X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=helm%2Fsoftware%2Fmatita%2Flibrary%2Fnat%2Fiteration2.ma;h=6dbbfd572a2ac824de1d69bff781d06eb18009cc;hb=7180662b4d33015e3cbc12a381f0cfc8839de697;hp=14e14b2633a0cbd603909e707005469a482b5262;hpb=a180bddcd4a8f35de3d7292162ba05d0077723aa;p=helm.git

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/library/nat/iteration2.ma b/helm/software/matita/library/nat/iteration2.ma
index 14e14b263..6dbbfd572 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/library/nat/iteration2.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/library/nat/iteration2.ma
@@ -12,72 +12,74 @@
 (*                                                                        *)
 (**************************************************************************)
 
-set "baseuri" "cic:/matita/nat/iteration2.ma".
+set "baseuri" "cic:/matita/nat/iteration2".
 
 include "nat/primes.ma".
 include "nat/ord.ma".
+include "nat/generic_iter_p.ma".
+include "nat/count.ma".(*necessary just to use bool_to_nat and bool_to_nat_andb*)
 
-let rec sigma_p n p (g:nat \to nat) \def
-  match n with
-   [ O \Rightarrow O
-   | (S k) \Rightarrow 
-      match p k with
-      [true \Rightarrow (g k)+(sigma_p k p g)
-      |false \Rightarrow sigma_p k p g]
-   ].
+
+(* sigma_p on nautral numbers is a specialization of sigma_p_gen *)
+definition sigma_p: nat \to (nat \to bool) \to (nat \to nat) \to nat \def
+\lambda n, p, g. (iter_p_gen n p nat g O plus).
+
+theorem symmetricIntPlus: symmetric nat plus.
+change with (\forall a,b:nat. (plus a b) = (plus b a)).
+intros.
+rewrite > sym_plus.
+reflexivity.
+qed.
    
+(*the following theorems on sigma_p in N are obtained by the more general ones
+ * in sigma_p_gen.ma
+ *)
 theorem true_to_sigma_p_Sn: 
 \forall n:nat. \forall p:nat \to bool. \forall g:nat \to nat.
 p n = true \to sigma_p (S n) p g = 
 (g n)+(sigma_p n p g).
-intros.simplify.
-rewrite > H.reflexivity.
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply true_to_iter_p_gen_Sn.
+assumption.
 qed.
    
 theorem false_to_sigma_p_Sn: 
 \forall n:nat. \forall p:nat \to bool. \forall g:nat \to nat.
 p n = false \to sigma_p (S n) p g = sigma_p n p g.
-intros.simplify.
-rewrite > H.reflexivity.
-qed.
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply false_to_iter_p_gen_Sn.
+assumption.
+qed.  
 
 theorem eq_sigma_p: \forall p1,p2:nat \to bool.
 \forall g1,g2: nat \to nat.\forall n.
 (\forall x.  x < n \to p1 x = p2 x) \to
 (\forall x.  x < n \to g1 x = g2 x) \to
 sigma_p n p1 g1 = sigma_p n p2 g2.
-intros 5.elim n
-  [reflexivity
-  |apply (bool_elim ? (p1 n1))
-    [intro.
-     rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn ? ? ? H3).
-     rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
-      [apply eq_f2
-        [apply H2.apply le_n.
-        |apply H
-          [intros.apply H1.apply le_S.assumption
-          |intros.apply H2.apply le_S.assumption
-          ]
-        ]
-      |rewrite < H3.apply sym_eq.apply H1.apply le_n
-      ]
-    |intro.
-     rewrite > (false_to_sigma_p_Sn ? ? ? H3).
-     rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
-      [apply H
-        [intros.apply H1.apply le_S.assumption
-        |intros.apply H2.apply le_S.assumption
-        ]
-      |rewrite < H3.apply sym_eq.apply H1.apply le_n
-      ]
-    ]
-  ]
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply eq_iter_p_gen;
+  assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem eq_sigma_p1: \forall p1,p2:nat \to bool.
+\forall g1,g2: nat \to nat.\forall n.
+(\forall x.  x < n \to p1 x = p2 x) \to
+(\forall x.  x < n \to p1 x = true \to g1 x = g2 x) \to
+sigma_p n p1 g1 = sigma_p n p2 g2.
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply eq_iter_p_gen1;
+  assumption.
 qed.
 
 theorem sigma_p_false: 
 \forall g: nat \to nat.\forall n.sigma_p n (\lambda x.false) g = O.
 intros.
-elim n[reflexivity|simplify.assumption]
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply iter_p_gen_false.
 qed.
 
 theorem sigma_p_plus: \forall n,k:nat.\forall p:nat \to bool.
@@ -85,43 +87,104 @@ theorem sigma_p_plus: \forall n,k:nat.\forall p:nat \to bool.
 sigma_p (k+n) p g 
 = sigma_p k (\lambda x.p (x+n)) (\lambda x.g (x+n)) + sigma_p n p g.
 intros.
-elim k
-  [reflexivity
-  |apply (bool_elim ? (p (n1+n)))
-    [intro.
-     simplify in \vdash (? ? (? % ? ?) ?).    
-     rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn ? ? ? H1).
-     rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn n1 (\lambda x.p (x+n)) ? H1).
-     rewrite > assoc_plus.
-     rewrite < H.reflexivity
-    |intro.
-     simplify in \vdash (? ? (? % ? ?) ?).    
-     rewrite > (false_to_sigma_p_Sn ? ? ? H1).
-     rewrite > (false_to_sigma_p_Sn n1 (\lambda x.p (x+n)) ? H1).
-     assumption.
-    ]
-  ]
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (iter_p_gen_plusA nat n k p g O plus)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus.
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+| apply associative_plus
+]
 qed.
 
 theorem false_to_eq_sigma_p: \forall n,m:nat.n \le m \to
 \forall p:nat \to bool.
 \forall g: nat \to nat. (\forall i:nat. n \le i \to i < m \to
 p i = false) \to sigma_p m p g = sigma_p n p g.
-intros 5.
-elim H
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (false_to_eq_iter_p_gen);
+  assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem or_false_to_eq_sigma_p:
+\forall n,m:nat.\forall p:nat \to bool.
+\forall g: nat \to nat. 
+n \le m \to (\forall i:nat. n \le i \to i < m \to p i = false \lor g i = O)
+\to sigma_p m p g = sigma_p n p g.
