X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=weblib%2Ftutorial%2Fchapter7.ma;h=b9a35a8ad93214da1f607dec2f9c2d1f9623bb0d;hb=c65aeeb22bdc7bf289e5db108c358b199773c857;hp=da90566e88cb4e1754096fbcf189d51fe15dd5cc;hpb=55be7edb5a8249fa65746a47ea1b702881cbc979;p=helm.git

diff --git a/weblib/tutorial/chapter7.ma b/weblib/tutorial/chapter7.ma
index da90566e8..b9a35a8ad 100644
--- a/weblib/tutorial/chapter7.ma
+++ b/weblib/tutorial/chapter7.ma
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-(* We shall apply all the previous machinery to the study of regular languages 
+(* <h1>Regular Expressions</h1>
+We shall apply all the previous machinery to the study of regular languages 
 and the constructions of the associated finite automata. *)
 
 include "tutorial/chapter6.ma".
@@ -46,7 +47,8 @@ lemma rsem_star : ∀S.∀r: a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter7/re.ind(1,0,1
 // qed.
 
 
-(* We now introduce pointed regular expressions, that are the main tool we shall 
+(* <h2>Pointed Regular expressions </h2>
+We now introduce pointed regular expressions, that are the main tool we shall 
 use for the construction of the automaton. 
 A pointed regular expression is just a regular expression internally labelled 
 with some additional points. Intuitively, points mark the positions inside the 
@@ -128,7 +130,8 @@ lemma erase_plus : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
 lemma erase_star : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.|i^*| = |i|^*. 
 // qed.
 
-(* Items and pres are very concrete datatypes: they can be effectively compared, 
+(* <h2>Comparing items and pres<h2>
+Items and pres are very concrete datatypes: they can be effectively compared, 
 and enumerated. In particular, we can define a boolean equality beqitem and a proof
 beqitem_true that it refects propositional equality, enriching the set (pitem S)
 to a DeqSet. *)
@@ -195,7 +198,8 @@ unification hint  0 ≔ S,i1,i2;
 (* ---------------------------------------- *) ⊢ 
     beqitem S i1 i2 ≡ eqb X i1 i2.
 
-(* The intuitive semantic of a point is to mark the position where
+(* <h2>Semantics of pointed regular expression<h2>
+The intuitive semantic of a point is to mark the position where
 we should start reading the regular expression. The language associated
 to a pre is the union of the languages associated with its points. *)
 
@@ -295,295 +299,3 @@ lemma minus_eps_pre: ∀S.∀e:pre S. \sem{\fst e} =1 \sem{e}-{[ ]}.
   ]
 qed.
 
