X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=weblib%2Ftutorial%2Fchapter4.ma;h=7f28c5ddb9cb070a6104d375a2944fbd53f26c77;hb=c0ac63fead67ea1902e3d923ce877a2779cf501e;hp=ff607176483a4ee9159c5264ef7a216393925bcd;hpb=7f6235dca57343e63217316b6415599daef7d4aa;p=helm.git

diff --git a/weblib/tutorial/chapter4.ma b/weblib/tutorial/chapter4.ma
index ff6071764..7f28c5ddb 100644
--- a/weblib/tutorial/chapter4.ma
+++ b/weblib/tutorial/chapter4.ma
@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ characteristic predicates over some universe codeA/code, that is as objects
 A→Prop. 
 For instance the empty set is defined by the always false function: *)
 
-definition empty_set ≝ λA:Type[0].λa:A.a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/False.ind(1,0,0)"False/a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="empty_set"definition empty_set ≝ λA:Type[0].λa:A.a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/False.ind(1,0,0)"False/a.
 notation "\emptyv" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'empty_set}.
 interpretation "empty set" 'empty_set = (empty_set ?).
 
 (* Similarly, a singleton set contaning containing an element a, is defined
 by by the characteristic function asserting equality with a *)
 
-definition singleton ≝ λA.λx,a:A.xa title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym=] (in [term])"/spana.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="singleton"definition singleton ≝ λA.λx,a:A.xa title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym=] (in [term])"/spana.
 (* notation "{x}" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'sing_lang $x}. *)
 interpretation "singleton" 'singl x = (singleton ? x).
 
@@ -26,22 +26,22 @@ The operations of union, intersection, complement and substraction
 are easily defined in terms of the propositional connectives of dijunction,
 conjunction and negation *)
 
-definition union : ∀A:Type[0].∀P,Q.A → Prop ≝ λA,P,Q,a.P a a title="logical or" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∨/a Q a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="union"definition union : ∀A:Type[0].∀P,Q.A → Prop ≝ λA,P,Q,a.P a a title="logical or" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∨/a Q a.
 interpretation "union" 'union a b = (union ? a b).
 
-definition intersection : ∀A:Type[0].∀P,Q.A→Prop ≝ λA,P,Q,a.P a a title="logical and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym∧] (in [term])"/span Q a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="intersection"definition intersection : ∀A:Type[0].∀P,Q.A→Prop ≝ λA,P,Q,a.P a a title="logical and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym∧] (in [term])"/span Q a.
 interpretation "intersection" 'intersects a b = (intersection ? a b).
 
-definition complement ≝ λU:Type[0].λA:U → Prop.λw.a title="logical not" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/a A w.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="complement"definition complement ≝ λU:Type[0].λA:U → Prop.λw.a title="logical not" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/a A w.
 interpretation "complement" 'not a = (complement ? a).
 
-definition substraction := λU:Type[0].λA,B:U → Prop.λw.A w a title="logical and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/a a title="logical not" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/a B w.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="substraction"definition substraction := λU:Type[0].λA,B:U → Prop.λw.A w a title="logical and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/a a title="logical not" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/a B w.
 interpretation "substraction" 'minus a b = (substraction ? a b).
 
 (* Finally, we use implication to define the inclusion relation between
 sets *)
 
-definition subset: ∀A:Type[0].∀P,Q:A→Prop.Prop ≝ λA,P,Q.∀a:A.(P a → Q a).
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="subset"definition subset: ∀A:Type[0].∀P,Q:A→Prop.Prop ≝ λA,P,Q.∀a:A.(P a → Q a).
 interpretation "subset" 'subseteq a b = (subset ? a b).
 
 (* 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ interpretation "subset" 'subseteq a b = (subset ? a b).
 Two sets are equals if and only if they have the same elements, that is,
 if the two characteristic functions are extensionally equivalent: *) 
 
-definition eqP ≝ λA:Type[0].λP,Q:A → Prop.∀a:A.P a a title="iff" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"↔/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym↔] (in [term])"/span Q a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP"definition eqP ≝ λA:Type[0].λP,Q:A → Prop.∀a:A.P a a title="iff" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"↔/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym↔] (in [term])"/span Q a.
 notation "A =1 B" non associative with precedence 45 for @{'eqP $A $B}.
 interpretation "extensional equality" 'eqP a b = (eqP ? a b).
 
