X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fmatita%2Fhelp%2FC%2Fsec_tactics.xml;h=7647232613daff64928d14d507f7d120439f736e;hb=d2a898e8636c360713d8c9967f1de74e3e077c3f;hp=cad04a53c400a3ab17ba867ca49fe9429aedc5b0;hpb=cea3a50f515d1e39467073d2b447a9ddfa1a4852;p=helm.git
diff --git a/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml b/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml
index cad04a53c..764723261 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml
+++ b/helm/software/matita/help/C/sec_tactics.xml
@@ -344,6 +344,58 @@
+
+ compose
+ compose
+ compose n t1 with t2 hyps
+
+
+
+ Synopsis:
+
+ compose [&nat;] &sterm; [with &sterm;] [&intros-spec;]
+
+
+
+ Pre-conditions:
+
+
+
+
+
+ Action:
+
+ Composes t1 with t2 in every possible way
+ n times introducing generated terms
+ as if intros hyps was issued.
+ If t1:âx:A.B[x] and
+ t2:âx,y:A.B[x]âB[y]âC[x,y] it generates:
+
+
+ λx,y:A.t2 x y (t1 x) : âx,y:A.B[y]âC[x,y]
+
+
+ λx,y:A.λH:B[x].t2 x y H (t1 y) : âx,y:A.B[x]âC[x,y]
+
+
+
+
+ If t2 is omitted it composes
+ t1
+ with every hypothesis that can be introduced.
+ n iterates the process.
+
+
+
+ New sequents to prove:
+
+ The same, but with more hypothesis eventually introduced
+ by the &intros-spec;.
+
+
+
+
+
change
change
@@ -519,10 +571,10 @@
Action:
- For each each premise H
- of type T in the current context
- where T is a non-recursive inductive type
- withour right parameters, the tactic runs
+ For each each premise H of type
+ T in the current context where
+ T is a non-recursive inductive type without
+ right parameters and of sort Prop or CProp, the tactic runs
elim H as H1 ... Hm
, clears H and runs itself
@@ -545,13 +597,13 @@
demodulate
demodulate
- demodulate
+ demodulate auto_params
Synopsis:
- demodulate
+ demodulate &autoparams;
@@ -1292,40 +1344,6 @@
-
- reduce
- reduce
- reduce patt
-
-
-
- Synopsis:
-
- reduce &pattern;
-
-
-
- Pre-conditions:
-
- None.
-
-
-
- Action:
-
- It replaces all the terms matched by patt
- with their βδιζ-normal form.
-
-
-
- New sequents to prove:
-
- None.
-
-
-
-
-
reflexivity
reflexivity