X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=matita%2Fhelp%2FC%2Fsec_terms.xml;h=05385f666b3a41ad4267a1977c0e8c8dac9aa4d5;hb=1be6639bbfa31fcbb49f0017016c78ebafe10453;hp=11b06b21cab7269c8bd3bd2867ed8bc48b31f1c5;hpb=27a70cc8c150c426956005e95b432b3a34ff36c0;p=helm.git diff --git a/matita/help/C/sec_terms.xml b/matita/help/C/sec_terms.xml index 11b06b21c..05385f666 100644 --- a/matita/help/C/sec_terms.xml +++ b/matita/help/C/sec_terms.xml @@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ Terms & co. Lexical conventions + + qstring + + + + &qstring; + ::= + "〈〈any sequence of characters excluded "〉〉" + + + +
id @@ -186,7 +198,7 @@ &rec_def; ::= - &id; [&id;|(&id;[,&term;]… :&term;)]… + &id; [&id;|_|(&id;[,&id;]… :&term;)]… @@ -194,7 +206,7 @@ - [on &nat;] + [on &id;] [: &term;] ≝ &term;] @@ -242,6 +254,12 @@ Set the impredicate sort of datatypes + + + | + CProp + one fixed predicative sort of constructive propositions + | @@ -267,7 +285,7 @@ | match &term; - [ in &term; ] + [ in &id; ] [ return &term; ] with @@ -369,6 +387,12 @@ (&id; &id; [&id;]…) n-ary constructor (binds the n arguments) + + + | + &id; &id; [&id;]… + n-ary constructor (binds the n arguments) +
@@ -399,6 +423,11 @@ f must be defined by means of tactics. Notice that the command is equivalent to theorem f: T ≝ t.
+ + <emphasis role="bold">letrec</emphasis> &TODO; + &TODO; + &TODO; + [<emphasis role="bold">inductive</emphasis>|<emphasis role="bold">coinductive</emphasis>] &id; [&args2;]… <emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis> &term; <emphasis role="bold">≝</emphasis> [<emphasis role="bold">|</emphasis>] [&id;<emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis>&term;] [<emphasis role="bold">|</emphasis> &id;<emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis>&term;]… [<emphasis role="bold">with</emphasis> &id; <emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis> &term; <emphasis role="bold">≝</emphasis> [<emphasis role="bold">|</emphasis>] [&id;<emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis>&term;] [<emphasis role="bold">|</emphasis> &id;<emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis>&term;]…]… @@ -473,7 +502,7 @@ <para>Notice that the command is equivalent to <command>definition f: T ≝ t</command>.</para> </sect2> <sect2 id="variant"> - <title><emphasis role="bold">variant</emphasis> &id;[<emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis> &term;] [<emphasis role="bold">≝</emphasis> &term;] + <emphasis role="bold">variant</emphasis> &id;<emphasis role="bold">:</emphasis> &term; <emphasis role="bold">≝</emphasis> &term; variant variant f: T ≝ t Same as theorem f: T ≝ t, but it does not @@ -531,12 +560,98 @@ &pattern; ::= - &TODO; + in + [&id;[: &path;]]… + [⊢ &path;]] + simple pattern + + + + | + in match &term; + [in + [&id;[: &path;]]… + [⊢ &path;]] + full pattern + + + + + + path + + + + &path; + ::= + 〈〈any &sterm; whithout occurrences of Set, Prop, CProp, Type, &id;, &uri; and user provided notation; however, % is now an additional production for &sterm;〉〉
- &TODO; + A path locates zero or more subterms of a given term by mimicking the term structure up to: + + Occurrences of the subterms to locate that are + represented by %. + Subterms without any occurrence of subterms to locate + that can be represented by ?. + + + For instance, the path + ∀_,_:?.(? ? % ?)→(? ? ? %) + locates at once the subterms + x+y and x*y in the + term ∀x,y:nat.x+y=1→0=x*y + (where the notation A=B hides the term + (eq T A B) for some type T). + + A simple pattern extends paths to locate + subterms in a whole sequent. In particular, the pattern + in H: p K: q ⊢ r locates at once all the subterms + located by the pattern r in the conclusion of the + sequent and by the patterns p and + q in the hypotheses H + and K of the sequent. + + If no list of hypotheses is provided in a simple pattern, no subterm + is selected in the hypothesis. If the ⊢ p + part of the pattern is not provided, no subterm will be matched in the + conclusion if at least one hypothesis is provided; otherwise the whole + conclusion is selected. + + Finally, a full pattern is interpreted in three + steps. In the first step the match T in + part is ignored and a set S of subterms is + located as for the case of + simple patterns. In the second step the term T + is parsed and interpreted in the context of each subterm + s ∈ S. In the last term for each + s ∈ S the interpreted term T + computed in the previous step is looked for. The final set of subterms + located by the full pattern is the set of occurrences of + the interpreted T in the subterms s. + + A full pattern can always be replaced by a simple pattern, + often at the cost of increased verbosity or decreased readability. + Example: the pattern + ⊢ in match x+y in ∀_,_:?.(? ? % ?) + locates only the first occurrence of x+y + in the sequent x,y: nat ⊢ ∀z,w:nat. (x+y) * (z+w) = + z * (x+y) + w * (x+y). The corresponding simple pattern + is ⊢ ∀_,_:?.(? ? (? % ?) ?). + + Every tactic that acts on subterms of the selected sequents have + a pattern argument for uniformity. To automatically generate a simple + pattern: + + Select in the current goal the subterms to pass to the + tactic by using the mouse. In order to perform a multiple selection of + subterms, hold the Ctrl key while selecting every subterm after the + first one. + From the contextual menu select "Copy". + From the "Edit" or the contextual menu select + "Paste as pattern" +
@@ -551,11 +666,6 @@ &reduction-kind; ::= - demodulate - - - - | normalize Computes the βδιζ-normal form @@ -588,6 +698,36 @@ + + + auto-params + &TODO; + + reduction-kind + + + + &autoparams; + ::= + depth=&nat; + &TODO; + + + + | + width=&nat; + &TODO; + + + + | + &TODO; + &TODO; + + + +
+