-definition lo ≝ λS:DeqSet.λa,b:pre S.〈\fst a + \fst b,\snd a ∨ \snd b〉.
-notation "a ⊕ b" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'oplus $a $b}.
-interpretation "oplus" 'oplus a b = (lo ? a b).
-
-lemma lo_def: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b1,b2. 〈i1,b1〉⊕〈i2,b2〉=〈i1+i2,b1∨b2〉.
-// qed.
-
-definition pre_concat_r ≝ λS:DeqSet.λi:pitem S.λe:pre S.
-  match e with [ mk_Prod i1 b ⇒ 〈i · i1, b〉].
- 
-notation "i ◃ e" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'lhd $i $e}.
-interpretation "pre_concat_r" 'lhd i e = (pre_concat_r ? i e).
-
-lemma eq_to_ex_eq: ∀S.∀A,B:word S → Prop. 
-  A = B → A =1 B. 
-#S #A #B #H >H /2/ qed.
-
-lemma sem_pre_concat_r : ∀S,i.∀e:pre S.
-  \sem{i ◃ e} =1 \sem{i} · \sem{|\fst e|} ∪ \sem{e}.
-#S #i * #i1 #b1 cases b1 [2: @eq_to_ex_eq //] 
->sem_pre_true >sem_cat >sem_pre_true /2/ 
-qed.
- 
-definition pre_concat_l ≝ λS:DeqSet.λbcast:∀S:DeqSet.pitem S → pre S.λe1:pre S.λi2:pitem S.
-  match e1 with 
-  [ mk_Prod i1 b1 ⇒ match b1 with 
-    [ true ⇒ (i1 ◃ (bcast ? i2)) 
-    | false ⇒ 〈i1 · i2,false〉
-    ]
-  ].
-
-notation "a ▹ b" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'tril eclose $a $b}.
-interpretation "item-pre concat" 'tril op a b = (pre_concat_l ? op a b).
-
-notation "•" non associative with precedence 60 for @{eclose ?}.
-
-let rec eclose (S: DeqSet) (i: pitem S) on i : pre S ≝
- match i with
-  [ pz ⇒ 〈 `∅, false 〉
-  | pe ⇒ 〈 ϵ,  true 〉
-  | ps x ⇒ 〈 `.x, false〉
-  | pp x ⇒ 〈 `.x, false 〉
-  | po i1 i2 ⇒ •i1 ⊕ •i2
-  | pc i1 i2 ⇒ •i1 ▹ i2
-  | pk i ⇒ 〈(\fst (•i))^*,true〉].
-  
-notation "• x" non associative with precedence 60 for @{'eclose $x}.
-interpretation "eclose" 'eclose x = (eclose ? x).
-
-lemma eclose_plus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
-  •(i1 + i2) = •i1 ⊕ •i2.
-// qed.
-
-lemma eclose_dot: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
-  •(i1 · i2) = •i1 ▹ i2.
-// qed.
-
-lemma eclose_star: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i:pitem S.
-  •i^* = 〈(\fst(•i))^*,true〉.
-// qed.
-
-definition lift ≝ λS.λf:pitem S →pre S.λe:pre S. 
-  match e with 
-  [ mk_Prod i b ⇒ 〈\fst (f i), \snd (f i) ∨ b〉].
-  
-definition preclose ≝ λS. lift S (eclose S). 
-interpretation "preclose" 'eclose x = (preclose ? x).
-
-(* theorem 16: 2 *)
-lemma sem_oplus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1,e2:pre S.
-  \sem{e1 ⊕ e2} =1 \sem{e1} ∪ \sem{e2}. 
-#S * #i1 #b1 * #i2 #b2 #w %
-  [cases b1 cases b2 normalize /2/ * /3/ * /3/
-  |cases b1 cases b2 normalize /2/ * /3/ * /3/
-  ]
-qed.
-
-lemma odot_true : 
-  ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
-  〈i1,true〉 ▹ i2 = i1 ◃ (•i2).
-// qed.
-
-lemma odot_true_bis : 
-  ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
-  〈i1,true〉 ▹ i2 = 〈i1 · \fst (•i2), \snd (•i2)〉.
-#S #i1 #i2 normalize cases (•i2) // qed.
-
-lemma odot_false: 
-  ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
-  〈i1,false〉 ▹ i2 = 〈i1 · i2, false〉.
-// qed.
-
-lemma LcatE : ∀S.∀e1,e2:pitem S.
-  \sem{e1 · e2} = \sem{e1} · \sem{|e2|} ∪ \sem{e2}. 
-// qed.
-
-lemma erase_bull : ∀S.∀i:pitem S. |\fst (•i)| = |i|.
-#S #i elim i // 
-  [ #i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >erase_dot <IH1 >eclose_dot
-    cases (•i1) #i11 #b1 cases b1 // <IH2 >odot_true_bis //
-  | #i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_plus >(erase_plus … i1) <IH1 <IH2
