X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fmatita%2Fcontribs%2Fdama%2Fdama%2Fmodels%2Fq_bars.ma;h=de39589073d51967d81528130c9afa59c4e858c4;hb=b5564e329d48efa6c2ca01da18203def26a70294;hp=d0d043f47e053ae50df4e8aaba1ac9f510a83d72;hpb=88b32d4e8fe371d59e41cd272064c9d486ae7ec5;p=helm.git

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/contribs/dama/dama/models/q_bars.ma b/helm/software/matita/contribs/dama/dama/models/q_bars.ma
index d0d043f47..de3958907 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/contribs/dama/dama/models/q_bars.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/contribs/dama/dama/models/q_bars.ma
@@ -12,175 +12,141 @@
 (*                                                                        *)
 (**************************************************************************)
 
+include "nat_ordered_set.ma".
 include "models/q_support.ma".
-include "models/list_support.ma".
-include "cprop_connectives.ma". 
+include "models/list_support.ma". 
+include "logic/cprop_connectives.ma". 
 
-definition bar ≝ ratio × ℚ. (* base (Qpos) , height *)
-record q_f : Type ≝ { start : ℚ; bars: list bar }.
+definition bar ≝ ℚ × (ℚ × ℚ).
 
 notation < "\rationals \sup 2" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'q2}.
 interpretation "Q x Q" 'q2 = (Prod Q Q).
 
-definition empty_bar : bar ≝ 〈one,OQ〉.
+definition empty_bar : bar ≝ 〈Qpos one,〈OQ,OQ〉〉.
 notation "\rect" with precedence 90 for @{'empty_bar}.
 interpretation "q0" 'empty_bar = empty_bar.
 
