From: Ferruccio Guidi <ferruccio.guidi@unibo.it>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:12:29 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: - paths and left residuals: forth case of the equivalence proved!
X-Git-Tag: make_still_working~1311
X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4945b61f415cf13ac87d0df288d9f8a9b3930b5e;p=helm.git

- paths and left residuals: forth case of the equivalence proved!
  The proof is now complete!!
---

diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/background/preamble.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/background/preamble.ma
index 01874eb72..769ffa5a3 100644
--- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/background/preamble.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/background/preamble.ma
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ notation > "◊"
   non associative with precedence 90
   for @{'nil}.
 
+lemma list_inv: ∀A. ∀l:list A. ◊ = l ∨ ∃∃a0,l0. a0 :: l0 = l.
+#A * /2 width=1/ /3 width=3/
+qed-.
+
 definition map_cons: ∀A. A → list (list A) → list (list A) ≝ λA,a.
                      map … (cons … a).
 
diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/labeled_st_computation.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/labeled_st_computation.ma
index 35ece1775..eb5e5dc64 100644
--- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/labeled_st_computation.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/labeled_st_computation.ma
@@ -234,11 +234,10 @@ lapply (pl_sts_fwd_is_standard … H)
 ]
 qed-.
 
-axiom pl_sred_is_standard_pl_st: ∀p,M,M2. M ↦[p] M2 → ∀F. ⇓F = M →
+lemma pl_sred_is_standard_pl_st: ∀p,M,M2. M ↦[p] M2 → ∀F. ⇓F = M →
                                  ∀s,M1.{⊤}⇑ M1 Ⓡ↦*[s] F →
                                  is_standard (s@(p::◊)) →
                                  ∃∃F2. F Ⓡ↦[p] F2 & ⇓F2 = M2.
-(*
 #p #M #M2 #H elim H -p -M -M2
 [ #B #A #F #HF #s #M1 #HM1 #Hs
   lapply (is_standard_fwd_is_whd … Hs) -Hs // #Hs
@@ -249,12 +248,12 @@ axiom pl_sred_is_standard_pl_st: ∀p,M,M2. M ↦[p] M2 → ∀F. ⇓F = M →
   elim (pl_sts_fwd_abst_dx … HM1) #r1 #r2 #Hr1 #H destruct
   elim (pl_sts_inv_trans … HM1) -HM1 #F0 #HM1 #HT
   elim (pl_sts_inv_pl_sreds … HM1 ?) // #M0 #_ #H -M1 -Hr1 destruct
-  elim (pl_sts_inv_rc_abst_dx … HT ??) -HT [3: // |2: skip ] #b0 #T0 #HT02 #H (**) (* simplify line *)
-  elim (boolean_inv_abst … (sym_eq … H)) -H #A0 #_ #H #_ -b0 -M0 destruct
   >associative_append in Hs; #Hs
   lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -r1
   <(map_cons_append … r2 (p::◊)) #H
-  lapply (is_standard_inv_compatible_rc … H) -H #H
+  lapply (is_standard_inv_compatible_rc … H) -H #Hp
+  elim (pl_sts_inv_rc_abst_dx … HT ??) -HT [3: // |2: skip ] #b0 #T0 #HT02 #H (**) (* simplify line *)
+  elim (boolean_inv_abst … (sym_eq … H)) -H #A0 #_ #H #_ -b0 -M0 destruct
   elim (IHA12 … HT02 ?) // -r2 -A0 -IHA12 #F2 #HF2 #H
   @(ex2_intro … ({⊥}𝛌.F2)) normalize // /2 width=1/ (**) (* auto needs some help here *)
 | #p #B1 #B2 #A #_ #IHB12 #F #HF #s #M1 #HM1 #Hs
@@ -262,17 +261,53 @@ axiom pl_sred_is_standard_pl_st: ∀p,M,M2. M ↦[p] M2 → ∀F. ⇓F = M →
   elim (pl_sts_fwd_appl_dx … HM1) #r1 #r2 #r3 #Hr1 #_ #H destruct
   elim (pl_sts_inv_trans … HM1) -HM1 #F0 #HM1 #HT
   elim (pl_sts_inv_pl_sreds … HM1 ?) // #M0 #_ #H -M1 -Hr1 destruct
-  elim (pl_sts_fwd_dx_sn_appl_dx … HT) -HT #b0 #V0 #T0 #T1 #HV0 #_ #H -T1
-  elim (boolean_inv_appl … (sym_eq … H)) -H #B0 #A0 #_ #H #_ #_ -b0 -M0 -T0 destruct
   >associative_append in Hs; #Hs
-  lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -r1 #Hs
-  >associative_append in Hs; #Hs
-  lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -r2
+  lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -r1
