> (k,count)::acc) h [] in + let proofs = List.filter (fun (_,c) -> c > 1) proofs in + let res = topological_sort bag (List.map (fun (i,_) -> i) proofs) in + res ;; -let build_proof_term h lift proof = +let build_proof_term bag eq h lift proof = let proof_of_id aux id = - let p,l,r = proof_of_id id in + let p,l,r = proof_of_id bag id in try List.assoc id h,l,r with Not_found -> aux p, l, r in let rec aux = function - | Exact term -> CicSubstitution.lift lift term - | Step (subst,(_, id1, (pos,id2), pred)) -> + | Exact term -> + CicSubstitution.lift lift term + | Step (subst,(rule, id1, (pos,id2), pred)) -> let p1,_,_ = proof_of_id aux id1 in let p2,l,r = proof_of_id aux id2 in - build_proof_step lift subst p1 p2 pos l r pred + let varname = + match rule with + | SuperpositionRight -> Cic.Name ("SupR" ^ Utils.string_of_pos pos) + | Demodulation -> Cic.Name ("DemEq"^ Utils.string_of_pos pos) + | _ -> assert false + in + let pred = + match pred with + | Cic.Lambda (_,a,b) -> Cic.Lambda (varname,a,b) + | _ -> assert false + in + let p = build_proof_step eq lift subst p1 p2 pos l r pred in +(* let cond = (not (List.mem 302 (Utils.metas_of_term p)) || id1 = 8 || id1 = 132) in + if not cond then + prerr_endline ("ERROR " ^ string_of_int id1 ^ " " ^ string_of_int id2); + assert cond;*) + p in aux proof ;; -let build_goal_proof l initial ty se = +let build_goal_proof bag eq l initial ty se context menv = let se = List.map (fun i -> Cic.Meta (i,[])) se in - let lets = get_duplicate_step_in_wfo l initial in + let lets = get_duplicate_step_in_wfo bag l initial in let letsno = List.length lets in - let _,mty,_,_ = open_eq ty in - let lift_list l = List.map (fun (i,t) -> i,CicSubstitution.lift 1 t) l - in + let lift_list l = List.map (fun (i,t) -> i,CicSubstitution.lift 1 t) l in let lets,_,h = List.fold_left (fun (acc,n,h) id -> - let p,l,r = proof_of_id id in - let cic = build_proof_term h n p in + let p,l,r = proof_of_id bag id in + let cic = build_proof_term bag eq h n p in let real_cic,instance = - parametrize_proof cic l r (CicSubstitution.lift n mty) + parametrize_proof cic l r in let h = (id, instance)::lift_list h in acc@[id,real_cic],n+1,h) @@ -571,18 +803,29 @@ let build_goal_proof l initial ty se = let proof,se = let rec aux se current_proof = function | [] -> current_proof,se - | (pos,id,subst,pred)::tl -> - let p,l,r = proof_of_id id in - let p = build_proof_term h letsno p in + | (rule,pos,id,subst,pred)::tl -> + let p,l,r = proof_of_id bag id in + let p = build_proof_term bag eq h letsno p in let pos = if pos = Utils.Left then Utils.Right else Utils.Left in + let varname = + match rule with + | SuperpositionLeft -> Cic.Name ("SupL" ^ Utils.string_of_pos pos) + | Demodulation -> Cic.Name ("DemG"^ Utils.string_of_pos pos) + | _ -> assert false + in + let pred = + match pred with + | Cic.Lambda (_,a,b) -> Cic.Lambda (varname,a,b) + | _ -> assert false + in let proof = - build_proof_step letsno subst current_proof p pos l r pred + build_proof_step eq letsno subst current_proof p pos l r pred in let proof,se = aux se proof tl in Subst.apply_subst_lift letsno subst proof, - List.map (fun x -> Subst.apply_subst_lift letsno subst x) se + List.map (fun x -> Subst.apply_subst(*_lift letsno*) subst x) se in - aux se (build_proof_term h letsno initial) l + aux se (build_proof_term bag eq h letsno initial) l in let n,proof = let initial = proof in @@ -594,41 +837,77 @@ let build_goal_proof l initial ty se = cic, p)) lets (letsno-1,initial) in - canonical (contextualize_rewrites proof (CicSubstitution.lift letsno