X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=matita%2Fmatita%2Fcontribs%2Flambda_delta%2Fbasic_2%2Fsubstitution%2Fldrop_ldrop.ma;h=b7862fcbf382ce014a13c97b541f2d104d410254;hb=99c7be7031e506c7ad4a6c5e3f12ad5ae542b049;hp=90f724ad36f93a19d2570ccbc88d62eae1bae8e0;hpb=eb918fc784eacd2094e3986ba321ef47690d9983;p=helm.git diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda_delta/basic_2/substitution/ldrop_ldrop.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda_delta/basic_2/substitution/ldrop_ldrop.ma index 90f724ad3..b7862fcbf 100644 --- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda_delta/basic_2/substitution/ldrop_ldrop.ma +++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda_delta/basic_2/substitution/ldrop_ldrop.ma @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ (* *) (**************************************************************************) -include "Basic_2/substitution/lift_lift.ma". -include "Basic_2/substitution/ldrop.ma". +include "basic_2/substitution/lift_lift.ma". +include "basic_2/substitution/ldrop.ma". (* DROPPING *****************************************************************) @@ -55,28 +55,67 @@ theorem ldrop_conf_ge: ∀d1,e1,L,L1. ⇩[d1, e1] L ≡ L1 → ] qed. -(* Basic_1: was: drop_conf_lt *) -theorem ldrop_conf_lt: ∀d1,e1,L,L1. ⇩[d1, e1] L ≡ L1 → - ∀e2,K2,I,V2. ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ K2. ⓑ{I} V2 → - e2 < d1 → let d ≝ d1 - e2 - 1 in - ∃∃K1,V1. ⇩[0, e2] L1 ≡ K1. ⓑ{I} V1 & - ⇩[d, e1] K2 ≡ K1 & ⇧[d, e1] V1 ≡ V2. -#d1 #e1 #L #L1 #H elim H -d1 -e1 -L -L1 -[ #d #e #e2 #K2 #I #V2 #H - lapply (ldrop_inv_atom1 … H) -H #H destruct -| #L #I #V #e2 #K2 #J #V2 #_ #H - elim (lt_zero_false … H) -| #L1 #L2 #I #V #e #_ #_ #e2 #K2 #J #V2 #_ #H - elim (lt_zero_false … H) -| #L1 #L2 #I #V1 #V2 #d #e #HL12 #HV12 #IHL12 #e2 #K2 #J #V #H #He2d +(* Note: apparently this was missing in basic_1 *) +theorem ldrop_conf_be: ∀L0,L1,d1,e1. ⇩[d1, e1] L0 ≡ L1 → + ∀L2,e2. ⇩[0, e2] L0 ≡ L2 → d1 ≤ e2 → e2 ≤ d1 + e1 → + ∃∃L. ⇩[0, d1 + e1 - e2] L2 ≡ L & ⇩[0, d1] L1 ≡ L. +#L0 #L1 #d1 #e1 #H elim H -L0 -L1 -d1 -e1 +[ #d1 #e1 #L2 #e2 #H >(ldrop_inv_atom1 … H) -H /2 width=3/ +| normalize #L #I #V #L2 #e2 #HL2 #_ #He2 + lapply (le_n_O_to_eq … He2) -He2 #H destruct + lapply (ldrop_inv_refl … HL2) -HL2 #H destruct /2 width=3/ +| normalize #L0 #K0 #I #V1 #e1 #HLK0 #IHLK0 #L2 #e2 #H #_ #He21 + lapply (ldrop_inv_O1 … H) -H * * #He2 #HL20 + [ -IHLK0 -He21 destruct plus_plus_comm_23 #_ #_ #IHLK0 #L2 #e2 #H #Hd1e2 #He2de1 + elim (le_inv_plus_l … Hd1e2) #_ #He2 + minus_le_minus_minus_comm // /3 width=3/ ] ] qed. +(* Basic_1: was: drop_trans_ge *) +theorem ldrop_trans_ge: ∀d1,e1,L1,L. ⇩[d1, e1] L1 ≡ L → + ∀e2,L2. ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ L2 → d1 ≤ e2 → ⇩[0, e1 + e2] L1 ≡ L2. +#d1 #e1 #L1 #L #H elim H -d1 -e1 -L1 -L +[ #d #e #e2 #L2 #H + >(ldrop_inv_atom1 … H) -H -L2 // +| // +| /3 width=1/ +| #L1 #L2 #I #V1 #V2 #d #e #H_ #_ #IHL12 #e2 #L #H #Hde2 + lapply (lt_to_le_to_lt 0 … Hde2) // #He2 + lapply (lt_to_le_to_lt … (e + e2) He2 ?) // #Hee2 + lapply (ldrop_inv_ldrop1 … H ?) -H // #HL2 + @ldrop_ldrop_lt // >le_plus_minus // @IHL12 /2 width=1/ (**) (* explicit constructor *) +] +qed. + (* Basic_1: was: drop_trans_le *) theorem ldrop_trans_le: ∀d1,e1,L1,L. ⇩[d1, e1] L1 ≡ L → ∀e2,L2. ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ L2 → e2 ≤ d1 → @@ -99,28 +138,23 @@ theorem ldrop_trans_le: ∀d1,e1,L1,L. ⇩[d1, e1] L1 ≡ L → ] qed. -(* Basic_1: was: drop_trans_ge *) -theorem ldrop_trans_ge: ∀d1,e1,L1,L. ⇩[d1, e1] L1 ≡ L → - ∀e2,L2. ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ L2 → d1 ≤ e2 → ⇩[0, e1 + e2] L1 ≡ L2. -#d1 #e1 #L1 #L #H elim H -d1 -e1 -L1 -L -[ #d #e #e2 #L2 #H - >(ldrop_inv_atom1 … H) -H -L2 // -| // -| /3 width=1/ -| #L1 #L2 #I #V1 #V2 #d #e #H_ #_ #IHL12 #e2 #L #H #Hde2 - lapply (lt_to_le_to_lt 0 … Hde2) // #He2 - lapply (lt_to_le_to_lt … (e + e2) He2 ?) // #Hee2 - lapply (ldrop_inv_ldrop1 … H ?) -H // #HL2 - @ldrop_ldrop_lt // >le_plus_minus // @IHL12 /2 width=1/ (**) (* explicit constructor *) -] +(* Basic_1: was: drop_conf_rev *) +axiom ldrop_div: ∀e1,L1,L. ⇩[0, e1] L1 ≡ L → ∀e2,L2. ⇩[0, e2] L2 ≡ L → + ∃∃L0. ⇩[0, e1] L0 ≡ L2 & ⇩[e1, e2] L0 ≡ L1. + +(* Basic_1: was: drop_conf_lt *) +lemma ldrop_conf_lt: ∀d1,e1,L,L1. ⇩[d1, e1] L ≡ L1 → + ∀e2,K2,I,V2. ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ K2. ⓑ{I} V2 → + e2 < d1 → let d ≝ d1 - e2 - 1 in + ∃∃K1,V1. ⇩[0, e2] L1 ≡ K1. ⓑ{I} V1 & + ⇩[d, e1] K2 ≡ K1 & ⇧[d, e1] V1 ≡ V2. +#d1 #e1 #L #L1 #H1 #e2 #K2 #I #V2 #H2 #He2d1 +elim (ldrop_conf_le … H1 … H2 ?) -L [2: /2 width=2/] #K #HL1K #HK2 +elim (ldrop_inv_skip1 … HK2 ?) -HK2 [2: /2 width=1/] #K1 #V1 #HK21 #HV12 #H destruct /2 width=5/ qed. -theorem ldrop_trans_ge_comm: ∀d1,e1,e2,L1,L2,L. - ⇩[d1, e1] L1 ≡ L → ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ L2 → d1 ≤ e2 → - ⇩[0, e2 + e1] L1 ≡ L2. +lemma ldrop_trans_ge_comm: ∀d1,e1,e2,L1,L2,L. + ⇩[d1, e1] L1 ≡ L → ⇩[0, e2] L ≡ L2 → d1 ≤ e2 → + ⇩[0, e2 + e1] L1 ≡ L2. #e1 #e1 #e2 >commutative_plus /2 width=5/ qed. - -(* Basic_1: was: drop_conf_rev *) -axiom ldrop_div: ∀e1,L1,L. ⇩[0, e1] L1 ≡ L → ∀e2,L2. ⇩[0, e2] L2 ≡ L → - ∃∃L0. ⇩[0, e1] L0 ≡ L2 & ⇩[e1, e2] L0 ≡ L1.