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply or_false_eq_baseA_to_eq_iter_p_gen
+  [intros.reflexivity
+  |assumption
+  |assumption
+  ]
+qed.
+
+theorem bool_to_nat_to_eq_sigma_p:
+\forall n:nat.\forall p1,p2:nat \to bool.
+\forall g1,g2: nat \to nat. 
+(\forall i:nat. 
+bool_to_nat (p1 i)*(g1 i) = bool_to_nat (p2 i)*(g2 i)) 
+\to sigma_p n p1 g1 = sigma_p n p2 g2.
+intros.elim n
   [reflexivity
-  |simplify.
-   rewrite > H3
-    [simplify.
-     apply H2.
-     intros.
-     apply H3[apply H4|apply le_S.assumption]
-    |assumption
-    |apply le_n
+  |generalize in match (H n1).
+   apply (bool_elim ? (p1 n1));intro
+    [apply (bool_elim ? (p2 n1));intros
+      [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+          [apply eq_f2
+            [simplify in H4.
+             rewrite > plus_n_O.
+             rewrite > plus_n_O in ⊢ (? ? ? %).
+             assumption
+            |assumption
+            ]
+          |assumption
+          ]
+        |assumption
+        ]
+      |rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
+          [change in ⊢ (? ? ? %) with (O + sigma_p n1 p2 g2).
+           apply eq_f2
+            [simplify in H4.
+             rewrite > plus_n_O.
+             assumption
+            |assumption
+            ]
+          |assumption
+          ]
+        |assumption
+        ]
+      ]
+    |apply (bool_elim ? (p2 n1));intros
+      [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+          [change in ⊢ (? ? % ?) with (O + sigma_p n1 p1 g1).
+           apply eq_f2
+            [simplify in H4.
+             rewrite < plus_n_O in H4.
+             assumption
+            |assumption
+            ]
+          |assumption
+          ]
+        |assumption
+        ]
+      |rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
+          [assumption
+          |assumption
+          ]
+        |assumption
+        ]
+      ]
     ]
   ]
 qed.
-
+            
 theorem sigma_p2 : 
 \forall n,m:nat.
 \forall p1,p2:nat \to bool.
@@ -132,293 +195,323 @@ sigma_p (n*m)
 sigma_p n p1 
   (\lambda x.sigma_p m p2 (g x)).
 intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (iter_p_gen2 n m p1 p2 nat g O plus)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem sigma_p2' : 
+\forall n,m:nat.
+\forall p1:nat \to bool.
+\forall p2:nat \to nat \to bool.
+\forall g: nat \to nat \to nat.
+sigma_p (n*m) 
+  (\lambda x.andb (p1 (div x m)) (p2 (div x m) (mod x  m))) 
+  (\lambda x.g (div x m) (mod x m)) =
+sigma_p n p1 
+  (\lambda x.sigma_p m (p2 x) (g x)).
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (iter_p_gen2' n m p1 p2 nat g O plus)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+]
+qed.
+
+lemma sigma_p_gi: \forall g: nat \to nat.
+\forall n,i.\forall p:nat \to bool.i < n \to p i = true \to 
+sigma_p n p g = g i + sigma_p n (\lambda x. andb (p x) (notb (eqb x i))) g.
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (iter_p_gen_gi)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+| assumption
+| assumption
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem eq_sigma_p_gh: 
+\forall g,h,h1: nat \to nat.\forall n,n1.
+\forall p1,p2:nat \to bool.
+(\forall i. i < n \to p1 i = true \to p2 (h i) = true) \to
+(\forall i. i < n \to p1 i = true \to h1 (h i) = i) \to 
+(\forall i. i < n \to p1 i = true \to h i < n1) \to 
+(\forall j. j < n1 \to p2 j = true \to p1 (h1 j) = true) \to
+(\forall j. j < n1 \to p2 j = true \to h (h1 j) = j) \to 
+(\forall j. j < n1 \to p2 j = true \to h1 j < n) \to 
+sigma_p n p1 (\lambda x.g(h x)) = sigma_p n1 p2 g.
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (eq_iter_p_gen_gh nat O plus ? ? ? g h h1 n n1 p1 p2)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+| assumption
+| assumption
+| assumption
+| assumption
+| assumption
+| assumption
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem eq_sigma_p_pred: 
+\forall n,p,g. p O = true \to
+sigma_p (S n) (\lambda i.p (pred i)) (\lambda i.g(pred i)) = 
+plus (sigma_p n p g) (g O).
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply eq_iter_p_gen_pred
+  [assumption
+  |apply symmetricIntPlus
+  |apply associative_plus
+  |intros.apply sym_eq.apply plus_n_O
+  ]
+qed.
+
+(* monotonicity *)
+theorem le_sigma_p: 
+\forall n:nat. \forall p:nat \to bool. \forall g1,g2:nat \to nat.
+(\forall i. i < n \to p i = true \to g1 i \le g2 i ) \to 
+sigma_p n p g1 \le sigma_p n p g2.
+intros.
+generalize in match H.
 elim n
-  [simplify.reflexivity
-  |apply (bool_elim ? (p1 n1))
-    [intro.
-     rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn ? ? ? H1).
-     simplify in \vdash (? ? (? % ? ?) ?);
-     rewrite > sigma_p_plus.
-     rewrite < H.
-     apply eq_f2
-      [apply eq_sigma_p
-        [intros.
-         rewrite > sym_plus.
-         rewrite > (div_plus_times ? ? ? H2).
-         rewrite > (mod_plus_times ? ? ? H2).
-         rewrite > H1.
-         simplify.reflexivity
-        |intros.
-         rewrite > sym_plus.
-         rewrite > (div_plus_times ? ? ? H2).
-         rewrite > (mod_plus_times ? ? ? H2).
-         rewrite > H1.
-         simplify.reflexivity.   
+  [apply le_n.
+  |apply (bool_elim ? (p n1));intros
+    [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+      [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+        [apply le_plus
+          [apply H2[apply le_n|assumption]
+          |apply H1.
+           intros.
+           apply H2[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
+          ]
+        |assumption
         ]
-      |reflexivity
+      |assumption
       ]
-    |intro.
-     rewrite > (false_to_sigma_p_Sn ? ? ? H1).
-     simplify in \vdash (? ? (? % ? ?) ?);
-     rewrite > sigma_p_plus.
