From: Ferruccio Guidi Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:55:42 +0000 (+0000) Subject: - the substitution lemma is proved! X-Git-Tag: make_still_working~2319 X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8f694a82e3291e4a3c2a4f805782846204cf348c;p=helm.git - the substitution lemma is proved! - slight modification of parallel substitution and some renaming --- diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/reduction/cpr.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/reduction/cpr.ma index fb79bdebc..e8a586d3d 100644 --- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/reduction/cpr.ma +++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/reduction/cpr.ma @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ lemma cpr_bind_dx: ∀I,L,V1,V2,T1,T2. V1 ⇒ V2 → L. 𝕓{I} V2 ⊢ T1 ⇒ T2 L ⊢ 𝕓{I} V1. T1 ⇒ 𝕓{I} V2. T2. #I #L #V1 #V2 #T1 #T2 #HV12 * #T #HT1 normalize #HT2 elim (tps_split_up … HT2 1 ? ?) -HT2 // #T0 arith_a2 /3/ + | elim (lt_or_ge i2 (d1 + e1)) #Hde1i2 + [ elim (ltps_drop_conf_be … HL01 … HLK0 ? ?) -HL01 HLK0 [2,3: /2/ ] #X #H #HLK1 + elim (ltps_inv_tps21 … H ?) -H [2: /2/ ] #K1 #V1 #_ #HV01 #H destruct -X; + lapply (drop_fwd_drop2 … HLK1) #H + elim (lift_total V1 0 (i2 + 1)) #W1 #HVW1 + lapply (tps_lift_ge … HV01 … H HVW0 HVW1 ?) -H HV01 HVW0 // normalize #HW01 + lapply (tps_weak … HW01 d1 e1 ? ?) [2,3: /3/ ] >arith_i2 // + | lapply (ltps_drop_conf_ge … HL01 … HLK0 ?) -HL01 HLK0 /3/ + ] + ] +| #L0 #I #V2 #W2 #T2 #U2 #d2 #e2 #_ #_ #IHVW2 #IHTU2 #L1 #d1 #e1 #HL01 + elim (IHVW2 … HL01) -IHVW2 #V #HV2 #HVW2 + elim (IHTU2 (L1. 𝕓{I} V) (d1 + 1) e1 ?) -IHTU2 [2: /2/ ] -HL01 /3 width=5/ +| #L0 #I #V2 #W2 #T2 #U2 #d2 #e2 #_ #_ #IHVW2 #IHTU2 #L1 #d1 #e1 #HL01 + elim (IHVW2 … HL01) -IHVW2; + elim (IHTU2 … HL01) -IHTU2 HL01 /3 width=5/ +] +qed. +(* +lemma ltps_tps_trans: (t1,t2,u2:?; j:?) (subst0 j u2 t1 t2) -> + (u1,u:?; i:?) (subst0 i u u1 u2) -> + (EX t | (subst0 j u1 t1 t) & (subst0 (S (plus i j)) u t t2)). + +*) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps.ma index 7f43bd332..0acbc3d4f 100644 --- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps.ma +++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps.ma @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ inductive tps: lenv → term → nat → nat → term → Prop ≝ | tps_subst: ∀L,K,V,W,i,d,e. d ≤ i → i < d + e → ↓[0, i] L ≡ K. 𝕓{Abbr} V → ↑[0, i + 1] V ≡ W → tps L (#i) d e W | tps_bind : ∀L,I,V1,V2,T1,T2,d,e. - tps L V1 d e V2 → tps (L. 𝕓{I} V1) T1 (d + 1) e T2 → + tps L V1 d e V2 → tps (L. 