-    cases (•i1) #i11 #b1 cases (•i2) #i21 #b2 //  
-  | #i #IH >eclose_star >(erase_star … i) <IH cases (•i) //
-  ]
-qed.
-
-(*
-lemma sem_eclose_star: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i:pitem S.
-  \sem{〈i^*,true〉} =1 \sem{〈i,false〉}·\sem{|i|}^* ∪ {ϵ}.
-/2/ qed.
-*)
-
-(* theorem 16: 1 → 3 *)
-lemma odot_dot_aux : ∀S.∀e1:pre S.∀i2:pitem S.
-   \sem{•i2} =1  \sem{i2} ∪ \sem{|i2|} →
-   \sem{e1 ▹ i2} =1  \sem{e1} · \sem{|i2|} ∪ \sem{i2}.
-#S * #i1 #b1 #i2 cases b1
-  [2:#th >odot_false >sem_pre_false >sem_pre_false >sem_cat /2/
-  |#H >odot_true >sem_pre_true @(eqP_trans … (sem_pre_concat_r …))
-   >erase_bull @eqP_trans [|@(eqP_union_l … H)]
-    @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_l[|@union_comm ]]
-    @eqP_trans [|@eqP_sym @union_assoc ] /3/ 
-  ]
-qed.
-  
-lemma minus_eps_pre_aux: ∀S.∀e:pre S.∀i:pitem S.∀A. 
- \sem{e} =1 \sem{i} ∪ A → \sem{\fst e} =1 \sem{i} ∪ (A - {[ ]}).
-#S #e #i #A #seme
-@eqP_trans [|@minus_eps_pre]
-@eqP_trans [||@eqP_union_r [|@eqP_sym @minus_eps_item]]
-@eqP_trans [||@distribute_substract] 
-@eqP_substract_r //
-qed.
-
-(* theorem 16: 1 *)
-theorem sem_bull: ∀S:DeqSet. ∀i:pitem S.  \sem{•i} =1 \sem{i} ∪ \sem{|i|}.
-#S #e elim e 
-  [#w normalize % [/2/ | * //]
-  |/2/ 
-  |#x normalize #w % [ /2/ | * [@False_ind | //]]
-  |#x normalize #w % [ /2/ | * // ] 
-  |#i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_dot
-   @eqP_trans [|@odot_dot_aux //] >sem_cat 
-   @eqP_trans
-     [|@eqP_union_r
-       [|@eqP_trans [|@(cat_ext_l … IH1)] @distr_cat_r]]
-   @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc]
-   @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
-   @eqP_union_l //
-  |#i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_plus
-   @eqP_trans [|@sem_oplus] >sem_plus >erase_plus 
-   @eqP_trans [|@(eqP_union_l … IH2)]
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
-   @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] @eqP_union_r
-   @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
-   @eqP_trans [||@eqP_union_l [|@union_comm]]
-   @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] /2/
-  |#i #H >sem_pre_true >sem_star >erase_bull >sem_star
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@cat_ext_l [|@minus_eps_pre_aux //]]]
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@distr_cat_r]]
-   @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] @eqP_union_l >erase_star 
-   @eqP_sym @star_fix_eps 
-  ]
-qed.
-
-(* blank item *)
-let rec blank (S: DeqSet) (i: re S) on i :pitem S ≝
- match i with
-  [ z ⇒ `∅
-  | e ⇒ ϵ
-  | s y ⇒ `y
-  | o e1 e2 ⇒ (blank S e1) + (blank S e2) 
-  | c e1 e2 ⇒ (blank S e1) · (blank S e2)
-  | k e ⇒ (blank S e)^* ].
-  
-lemma forget_blank: ∀S.∀e:re S.|blank S e| = e.
-#S #e elim e normalize //
-qed.
-
-lemma sem_blank: ∀S.∀e:re S.\sem{blank S e} =1 ∅.
-#S #e elim e 
-  [1,2:@eq_to_ex_eq // 
-  |#s @eq_to_ex_eq //
-  |#e1 #e2 #Hind1 #Hind2 >sem_cat 
-   @eqP_trans [||@(union_empty_r … ∅)] 
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_l[|@Hind2]] @eqP_union_r
-   @eqP_trans [||@(cat_empty_l … ?)] @cat_ext_l @Hind1
-  |#e1 #e2 #Hind1 #Hind2 >sem_plus 
-   @eqP_trans [||@(union_empty_r … ∅)] 
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_l[|@Hind2]] @eqP_union_r @Hind1
-  |#e #Hind >sem_star