-     rewrite > H.
-     apply (trans_eq ? ? (O+(sigma_p n1 p1 (\lambda x:nat.sigma_p m p2 (g x)))))
-      [apply eq_f2
-        [rewrite > (eq_sigma_p ? (\lambda x.false) ? (\lambda x:nat.g ((x+n1*m)/m) ((x+n1*m)\mod m)))
-          [apply sigma_p_false
-          |intros.
-           rewrite > sym_plus.
-           rewrite > (div_plus_times ? ? ? H2).
-           rewrite > (mod_plus_times ? ? ? H2).
-           rewrite > H1.
-           simplify.reflexivity
-          |intros.reflexivity.
-          ]
-        |reflexivity
+    |rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
+      [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+        [apply H1.
+         intros.
+         apply H2[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
+        |assumption
         ]
-      |reflexivity   
+      |assumption
       ]
     ]
   ]
 qed.
 
-lemma sigma_p_gi: \forall g: nat \to nat.
-\forall n,i.\forall p:nat \to bool.i < n \to p i = true \to 
-sigma_p n p g = g i + sigma_p n (\lambda x. andb (p x) (notb (eqb x i))) g.
-intros 2.
+(* a slightly more general result *)
+theorem le_sigma_p1: 
+\forall n:nat. \forall p1,p2:nat \to bool. \forall g1,g2:nat \to nat.
+(\forall i. i < n \to 
+bool_to_nat (p1 i)*(g1 i) \le bool_to_nat (p2 i)*g2 i) \to 
+sigma_p n p1 g1 \le sigma_p n p2 g2.
+intros.
+generalize in match H.
 elim n
-  [apply False_ind.
-   apply (not_le_Sn_O i).
-   assumption
-  |apply (bool_elim ? (p n1));intro
-    [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq i n1)
+  [apply le_n.
+  |apply (bool_elim ? (p1 n1));intros
+    [apply (bool_elim ? (p2 n1));intros
       [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
-        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
-          [rewrite < assoc_plus.
-           rewrite < sym_plus in \vdash (? ? ? (? % ?)).
-           rewrite > assoc_plus.
-           apply eq_f2
-            [reflexivity
-            |apply H[assumption|assumption]
+        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+          [apply le_plus
+            [lapply (H2 n1) as H5
+              [rewrite > H3 in H5.
+               rewrite > H4 in H5.
+               simplify in H5.
+               rewrite < plus_n_O in H5.
+               rewrite < plus_n_O in H5.
+               assumption
+              |apply le_S_S.apply le_n
+              ]
+            |apply H1.intros.
+             apply H2.apply le_S.assumption
             ]
-          |rewrite > H3.simplify.
-           change with (notb (eqb n1 i) = notb false).
-           apply eq_f.
-           apply not_eq_to_eqb_false.
-           unfold Not.intro.
-           apply (lt_to_not_eq ? ? H4).
-           apply sym_eq.assumption
+          |assumption
           ]
         |assumption
         ]
       |rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
-        [rewrite > H4.
-         apply eq_f2
-          [reflexivity
-          |rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
-            [apply eq_sigma_p
-              [intros.
-               elim (p x)
-                [simplify.
-                 change with (notb false = notb (eqb x n1)).
-                 apply eq_f.
-                 apply sym_eq. 
-                 apply not_eq_to_eqb_false.
-                 apply (lt_to_not_eq ? ? H5)
-                |reflexivity
-                ]
-              |intros.reflexivity
+        [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+          [change in ⊢ (? ? %) with (O + sigma_p n1 p2 g2).
+           apply le_plus
+            [lapply (H2 n1) as H5
+              [rewrite > H3 in H5.
+               rewrite > H4 in H5.
+               simplify in H5.
+               rewrite < plus_n_O in H5.
+               assumption
+              |apply le_S_S.apply le_n
               ]
-            |rewrite > H3.
-             rewrite > (eq_to_eqb_true ? ? (refl_eq ? n1)).
-             reflexivity
+            |apply H1.intros.
+             apply H2.apply le_S.assumption
             ]
+          |assumption
           ]
         |assumption
         ]
-      |apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption
       ]
-    |rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
-      [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq i n1)
-        [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
-          [apply H[assumption|assumption]
-          |rewrite > H3.reflexivity
+    |apply (bool_elim ? (p2 n1));intros
+      [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+          [change in ⊢ (? % ?) with (O + sigma_p n1 p1 g1).
+           apply le_plus
+            [lapply (H2 n1) as H5
+              [rewrite > H3 in H5.
+               rewrite > H4 in H5.
+               simplify in H5.
+               rewrite < plus_n_O in H5.
+               assumption
+              |apply le_S_S.apply le_n
+              ]
+            |apply H1.intros.
+             apply H2.apply le_S.assumption
+            ]
+          |assumption
           ]
-        |apply False_ind. 
-         apply not_eq_true_false.
-         rewrite < H2.
-         rewrite > H4.
-         assumption
-        |apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption
+        |assumption
         ]
-      |assumption
-      ]
-    ] 
-  ] 
-qed.
-
-theorem eq_sigma_p_gh: 
-\forall g,h,h1: nat \to nat.\forall n,n1.
-\forall p1,p2:nat \to bool.
-(\forall i. i < n \to p1 i = true \to p2 (h i) = true) \to
-(\forall i. i < n \to p1 i = true \to h1 (h i) = i) \to 
-(\forall i. i < n \to p1 i = true \to h i < n1) \to 
-(\forall j. j < n1 \to p2 j = true \to p1 (h1 j) = true) \to
-(\forall j. j < n1 \to p2 j = true \to h (h1 j) = j) \to 
-(\forall j. j < n1 \to p2 j = true \to h1 j < n) \to 
-sigma_p n p1 (\lambda x.g(h x)) = sigma_p n1 (\lambda x.p2 x) g.
-intros 4.
-elim n
-  [generalize in match H5.
-   elim n1
-    [reflexivity
-    |apply (bool_elim ? (p2 n2));intro
-      [apply False_ind.
-       apply (not_le_Sn_O (h1 n2)).
-       apply H7
-        [apply le_n|assumption]
       |rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
-        [apply H6.
-         intros.  
-            apply H7[apply le_S.apply H9|assumption]
+        [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+          [apply H1.intros.