𝕓{I} V2) T1 (d + 1) e T2 → tps L (𝕓{I} V1. T1) d e (𝕓{I} V2. T2) | tps_flat : ∀L,I,V1,V2,T1,T2,d,e. tps L V1 d e V2 → tps L T1 d e T2 → @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ interpretation "parallel substritution (term)" (* Basic properties *********************************************************) -lemma tps_leq_repl: ∀L1,T1,T2,d,e. L1 ⊢ T1 [d, e] ≫ T2 → - ∀L2. L1 [d, e] ≈ L2 → L2 ⊢ T1 [d, e] ≫ T2. +lemma tps_leq_repl_dx: ∀L1,T1,T2,d,e. L1 ⊢ T1 [d, e] ≫ T2 → + ∀L2. L1 [d, e] ≈ L2 → L2 ⊢ T1 [d, e] ≫ T2. #L1 #T1 #T2 #d #e #H elim H -H L1 T1 T2 d e [ // | #L1 #K1 #V #W #i #d #e #Hdi #Hide #HLK1 #HVW #L2 #HL12 @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ lemma tps_split_up: ∀L,T1,T2,d,e. L ⊢ T1 [d, e] ≫ T2 → ∀i. d ≤ i → elim (IHV12 i ? ?) -IHV12 // #V #HV1 #HV2 elim (IHT12 (i + 1) ? ?) -IHT12 [2: /2 by arith4/ |3: /2/ ] (* just /2/ is too slow *) -Hdi Hide >arith_c1 >arith_c1x #T #HT1 #HT2 - @ex2_1_intro [2,3: @tps_bind | skip ] (**) (* explicit constructors *) - [3: @HV1 |4: @HT1 |5: // |1,2: skip | /3 width=5/ ] + lapply (tps_leq_repl_dx … HT1 (L. 𝕓{I} V) ?) -HT1 /3 width=5/ | #L #I #V1 #V2 #T1 #T2 #d #e #_ #_ #IHV12 #IHT12 #i #Hdi #Hide elim (IHV12 i ? ?) -IHV12 // elim (IHT12 i ? ?) -IHT12 // -Hdi Hide /3 width=5/ @@ -152,7 +151,7 @@ qed. fact tps_inv_bind1_aux: ∀d,e,L,U1,U2. L ⊢ U1 [d, e] ≫ U2 → ∀I,V1,T1. U1 = 𝕓{I} V1. T1 → ∃∃V2,T2. L ⊢ V1 [d, e] ≫ V2 & - L. 𝕓{I} V1 ⊢ T1 [d + 1, e] ≫ T2 & + L. 𝕓{I} V2 ⊢ T1 [d + 1, e] ≫ T2 & U2 = 𝕓{I} V2. T2. #d #e #L #U1 #U2 * -d e L U1 U2 [ #L #k #d #e #I #V1 #T1 #H destruct @@ -164,7 +163,7 @@ qed. lemma tps_inv_bind1: ∀d,e,L,I,V1,T1,U2. L ⊢ 𝕓{I} V1. T1 [d, e] ≫ U2 → ∃∃V2,T2. L ⊢ V1 [d, e] ≫ V2 & - L. 𝕓{I} V1 ⊢ T1 [d + 1, e] ≫ T2 & + L. 𝕓{I} V2 ⊢ T1 [d + 1, e] ≫ T2 & U2 = 𝕓{I} V2. T2. /2/ qed. @@ -202,9 +201,9 @@ lemma tps_inv_refl_O2: ∀L,T1,T2,d. L ⊢ T1 [d, 0] ≫ T2 → T1 = T2. (* Basic-1: removed theorems 23: subst0_gen_sort subst0_gen_lref subst0_gen_head subst0_gen_lift_lt subst0_gen_lift_false subst0_gen_lift_ge subst0_refl subst0_trans - subst0_lift_lt subst0_lift_ge subst0_lift_ge_S subst0_lift_ge_s + subst0_lift_lt subst0_lift_ge subst0_lift_ge_S subst0_lift_ge_s subst0_subst0 subst0_subst0_back subst0_weight_le subst0_weight_lt - subst0_confluence_neq subst0_confluence_eq subst0_tlt_head + subst0_confluence_neq subst0_confluence_eq subst0_tlt_head subst0_confluence_lift subst0_tlt subst1_head subst1_gen_head *) diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps_lift.