+  >associative_append #Hs
+  lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -Hs
   <(map_cons_append … r3 (p::◊)) #H
-  lapply (is_standard_inv_compatible_sn … H) -H #H
-  elim (IHB12 … HV0 ?) // -r3 -B0 -IHB12 #F2 #HF2 #H
-  @(ex2_intro … ({⊥}@F2.{⊥}⇕T)) normalize // /2 width=1/ (**) (* auto needs some help here *)
-*)
+  lapply (is_standard_inv_compatible_sn … H) -H #Hp
+  elim (pl_sts_fwd_dx_sn_appl_dx … HT) -HT #b0 #V0 #T0 #T1 #HV0 #_ #H -T1 -r2
+  elim (boolean_inv_appl … (sym_eq … H)) -H #B0 #A0 #_ #H #_ #_ -b0 -M0 -T0 destruct
+  elim (IHB12 … HV0 ?) // -r3 -B0 -IHB12 #G2 #HG2 #H
+  @(ex2_intro … ({⊥}@G2.{⊥}⇕T)) normalize // /2 width=1/ (**) (* auto needs some help here *)
+| #p #B #A1 #A2 #_ #IHA12 #F #HF #s #M1 #HM1 #Hs
+  elim (carrier_inv_appl … HF) -HF #b #V #T #HV #HT #HF destruct
+  elim (pl_sts_fwd_appl_dx … HM1) #r1 #r2 #r3 #Hr1 #Hr2 #H destruct
+  elim (pl_sts_inv_trans … HM1) -HM1 #F0 #HM1 #HT
+  elim (pl_sts_inv_pl_sreds … HM1 ?) // #M0 #_ #H -M1 -Hr1 destruct
+  >associative_append in Hs; #Hs
+  lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -r1
+  >associative_append #Hs
+  elim (list_inv … r3)
+  [ #H destruct
+    elim (in_whd_or_in_inner p) #Hp
+    [ lapply (is_standard_fwd_is_whd … Hs) -Hs /2 width=1/ -Hp #Hs
+      lapply (is_whd_inv_dx … Hs) -Hs #H
+      lapply (is_whd_is_inner_inv … Hr2) -Hr2 // -H #H destruct
+      lapply (pl_sts_inv_nil … HT ?) -HT // #H
+      elim (boolean_inv_appl … H) -H #B0 #A0 #_ #_ #H #_ -M0 -B0 destruct
+      elim (IHA12 … A0 ??) -IHA12 [3,5,6: // |2,4: skip ] (* simplify line *)
+      #F2 #HF2 #H
+      @(ex2_intro … ({b}@V.F2)) normalize // /2 width=1/ (**) (* auto needs some help here *)
+    | <(map_cons_append … r2 (p::◊)) in Hs; #H
+      lapply (is_standard_inv_compatible_dx … H ?) -H /3 width=1/ -Hp #Hp
+      >append_nil in HT; #HT
+      elim (pl_sts_inv_dx_appl_dx … HT ??) -HT [3: // |2: skip ] (* simplify line *) 
+      #T0 #HT0 #H
+      elim (boolean_inv_appl … (sym_eq … H)) -H #B0 #A0 #_ #_ #H #_ -M0 -B0 destruct
+      elim (IHA12 … HT0 ?) // -r2 -A0 -IHA12 #F2 #HF2 #H
+      @(ex2_intro … ({b}@V.F2)) normalize // /2 width=1/ (**) (* auto needs some help here *)
+    ]
+  | -IHA12 -Hr2 -M0 * #q #r #H destruct
+    lapply (is_standard_fwd_append_dx … Hs) -r2 #Hs
+    lapply (is_standard_fwd_sle … Hs) -r #H
+    elim (sle_inv_sn … H ??) -H [3: // |2: skip ] (**) (* simplify line *)
+    #q0 #_ #H destruct
+  ]
+]
+qed-.
+
 theorem pl_sreds_is_standard_pl_sts: ∀s,M1,M2. M1 ↦*[s] M2 → is_standard s →
                                      ∃∃F2. {⊤}⇑ M1 Ⓡ↦*[s] F2 & ⇓F2 = M2.
 #s #M1 #M2 #H @(lstar_ind_r … s M2 H) -s -M2 /2 width=3/
diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/trace.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/trace.ma
index d92d25b9b..3fdcef3f2 100644
--- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/trace.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda/paths/trace.ma
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ lemma is_whd_append: ∀r. is_whd r → ∀s. is_whd s → is_whd (r@s).
 /2 width=1 by All_append/
 qed.
 
+lemma is_whd_inv_dx: ∀s. is_whd (dx:::s) → is_whd s.
+#s elim s -s //
+#p #s #IHs * * #_ /3 width=1/
+qed-.
+
 lemma is_whd_inv_append: ∀r,s. is_whd (r@s) → is_whd r ∧ is_whd s.
 /2 width=1 by All_inv_append/
 qed-.
@@ -59,6 +64,10 @@ qed-.
 (* Note: an "inner" computation contracts just redexes not in the whd *)
 definition is_inner: predicate trace ≝ All … in_inner.
 
+lemma is_inner_append: ∀r. is_inner r → ∀s. is_inner s → is_inner (r@s).
+/2 width=1 by All_append/
+qed.
+
 lemma is_whd_is_inner_inv: ∀s. is_whd s → is_inner s → ◊ = s.
 * // #p #s * #H1p #_ * #H2p #_ elim (H2p ?) -H2p //
 qed-.