 notation < "\ldots\rect\square\EmptySmallSquare\ldots" with precedence 90 for @{'lq2}.
-interpretation "lq2" 'lq2 = (list bar).
-
-let rec sum_bases (l:list bar) (i:nat) on i ≝
-    match i with
-    [ O ⇒ OQ
-    | S m ⇒ 
-         match l with
-         [ nil ⇒ sum_bases l m + Qpos one
-         | cons x tl ⇒ sum_bases tl m + Qpos (\fst x)]].
-         
-axiom sum_bases_empty_nat_of_q_ge_OQ:
-  ∀q:ℚ.OQ ≤ sum_bases [] (nat_of_q q). 
-axiom sum_bases_empty_nat_of_q_le_q:
-  ∀q:ℚ.sum_bases [] (nat_of_q q) ≤ q.
-axiom sum_bases_empty_nat_of_q_le_q_one:
-  ∀q:ℚ.q < sum_bases [] (nat_of_q q) + Qpos one.
-
-definition eject1 ≝
-  λP.λp:∃x:nat × ℚ.P x.match p with [ex_introT p _ ⇒ p].
-coercion eject1.
-definition inject1 ≝ λP.λp:nat × ℚ.λh:P p. ex_introT ? P p h.
-coercion inject1 with 0 1 nocomposites.
-
-definition value : 
-  ∀f:q_f.∀i:ℚ.∃p:nat × ℚ. 
-   match q_cmp i (start f) with
-   [ q_lt _ ⇒ \snd p = OQ
-   | _ ⇒ 
-        And3
-         (sum_bases (bars f) (\fst p) ≤ ⅆ[i,start f]) 
-         (ⅆ[i, start f] < sum_bases (bars f) (S (\fst p))) 
-         (\snd p = \snd (nth (bars f) ▭ (\fst p)))].
-intros;
-alias symbol "pi2" = "pair pi2".
-alias symbol "pi1" = "pair pi1".
-letin value ≝ (
-  let rec value (p: ℚ) (l : list bar) on l ≝
-    match l with
-    [ nil ⇒ 〈nat_of_q p,OQ〉
-    | cons x tl ⇒
-        match q_cmp p (Qpos (\fst x)) with
-        [ q_lt _ ⇒ 〈O, \snd x〉
-        | _ ⇒
-           let rc ≝ value (p - Qpos (\fst x)) tl in
-           〈S (\fst rc),\snd rc〉]]
-  in value :
-  ∀acc,l.∃p:nat × ℚ. OQ ≤ acc →
-     And3
-       (sum_bases l (\fst p) ≤ acc) 
-       (acc < sum_bases l (S (\fst p))) 
-       (\snd p = \snd (nth l ▭ (\fst p))));
-[5: clearbody value; 
-    cases (q_cmp i (start f));
-    [2: exists [apply 〈O,OQ〉] simplify; reflexivity;
-    |*: cases (value ⅆ[i,start f] (bars f)) (p Hp);
-        cases (Hp (q_dist_ge_OQ ? ?)); clear Hp value;
-        exists[1,3:apply p]; simplify; split; assumption;]
-|1,3: intros; split;
-    [1,4: clear H2; cases (value (q-Qpos (\fst b)) l1);
-           cases (H2 (q_le_to_diff_ge_OQ ?? (? H1)));
-          [1,3: intros; [apply q_lt_to_le|apply q_eq_to_le;symmetry] assumption]
-          simplify; apply q_le_minus; assumption;
-    |2,5: cases (value (q-Qpos (\fst b)) l1); 
-          cases (H4 (q_le_to_diff_ge_OQ ?? (? H1)));
-          [1,3: intros; [apply q_lt_to_le|apply q_eq_to_le;symmetry] assumption]
-          clear H3 H2 value;
-          change with (q < sum_bases l1 (S (\fst w)) + Qpos (\fst b));
-          apply q_lt_plus; assumption;
-    |*: cases (value (q-Qpos (\fst b)) l1); simplify; 
-        cases (H4 (q_le_to_diff_ge_OQ ?? (? H1))); 
-        [1,3: intros; [apply q_lt_to_le|apply q_eq_to_le;symmetry] assumption]
-        assumption;]
-|2: clear value H2; simplify; intros; split; [assumption|3:reflexivity]
-    rewrite > q_plus_sym; rewrite > q_plus_OQ; assumption;
-|4: simplify; intros; split; 
-    [1: apply sum_bases_empty_nat_of_q_le_q;
-    |2: apply sum_bases_empty_nat_of_q_le_q_one;
-    |3: elim (nat_of_q q); [reflexivity] simplify; assumption]] 
+interpretation "lq2" 'lq2 = (list bar). 
+
+definition q2_lt := mk_rel bar (λx,y:bar.\fst x < \fst y).
+
+interpretation "bar lt" 'lt x y = (rel_op _ q2_lt x y).
+
+lemma q2_trans : ∀a,b,c:bar. a < b → b < c → a < c.
+intros 3; cases a; cases b; cases c; unfold q2_lt; simplify; intros;
+apply (q_lt_trans ??? H H1);
+qed. 
+
+definition q2_trel := mk_trans_rel bar q2_lt q2_trans.
+
+interpretation "bar lt" 'lt x y = (FunClass_2_OF_trans_rel q2_trel x y).
+
+definition canonical_q_lt : rel bar → trans_rel ≝ λx:rel bar.q2_trel.
+
+coercion canonical_q_lt with nocomposites.
+
+interpretation "bar lt" 'lt x y = (FunClass_2_OF_trans_rel (canonical_q_lt _) x y).
+
+definition nth_base ≝ λf,n. \fst (\nth f ▭ n).
+definition nth_height ≝ λf,n. \snd (\nth f ▭ n).
+
+record q_f : Type ≝ {
+ bars: list bar; 
+ bars_sorted : sorted q2_lt bars;
+ bars_begin_OQ : nth_base bars O = OQ;
+ bars_end_OQ : nth_height bars (pred (\len bars)) = 〈OQ,OQ〉
+}.
+
+lemma len_bases_gt_O: ∀f.O < \len (bars f).
+intros; generalize in match (bars_begin_OQ f); cases (bars f); intros;
+[2: simplify; apply le_S_S; apply le_O_n;
+|1: normalize in H; destruct H;]
+qed. 
+
+lemma all_bases_positive : ∀f:q_f.∀i. OQ < nth_base (bars f) (S i).
+intro f; generalize in match (bars_begin_OQ f); generalize in match (bars_sorted f);
+cases (len_gt_non_empty ?? (len_bases_gt_O f)); intros;
+cases (cmp_nat (\len l) i);
+[2: lapply (sorted_tail_bigger q2_lt ?? ▭ H ? H2) as K;  
+    simplify in H1; rewrite < H1; apply K;
+|1: simplify; elim l in i H2;[simplify; rewrite > nth_nil; apply (q_pos_OQ one)]
+    cases n in H3; intros; [simplify in H3; cases (not_le_Sn_O ? H3)] 
+    apply (H2 n1); simplify in H3; apply (le_S_S_to_le ?? H3);]
 qed.
-    
-          
-definition same_values ≝
-  λl1,l2:q_f.
-   ∀input.\snd (\fst (value l1 input)) = \snd (\fst (value l2 input)). 
 