+           apply H2.apply le_S.assumption
+          |assumption
+          ]
         |assumption
         ]
       ]
     ]
-  |apply (bool_elim ? (p1 n1));intro
-    [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
-      [rewrite > (sigma_p_gi g n2 (h n1))
-        [apply eq_f2
-          [reflexivity
-          |apply H
-            [intros.
-             rewrite > H1
-              [simplify.
-               change with ((\not eqb (h i) (h n1))= \not false).
-               apply eq_f.
-               apply not_eq_to_eqb_false.
-               unfold Not.intro.
-               apply (lt_to_not_eq ? ? H8).
-               rewrite < H2
-                [rewrite < (H2 n1)
-                  [apply eq_f.assumption|apply le_n|assumption]
-                |apply le_S.assumption
-                |assumption
-                ]
-              |apply le_S.assumption
+  ]
+qed.    
+
+theorem lt_sigma_p: 
+\forall n:nat. \forall p:nat \to bool. \forall g1,g2:nat \to nat.
+(\forall i. i < n \to p i = true \to g1 i \le g2 i ) \to
+(\exists i. i < n \and (p i = true) \and (g1 i < g2 i)) \to
+sigma_p n p g1 < sigma_p n p g2.
+intros 4.
+elim n
+  [elim H1.clear H1.
+   elim H2.clear H2.
+   elim H1.clear H1.
+   apply False_ind.
+   apply (lt_to_not_le ? ? H2).
+   apply le_O_n
+  |apply (bool_elim ? (p n1));intros
+    [apply (bool_elim ? (leb (S (g1 n1)) (g2 n1)));intros
+      [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+          [change with 
+           (S (g1 n1)+sigma_p n1 p g1 \le g2 n1+sigma_p n1 p g2).
+           apply le_plus
+            [apply leb_true_to_le.assumption
+            |apply le_sigma_p.intros.
+             apply H1
+              [apply lt_to_le.apply le_S_S.assumption
               |assumption
               ]
-            |intros.
-             apply H2[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
-            |intros.
-             apply H3[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
-            |intros.
-             apply H4
-              [assumption
-              |generalize in match H9.
-               elim (p2 j)
-                [reflexivity|assumption]
-              ]
-            |intros.
-             apply H5
-              [assumption
-              |generalize in match H9.
-               elim (p2 j)
-                [reflexivity|assumption]
+            ]
+          |assumption
+          ]
+        |assumption
+        ]
+      |rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+        [rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+          [unfold lt.
+           rewrite > plus_n_Sm.
+           apply le_plus
+            [apply H1
+              [apply le_n
+              |assumption
               ]
-            |intros.
-             elim (le_to_or_lt_eq (h1 j) n1)
-              [assumption
-              |generalize in match H9.
-               elim (p2 j)
-                [simplify in H11.
-                 absurd (j = (h n1))
-                  [rewrite < H10.
-                   rewrite > H5
-                    [reflexivity|assumption|autobatch]
-                  |apply eqb_false_to_not_eq.
-                   generalize in match H11.
-                   elim (eqb j (h n1))
-                    [apply sym_eq.assumption|reflexivity]
-                  ]
-                |simplify in H11.
-                 apply False_ind.
-                 apply not_eq_true_false.
-                 apply sym_eq.assumption
+            |apply H
+              [intros.apply H1
+                [apply lt_to_le.apply le_S_S.assumption
+                |assumption
                 ]
-              |apply le_S_S_to_le.
-               apply H6
-                [assumption
-                |generalize in match H9.
-                 elim (p2 j)
-                  [reflexivity|assumption]
+              |elim H2.clear H2.
+               elim H5.clear H5.
+               elim H2.clear H2.
+               apply (ex_intro ? ? a).
+               split
+                [split
+                  [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq a n1)
+                    [assumption
+                    |absurd (g1 a < g2 a)
+                      [assumption
+                      |apply leb_false_to_not_le.
+                       rewrite > H2.
+                       assumption
+                      ]
+                    |apply le_S_S_to_le.
+                     assumption
+                    ]
+                  |assumption
+                  ]
+                |assumption
                 ]
               ]
             ]
+          |assumption
           ]
-        |apply H3[apply le_n|assumption]
-        |apply H1[apply le_n|assumption]
+        |assumption
         ]
-      |assumption
       ]
     |rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn
-     [apply H
-       [intros.apply H1[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
-       |intros.apply H2[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
-       |intros.apply H3[apply le_S.assumption|assumption]
-       |intros.apply H4[assumption|assumption]
-       |intros.apply H5[assumption|assumption]
-       |intros.
-        elim (le_to_or_lt_eq (h1 j) n1)
-          [assumption
-          |absurd (j = (h n1))
-            [rewrite < H10.
-             rewrite > H5
-               [reflexivity|assumption|assumption]
-            |unfold Not.intro.
-             apply not_eq_true_false.
-             rewrite < H7.
-             rewrite < H10.
-             rewrite > H4
-              [reflexivity|assumption|assumption]
+      [rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn in ⊢ (? ? %)
+        [apply H
+          [intros.apply H1
+            [apply lt_to_le.apply le_S_S.assumption
+            |assumption
+            ]
+          |elim H2.clear H2.
+           elim H4.clear H4.
+           elim H2.clear H2.
+           apply (ex_intro ? ? a).
+           split
+            [split
+              [elim (le_to_or_lt_eq a n1)
+                [assumption
+                |apply False_ind.
+                 apply not_eq_true_false.
+                 rewrite < H6.
+                 rewrite < H3.
+                 rewrite < H2. 
+                 reflexivity
+                |apply le_S_S_to_le.
+                 assumption
+                ]
+              |assumption
+              ]
+            |assumption
             ]
-          |apply le_S_S_to_le.
-           apply H6[assumption|assumption]
           ]
+        |assumption
         ]
       |assumption
       ]
     ]
   ]
 qed.
-
-definition p_ord_times \def
-\lambda p,m,x.
-  match p_ord x p with
-  [pair q r \Rightarrow r*m+q].
-  
-theorem  eq_p_ord_times: \forall p,m,x.
-p_ord_times p m x = (ord_rem x p)*m+(ord x p).
-intros.unfold p_ord_times. unfold ord_rem.
-unfold ord.
-elim (p_ord x p).
-reflexivity.
-qed.
-
-theorem div_p_ord_times: 
-\forall p,m,x. ord x p < m \to p_ord_times p m x / m = ord_rem x p.