ty)), se + canonical + (contextualize_rewrites proof (CicSubstitution.lift letsno ty)) + context menv, + se ;; -let refl_proof ty term = - Cic.Appl - [Cic.MutConstruct - (LibraryObjects.eq_URI (), 0, 1, []); - ty; term] +let refl_proof eq_uri ty term = + Cic.Appl [Cic.MutConstruct (eq_uri, 0, 1, []); ty; term] ;; -let metas_of_proof p = - let p = build_proof_term [] 0 p in +let metas_of_proof bag p = + let eq = + match LibraryObjects.eq_URI () with + | Some u -> u + | None -> + raise + (ProofEngineTypes.Fail + (lazy "No default equality defined when calling metas_of_proof")) + in + let p = build_proof_term bag eq [] 0 p in Utils.metas_of_term p ;; -let relocate newmeta menv = - let subst, metasenv, newmeta = +let remove_local_context eq = + let w, p, (ty, left, right, o), menv,id = open_equality eq in + let p = Utils.remove_local_context p in + let ty = Utils.remove_local_context ty in + let left = Utils.remove_local_context left in + let right = Utils.remove_local_context right in + w, p, (ty, left, right, o), menv, id +;; + +let relocate newmeta menv to_be_relocated = + let subst, newmetasenv, newmeta = List.fold_right - (fun (i, context, ty) (subst, menv, maxmeta) -> - let irl = [] (* - CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context *) - in - let newsubst = Subst.buildsubst i context (Cic.Meta(maxmeta,irl)) ty subst in - let newmeta = maxmeta, context, ty in - newsubst, newmeta::menv, maxmeta+1) - menv (Subst.empty_subst, [], newmeta+1) + (fun i (subst, metasenv, maxmeta) -> + let _,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta i menv in + let irl = [] in + let newmeta = Cic.Meta(maxmeta,irl) in + let newsubst = Subst.buildsubst i context newmeta ty subst in + newsubst, (maxmeta,context,ty)::metasenv, maxmeta+1) + to_be_relocated (Subst.empty_subst, [], newmeta+1) in - let metasenv = Subst.apply_subst_metasenv subst metasenv in - let subst = Subst.flatten_subst subst in - subst, metasenv, newmeta + let menv = Subst.apply_subst_metasenv subst menv @ newmetasenv in + subst, menv, newmeta +let fix_metas_goal newmeta goal = + let (proof, menv, ty) = goal in + let to_be_relocated = + HExtlib.list_uniq (List.sort Pervasives.compare (Utils.metas_of_term ty)) + in + let subst, menv, newmeta = relocate newmeta menv to_be_relocated in + let ty = Subst.apply_subst subst ty in + let proof = + match proof with + | [] -> assert false (* is a nonsense to relocate the initial goal *) + | (r,pos,id,s,p) :: tl -> (r,pos,id,Subst.concat subst s,p) :: tl + in + newmeta+1,(proof, menv, ty) +;; -let fix_metas newmeta eq = +let fix_metas bag newmeta eq = let w, p, (ty, left, right, o), menv,_ = open_equality eq in - let subst, metasenv, newmeta = relocate newmeta menv in + let to_be_relocated = +(* List.map (fun i ,_,_ -> i) menv *) + HExtlib.list_uniq + (List.sort Pervasives.compare + (Utils.metas_of_term left @ Utils.metas_of_term right @ + Utils.metas_of_term ty)) + in + let subst, metasenv, newmeta = relocate newmeta menv to_be_relocated in let ty = Subst.apply_subst subst ty in let left = Subst.apply_subst subst left in let right = Subst.apply_subst subst right in @@ -638,15 +917,17 @@ let fix_metas newmeta eq = Step (Subst.concat s subst,(r,id1,(pos,id2), pred)) in let p = fix_proof p in - let eq = mk_equality (w, p, (ty, left, right, o), metasenv) in - newmeta+1, eq + let eq' = mk_equality bag (w, p, (ty, left, right, o), metasenv) in + newmeta+1, eq' exception NotMetaConvertible;; let meta_convertibility_aux table t1 t2 = let module C = Cic in - let rec aux ((table_l, table_r) as table) t1 t2 = + let rec aux ((table_l,table_r) as table) t1 t2 = match t1, t2 with + | C.Meta (m1, tl1), C.Meta (m2, tl2) when m1 = m2 -> table + | C.Meta (m1, tl1), C.Meta (m2, tl2) when m1 < m2 -> aux table t2 t1 | C.Meta (m1, tl1), C.Meta (m2, tl2) -> let m1_binding, table_l = try List.assoc m1 table_l, table_l @@ -657,18 +938,7 @@ let meta_convertibility_aux table t1 t2 = in if (m1_binding <> m2) || (m2_binding <> m1) then raise NotMetaConvertible - else ( - try - List.fold_left2 - (fun res t1 t2 -> - match t1, t2 with - | None, Some _ | Some _, None -> raise NotMetaConvertible - | None, None -> res - | Some t1, Some t2 -> (aux res t1 t2)) - (table_l, table_r) tl1 tl2 - with Invalid_argument _ -> - raise NotMetaConvertible - ) + else table_l,table_r | C.Var (u1, ens1), C.Var (u2, ens2) | C.Const (u1, ens1), C.Const (u2, ens2) when (UriManager.eq u1 u2) -> aux_ens table ens1 ens2 @@ -744,12 +1014,12 @@ let meta_convertibility_eq eq1 eq2 = true else try - let table = meta_convertibility_aux ([], []) left left' in + let table = meta_convertibility_aux ([],[]) left left' in let _ = meta_convertibility_aux table right right' in true with NotMetaConvertible -> try - let table = meta_convertibility_aux ([], []) left right' in + let table = meta_convertibility_aux ([],[]) left right' in let _ = meta_convertibility_aux table right left' in true with NotMetaConvertible -> @@ -762,7 +1032,7 @@ let meta_convertibility t1 t2 = true else try - ignore(meta_convertibility_aux ([], []) t1 t2); + ignore(meta_convertibility_aux ([],[]) t1 t2); true with NotMetaConvertible -> false @@ -771,21 +1041,20 @@ let meta_convertibility t1 t2 = exception TermIsNotAnEquality;; let term_is_equality term = - let iseq uri = UriManager.eq uri (LibraryObjects.eq_URI ()) in match term with - | Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (uri, _, _); _; _; _] when iseq uri -> true + | Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (uri, _, _); _; _; _] + when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI uri -> true | _ -> false ;; -let equality_of_term proof term = - let eq_uri = LibraryObjects.eq_URI () in - let iseq uri = UriManager.eq uri eq_uri in +let equality_of_term bag proof term = match term with - | Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (uri, _, _); ty; t1; t2] when iseq uri -> + | Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (uri, _, _); ty; t1; t2] + when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI uri -> let o = !Utils.compare_terms t1 t2 in let stat = (ty,t1,t2,o) in let w = Utils.compute_equality_weight stat in - let e = mk_equality (w, Exact proof, stat,[]) in + let e = mk_equality bag (w, Exact proof, stat,[]) in e | _ -> raise TermIsNotAnEquality @@ -793,24 +1062,26 @@ let equality_of_term proof term = let is_weak_identity eq = let _,_,(_,left, right,_),_,_ = open_equality eq in - left = right || meta_convertibility left right + left = right + (* doing metaconv here is meaningless *) ;; let is_identity (_, context, ugraph) eq = let _,_,(ty,left,right,_),menv,_ = open_equality eq in - left = right || - (* (meta_convertibility left right)) *) - fst (CicReduction.are_convertible ~metasenv:menv context left right ugraph) + (* doing metaconv here is meaningless *) + left = right +(* fst (CicReduction.are_convertible ~metasenv:menv context left right ugraph) + * *) ;; -let term_of_equality equality = +let term_of_equality eq_uri equality = let _, _, (ty, left, right, _), menv, _= open_equality equality in let eq i = function Cic.Meta (j, _) -> i = j | _ -> false in let argsno = List.length