-definition same_bases ≝ 
-  λl1,l2:q_f.
-    (∀i.\fst (nth (bars l1) ▭ i) = \fst (nth (bars l2) ▭ i)).
+coinductive value_spec (f : q_f) (i : ℚ) : ℚ × ℚ → CProp ≝
+| value_of : ∀j,q. 
+    nth_height (bars f) j = q →  nth_base (bars f) j < i →
+    (∀n.j < n → n < \len (bars f) → i ≤ nth_base (bars f) n) → value_spec f i q. 
+         
+definition value_lemma :  ∀f:q_f.∀i:ratio.∃p:ℚ×ℚ.value_spec f (Qpos i) p.
+intros;
+letin P ≝ 
+  (λx:bar.match q_cmp (Qpos i) (\fst x) with[ q_leq _ ⇒ true| q_gt _ ⇒ false]);
+exists [apply (nth_height (bars f) (pred (find ? P (bars f) ▭)));]
+apply (value_of ?? (pred (find ? P (bars f) ▭)));
+[1: reflexivity
+|2: cases (cases_find bar P (bars f) ▭);
+    [1: cases i1 in H H1 H2 H3; simplify; intros;
+        [1: generalize in match (bars_begin_OQ f); 
+            cases (len_gt_non_empty ?? (len_bases_gt_O f)); simplify; intros;
+            rewrite > H4; apply q_pos_OQ;
+        |2: cases (len_gt_non_empty ?? (len_bases_gt_O f)) in H3;
+            intros; lapply (H3 n (le_n ?)) as K; unfold P in K;
+            cases (q_cmp (Qpos i) (\fst (\nth (x::l) ▭ n))) in K;
+            simplify; intros; [destruct H5] assumption] 
+    |2: destruct H; cases (len_gt_non_empty ?? (len_bases_gt_O f)) in H2;
+        simplify; intros; lapply (H (\len l) (le_n ?)) as K; clear H;
+        unfold P in K; cases (q_cmp (Qpos i) (\fst (\nth (x::l) ▭ (\len l)))) in K;
+        simplify; intros; [destruct H2] assumption;]     
+|3: intro; cases (cases_find bar P (bars f) ▭); intros;
+    [1: generalize in match (bars_sorted f); 
+        cases (list_break ??? H) in H1; rewrite > H6;
+        rewrite < H1; simplify; rewrite > nth_len; unfold P; 
+        cases (q_cmp (Qpos i) (\fst x)); simplify; 
+        intros (X Hs); [2: destruct X] clear X;
+        cases (sorted_pivot q2_lt ??? ▭ Hs);
+        cut (\len l1 ≤ n) as Hn; [2:
+          rewrite > H1;  cases i1 in H4; simplify; intro X; [2: assumption]
+          apply lt_to_le; assumption;]
+        unfold nth_base; rewrite > (nth_append_ge_len ????? Hn);
+        cut (n - \len l1 < \len (x::l2)) as K; [2:
+          simplify; rewrite > H1; rewrite > (?:\len l2 = \len (bars f) - \len (l1 @ [x]));[2:
+            rewrite > H6; repeat rewrite > len_append; simplify;
+            repeat rewrite < plus_n_Sm; rewrite < plus_n_O; simplify;
+            rewrite > sym_plus; rewrite < minus_plus_m_m; reflexivity;]
+          rewrite > len_append; rewrite > H1; simplify; rewrite < plus_n_SO;
+          apply le_S_S; clear H1 H6 H7 Hs H8 H9 Hn x l2 l1 H4 H3 H2 H P i;
+          elim (\len (bars f)) in i1 n H5; [cases (not_le_Sn_O ? H);]
+          simplify; cases n2; [ repeat rewrite < minus_n_O; apply le_S_S_to_le; assumption]
+          cases n1 in H1; [intros; rewrite > eq_minus_n_m_O; apply le_O_n]
+          intros; simplify; apply H; apply le_S_S_to_le; assumption;]
+        cases (n - \len l1) in K; simplify; intros; [ assumption]
+        lapply (H9 ? (le_S_S_to_le ?? H10)) as W; apply (q_le_trans ??? H7);
+        apply q_lt_to_le; apply W;
+    |2: cases (not_le_Sn_n i1); rewrite > H in ⊢ (??%);
+        apply (trans_le ??? ? H4); cases i1 in H3; intros; apply le_S_S; 
+        [ apply le_O_n; | assumption]]]
+qed.    
+
+lemma value : q_f → ratio → ℚ × ℚ.
+intros; cases (value_lemma q r); apply w; qed.
+
+lemma cases_value : ∀f,i. value_spec f (Qpos i) (value f i).
+intros; unfold value; cases (value_lemma f i); assumption; qed.
+
+definition same_values ≝ λl1,l2:q_f.∀input. value l1 input = value l2 input. 
+
+definition same_bases ≝ λl1,l2:list bar. ∀i.\fst (\nth l1 ▭ i) = \fst (\nth l2 ▭ i).
 
