X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fmatita%2Fdama%2Fmetric_lattice.ma;h=cca6430983486656f7863db6224c02d4c7d22ed3;hb=11f667afbb87725dd5e243d4b3717d19f584a481;hp=917e2a199037d55157ccae646a30bd5da2c66eac;hpb=0e93f77172427eed198b974e32c7f3e80d2c0251;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/matita/dama/metric_lattice.ma b/helm/software/matita/dama/metric_lattice.ma index 917e2a199..cca643098 100644 --- a/helm/software/matita/dama/metric_lattice.ma +++ b/helm/software/matita/dama/metric_lattice.ma @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ set "baseuri" "cic:/matita/metric_lattice/". include "metric_space.ma". include "lattice.ma". -record mlattice_ (R : ogroup) : Type ≝ { +record mlattice_ (R : todgroup) : Type ≝ { ml_mspace_: metric_space R; ml_lattice:> lattice; ml_with_: ms_carr ? ml_mspace_ = ap_carr (l_carr ml_lattice) @@ -33,12 +33,12 @@ qed. coercion cic:/matita/metric_lattice/ml_mspace.con. -record is_mlattice (R : ogroup) (ml: mlattice_ R) : Type ≝ { +record is_mlattice (R : todgroup) (ml: mlattice_ R) : Type ≝ { ml_prop1: ∀a,b:ml. 0 < δ a b → a # b; ml_prop2: ∀a,b,c:ml. δ (a∨b) (a∨c) + δ (a∧b) (a∧c) ≤ δ b c }. -record mlattice (R : ogroup) : Type ≝ { +record mlattice (R : todgroup) : Type ≝ { ml_carr :> mlattice_ R; ml_props:> is_mlattice R ml_carr }. @@ -54,13 +54,6 @@ apply (ml_prop1 ?? ml); split [apply mpositive] apply ap_symmetric; assumption; qed. -(* -lemma lt_to_dpos: ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀x,y:ml.x < y → 0 < δ x y. -intros 4; repeat (unfold in ⊢ (? % ? ?→?)); simplify; unfold excl; -intro H; elim H (H1 H2); elim H2 (H3 H3); [cases (H1 H3)] -split; [apply mpositive] -*) - lemma meq_l: ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀x,y,z:ml. x≈z → δx y ≈ δz y. intros (R ml x y z); apply le_le_eq; [ apply (le_transitive ???? (mtineq ???y z)); @@ -76,10 +69,7 @@ lemma meq_r: ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀x,y,z:ml. x≈z → δy x ≈ δy z. intros; apply (eq_trans ???? (msymmetric ??y x)); apply (eq_trans ????? (msymmetric ??z y)); apply meq_l; assumption; qed. - -lemma ap_le_to_lt: ∀O:ogroup.∀a,c:O.c # a → c ≤ a → c < a. -intros (R a c A L); split; assumption; -qed. + lemma dap_to_lt: ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀x,y:ml. δ x y # 0 → 0 < δ x y. intros; split [apply mpositive] apply ap_symmetric; assumption; @@ -95,22 +85,29 @@ lemma le_mtri: ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀x,y,z:ml. x ≤ y → y ≤ z → δ x z ≈ δ x y + δ y z. intros (R ml x y z Lxy Lyz); apply le_le_eq; [apply mtineq] apply (le_transitive ????? (ml_prop2 ?? ml (y) ??)); - cut ( δx y+ δy z ≈ δ(y∨x) (y∨z)+ δ(y∧x) (y∧z)); [ - apply (le_rewr ??? (δx y+ δy z)); [assumption] apply le_reflexive] - lapply (le_to_eqm ??? Lxy) as Dxm; - lapply (le_to_eqm ??? Lyz) as Dym; - lapply (le_to_eqj ??? Lxy) as Dxj; - lapply (le_to_eqj ??? Lyz) as Dyj; clear Lxy Lyz; - apply (eq_trans ?? (δ(x∧y) y + δy z)); [apply feq_plusr; apply (meq_l ????? Dxm);] - apply (eq_trans ?? (δ(x∧y) (y∧z) + δy z)); [apply feq_plusr; apply (meq_r ????? Dym);] - apply (eq_trans ?? (δ(x∧y) (y∧z) + δ(x∨y) z)); [apply feq_plusl; apply (meq_l ????? Dxj);] - apply (eq_trans ?? (δ(x∧y) (y∧z) + δ(x∨y) (y∨z))); [apply feq_plusl; apply (meq_r ????? Dyj);] - apply (eq_trans ?? ? ? (plus_comm ???)); - apply (eq_trans ?? (δ(y∨x) (y∨z)+ δ(x∧y) (y∧z))); [apply feq_plusr; apply (meq_l ????? (join_comm ???));] - apply feq_plusl; - apply (eq_trans ?? (δ(y∧x) (y∧z))); [apply (meq_l ????? (meet_comm ???));] - apply eq_reflexive; +cut ( δx y+ δy z ≈ δ(y∨x) (y∨z)+ δ(y∧x) (y∧z)); [ + apply (le_rewr ??? (δx y+ δy z)); [assumption] apply le_reflexive] +lapply (le_to_eqm ??? Lxy) as Dxm; lapply (le_to_eqm ??? Lyz) as Dym; +lapply (le_to_eqj ??? Lxy) as Dxj; lapply (le_to_eqj ??? Lyz) as Dyj; clear Lxy Lyz; +apply (Eq≈ (δ(x∧y) y + δy z) (meq_l ????? Dxm)); +apply (Eq≈ (δ(x∧y) (y∧z) + δy z) (meq_r ????? Dym)); +apply (Eq≈ (δ(x∧y) (y∧z) + δ(x∨y) z) (meq_l ????? Dxj)); +apply (Eq≈ (δ(x∧y) (y∧z) + δ(x∨y) (y∨z)) (meq_r ????? Dyj)); +apply (Eq≈ ? (plus_comm ???)); +apply (Eq≈ (δ(y∨x) (y∨z)+ δ(x∧y) (y∧z)) (meq_l ????? (join_comm ?x y))); +apply feq_plusl; +apply (Eq≈ (δ(y∧x) (y∧z)) (meq_l ????? (meet_comm ?x y))); +apply eq_reflexive; qed. - +(* 3.17 conclusione: δ x y ≈ 0 *) +(* 3.20 conclusione: δ x y ≈ 0 *) +(* 3.21 sup forte + strong_sup x ≝ ∀n. s n ≤ x ∧ ∀y x ≰ y → ∃n. s n ≰ y + strong_sup_zoli x ≝ ∀n. s n ≤ x ∧ ∄y. y#x ∧ y ≤ x +*) +(* 3.22 sup debole (più piccolo dei maggioranti) *) +(* 3.23 conclusion: δ x sup(...) ≈ 0 *) +(* 3.25 vero nel reticolo e basta (niente δ) *) +(* 3.36 conclusion: δ x y ≈ 0 *) \ No newline at end of file