From: Enrico Tassi <enrico.tassi@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:39:38 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: sandeich lemma makeup
X-Git-Tag: make_still_working~5714
X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6067115471521e8b9ea805531cb94a0a80774314;p=helm.git

sandeich lemma makeup
---

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/dama/divisible_group.ma b/helm/software/matita/dama/divisible_group.ma
index 44db35a15..6830ef4e1 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/dama/divisible_group.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/dama/divisible_group.ma
@@ -83,3 +83,17 @@ intros; elim n; [simplify; apply eq_reflexive]
 simplify; apply (Eq≈ ? (zero_neutral ??)); assumption; 
 qed.
 
+let rec gpowS (G : abelian_group) (x : G) (n : nat) on n : G ≝
+  match n with [ O ⇒ x | S m ⇒ gpowS ? x m + x].
+  
+lemma gpowS_gpow: ∀G:dgroup.∀e:G.∀n. S n * e ≈ gpowS ? e n.
+intros (G e n); elim n; simplify; [
+  apply (Eq≈ ? (plus_comm ???));apply zero_neutral]
+apply (Eq≈ ?? (plus_comm ???));  
+apply (Eq≈ (e+S n1*e) ? H); clear H; simplify; apply eq_reflexive;
+qed.
+
+lemma divpow: ∀G:dgroup.∀e:G.∀n. e ≈ gpowS ? (e/n) n.
+intros (G e n); apply (Eq≈ ?? (gpowS_gpow ?(e/n) n));
+apply eq_sym; apply divide_divides;
+qed.
diff --git a/helm/software/matita/dama/excess.ma b/helm/software/matita/dama/excess.ma
index 061d2db9b..d8cf09766 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/dama/excess.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/dama/excess.ma
@@ -146,22 +146,22 @@ intros (E z y x Exy Lxz); apply (le_transitive ???? ? Lxz);
 intro Xyz; apply Exy; apply unfold_apart; right; assumption;
 qed.
 
-notation > "'Ex'≪" non associative with precedence 50 for
- @{'excessrewritel}.
- 
-interpretation "exc_rewl" 'excessrewritel = 
- (cic:/matita/excess/exc_rewl.con _ _ _).
-
 lemma le_rewr: ∀E:excess.∀z,y,x:E. x ≈ y → z ≤ x → z ≤ y.
 intros (E z y x Exy Lxz); apply (le_transitive ???? Lxz);
 intro Xyz; apply Exy; apply unfold_apart; left; assumption;
 qed.
 
-notation > "'Ex'≫" non associative with precedence 50 for
- @{'excessrewriter}.
+notation > "'Le'≪" non associative with precedence 50 for
+ @{'lerewritel}.
  
-interpretation "exc_rewr" 'excessrewriter = 
- (cic:/matita/excess/exc_rewr.con _ _ _).
+interpretation "le_rewl" 'lerewritel = 
+ (cic:/matita/excess/le_rewl.con _ _ _).
+
+notation > "'Le'≫" non associative with precedence 50 for
+ @{'lerewriter}.
+ 
+interpretation "le_rewr" 'lerewriter = 
+ (cic:/matita/excess/le_rewr.con _ _ _).
 
 lemma ap_rewl: ∀A:apartness.∀x,z,y:A. x ≈ y → y # z → x # z.
 intros (A x z y Exy Ayz); cases (ap_cotransitive ???x Ayz); [2:assumption]
@@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ intros (A x z y Exy Azy); elim (exc_cotransitive ???x Azy); [assumption]
 elim (Exy); left; assumption;
 qed.
 
+notation > "'Ex'≪" non associative with precedence 50 for
+ @{'excessrewritel}.
+ 
+interpretation "exc_rewl" 'excessrewritel = 
+ (cic:/matita/excess/exc_rewl.con _ _ _).
+
+notation > "'Ex'≫" non associative with precedence 50 for
+ @{'excessrewriter}.
+ 
+interpretation "exc_rewr" 'excessrewriter = 
+ (cic:/matita/excess/exc_rewr.con _ _ _).
+
 lemma lt_rewr: ∀A:excess.∀x,z,y:A. x ≈ y → z < y → z < x.
 intros (A x y z E H); split; elim H; 
 [apply (le_rewr ???? (eq_sym ??? E));|apply (ap_rewr ???? E)] assumption;
@@ -193,6 +205,18 @@ intros (A x y z E H); split; elim H;
 [apply (le_rewl ???? (eq_sym ??? E));| apply (ap_rewl ???? E);] assumption;
 qed.
 