-intros.rewrite > eq_p_ord_times.
-apply div_plus_times.
-assumption.
-qed.
-
-theorem mod_p_ord_times: 
-\forall p,m,x. ord x p < m \to p_ord_times p m x \mod m = ord x p.
-intros.rewrite > eq_p_ord_times.
-apply mod_plus_times.
-assumption.
-qed.
-
+          
 theorem sigma_p_divides: 
 \forall n,m,p:nat.O < n \to prime p \to Not (divides p n) \to 
 \forall g: nat \to nat.
@@ -426,258 +519,464 @@ sigma_p (S (n*(exp p m))) (\lambda x.divides_b x (n*(exp p m))) g =
 sigma_p (S n) (\lambda x.divides_b x n)
   (\lambda x.sigma_p (S m) (\lambda y.true) (\lambda y.g (x*(exp p y)))).
 intros.
-cut (O < p)
-  [rewrite < sigma_p2.
-   apply (trans_eq ? ? 
-    (sigma_p (S n*S m) (\lambda x:nat.divides_b (x/S m) n)
-       (\lambda x:nat.g (x/S m*(p)\sup(x\mod S m)))))
-    [apply sym_eq.
-     apply (eq_sigma_p_gh g ? (p_ord_times p (S m)))
-      [intros.
-       lapply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? H H4).
-       apply divides_to_divides_b_true
-        [rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-         apply lt_times
-          [assumption
-          |apply lt_O_exp.assumption
-          ]
-        |apply divides_times
-          [apply divides_b_true_to_divides.assumption
-          |apply (witness ? ? (p \sup (m-i \mod (S m)))).
-           rewrite < exp_plus_times.
-           apply eq_f.
-           rewrite > sym_plus.
-           apply plus_minus_m_m.
-           autobatch
-          ]
+unfold sigma_p.
+apply (iter_p_gen_divides nat O plus n m p ? ? ? g)
+[ assumption
+| assumption
+| assumption
+| apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem distributive_times_plus_sigma_p: \forall n,k:nat. \forall p:nat \to bool. \forall g:nat \to nat.
+k*(sigma_p n p g) = sigma_p n p (\lambda i:nat.k * (g i)).
+intros.
+apply (distributive_times_plus_iter_p_gen nat plus O times n k p g)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intros.
+  apply sym_eq.
+  apply plus_n_O
+| apply symmetric_times
+| apply distributive_times_plus
+| intros.
+  rewrite < (times_n_O a).
+  reflexivity
+]
+qed.
+
+(*some properties of sigma_p invoked with an "always true" predicate (in this 
+  way sigma_p just counts the elements, without doing any control) or with
+  the nat \to nat function which always returns (S O).
+  It 's not easily possible proving these theorems in a general form 
+  in generic_sigma_p.ma
+ *)
+
+theorem sigma_p_true: \forall n:nat.
+(sigma_p n (\lambda x.true) (\lambda x.S O)) = n.
+intros.
+elim n
+[ simplify.
+  reflexivity
+| rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn n1 (\lambda x:nat.true) (\lambda x:nat.S O))
+  [ rewrite > H.
+    simplify.
+    reflexivity
+  | reflexivity 
+  ]
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem sigma_P_SO_to_sigma_p_true: \forall n:nat. \forall g:nat \to bool.
+sigma_p n g (\lambda n:nat. (S O)) = 
+sigma_p n (\lambda x:nat.true) (\lambda i:nat.bool_to_nat (g i)).
+intros.
+elim n
+[ simplify.
+  reflexivity
+| cut ((g n1) = true \lor (g n1) = false)
+  [ rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in \vdash (? ? ? %)
+    [ elim Hcut
+      [ rewrite > H1.
+        rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn in \vdash (? ? % ?)
+        [ simplify.
+          apply eq_f.
+          assumption
+        | assumption
         ]
-      |intros.
-       lapply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? H H4).
-       unfold p_ord_times.
-       rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? (i \mod (S m)) (i/S m))
-        [change with ((i/S m)*S m+i \mod S m=i).
-         apply sym_eq.
-         apply div_mod.
-         apply lt_O_S
-        |assumption
-        |unfold Not.intro.
-         apply H2.
-         apply (trans_divides ? (i/ S m))
-          [assumption|
-           apply divides_b_true_to_divides;assumption]
-        |apply sym_times.
+      | rewrite > H1.
+        rewrite > false_to_sigma_p_Sn in \vdash (? ? % ?)
+        [ simplify.
+          assumption
+        | assumption
         ]
-      |intros.
-       apply le_S_S.
-       apply le_times
-        [apply le_S_S_to_le.
-         change with ((i/S m) < S n).
-         apply (lt_times_to_lt_l m).
-         apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? i)
-          [autobatch|assumption]
-        |apply le_exp
-          [assumption
-          |apply le_S_S_to_le.
-           apply lt_mod_m_m.
-           apply lt_O_S
+      ]
+    | reflexivity
+    ]
+  | elim (g n1)
+    [ left.
+      reflexivity
+    | right.
+      reflexivity
+    ]
+  ]
+]
+qed.
+
+(* I introduce an equivalence in the form map_iter_i in order to use
+ * the existing result about permutation in that part of the library.
+ *) 
+ 
+theorem eq_map_iter_i_sigma_p_alwaysTrue:  \forall n:nat.\forall g:nat \to nat. 
+map_iter_i n g plus O = sigma_p (S n) (\lambda c:nat.true) g.
+intros.
+elim n
+[ simplify.
+  rewrite < plus_n_O.
+  reflexivity
+| rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+  [ simplify in \vdash (? ? % ?).
+    rewrite < plus_n_O.
+    apply eq_f.
+    assumption
+  | reflexivity
+  ]
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem sigma_p_plus_1: \forall n:nat. \forall f,g:nat \to nat.
+sigma_p n (\lambda b:nat. true) (\lambda a:nat.(f a) + (g a)) = 
+sigma_p n (\lambda b:nat. true) f + sigma_p n (\lambda b:nat. true) g.
+intros.
+elim n
+[ simplify.
+  reflexivity
+| rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+  [ rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn n1 (\lambda c:nat.true) f)
+    [ rewrite > (true_to_sigma_p_Sn n1 (\lambda c:nat.true) g)
+      [ rewrite > assoc_plus in \vdash (? ? ? %).