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps_lift.ma index e3b6ee39e..80ed80f1c 100644 --- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps_lift.ma +++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambda-delta/Basic-2/substitution/tps_lift.ma @@ -85,8 +85,9 @@ lemma tps_inv_lift1_le: ∀L,U1,U2,dt,et. L ⊢ U1 [dt, et] ≫ U2 → elim (lift_trans_le … HUV … HVW ?) -HUV HVW V // >arith_a2 // -Hid /3/ | #L #I #V1 #V2 #U1 #U2 #dt #et #_ #_ #IHV12 #IHU12 #K #d #e #HLK #X #H #Hdetd elim (lift_inv_bind2 … H) -H #W1 #T1 #HWV1 #HTU1 #H destruct -X; - elim (IHV12 … HLK … HWV1 ?) -IHV12 // - elim (IHU12 … HTU1 ?) -IHU12 HTU1 [3: /2/ |4: @drop_skip // |2: skip ] -HLK HWV1 Hdetd /3 width=5/ (**) (* just /3 width=5/ is too slow *) + elim (IHV12 … HLK … HWV1 ?) -IHV12 HWV1 // #W2 #HW12 #HWV2 + elim (IHU12 … HTU1 ?) -IHU12 HTU1 [3: /2/ |4: @drop_skip // |2: skip ] -HLK Hdetd (**) (* /3 width=5/ is too slow *) + /3 width=5/ | #L #I #V1 #V2 #U1 #U2 #dt #et #_ #_ #IHV12 #IHU12 #K #d #e #HLK #X #H #Hdetd elim (lift_inv_flat2 … H) -H #W1 #T1 #HWV1 #HTU1 #H destruct -X; elim (IHV12 … HLK … HWV1 ?) -IHV12 HWV1 // @@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ lemma tps_inv_lift1_ge: ∀L,U1,U2,dt,et. L ⊢ U1 [dt, et] ≫ U2 → | #L #I #V1 #V2 #U1 #U2 #dt #et #_ #_ #IHV12 #IHU12 #K #d #e #HLK #X #H #Hdetd elim (lift_inv_bind2 … H) -H #W1 #T1 #HWV1 #HTU1 #H destruct -X; lapply (plus_le_weak … Hdetd) #Hedt - elim (IHV12 … HLK … HWV1 ?) -IHV12 // #W2 #HW12 #HWV2 + elim (IHV12 … HLK … HWV1 ?) -IHV12 HWV1 // #W2 #HW12 #HWV2 elim (IHU12 … HTU1 ?) -IHU12 HTU1 [4: @drop_skip // |2: skip |3: /2/ ] plus_plus_comm_23 >plus_plus_comm_23 in ⊢ (? ? %) elim H -H #H [ @or_introl | @or_intror ] /2 by monotonic_le_plus_l/ (**) (* /3/ is too slow *) ] @@ -93,23 +94,14 @@ theorem tps_trans_down: ∀L,T1,T0,d1,e1. L ⊢ T1 [d1, e1] ≫ T0 → <(tps_inv_lift1_eq … HWT2 … HVW) -HWT2 /4/ | #L #I #V1 #V0 #T1 #T0 #d1 #e1 #_ #_ #IHV10 #IHT10 #X #d2 #e2 #HX #de2d1 elim (tps_inv_bind1 … HX) -HX #V2 #T2 #HV02 #HT02 #HX destruct -X; - lapply (tps_leq_repl … HT02 (L. 𝕓{I} V1) ?) -HT02 /2/ #HT02 + lapply (tps_leq_repl_dx … HT02 (L. 𝕓{I} V0) ?) -HT02 /2/ #HT02 elim (IHV10 … HV02 ?) -IHV10 HV02 // #V elim (IHT10 … HT02 ?) -IHT10 HT02 [2: /2/ ] #T #HT1 #HT2 - lapply (tps_leq_repl … HT2 (L. 𝕓{I} V) ?) -HT2 /3 width=6/ + lapply (tps_leq_repl_dx … HT1 (L. 𝕓{I} V) ?) -HT1; + lapply (tps_leq_repl_dx … HT2 (L. 𝕓{I} V2) ?) -HT2 /3 width=6/ | #L #I #V1 #V0 #T1 #T0 #d1 #e1 #_ #_ #IHV10 #IHT10 #X #d2 #e2 #HX #de2d1 elim (tps_inv_flat1 … HX) -HX #V2 #T2 #HV02 #HT02 #HX destruct -X; elim (IHV10 … HV02 ?) -IHV10 HV02 // elim (IHT10 … HT02 ?) -IHT10 HT02 // /3 width=6/ ] qed. -(* - Theorem subst0_subst0: (t1,t2,u2:?; j:?) (subst0 j u2 t1 t2) -> - (u1,u:?; i:?) (subst0 i u u1 u2) -> - (EX t | (subst0 j u1 t1 t) & (subst0 (S (plus i j)) u t t2)). - - Theorem subst0_subst0_back: (t1,t2,u2:?; j:?) (subst0 j u2 t1 t2) -> - (u1,u:?; i:?) (subst0 i u u2 u1) -> - (EX t | (subst0 j u1 t1 t) & (subst0 (S (plus i j)) u t2 t)). - -*)