From: Enrico Zoli <??>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:43:24 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: More work on groups, real numbers and integration algebras.
X-Git-Tag: 0.4.95@7852~817
X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=08d8e4e422aafdc11e4230a87f2adee7facad809;p=helm.git

More work on groups, real numbers and integration algebras.
Up to a thousand of unproved lemmas, we have the result that the
distance induced by the integral on an integration Riesz space is
a distance. The next step is to axiomatise an L-space (an integration
Riesz space complete w.r.t. the induced distance).
---

diff --git a/matita/dama/groups.ma b/matita/dama/groups.ma
index 1b39c1518..699bd73fc 100644
--- a/matita/dama/groups.ma
+++ b/matita/dama/groups.ma
@@ -126,4 +126,15 @@ theorem eq_opp_opp_x_x: ∀G:abelian_group.∀x:G.--x=x.
  rewrite > plus_comm;
  rewrite > opp_inverse;
  reflexivity.
+qed.
+
+theorem eq_zero_opp_zero: ∀G:abelian_group.0=-0.
+ [ assumption
+ | intros;
+   apply (cancellationlaw ? 0);
+   rewrite < plus_comm in ⊢ (? ? ? %);
+   rewrite > opp_inverse;
+   rewrite > zero_neutral;
+   reflexivity
+ ].
 qed.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/matita/dama/integration_algebras.ma b/matita/dama/integration_algebras.ma
index 28185a785..534882ff2 100644
--- a/matita/dama/integration_algebras.ma
+++ b/matita/dama/integration_algebras.ma
@@ -39,11 +39,68 @@ record is_semi_norm (R:real) (V: vector_space R) (semi_norm:V→R) : Prop \def
    sn_triangle_inequality: ∀x,y:V. semi_norm (x + y) ≤ semi_norm x + semi_norm y
  }.
 
+theorem eq_semi_norm_zero_zero:
+ ∀R:real.∀V:vector_space R.∀semi_norm:V→R.
+  is_semi_norm ? ? semi_norm →
+   semi_norm 0 = 0.
+ intros;
+ (* facile *)
+ elim daemon.
+qed.
+
 record is_norm (R:real) (V:vector_space R) (norm:V → R) : Prop \def
  { n_semi_norm:> is_semi_norm ? ? norm;
    n_properness: ∀x:V. norm x = 0 → x = 0
  }.
 
+record is_semi_distance (R:real) (C:Type) (semi_d: C→C→R) : Prop \def
+ { sd_positive: ∀x,y:C. 0 ≤ semi_d x y;
+   sd_properness: \forall x:C. semi_d x x = 0; 
+   sd_triangle_inequality: ∀x,y,z:C. semi_d x z ≤ semi_d x y + semi_d z y
+ }.
+
+record is_distance (R:real) (C:Type) (d:C→C→R) : Prop \def
+ { d_semi_distance:> is_semi_distance ? ? d;
+   d_properness: ∀x,y:C. d x y = 0 → x=y
+ }.
+
+definition induced_distance ≝
+ λR:real.λV:vector_space R.λnorm:V→R.
+  λf,g:V.norm (f - g).
+
+theorem induced_distance_is_distance:
+ ∀R:real.∀V:vector_space R.∀norm:V→R.
+  is_norm ? ? norm → is_distance ? ? (induced_distance ? ? norm).
+ intros;
+ apply mk_is_distance;
+  [ apply mk_is_semi_distance;
+    [ unfold induced_distance;
+      intros;
+      apply sn_positive;
+      apply n_semi_norm;
+      assumption
+    | unfold induced_distance;
+      intros;
+      unfold minus;
+      rewrite < plus_comm;
+      rewrite > opp_inverse;
+      apply eq_semi_norm_zero_zero;
+      apply n_semi_norm;
+      assumption
+    | unfold induced_distance;
+      intros;
+      (* ??? *)
+      elim daemon
+    ]
+  | unfold induced_distance;
+    intros;
+    generalize in match (n_properness ? ? ? H ? H1);
+    intro;
+    (* facile *)
+    elim daemon
+  ].
+qed.
+
 record is_lattice (C:Type) (join,meet:C→C→C) : Prop \def
  { (* abelian semigroup properties *)
    l_comm_j: symmetric ? join;
@@ -66,6 +123,11 @@ definition le \def λC:Type.λL:lattice C.λf,g. meet ? L f g = f.
 interpretation "Lattice le" 'leq a b =
  (cic:/matita/integration_algebras/le.con _ _ a b).
 
+definition lt \def λC:Type.λL:lattice C.λf,g. le ? L f g ∧ f ≠ g.
+
+interpretation "Lattice lt" 'lt a b =
+ (cic:/matita/integration_algebras/lt.con _ _ a b).
+
 definition carrier_of_lattice ≝
  λC:Type.λL:lattice C.C.
 