+        rewrite < assoc_plus in \vdash (? ? ? (? ? %)).
+        rewrite < sym_plus in \vdash (? ? ? (? ? (? % ?))).
+        rewrite > assoc_plus in \vdash (? ? ? (? ? %)).
+        rewrite < assoc_plus in \vdash (? ? ? %).
+        apply eq_f.
+        assumption
+      | reflexivity
+      ]
+    | reflexivity
+    ]
+  | reflexivity
+  ]
+]
+qed.
+
+
+theorem eq_sigma_p_sigma_p_times1 : \forall n,m:nat.\forall f:nat \to nat.
+sigma_p (n*m) (\lambda x:nat.true) f =
+sigma_p m (\lambda x:nat.true) 
+    (\lambda a.(sigma_p n (\lambda x:nat.true) (\lambda b.f (b*m + a)))).
+intro.
+elim n
+[ simplify.
+  elim m
+  [ simplify.
+    reflexivity
+  | rewrite > true_to_sigma_p_Sn
+    [ rewrite < H.
+      reflexivity
+    | reflexivity
+    ]
+  ]
+| change in \vdash (? ? ? (? ? ? (\lambda a:?.%))) with ((f ((n1*m)+a)) + 
+  (sigma_p n1 (\lambda x:nat.true) (\lambda b:nat.f (b*m +a)))).
+  rewrite > sigma_p_plus_1 in \vdash (? ? ? %).
+  rewrite > (sym_times (S n1) m).
+  rewrite < (times_n_Sm m  n1).
+  rewrite > sigma_p_plus in \vdash (? ? % ?).
+  apply eq_f2
+  [ rewrite < (sym_times m n1).
+    apply eq_sigma_p
+    [ intros. 
+      reflexivity
+    | intros.
+      rewrite < (sym_plus ? (m * n1)).
+      reflexivity
+    ]
+  | rewrite > (sym_times m n1).
+    apply H
+  ]
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem eq_sigma_p_sigma_p_times2 : \forall n,m:nat.\forall f:nat \to nat.
+sigma_p (n *m) (\lambda c:nat.true) f =
+sigma_p  n (\lambda c:nat.true) 
+  (\lambda a.(sigma_p m (\lambda c:nat.true) (\lambda b:nat.f (b* n + a)))).
+intros.
+rewrite > sym_times.
+apply eq_sigma_p_sigma_p_times1.
+qed.
+
+theorem sigma_p_times:\forall n,m:nat. 
+\forall f,f1,f2:nat \to bool.
+\forall g:nat \to nat \to nat. 
+\forall g1,g2: nat \to nat.
+(\forall a,b:nat. a < (S n) \to b < (S m) \to (g b a) < (S n)*(S m)) \to
+(\forall a,b:nat. a < (S n) \to b < (S m) \to (g1 (g b a)) = a) \to
+(\forall a,b:nat. a < (S n) \to b < (S m) \to (g2 (g b a)) = b) \to
+(\forall a,b:nat. a < (S n) \to b < (S m) \to f (g b a) = andb (f2 b) (f1 a)) \to
+(sigma_p ((S n) * (S m)) f (\lambda c:nat.(S O))) = 
+sigma_p (S n) f1 (\lambda c:nat.(S O)) * sigma_p (S m) f2 (\lambda c:nat.(S O)). 
+intros.
+
+rewrite > (sigma_P_SO_to_sigma_p_true ).
+rewrite > (S_pred ((S n)*(S m))) in \vdash (? ? (? % ? ?) ?)
+[ rewrite < (eq_map_iter_i_sigma_p_alwaysTrue (pred ((S n)* (S m)))).
+  rewrite > (permut_to_eq_map_iter_i plus assoc_plus sym_plus ? ? ? 
+           (\lambda i.g (div i (S n)) (mod i (S n))))
+  [ rewrite > eq_map_iter_i_sigma_p_alwaysTrue.
+    rewrite < S_pred
+    [ rewrite > eq_sigma_p_sigma_p_times2.
+      apply (trans_eq ? ? (sigma_p (S n)  (\lambda c:nat.true) 
+        (\lambda a. sigma_p (S m) (\lambda c:nat.true) 
+                (\lambda b.(bool_to_nat (f2 b))*(bool_to_nat (f1 a))))))
+      [ apply eq_sigma_p;intros
+        [ reflexivity
+        | apply eq_sigma_p;intros
+          [ reflexivity
+          | 
+            rewrite > (div_mod_spec_to_eq (x1*(S n) + x) (S n) ((x1*(S n) + x)/(S n)) 
+                                                  ((x1*(S n) + x) \mod (S n)) x1 x)
+            [ rewrite > (div_mod_spec_to_eq2 (x1*(S n) + x) (S n) ((x1*(S n) + x)/(S n)) 
+                                                  ((x1*(S n) + x) \mod (S n)) x1 x)
+              [ rewrite > H3
+                [ apply bool_to_nat_andb
+                | assumption
+                | assumption
+                ]
+              | apply div_mod_spec_div_mod.
+                apply lt_O_S
+              | constructor 1
+                [ assumption
+                | reflexivity
+                ]
+              ]
+            | apply div_mod_spec_div_mod.
+              apply lt_O_S
+            | constructor 1
+              [ assumption
+              | reflexivity
+              ]
+            ]
           ]
         ]
-      |intros.
-       cut (ord j p < S m)
-        [rewrite > div_p_ord_times
-          [apply divides_to_divides_b_true
-            [apply lt_O_ord_rem
-             [elim H1.assumption
-             |apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-               rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-               apply lt_times
-               [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-             ]
-           |cut (n = ord_rem (n*(exp p m)) p)
-              [rewrite > Hcut2.
-               apply divides_to_divides_ord_rem
-                [apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-                 rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-                 apply lt_times
-                 [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-                 |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-                   apply lt_times
-                  [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-               |assumption
-               |apply divides_b_true_to_divides.
-                assumption
-               ]
-              |unfold ord_rem.
-              rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? m n)
-                [reflexivity
-               |assumption
-                |assumption
-               |apply sym_times
-               ]
-             ]
+      | apply (trans_eq ? ? 
+         (sigma_p (S n) (\lambda c:nat.true) (\lambda n.((bool_to_nat (f1 n)) *
+         (sigma_p (S m) (\lambda c:nat.true) (\lambda n.bool_to_nat (f2 n)))))))
+        [ apply eq_sigma_p;intros
+          [ reflexivity
+          | rewrite > distributive_times_plus_sigma_p.
