fo_unif_subst
test_equality_only subst context metasenv
redappl1 redappl2 ugraph)
+ (*CSC: This is necessary because of the "elim H" tactic
+ where the type of H is only reducible to an
+ inductive type. This could be extended from inductive
+ types to any rigid term. However, the code is
+ duplicated in two places: inside applications and
+ outside them. Probably it would be better to
+ work with lambda-bar terms instead. *)
+ | (Cic.MutInd _::_, Cic.MutInd _::_) -> raise exn
+ | (_, Cic.MutInd _::_) ->
+ let t1' = R.whd ~subst context t1 in
+ (match t1' with
+ C.Appl (C.MutInd _::_) ->
+ fo_unif_subst test_equality_only
+ subst context metasenv t1' t2 ugraph
+ | _ -> raise (UnificationFailure (lazy "88")))
+ | (Cic.MutInd _::_,_) ->
+ let t2' = R.whd ~subst context t2 in
+ (match t2' with
+ C.Appl (C.MutInd _::_) ->
+ fo_unif_subst test_equality_only
+ subst context metasenv t1 t2' ugraph
+ | _ -> raise (UnificationFailure (lazy "99")))
| _ -> raise exn)))
| (C.MutCase (_,_,outt1,t1',pl1), C.MutCase (_,_,outt2,t2',pl2))->
let subst', metasenv',ugraph1 =
in
fo_unif_subst test_equality_only subst context metasenv
beta_expanded (C.Meta (i,l)) ugraph1
+(* Works iff there are no arguments applied to it; similar to the
+ case below
+ | (_, C.MutInd _) ->
+ let t1' = R.whd ~subst context t1 in
+ (match t1' with
+ C.MutInd _ ->
+ fo_unif_subst test_equality_only
+ subst context metasenv t1' t2 ugraph
+ | _ -> raise (UnificationFailure (lazy "8")))
+*)
(* The following idea could be exploited again; right now we have no
longer any example requiring it
| (C.Prod _, t2) ->