@@ -58,38 +58,38 @@ This notion of equality is different from the intensional equality of
 functions; the fact it defines an equivalence relation must be explicitly 
 proved: *)
 
-lemma eqP_sym: ∀U.∀A,B:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_sym"lemma eqP_sym: ∀U.∀A,B:U →Prop. 
   A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 B → B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A.
 #U #A #B #eqAB #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_sym.def(2)"iff_sym/a @eqAB qed.
  
-lemma eqP_trans: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_trans"lemma eqP_trans: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 B → B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C → A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C.
 #U #A #B #C #eqAB #eqBC #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_trans.def(2)"iff_trans/a // qed.
 
 (* For the same reason, we must also prove that all the operations behave well
 with respect to eqP: *)
 
-lemma eqP_union_r: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_union_r"lemma eqP_union_r: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: NUMBER '1' or [term] expected after [sym=] (in [term])"/span1 C  → A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B.
 #U #A #B #C #eqAB #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_or_r.def(2)"iff_or_r/a @eqAB qed.
   
-lemma eqP_union_l: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_union_l"lemma eqP_union_l: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C  → A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a C.
 #U #A #B #C #eqBC #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_or_l.def(2)"iff_or_l/a @eqBC qed.
   
-lemma eqP_intersect_r: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_intersect_r"lemma eqP_intersect_r: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C  → A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a B.
 #U #A #B #C #eqAB #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_and_r.def(2)"iff_and_r/a @eqAB qed.
   
-lemma eqP_intersect_l: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_intersect_l"lemma eqP_intersect_l: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C  → A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/aspan class="error" title="Parse error: [term] expected after [sym∩] (in [term])"/span B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a C.
 #U #A #B #C #eqBC #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_and_l.def(2)"iff_and_l/a @eqBC qed.
 
-lemma eqP_substract_r: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_substract_r"lemma eqP_substract_r: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C  → A a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a B.
 #U #A #B #C #eqAB #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_and_r.def(2)"iff_and_r/a @eqAB qed.
   
-lemma eqP_substract_l: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqP_substract_l"lemma eqP_substract_l: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U →Prop. 
   B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 C  → A a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a C.
 #U #A #B #C #eqBC #a @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_and_l.def(2)"iff_and_l/a /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff_not.def(4)"iff_not/a/span/span/ qed.
 
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ We can now prove several properties of the previous set-theoretic operations.
 In particular, union is commutative and associative, and the empty set is an 
 identity element: *)
 
-lemma union_empty_r: ∀U.∀A:U→Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="union_empty_r"lemma union_empty_r: ∀U.∀A:U→Prop. 
   A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a a title="empty set" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∅/a a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A.
 #U #A #w % [* // normalize #abs @a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/False_ind.fix(0,1,1)"False_ind/a /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace /span/span/ | /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a/span/span/]
 qed.
 
-lemma union_comm : ∀U.∀A,B:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="union_comm"lemma union_comm : ∀U.∀A,B:U →Prop. 
   A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 B a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a A.
 #U #A #B #a % * /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a/span/span/ qed. 
 
-lemma union_assoc: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U → Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="union_assoc"lemma union_assoc: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U → Prop. 
   A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a C a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a (B a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a C).
 #S #A #B #C #w % [* [* /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a/span/span/ | /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a/span/span/ ] | * [/span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a/span/span/ | * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a/span/span/]
 qed.   
@@ -116,39 +116,39 @@ qed.
 (* In the same way we prove commutativity and associativity for set 
 interesection *)
 
-lemma cap_comm : ∀U.∀A,B:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="cap_comm"lemma cap_comm : ∀U.∀A,B:U →Prop. 
   A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a B a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 B a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a A.
 #U #A #B #a % * /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/ qed. 
 
-lemma cap_assoc: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U→Prop.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="cap_assoc"lemma cap_assoc: ∀U.∀A,B,C:U→Prop.
   A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a (B a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a C) a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 (A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a B) a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a C.
 #U #A #B #C #w % [ * #Aw * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/ span class="autotactic"span class="autotrace"/span/span| * * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/ ]
 qed.
 
 (* We can also easily prove idempotency for union and intersection *)
 
-lemma union_idemp: ∀U.∀A:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="union_idemp"lemma union_idemp: ∀U.∀A:U →Prop. 
   A  a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A.
 #U #A #a % [* // | /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a/span/span/] qed. 
 
-lemma cap_idemp: ∀U.∀A:U →Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="cap_idemp"lemma cap_idemp: ∀U.∀A:U →Prop. 
   A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a A a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A.
 #U #A #a % [* // | /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/] qed. 
 