+            apply eq_sigma_p;intros
+            [ reflexivity
+            | rewrite > sym_times. 
+              reflexivity
             ]
-          |assumption
           ]
-        |cut (m = ord (n*(exp p m)) p)
-          [apply le_S_S.
-           rewrite > Hcut1.
-           apply divides_to_le_ord
-            [apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-             rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-             apply lt_times
-              [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-            |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-             apply lt_times
-              [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-            |assumption
-            |apply divides_b_true_to_divides.
-             assumption
+        | apply sym_eq.
+          rewrite > sigma_P_SO_to_sigma_p_true.
+          rewrite > sigma_P_SO_to_sigma_p_true in \vdash (? ? (? ? %) ?).
+          rewrite > sym_times. 
+          rewrite > distributive_times_plus_sigma_p.
+          apply eq_sigma_p;intros
+          [ reflexivity
+          | rewrite > distributive_times_plus_sigma_p.
+            rewrite < sym_times.
+            rewrite > distributive_times_plus_sigma_p.
+            apply eq_sigma_p;
+              intros; reflexivity            
+          ]
+        ]
+      ]
+    | apply lt_O_times_S_S
+    ]
+    
+  | unfold permut.
+    split
+    [ intros.
+      rewrite < plus_n_O.
+      apply le_S_S_to_le.
+      rewrite < S_pred in \vdash (? ? %)
+      [ change with ((g (i/(S n)) (i \mod (S n))) \lt (S n)*(S m)).
+        apply H
+        [ apply lt_mod_m_m.
+          unfold lt. 
+          apply le_S_S.
+          apply le_O_n 
+        | apply (lt_times_to_lt_l n).
+          apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? i)
+          [ rewrite > (div_mod i (S n)) in \vdash (? ? %)
+            [ rewrite > sym_plus.
+              apply le_plus_n
+            | unfold lt. 
+              apply le_S_S.
+              apply le_O_n
             ]
-          |unfold ord.
-           rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? m n)
-            [reflexivity
-            |assumption
-            |assumption
-            |apply sym_times
+          | unfold lt.
+            rewrite > S_pred in \vdash (? ? %)
+            [ apply le_S_S.
+              rewrite > plus_n_O in \vdash (? ? %).
+              rewrite > sym_times. 
+              assumption
+            | apply lt_O_times_S_S
             ]
           ]
         ]
-      |intros.
-       cut (ord j p < S m)
-        [rewrite > div_p_ord_times
-          [rewrite > mod_p_ord_times
-            [rewrite > sym_times.
-             apply sym_eq.
-             apply exp_ord
-              [elim H1.assumption
-              |apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-               rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-               apply lt_times
-                [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
+      | apply lt_O_times_S_S
+      ]
+    | rewrite < plus_n_O.
+      unfold injn.
+      intros.
+      cut (i < (S n)*(S m))
+      [ cut (j < (S n)*(S m))
+        [ cut ((i \mod (S n)) < (S n))
+          [ cut ((i/(S n)) < (S m))
+            [ cut ((j \mod (S n)) < (S n))
+              [ cut ((j/(S n)) < (S m))
+                [ rewrite > (div_mod i (S n))
+                  [ rewrite > (div_mod j (S n))
+                    [ rewrite < (H1 (i \mod (S n)) (i/(S n)) Hcut2 Hcut3).
+                      rewrite < (H2 (i \mod (S n)) (i/(S n)) Hcut2 Hcut3) in \vdash (? ? (? % ?) ?).
+                      rewrite < (H1 (j \mod (S n)) (j/(S n)) Hcut4 Hcut5).
+                      rewrite < (H2 (j \mod (S n)) (j/(S n)) Hcut4 Hcut5) in \vdash (? ? ? (? % ?)).
+                      rewrite > H6.
+                      reflexivity
+                    | unfold lt.
+                      apply le_S_S.
+                      apply le_O_n
+                    ]
+                  | unfold lt. 
+                    apply le_S_S.
+                    apply le_O_n
+                  ]
+                | apply (lt_times_to_lt_l n).
+                  apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? j)
+                  [ rewrite > (div_mod j (S n)) in \vdash (? ? %)
+                    [ rewrite > sym_plus.
+                      apply le_plus_n
+                    | unfold lt. apply le_S_S.
+                      apply le_O_n
+                    ]
+                  | rewrite < sym_times. 
+                    assumption                    
+                  ]
+                ]
+              | apply lt_mod_m_m.
+                unfold lt. 
+                apply le_S_S.
+                apply le_O_n
               ]
-           |cut (m = ord (n*(exp p m)) p)
-             [apply le_S_S.
-              rewrite > Hcut2.
-              apply divides_to_le_ord
-               [apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-                rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-                apply lt_times
-                 [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-               |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-                apply lt_times
-                 [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-               |assumption
-               |apply divides_b_true_to_divides.
-                assumption
-               ]
-             |unfold ord.
-              rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? m n)
-                [reflexivity
-                |assumption
-                |assumption
-                |apply sym_times
+            | apply (lt_times_to_lt_l n).
+              apply (le_to_lt_to_lt ? i)
+              [ rewrite > (div_mod i (S n)) in \vdash (? ? %)
+                [ rewrite > sym_plus.
+                  apply le_plus_n
+                | unfold lt. 
+                  apply le_S_S.
+                  apply le_O_n
                 ]
+              | rewrite < sym_times. 
+                assumption
               ]
             ]
-          |assumption
+          | apply lt_mod_m_m.
+            unfold lt. 
+            apply le_S_S.
+            apply le_O_n
           ]
-        |cut (m = ord (n*(exp p m)) p)
-          [apply le_S_S.
-           rewrite > Hcut1.
-           apply divides_to_le_ord
-            [apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-             rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-             apply lt_times
-              [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-            |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-             apply lt_times
-              [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-            |assumption
-            |apply divides_b_true_to_divides.
-             assumption
-            ]
-          |unfold ord.
-           rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? m n)
-            [reflexivity
-            |assumption
-            |assumption
-            |apply sym_times
-            ]
+        | unfold lt.
+          rewrite > S_pred in \vdash (? ? %)
+          [ apply le_S_S.
+            assumption
+          | apply lt_O_times_S_S 
           ]
         ]
-      |intros.