menv in let t = CicSubstitution.lift argsno - (Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (LibraryObjects.eq_URI (), 0, []); ty; left; right]) + (Cic.Appl [Cic.MutInd (eq_uri, 0, []); ty; left; right]) in snd ( List.fold_right @@ -826,3 +1097,242 @@ let term_of_equality equality = menv (argsno, t)) ;; +let symmetric bag eq_ty l id uri m = + let eq = Cic.MutInd(uri,0,[]) in + let pred = + Cic.Lambda (Cic.Name "Sym",eq_ty, + Cic.Appl [CicSubstitution.lift 1 eq ; + CicSubstitution.lift 1 eq_ty; + Cic.Rel 1;CicSubstitution.lift 1 l]) + in + let prefl = + Exact (Cic.Appl + [Cic.MutConstruct(uri,0,1,[]);eq_ty;l]) + in + let id1 = + let eq = mk_equality bag (0,prefl,(eq_ty,l,l,Utils.Eq),m) in + let (_,_,_,_,id) = open_equality eq in + id + in + Step(Subst.empty_subst, + (Demodulation,id1,(Utils.Left,id),pred)) +;; + +module IntOT = struct + type t = int + let compare = Pervasives.compare +end + +module IntSet = Set.Make(IntOT);; + +let n_purged = ref 0;; + +let collect ((id_to_eq,_) as bag) alive1 alive2 alive3 = +(* let _ = <:start> in *) + let deps_of id = + let p,_,_ = proof_of_id bag id in + match p with + | Exact _ -> IntSet.empty + | Step (_,(_,id1,(_,id2),_)) -> + IntSet.add id1 (IntSet.add id2 IntSet.empty) + in + let rec close s = + let news = IntSet.fold (fun id s -> IntSet.union (deps_of id) s) s s in + if IntSet.equal news s then s else close news + in + let l_to_s s l = List.fold_left (fun s x -> IntSet.add x s) s l in + let alive_set = l_to_s (l_to_s (l_to_s IntSet.empty alive2) alive1) alive3 in + let closed_alive_set = close alive_set in + let to_purge = + Hashtbl.fold + (fun k _ s -> + if not (IntSet.mem k closed_alive_set) then + k::s else s) id_to_eq [] + in + n_purged := !n_purged + List.length to_purge; + List.iter (Hashtbl.remove id_to_eq) to_purge; +(* let _ = <:stop> in () *) +;; + +let id_of e = + let _,_,_,_,id = open_equality e in id +;; + +let get_stats () = "" +(* + <:show> ^ + "# of purged eq by the collector: " ^ string_of_int !n_purged ^ "\n" +*) +;; + +let rec pp_proofterm name t context = + let rec skip_lambda tys ctx = function + | Cic.Lambda (n,s,t) -> skip_lambda (s::tys) ((Some n)::ctx) t + | t -> ctx,tys,t + in + let rename s name = + match name with + | Cic.Name s1 -> Cic.Name (s ^ s1) + | _ -> assert false + in + let rec skip_letin ctx = function + | Cic.LetIn (n,b,t) -> + pp_proofterm (Some (rename "Lemma " n)) b ctx:: + skip_letin ((Some n)::ctx) t + | t -> + let ppterm t = CicPp.pp t ctx in + let rec pp inner = function + | Cic.Appl [Cic.Const (uri,[]);_;l;m;r;p1;p2] + when Pcre.pmatch ~pat:"trans_eq" (UriManager.string_of_uri uri)-> + if not inner then + (" " ^ ppterm l) :: pp true p1 @ + [ " = " ^ ppterm m ] @ pp true p2 @ + [ " = " ^ ppterm r ] + else + pp true p1 @ + [ " = " ^ ppterm m ] @ pp true p2 + | Cic.Appl [Cic.Const (uri,[]);_;l;m;p] + when Pcre.pmatch ~pat:"sym_eq" (UriManager.string_of_uri uri)-> + pp true p + | Cic.Appl [Cic.Const (uri,[]);_;_;_;_;_;p] + when Pcre.pmatch ~pat:"eq_f" (UriManager.string_of_uri uri)-> + pp true p + | Cic.Appl [Cic.Const (uri,[]);_;_;_;_;_;p] + when Pcre.pmatch ~pat:"eq_f1" (UriManager.string_of_uri uri)-> + pp true p + | Cic.Appl [Cic.MutConstruct (uri,_,_,[]);_;_;t;p] + when Pcre.pmatch ~pat:"ex.ind" (UriManager.string_of_uri uri)-> + [ "witness " ^ ppterm t ] @ pp true p + | Cic.Appl (t::_) ->[ " [by " ^ ppterm t ^ "]"] + | t ->[ " [by " ^ ppterm t ^ "]"] + in + let rec compat = function + | a::b::tl -> (b ^ a) :: compat tl + | h::[] -> [h] + | [] -> [] + in + let compat l = List.hd l :: compat (List.tl