+notation > "'Lt'≪" non associative with precedence 50 for
+ @{'ltrewritel}.
+ 
+interpretation "lt_rewl" 'ltrewritel = 
+ (cic:/matita/excess/lt_rewl.con _ _ _).
+
+notation > "'Lt'≫" non associative with precedence 50 for
+ @{'ltrewriter}.
+ 
+interpretation "lt_rewr" 'ltrewriter = 
+ (cic:/matita/excess/lt_rewr.con _ _ _).
+
 lemma lt_le_transitive: ∀A:excess.∀x,y,z:A.x < y → y ≤ z → x < z.
 intros (A x y z LT LE); cases LT (LEx APx); split; [apply (le_transitive ???? LEx LE)]
 whd in LE LEx APx; cases APx (EXx EXx); [cases (LEx EXx)]
diff --git a/helm/software/matita/dama/sandwich.ma b/helm/software/matita/dama/sandwich.ma
index 10b54b3e4..95dd0d3cb 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/dama/sandwich.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/dama/sandwich.ma
@@ -29,31 +29,6 @@ qed.
 include "sequence.ma".
 include "metric_lattice.ma".
 
-lemma sandwich_ineq: ∀G:todgroup.∀e:G.0<e → e/3 + e/2 + e/2 < e.
-intro G; cases G; unfold divide; intro e;
-alias num (instance 0) = "natural number".
-cases (dg_prop (mk_todgroup todg_order todg_division_ H) e 3) 0;
-cases (dg_prop (mk_todgroup todg_order todg_division_ H) e 2) 0; simplify;
-intro H3;
-cut (0<w1) as H4; [2: 
-  apply (ltmul_lt ??? 2); apply (lt_rewr ???? H2);
-  apply (lt_rewl ???? (mulzero ? 3)); assumption]
-cut (0<w) as H5; [2:
-  apply (ltmul_lt ??? 3); apply (lt_rewr ???? H1);
-  apply (lt_rewl ???? (mulzero ? 4)); assumption]
-cut (w<w1) as H6; [2: 
-  apply (muleqplus_lt ??? 2 O); try assumption; apply (Eq≈ ? H2 H1);]
-apply (plus_cancr_lt ??? w1);
-apply (lt_rewl ??? (w+e)); [
-  apply (Eq≈ (w+3*w1) ? H2);
-  apply (Eq≈ (w+w1+(w1+w1)) (plus_assoc ??w1 w1));
-  apply (Eq≈ (w+(w1+(w1+w1))) (plus_assoc ?w w1 ?));
-  simplify; repeat apply feq_plusl; apply eq_sym; 
-  apply (Eq≈ ? (plus_comm ???)); apply zero_neutral;]
-apply (lt_rewl ???? (plus_comm ???));
-apply flt_plusl; assumption;
-qed.
-
 definition d2s ≝ 
   λR.λml:mlattice R.λs:sequence ml.λk.λn. δ (s n) k.
 
