X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fmatita%2Fhelp%2FC%2Fsec_tactics.xml;h=7647232613daff64928d14d507f7d120439f736e;hb=04d8e2282a3536a9b822a8dbfcbdb4e3a949f04d;hp=cad04a53c400a3ab17ba867ca49fe9429aedc5b0;hpb=cea3a50f515d1e39467073d2b447a9ddfa1a4852;p=helm.git diff --git a/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml b/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml index cad04a53c..764723261 100644 --- a/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml +++ b/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml @@ -344,6 +344,58 @@ + + compose + compose + compose n t1 with t2 hyps + + + + Synopsis: + + compose [&nat;] &sterm; [with &sterm;] [&intros-spec;] + + + + Pre-conditions: + + + + + + Action: + + Composes t1 with t2 in every possible way + n times introducing generated terms + as if intros hyps was issued. + If t1:∀x:A.B[x] and + t2:∀x,y:A.B[x]→B[y]→C[x,y] it generates: + + + λx,y:A.t2 x y (t1 x) : ∀x,y:A.B[y]→C[x,y] + + + λx,y:A.λH:B[x].t2 x y H (t1 y) : ∀x,y:A.B[x]→C[x,y] + + + + + If t2 is omitted it composes + t1 + with every hypothesis that can be introduced. + n iterates the process. + + + + New sequents to prove: + + The same, but with more hypothesis eventually introduced + by the &intros-spec;. + + + + + change change @@ -519,10 +571,10 @@ Action: - For each each premise H - of type T in the current context - where T is a non-recursive inductive type - withour right parameters, the tactic runs + For each each premise H of type + T in the current context where + T is a non-recursive inductive type without + right parameters and of sort Prop or CProp, the tactic runs elim H as H1 ... Hm , clears H and runs itself @@ -545,13 +597,13 @@ demodulate demodulate - demodulate + demodulate auto_params Synopsis: - demodulate + demodulate &autoparams; @@ -1292,40 +1344,6 @@ - - reduce - reduce - reduce patt - - - - Synopsis: - - reduce &pattern; - - - - Pre-conditions: - - None. - - - - Action: - - It replaces all the terms matched by patt - with their βδιζ-normal form. - - - - New sequents to prove: - - None. - - - - - reflexivity reflexivity