l) in + compat (pp false t) @ ["";""] + in + let names, tys, body = skip_lambda [] context t in + let ppname name = (match name with Some (Cic.Name s) -> s | _ -> "") in + ppname name ^ ":\n" ^ + (if context = [] then + let rec pp_l ctx = function + | (t,name)::tl -> + " " ^ ppname name ^ ": " ^ CicPp.pp t ctx ^ "\n" ^ + pp_l (name::ctx) tl + | [] -> "\n\n" + in + pp_l [] (List.rev (List.combine tys names)) + else "") + ^ + String.concat "\n" (skip_letin names body) +;; + +let pp_proofterm t = + "\n\n" ^ + pp_proofterm (Some (Cic.Name "Hypothesis")) t [] +;; + +let initial_nameset_list = [ + "x"; "y"; "z"; "t"; "u"; "v"; "a"; "b"; "c"; "d"; + "e"; "l"; "m"; "n"; "o"; "p"; "q"; "r"; +] + +module S = Set.Make(String) + +let initial_nameset = List.fold_right S.add initial_nameset_list S.empty, [];; + +let freshname (nameset, subst) term = + let m = CicUtil.metas_of_term term in + let nameset, subst = + List.fold_left + (fun (set,rc) (m,_) -> + if List.mem_assoc m rc then set,rc else + let name = S.choose set in + let set = S.remove name set in + set, + (m,Cic.Const(UriManager.uri_of_string + ("cic:/"^name^".con"),[]))::rc) + (nameset,subst) m + in + let term = + ProofEngineReduction.replace + ~equality:(fun i t -> match t with Cic.Meta (j,_) -> i=j| _ -> false) + ~what:(List.map fst subst) + ~with_what:(List.map snd subst) ~where:term + in + (nameset, subst), term +;; + +let remove_names_in_context (set,subst) names = + List.fold_left + (fun s n -> + match n with Some (Cic.Name n) -> S.remove n s | _ -> s) + set names, subst +;; + +let string_of_id2 (id_to_eq,_) names nameset id = + if id = 0 then "" else + try + let (_,_,(_,l,r,_),_,_) = open_equality (Hashtbl.find id_to_eq id) in + let nameset, l = freshname nameset l in + let nameset, r = freshname nameset r in + Printf.sprintf "%s = %s" (CicPp.pp l names) (CicPp.pp r names) + with + Not_found -> assert false +;; + +let draw_proof bag names goal_proof proof id = + let b = Buffer.create 100 in + let fmt = Format.formatter_of_buffer b in + let sint = string_of_int in + let fst3 (x,_,_) = x in + let visited = ref [] in + let nameset = remove_names_in_context initial_nameset names in + let rec fact id = function + | Exact t -> + if not (List.mem id !visited) then + begin + visited := id :: !visited; + let nameset, t = freshname nameset t in + let t = CicPp.pp t names in + GraphvizPp.Dot.node (sint id) + ~attrs:["label",t^":"^string_of_id2 bag names nameset id; + "shape","rectangle"] fmt; + end + | Step (_,(_,id1,(_,id2),_)) -> + GraphvizPp.Dot.edge (sint id) (sint id1) fmt; + GraphvizPp.Dot.edge (sint id) (sint id2) fmt; + let p1,_,_ = proof_of_id bag id1 in + let p2,_,_ = proof_of_id bag id2 in + fact id1 p1; + fact id2 p2; + if not (List.mem id !visited); then + begin + visited := id :: !visited; + GraphvizPp.Dot.node (sint id) + ~attrs:["label",sint id^":"^string_of_id2 bag names nameset id; + "shape","ellipse"] fmt + end + in + let sleft acc (_,_,id,_,_) = + if acc != 0 then GraphvizPp.Dot.edge (sint acc) (sint id) fmt; + fact id (fst3 (proof_of_id bag id)); + id + in + GraphvizPp.Dot.header ~node_attrs:["fontsize","10"; ] fmt; + ignore(List.fold_left sleft id goal_proof); + GraphvizPp.Dot.trailer fmt; + let oc = open_out "/tmp/matita_paramod.dot" in + Buffer.output_buffer oc b; + close_out oc; + Utils.debug_print (lazy "dot!"); + ignore(Unix.system + "dot -Tps -o /tmp/matita_paramod.eps /tmp/matita_paramod.dot" +(* "cat /tmp/matita_paramod.dot| tred | dot -Tps -o /tmp/matita_paramod.eps" *) + ); + ignore(Unix.system "gv /tmp/matita_paramod.eps"); +;; +