for mathemtical items, based on a reach metadata set that has been
tuned along the European Project IST-2001-33562 MoWGLI. The metadata
set, and the searching facilites built on top of them - collected
-in the so called \whelp seach engine - have been
+in the so called \WHELP search engine - have been
extensively described in \cite{whelp}. Let us just recall here that
-the whelp metadata model is essentially based a single ternary relation
+the \WHELP metadata model is essentially based a single ternary relation
\REF{p}{s}{t} stating that an object $s$ refers an object $t$ at a
given position $p$, where the position specify the place of the
occurrence of $t$ inside $s$ (we currently work with a fixed set of
As soon as a new statement is defined, and before proving it,
the library is searched
to check that no other equivalent statement has been already proved
-(based on the \whelp{} pattern matching functionality); if this is the case,
+(based on the \WHELP pattern matching functionality); if this is the case,
a warning is raised to the user. At present, the notion of equivalence
adopted by Matita is convertibility, but we may imagine to weaken it
in the future, covering for instance isomorphisms.
-Another usefull \whelp{} operation is {\em hint}; we may invoke this query
+Another usefull \WHELP operation is {\em hint}; we may invoke this query
at any moment during the development of a proof, resulting in the list
of all theorems of the library which can be applied to the current
goal. In practice, this is mostly used not really to discover what theorems
can be applied to a given goal, but to actually retrieve a theorem that
we wish to apply, but whose name we have forgotten.
-In fact, even if \Matita adopts a semi-rigid naming convention for
+In fact, even if \MATITA adopts a semi-rigid naming convention for
statements \ref{naming} that greatly simplifies the effort of recalling
names, the naming discipline remains one of the most
annoying aspects of formal developments, and the hint feature provides