-   @eqP_trans [||@(cat_empty_l … ?)] @cat_ext_l @Hind
-  ]
-qed.
-   
-theorem re_embedding: ∀S.∀e:re S. 
-  \sem{•(blank S e)} =1 \sem{e}.
-#S #e @eqP_trans [|@sem_bull] >forget_blank 
-@eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@sem_blank]]
-@eqP_trans [|@union_comm] @union_empty_r.
-qed.
-
-(* lefted operations *)
-definition lifted_cat ≝ λS:DeqSet.λe:pre S. 
-  lift S (pre_concat_l S eclose e).
-
-notation "e1 ⊙ e2" left associative with precedence 70 for @{'odot $e1 $e2}.
-
-interpretation "lifted cat" 'odot e1 e2 = (lifted_cat ? e1 e2).
-
-lemma odot_true_b : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b. 
-  〈i1,true〉 ⊙ 〈i2,b〉 = 〈i1 · (\fst (•i2)),\snd (•i2) ∨ b〉.
-#S #i1 #i2 #b normalize in ⊢ (??%?); cases (•i2) // 
-qed.
-
-lemma odot_false_b : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b.
-  〈i1,false〉 ⊙ 〈i2,b〉 = 〈i1 · i2 ,b〉.
-// 
-qed.
-  
-lemma erase_odot:∀S.∀e1,e2:pre S.
-  |\fst (e1 ⊙ e2)| = |\fst e1| · (|\fst e2|).
-#S * #i1 * * #i2 #b2 // >odot_true_b >erase_dot //  
-qed.
-
-definition lk ≝ λS:DeqSet.λe:pre S.
-  match e with 
-  [ mk_Prod i1 b1 ⇒
-    match b1 with 
-    [true ⇒ 〈(\fst (eclose ? i1))^*, true〉
-    |false ⇒ 〈i1^*,false〉
-    ]
-  ]. 
-
-(* notation < "a \sup ⊛" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'lk $a}.*)
-interpretation "lk" 'lk a = (lk ? a).
-notation "a^⊛" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'lk $a}.
-
-
-lemma ostar_true: ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
-  〈i,true〉^⊛ = 〈(\fst (•i))^*, true〉.
-// qed.
-
-lemma ostar_false: ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
-  〈i,false〉^⊛ = 〈i^*, false〉.
-// qed.
-  
-lemma erase_ostar: ∀S.∀e:pre S.
-  |\fst (e^⊛)| = |\fst e|^*.
-#S * #i * // qed.
-
-lemma sem_odot_true: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1:pre S.∀i. 
-  \sem{e1 ⊙ 〈i,true〉} =1 \sem{e1 ▹ i} ∪ { [ ] }.
-#S #e1 #i 
-cut (e1 ⊙ 〈i,true〉 = 〈\fst (e1 ▹ i), \snd(e1 ▹ i) ∨ true〉) [//]
-#H >H cases (e1 ▹ i) #i1 #b1 cases b1 
-  [>sem_pre_true @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
-   @eqP_union_l /2/ 
-  |/2/
-  ]
-qed.
-
-lemma eq_odot_false: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1:pre S.∀i. 
-  e1 ⊙ 〈i,false〉 = e1 ▹ i.
-#S #e1 #i  
-cut (e1 ⊙ 〈i,false〉 = 〈\fst (e1 ▹ i), \snd(e1 ▹ i) ∨ false〉) [//]
-cases (e1 ▹ i) #i1 #b1 cases b1 #H @H
-qed.
-
-lemma sem_odot: 
-  ∀S.∀e1,e2: pre S. \sem{e1 ⊙ e2} =1 \sem{e1}· \sem{|\fst e2|} ∪ \sem{e2}.
-#S #e1 * #i2 * 
-  [>sem_pre_true 
-   @eqP_trans [|@sem_odot_true]
-   @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] @eqP_union_r @odot_dot_aux //
-  |>sem_pre_false >eq_odot_false @odot_dot_aux //
-  ]
-qed.
-
-(* theorem 16: 4 *)      
-theorem sem_ostar: ∀S.∀e:pre S. 
-  \sem{e^⊛} =1  \sem{e} · \sem{|\fst e|}^*.
-#S * #i #b cases b
-  [>sem_pre_true >sem_pre_true >sem_star >erase_bull
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r[|@cat_ext_l [|@minus_eps_pre_aux //]]]
-   @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@distr_cat_r]]
-   @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @distr_cat_r]
-   @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] @eqP_union_l
-   @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @epsilon_cat_l] @eqP_sym @star_fix_eps 
-  |>sem_pre_false >sem_pre_false >sem_star /2/
-  ]
-qed.
\ No newline at end of file