@@ -113,7 +175,10 @@ definition is_weak_unit ≝
    2. Fremlin proves |x|/\u=0 \to u=0. How do we remove the absolute value?
  λR:real.λV:archimedean_riesz_space R.λunit: V.
   ∀x:V. meet x unit = 0 → u = 0.
-*) λR:real.λV:archimedean_riesz_space R.λe:V.True.
+  3. Fremlin proves u > 0 implies x /\ u > 0  > 0 for Archimedean spaces
+   only. We pick this definition for now.
+*) λR:real.λV:archimedean_riesz_space R.λe:V.
+    ∀v:V. lt ? V 0 v → lt ? V 0 (meet ? V v e).
 
 (* Here we are avoiding a construction (the quotient space to define
    f=g iff I(|f-g|)=0 *)
@@ -139,9 +204,58 @@ record integration_riesz_space (R:real) : Type \def
          ) * irs_unit))) 0;
    irs_quotient_space1:
     ∀f,g:irs_archimedean_riesz_space.
-     f=g → integral (absolute_value ? irs_archimedean_riesz_space (f - g)) = 0
+     integral (absolute_value ? irs_archimedean_riesz_space (f - g)) = 0 → f=g
  }.
 
+definition induced_norm ≝
+ λR:real.λV:integration_riesz_space R.λf:V.
+  integral ? ? (absolute_value ? ? f).
+
+lemma induced_norm_is_norm:
+ ∀R:real.∀V:integration_riesz_space R.is_norm ? V (induced_norm ? V).
+ intros;
+ apply mk_is_norm;
+  [ apply mk_is_semi_norm;
+     [ unfold induced_norm;
+       intros;
+       apply i_positive;
+       [ apply (irs_integral_properties ? V)
+       | (* difficile *)
+         elim daemon
+       ]
+     | intros;
+       unfold induced_norm;
+       (* facile *)
+       elim daemon
+     | intros;
+       unfold induced_norm;
+       (* difficile *)
+       elim daemon
+     ]
+  | intros;
+    unfold induced_norm in H;
+    apply irs_quotient_space1;
+    unfold minus;
+    rewrite < plus_comm;
+    rewrite < eq_zero_opp_zero;
+    rewrite > zero_neutral;
+    assumption
+  ].
+qed.
+
+definition distance_induced_by_integral ≝
+ λR:real.λV:integration_riesz_space R.
+  induced_distance ? ? (induced_norm R V).
+
+theorem distance_induced_by_integral_is_distance:
+ ∀R:real.∀V:integration_riesz_space R.
+  is_distance ? ? (distance_induced_by_integral ? V).
+ intros;
+ unfold distance_induced_by_integral;
+ apply induced_distance_is_distance;
+ apply induced_norm_is_norm.
+qed.
+
 record is_algebra (K: field) (V:vector_space K) (mult:V→V→V) (one:V) : Prop
 ≝
  { (* ring properties *)
diff --git a/matita/dama/reals.ma b/matita/dama/reals.ma
index 336bfe2e7..63f487899 100644
--- a/matita/dama/reals.ma
+++ b/matita/dama/reals.ma
@@ -121,4 +121,51 @@ definition max: ∀R:real.R → R → R.
  apply cauchy_max_seq.
 qed.
 
-definition abs \def λR:real.λx:R. max R x (-x).
\ No newline at end of file
+definition abs \def λR:real.λx:R. max R x (-x).
+
+lemma comparison:
+ ∀R:real.∀f,g:nat→R. is_cauchy_seq ? f → is_cauchy_seq ? g →
+  (∀n:nat.f n ≤ g n) → lim ? f ? ≤ lim ? g ?.
+ [ assumption
+ | assumption
+ | intros;
+   elim daemon
+ ].
+qed.
+
+definition to_zero ≝
+ λR:real.λn.
+  -(inv R (sum_field R (S n))
+   (not_eq_sum_field_zero R (S n) (le_S_S O n (le_O_n n)))).
+  
+axiom is_cauchy_seq_to_zero: ∀R:real. is_cauchy_seq ? (to_zero R).
+
+lemma technical1: ∀R:real.lim R (to_zero R) (is_cauchy_seq_to_zero R) = 0.
+ intros;
+ unfold lim;
+ elim daemon.
+qed.
+ 
+lemma abs_x_ge_O: \forall R: real. \forall x:R. 0 ≤ abs R x.
+ intros;
+ unfold abs;
+ unfold max;
+ rewrite < technical1;
+ apply comparison;
+ intros;
+ unfold to_zero;
+ unfold max_seq;
+ elim
+     (to_cotransitive R (of_le R) R 0
+(inv R (sum_field R (S n))
+ (not_eq_sum_field_zero R (S n) (le_S_S O n (le_O_n n)))) (x--x)
+(lt_zero_to_le_inv_zero R (S n)
+ (not_eq_sum_field_zero R (S n) (le_S_S O n (le_O_n n)))));
+ [ simplify;
+   (* facile *)
+   elim daemon
+ | simplify;
+   (* facile *)
+   elim daemon
+ ].
+qed.
\ No newline at end of file