 (* We conclude our examples with a couple of distributivity theorems, and a 
 characterization of substraction in terms of interesection and complementation. *)
 
-lemma distribute_intersect : ∀U.∀A,B,C:U→Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="distribute_intersect"lemma distribute_intersect : ∀U.∀A,B,C:U→Prop. 
   (A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B) a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a C a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 (A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a C) a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a (B a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a C).
 #U #A #B #C #w % [* * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/ | * * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/] 
 qed.
   
-lemma distribute_substract : ∀U.∀A,B,C:U→Prop. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="distribute_substract"lemma distribute_substract : ∀U.∀A,B,C:U→Prop. 
   (A a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a B) a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a C a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 (A a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a C) a title="union" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∪/a (B a title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/a C).
 #U #A #B #C #w % [* * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/ | * * /span class="autotactic"3span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,1,2)"or_introl/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/Or.con(0,2,2)"or_intror/a, a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/] 
 qed.
 
-lemma substract_def:∀U.∀A,B:U→Prop. Aa title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/aB a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a a title="complement" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/aB.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="substract_def"lemma substract_def:∀U.∀A,B:U→Prop. Aa title="substraction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"-/aB a title="extensional equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a1 A a title="intersection" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∩/a a title="complement" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/aB.
 #U #A #B #w normalize /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/
 qed.
 
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ between elements of a set U, namely a boolean function eqb: U→U→bool such th
 for any pair of elements a and b in U, (eqb x y) is true if and only if x=y. 
 A set equipped with such an equality is called a DeqSet: *)
 
-record DeqSet : Type[1] ≝ { carr :> Type[0];
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="DeqSet"record DeqSet : Type[1] ≝ { carr :> Type[0];
    eqb: carr → carr → a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.ind(1,0,0)"bool/a;
    eqb_true: ∀x,y. (eqb x y a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a) a title="iff" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"↔/a (x a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a y)
 }.
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ notation "\b H" non associative with precedence 90
 statement asserts that we can reflect a proof that eqb a b is false into
 a proof of the proposition a ≠ b. *)
 
-lemma eqb_false: ∀S:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.∀a,b:S. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eqb_false"lemma eqb_false: ∀S:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.∀a,b:S. 
   (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eqb.fix(0,0,3)"eqb/a ? a b) a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a a title="iff" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"↔/a a a title="leibnitz's non-equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"≠/a b.
 
 (* We start the proof introducing the hypothesis, and then split the "if" and
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ notation "\bf H" non associative with precedence 90
 (* The following statement proves that propositional equality in a 
 DeqSet is decidable in the traditional sense, namely either a=b or a≠b *)
 
- lemma dec_eq: ∀S:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.∀a,b:S. a a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a b a title="logical or" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∨/a a a title="leibnitz's non-equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"≠/a b.
+ img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="dec_eq"lemma dec_eq: ∀S:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.∀a,b:S. a a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a b a title="logical or" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∨/a a a title="leibnitz's non-equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"≠/a b.
 #S #a #b cases (a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/true_or_false.def(1)"true_or_false/a (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eqb.fix(0,0,3)"eqb/a ? a b)) #H
   [%1 @(\P H) | %2 @(\Pf H)]
 qed.
@@ -237,16 +237,16 @@ the boolean equality beqb, that is just the xand function, then prove that
 beqb b1 b2 is true if and only if b1=b2, and finally build the type DeqBool by 
 instantiating the DeqSet record with the previous information *)
 
-definition beqb ≝ λb1,b2.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="beqb"definition beqb ≝ λb1,b2.
   match b1 with [ true ⇒ b2 | false ⇒ a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/notb.def(1)"notb/a b2].
 
 notation < "a == b" non associative with precedence 45 for @{beqb $a $b }.
 
-lemma beqb_true: ∀b1,b2. a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff.def(1)"iff/a (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/beqb.def(2)"beqb/a b1 b2 a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a) (b1 a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a b2).
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="beqb_true"lemma beqb_true: ∀b1,b2. a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/iff.def(1)"iff/a (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/beqb.def(2)"beqb/a b1 b2 a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a) (b1 a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a b2).
 #b1 #b2 cases b1 cases b2 normalize /span class="autotactic"2span class="autotrace" trace a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/And.con(0,1,2)"conj/a/span/span/
 qed. 
 
