nice notation for hints!

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/hints_declaration.ma b/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/hints_declaration.ma
index 5c189f63a618a837acbf8c67e2e20f0025932981..b826d2e767dda6a0d3adae1b551da9e84c9ae301 100644 (file)
--- a/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/hints_declaration.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/hints_declaration.ma
@@ -12,7 +12,44 @@
 (*                                                                        *)
 (**************************************************************************)
 
+(* 
+
+Notation for hint declaration
+==============================
+
+The idea is to write a context, with abstraction first, then
+recursive calls (let-in) and finally the two equivalent terms.
+The context can be empty. Note the ; to begin the second part of
+the context (necessary even if the first part is empty). 
+
+ unification hint PREC \coloneq
+   ID : TY, ..., ID : TY
+   ; ID \equest T, ..., ID \equest T
+   \vdash T1 \equiv T2       
+
+With unidoce and some ASCII art it looks like the following:
+
+ unification hint PREC ≔ ID : TY, ..., ID : TY;
+    ID ≟ T, ..., ID ≟ T
+ (*---------------------*) ⊢
+         T1 ≡ T2       
+
+*)
+   
+notation > "≔ (list0 ( ident x : T ) sep ,) opt (; (list1 (ident U ≟ term 90 V ) sep ,)) ⊢ term 19 Px ≡ term 19 Py"
+  with precedence 90
+  for @{ ${ fold right 
+               @{ ${ default 
+                    @{ ${ fold right 
+                        @{ 'hint_decl $Px $Py } 
+                        rec acc1 @{ let ( ${ident U} : ?) ≝ $V in $acc1} } }
+                    @{ 'hint_decl $Px $Py } 
+                 }
+               } 
+               rec acc @{ ∀${ident x}:$T.$acc } } }.
+
 include "logic/pts.ma".
+
 ndefinition hint_declaration_Type0  ≝  λA:Type[0] .λa,b:A.Prop.
 ndefinition hint_declaration_Type1  ≝  λA:Type[1].λa,b:A.Prop.
 ndefinition hint_declaration_Type2  ≝  λa,b:Type[1].Prop.
@@ -20,13 +57,19 @@ ndefinition hint_declaration_CProp0 ≝  λA:CProp[0].λa,b:A.Prop.
 ndefinition hint_declaration_CProp1 ≝  λA:CProp[1].λa,b:A.Prop.
 ndefinition hint_declaration_CProp2 ≝  λa,b:CProp[1].Prop.
   
-notation > "≔ (list0 (ident x : T ) sep ,) ⊢ term 19 Px ≡ term 19 Py"
-  with precedence 90
-  for @{ ${ fold right @{'hint_decl $Px $Py} rec acc @{ ∀${ident x}:$T.$acc } } }.
-
 interpretation "hint_decl_Type2"  'hint_decl a b = (hint_declaration_Type2 a b).
 interpretation "hint_decl_CProp2" 'hint_decl a b = (hint_declaration_CProp2 a b).
 interpretation "hint_decl_Type1"  'hint_decl a b = (hint_declaration_Type1 ? a b).
 interpretation "hint_decl_CProp1" 'hint_decl a b = (hint_declaration_CProp1 ? a b).
 interpretation "hint_decl_CProp0" 'hint_decl a b = (hint_declaration_CProp0 ? a b).
 interpretation "hint_decl_Type0"  'hint_decl a b = (hint_declaration_Type0 ? a b).
+
+(* little test 
+naxiom A : Type[0].
+naxiom C : A → A → Type[0].
+ndefinition D ≝ C.               
+alias symbol "hint_decl" = "hint_decl_Type1".
+unification hint 0 ≔ 
+  X : A, Y : A ;  Z ≟ X, W ≟ Y ⊢ C X Y ≡ D Z W.
+  
+*)