@@ -66,22 +41,20 @@ alias symbol "and" = "constructive and".
 theorem sandwich:
   ∀R.∀ml:mlattice R.∀an,bn,xn:sequence ml.∀x:ml.
     (∀n. (an n ≤ xn n) ∧ (xn n ≤ bn n)) → 
-    an ⇝ x → 
-    bn ⇝ x →
-    xn ⇝ x.
-intros (R ml an bn xn x H Ha Hb); unfold tends0 in Ha Hb ⊢ %. unfold d2s in Ha Hb ⊢ %.
-intros (e He);
-elim (Ha (e/2) (divide_preserves_lt ??? He)) (n1 H1); clear Ha; 
-elim (Hb (e/3) (divide_preserves_lt ??? He)) (n2 H2); clear Hb;
-constructor 1; [apply (n1 + n2);] intros (n3 Hn3);
-lapply (ltwr ??? Hn3) as Hn1n3; lapply (ltwl ??? Hn3) as Hn2n3;
-elim (H1 ? Hn1n3) (H3 H4); elim (H2 ? Hn2n3) (H5 H6); clear Hn1n3 Hn2n3;
-elim (H n3) (H7 H8); clear H H1 H2; 
-lapply (le_to_eqm ??? H7) as Dxm; lapply (le_to_eqj ??? H7) as Dym; 
-(* the main step *)
+    an ⇝ x → bn ⇝ x → xn ⇝ x.
+intros (R ml an bn xn x H Ha Hb); 
+unfold tends0 in Ha Hb ⊢ %; unfold d2s in Ha Hb ⊢ %; intros (e He);
+alias num (instance 0) = "natural number".
+cases (Ha (e/2) (divide_preserves_lt ??? He)) (n1 H1); clear Ha; 
+cases (Hb (e/2) (divide_preserves_lt ??? He)) (n2 H2); clear Hb;
+apply (ex_introT ?? (n1+n2)); intros (n3 Lt_n1n2_n3);
+lapply (ltwr ??? Lt_n1n2_n3) as Lt_n1n3; lapply (ltwl ??? Lt_n1n2_n3) as Lt_n2n3;
+cases (H1 ? Lt_n1n3) (c daxe); cases (H2 ? Lt_n2n3) (c dbxe); 
+cases (H n3) (H7 H8); clear Lt_n1n3 Lt_n2n3 Lt_n1n2_n3 c H1 H2 H n1 n2;     
+(* the main inequality *)
 cut (δ (xn n3) x ≤ δ (bn n3) x + δ (an n3) x + δ (an n3) x) as main_ineq; [2:
   apply (le_transitive ???? (mtineq ???? (an n3)));
-  lapply (le_mtri ????? H7 H8) as H9;
+  lapply (le_mtri ????? H7 H8) as H9; clear H7 H8;
   lapply (feq_plusr ? (- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)) ?? H9) as H10; clear H9;
   cut ( δ(an n3) (bn n3)+- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)≈( δ(an n3) (xn n3))) as H11; [2:
     apply (Eq≈  (0 + δ(an n3) (xn n3)) ? (zero_neutral ??));
@@ -91,23 +64,18 @@ cut (δ (xn n3) x ≤ δ (bn n3) x + δ (an n3) x + δ (an n3) x) as main_ineq;
     apply (Eq≈  ? ? (eq_sym ??? (plus_assoc ????))); assumption;] clear H10;
   apply (le_rewl ???  ( δ(an n3) (xn n3)+ δ(an n3) x) (msymmetric ??(an n3)(xn n3)));    
   apply (le_rewl ???  (δ(an n3) (bn n3)+- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)+ δ(an n3) x) H11);
-  clear Dym Dxm H8 H7 H6 H5 H4 H3;
-  apply (le_rewl ??? (- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)+ δ(an n3) (bn n3)+δ(an n3) x) (plus_comm ??(δ(an n3) (bn n3))));
-  apply (le_rewl ??? (- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)+ (δ(an n3) (bn n3)+δ(an n3) x)) (plus_assoc ????));
-  apply (le_rewl ??? ((δ(an n3) (bn n3)+δ(an n3) x)+- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)) (plus_comm ???));
+  apply (Le≪ (- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)+ δ(an n3) (bn n3)+δ(an n3) x) (plus_comm ??(δ(an n3) (bn n3))));
+  apply (Le≪ (- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)+ (δ(an n3) (bn n3)+δ(an n3) x)) (plus_assoc ????));
+  apply (Le≪ ((δ(an n3) (bn n3)+δ(an n3) x)+- δ(xn n3) (bn n3)) (plus_comm ???));
   apply lew_opp; [apply mpositive] apply fle_plusr;
-  apply (le_rewr ???? (plus_comm ???));
-  apply (le_rewr ??? ( δ(an n3) x+ δx (bn n3)) (msymmetric ????));
+  apply (Le≫ ? (plus_comm ???));
+  apply (Le≫ ( δ(an n3) x+ δx (bn n3)) (msymmetric ????));
   apply mtineq;]
-split; [ (* first the trivial case *)
+split; [ (* first the trivial case: -e< δ(xn n3) x *)
   apply (lt_le_transitive ????? (mpositive ????));
-  apply lt_zero_x_to_lt_opp_x_zero; assumption;]  
-clear Dxm Dym H7 H8 Hn3 H5 H3 n1 n2; cases H4 (H7 H8); clear H4;
-apply (le_lt_transitive ???? ? (sandwich_ineq ?? He));
-apply (le_transitive ???? main_ineq);
-apply (le_transitive ??  (e/3+ δ(an n3) x+ δ(an n3) x)); [
-  repeat apply fle_plusr; cases H6; assumption;]
-apply (le_transitive ??  (e/3+ e/2 + δ(an n3) x) ); [apply fle_plusr; apply fle_plusl; assumption]
-apply (le_transitive ??  (e/3+ e/2 + e/2)); [apply fle_plusl; assumption;]
-apply le_reflexive;
+  apply lt_zero_x_to_lt_opp_x_zero; assumption;]
+(* the main goal: δ(xn n3) x<e *)
+apply (le_lt_transitive ???? main_ineq);
+apply (Lt≫ (e/2+e/2+e/2)); [apply (divpow ?e 2)]
+repeat (apply ltplus; try assumption);
 qed.