-definition DeqBool ≝ a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.con(0,1,0)"mk_DeqSet/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.ind(1,0,0)"bool/a a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/beqb.def(2)"beqb/a a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/beqb_true.def(4)"beqb_true/a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="DeqBool"definition DeqBool ≝ a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.con(0,1,0)"mk_DeqSet/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.ind(1,0,0)"bool/a a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/beqb.def(2)"beqb/a a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/beqb_true.def(4)"beqb_true/a.
 
 (* At this point, we would expect to be able to prove things like the
 following: for any boolean b, if b==false is true then b=false. 
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ Unfortunately, this would not work, unless we declare b of type
 DeqBool (change the type in the following statement and see what 
 happens). *)
 
-example exhint: ∀b:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqBool.def(5)"DeqBool/a. (ba title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a=a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a) a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a → ba title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="exhint"example exhint: ∀b:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqBool.def(5)"DeqBool/a. (ba title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a) a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a → ba title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a.
 #b #H @(\P H) 
 qed.
 
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ unification hint  0 a href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)" title="hint_decl_Type0"≔/a
 (* After having provided the previous hints, we may rewrite example exhint 
 declaring b of type bool. *)
  
-example exhint1: ∀b:a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.ind(1,0,0)"bool/a. (b a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a= a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a) a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a → b a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a. 
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="exhint1"example exhint1: ∀b:a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.ind(1,0,0)"bool/a. (b a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a) a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a → b a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a. 
 #b #H @(\P H)
 qed.
 
@@ -295,10 +295,10 @@ qed.
 this, we must as usual define the boolen equality function, and prove
 it correctly reflects propositional equality. *)
 
-definition eq_pairs ≝
-  λA,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.λp1,p2:Aa title="Product" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"×/aB.(a title="pair pi1" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\fst/a p1 a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a= a title="pair pi1" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\fst/a p2) a title="boolean and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/a (a title="pair pi2" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\snd/a p1 a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a= a title="pair pi2" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\snd/a p2).
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eq_pairs"definition eq_pairs ≝
+  λA,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.λp1,p2:Aa title="Product" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"×/aB.(a title="pair pi1" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\fst/a p1 a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a title="pair pi1" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\fst/a p2) a title="boolean and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/a (a title="pair pi2" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\snd/a p1 a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a title="pair pi2" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"\snd/a p2).
 
-lemma eq_pairs_true: ∀A,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.∀p1,p2:Aa title="Product" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"×/aB.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="eq_pairs_true"lemma eq_pairs_true: ∀A,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.∀p1,p2:Aa title="Product" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"×/aB.
   a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eq_pairs.def(4)"eq_pairs/a A B p1 p2 a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a a title="iff" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"↔/a p1 a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a p2.
 #A #B * #a1 #b1 * #a2 #b2 %
   [#H cases (a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/andb_true.def(5)"andb_true/a …H) normalize #eqa #eqb >(\P eqa) >(\P eqb) //
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ lemma eq_pairs_true: ∀A,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,
   ]
 qed.
 
-definition DeqProd ≝ λA,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="DeqProd"definition DeqProd ≝ λA,B:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.ind(1,0,0)"DeqSet/a.
   a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/DeqSet.con(0,1,0)"mk_DeqSet/a (Aa title="Product" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"×/aB) (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eq_pairs.def(4)"eq_pairs/a A B) (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eq_pairs_true.def(6)"eq_pairs_true/a A B).
 
 (* Having an unification problem of the kind T1×T2 = carr X, what kind 
@@ -326,6 +326,6 @@ unification hint  0 a href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)" title="hint_decl_Type0"≔/a
 (* ---------------------------------------- *) ⊢ 
     a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eq_pairs.def(4)"eq_pairs/a T1 T2 p1 p2 ≡ a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/eqb.fix(0,0,3)"eqb/a X p1 p2.
 
-example hint2: ∀b1,b2. 
-  a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/ab1,a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a〉a title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a=a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a,b2〉a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a → a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/ab1,a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a〉a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a,b2〉.
+img class="anchor" src="icons/tick.png" id="hint2"example hint2: ∀b1,b2. 
+  a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/ab1,a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/aa title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〉/aa title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="eqb" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a,b2a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〉/aa title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a → a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/ab1,a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/aa title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〉/aa title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/aa title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〈/aa href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,2,0)"false/a,b2a title="Pair construction" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"〉/a.
 #b1 #b2 #H @(\P H).
\ No newline at end of file