-       rewrite > eq_p_ord_times.
-       rewrite > sym_plus.
-       apply (lt_to_le_to_lt ? (S m +ord_rem j p*S m))
-        [apply lt_plus_l.
-         apply le_S_S.
-         cut (m = ord (n*(p \sup m)) p)
-          [rewrite > Hcut1.
-           apply divides_to_le_ord
-            [apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-             rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-             apply lt_times
-              [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-            |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-             apply lt_times
-              [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-            |assumption
-            |apply divides_b_true_to_divides.
-             assumption
-            ]
-          |unfold ord.
-           rewrite > sym_times.
-           rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? m n)
-            [reflexivity
-            |assumption
-            |assumption
-            |reflexivity
-            ]
-          ]
-        |change with (S (ord_rem j p)*S m \le S n*S m).
-         apply le_times_l.
-         apply le_S_S.
-         cut (n = ord_rem (n*(p \sup m)) p)
-          [rewrite > Hcut1.
-           apply divides_to_le
-            [apply lt_O_ord_rem
-              [elim H1.assumption
-              |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-               apply lt_times
-                [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-              ]
-            |apply divides_to_divides_ord_rem
-              [apply (divides_b_true_to_lt_O ? ? ? H4).
-               rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-               apply lt_times
-                [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-              |rewrite > (times_n_O O).
-               apply lt_times
-                [assumption|apply lt_O_exp.assumption]
-              |assumption
-              |apply divides_b_true_to_divides.
-               assumption
-              ]
-            ]
-        |unfold ord_rem.
-         rewrite > sym_times.
-         rewrite > (p_ord_exp1 p ? m n)
-          [reflexivity
-          |assumption
-          |assumption
-          |reflexivity
-          ]
+      | unfold lt.
+        rewrite > S_pred in \vdash (? ? %)
+        [ apply le_S_S.
+          assumption
+        | apply lt_O_times_S_S 
         ]
       ]
     ]
-  |apply eq_sigma_p
-    [intros.
-     elim (divides_b (x/S m) n);reflexivity
-    |intros.reflexivity
-    ]
+  | intros.
+    apply False_ind.
+    apply (not_le_Sn_O m1 H4)
   ]
-|elim H1.apply lt_to_le.assumption
+| apply lt_O_times_S_S
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem sigma_p_knm: 
+\forall g: nat \to nat.
+\forall h2:nat \to nat \to nat.
+\forall h11,h12:nat \to nat. 
+\forall k,n,m.
+\forall p1,p21:nat \to bool.
+\forall p22:nat \to nat \to bool.
+(\forall x. x < k \to p1 x = true \to 
+p21 (h11 x) = true \land p22 (h11 x) (h12 x) = true
+\land h2 (h11 x) (h12 x) = x 
+\land (h11 x) < n \land (h12 x) < m) \to
+(\forall i,j. i < n \to j < m \to p21 i = true \to p22 i j = true \to 
+p1 (h2 i j) = true \land 
+h11 (h2 i j) = i \land h12 (h2 i j) = j
+\land h2 i j < k) \to
+sigma_p k p1 g=
+sigma_p n p21 (\lambda x:nat.sigma_p m (p22 x) (\lambda y. g (h2 x y))).
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+unfold sigma_p in \vdash (? ? ? (? ? ? ? (\lambda x:?.%) ? ?)).
+apply iter_p_gen_knm
+  [apply symmetricIntPlus
+  |apply associative_plus
+  |intro.rewrite < plus_n_O.reflexivity
+  |exact h11
+  |exact h12
+  |assumption
+  |assumption
+  ]
+qed.
+  
+  
+theorem sigma_p2_eq: 
+\forall g: nat \to nat \to nat.
+\forall h11,h12,h21,h22: nat \to nat \to nat. 
+\forall n1,m1,n2,m2.
+\forall p11,p21:nat \to bool.
+\forall p12,p22:nat \to nat \to bool.
+(\forall i,j. i < n2 \to j < m2 \to p21 i = true \to p22 i j = true \to 
+p11 (h11 i j) = true \land p12 (h11 i j) (h12 i j) = true
+\land h21 (h11 i j) (h12 i j) = i \land h22 (h11 i j) (h12 i j) = j
+\land h11 i j < n1 \land h12 i j < m1) \to
+(\forall i,j. i < n1 \to j < m1 \to p11 i = true \to p12 i j = true \to 
+p21 (h21 i j) = true \land p22 (h21 i j) (h22 i j) = true
+\land h11 (h21 i j) (h22 i j) = i \land h12 (h21 i j) (h22 i j) = j
+\land (h21 i j) < n2 \land (h22 i j) < m2) \to
+sigma_p n1 p11 (\lambda x:nat .sigma_p m1 (p12 x) (\lambda y. g x y)) =
+sigma_p n2 p21 (\lambda x:nat .sigma_p m2 (p22 x) (\lambda y. g (h11 x y) (h12 x y))).
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.
+unfold sigma_p in \vdash (? ? (? ? ? ? (\lambda x:?.%) ? ?) ?).
+unfold sigma_p in \vdash (? ? ? (? ? ? ? (\lambda x:?.%) ? ?)).
+
+apply(iter_p_gen_2_eq nat O plus ? ? ? g h11 h12 h21 h22 n1 m1 n2 m2 p11 p21 p12 p22)
+[ apply symmetricIntPlus
+| apply associative_plus
+| intro.
+  rewrite < (plus_n_O).
+  reflexivity
+| assumption
+| assumption
 ]
 qed.
-    
 
+theorem sigma_p_sigma_p: 
+\forall g: nat \to nat \to nat.
+\forall n,m.
+\forall p11,p21:nat \to bool.
+\forall p12,p22:nat \to nat \to bool.
+(\forall x,y. x < n \to y < m \to 
+ (p11 x \land p12 x y) = (p21 y \land p22 y x)) \to
+sigma_p n p11 (\lambda x:nat.sigma_p m (p12 x) (\lambda y. g x y)) =
+sigma_p m p21 (\lambda y:nat.sigma_p n (p22 y) (\lambda x. g x y)).
+intros.
+unfold sigma_p.unfold sigma_p.
+apply (iter_p_gen_iter_p_gen ? ? ? sym_plus assoc_plus)
+  [intros.apply sym_eq.apply plus_n_O.
+  |assumption
+  ]
+qed.
\ No newline at end of file