 alias symbol "lt" = "Q less than".
 lemma unpos: ∀x:ℚ.OQ < x → ∃r:ratio.Qpos r = x.
 intro; cases x; intros; [2:exists [apply r] reflexivity]
 cases (?:False);
-[ apply (q_lt_corefl ? H)|apply (q_neg_gt ? H)]
-qed.
-
-notation < "\blacksquare" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'hide}.
-definition hide ≝ λT:Type.λx:T.x.
-interpretation "hide" 'hide = (hide _ _).
-
-lemma sum_bases_ge_OQ:
-  ∀l,n. OQ ≤ sum_bases l n.
-intro; elim l; simplify; intros;
-[1: elim n; [apply q_eq_to_le;reflexivity] simplify;
-    apply q_le_plus_trans; try assumption; apply q_lt_to_le; apply q_pos_lt_OQ;
-|2: cases n; [apply q_eq_to_le;reflexivity] simplify; 
-    apply q_le_plus_trans; [apply H| apply q_lt_to_le; apply q_pos_lt_OQ;]]
+[ apply (q_lt_corefl ? H)| cases (q_lt_le_incompat ?? (q_neg_gt ?) (q_lt_to_le ?? H))]
 qed.
 
-lemma sum_bases_O:
-  ∀l:q_f.∀x.sum_bases (bars l) x ≤ OQ → x = O.
-intros; cases x in H; [intros; reflexivity] intro; cases (?:False);
-cases (q_le_cases ?? H); 
-[1: apply (q_lt_corefl OQ); rewrite < H1 in ⊢ (?? %); 
-|2: apply (q_lt_antisym ??? H1);] clear H H1; cases (bars l);
-simplify; apply q_lt_plus_trans;
-try apply q_pos_lt_OQ; 
-try apply (sum_bases_ge_OQ []);
-apply (sum_bases_ge_OQ l1);
-qed.
-
-lemma sum_bases_increasing:
-  ∀l,x.sum_bases l x < sum_bases l (S x). 
-intro; elim l;
-[1: elim x;
-    [1: simplify; rewrite > q_plus_sym; rewrite > q_plus_OQ;
-        apply q_pos_lt_OQ;
-    |2: simplify in H ⊢ %; 
-        apply q_lt_plus; rewrite > q_elim_minus;
-        rewrite < q_plus_assoc; rewrite < q_elim_minus;
-        rewrite > q_plus_minus; rewrite > q_plus_OQ;
-        assumption;]
-|2: elim x;
-    [1: simplify; rewrite > q_plus_sym; rewrite > q_plus_OQ;
-        apply q_pos_lt_OQ;
-    |2: simplify; change in ⊢ (? ? (? % ?)) with (sum_bases l1 (S n)) ;  
-        apply q_lt_plus; rewrite > q_elim_minus;
-        rewrite < q_plus_assoc; rewrite < q_elim_minus;
-        rewrite > q_plus_minus; rewrite > q_plus_OQ; apply H]]
-qed.
-
-lemma sum_bases_lt_canc:
-  ∀l,x,y.sum_bases l (S x) < sum_bases l (S y) → sum_bases l x < sum_bases l y.
-intro; elim l; [apply (q_lt_canc_plus_r ?? (Qpos one));apply H]
-generalize in match H1;apply (nat_elim2 (?:? → ? → CProp) ??? x y);
-intros 2;
-[3: intros 2; simplify; apply q_lt_inj_plus_r; apply H;
-    apply (q_lt_canc_plus_r ?? (Qpos (\fst a))); apply H3;
-|2: cases (?:False); simplify in H2;
-    apply (q_lt_le_incompat (sum_bases l1 (S n)) OQ);[2: apply sum_bases_ge_OQ;]
-    apply (q_lt_canc_plus_r ?? (Qpos (\fst a))); apply H2;
-|1: cases n in H2; intro; 
-    [1: cases (?:False); apply (q_lt_corefl ? H2);
-    |2: simplify; apply  q_lt_plus_trans; [apply sum_bases_ge_OQ]
-        apply q_pos_lt_OQ;]]
-qed.
+notation < "x \blacksquare" non associative with precedence 50 for @{'unpos $x}.
+interpretation "hide unpos proof" 'unpos x = (unpos x _).