From: Andrea Asperti <andrea.asperti@unibo.it>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:32:19 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Esempio
X-Git-Tag: make_still_working~3102
X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a356482acf3bf92eaa34d2b38ee2e81761f58520;p=helm.git

Esempio
---

diff --git a/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/arithmetics/nat.ma b/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/arithmetics/nat.ma
index a1e6fbb23..8efe32043 100644
--- a/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/arithmetics/nat.ma
+++ b/helm/software/matita/nlibrary/arithmetics/nat.ma
@@ -36,12 +36,10 @@ ncoercion nat_to_pos: ∀n:nat. n ≠0 →pos ≝ mk_pos on
 *)
 
 ndefinition pred ≝
- λn. match n with
- [ O ⇒  O
- | (S p) ⇒ p].
+ λn. match n with [ O ⇒  O | (S p) ⇒ p].
 
 ntheorem pred_Sn : ∀n. n = pred (S n).
-//. nqed.
+//; nqed.
 
 ntheorem injective_S : injective nat nat S.
 //; nqed.
@@ -55,8 +53,7 @@ ntheorem not_eq_S: ∀n,m:nat. n ≠ m → S n ≠ S m.
 
 ndefinition not_zero: nat → Prop ≝
  λn: nat. match n with
-  [ O ⇒ False
-  | (S p) ⇒ True ].
+  [ O ⇒ False | (S p) ⇒ True ].
 
 ntheorem not_eq_O_S : ∀n:nat. O ≠ S n.
 #n; #eqOS; nchange with (not_zero O); nrewrite > eqOS; //.
@@ -80,10 +77,10 @@ ntheorem nat_elim2 :
 #n0; #Rn0m; #m; ncases m;/2/; nqed.
 
 ntheorem decidable_eq_nat : \forall n,m:nat.decidable (n=m).
-napply nat_elim2;#n;
+napply nat_elim2; #n;
  ##[ ncases n; /2/;
  ##| /3/;
- ##| #m; #Hind; ncases Hind; /3/; (* ??? /2/;#neqnm; /3/; *)
+ ##| #m; #Hind; ncases Hind; /3/;
  ##]
 nqed. 
 
@@ -125,7 +122,7 @@ ntheorem symmetric_plus: symmetric ? plus.
 ntheorem associative_plus : associative nat plus.
 #n; nelim n; nnormalize; //; nqed.
 
-ntheorem assoc_plus1: ∀a,b,c. b + (a + c) = a + (b + c).
+ntheorem assoc_plus1: ∀a,b,c. c + (b + a) = b + c + a.
 //; nqed.
 
 ntheorem injective_plus_r: ∀n:nat.injective nat nat (λm.n+m).
@@ -206,5 +203,420 @@ n = (S(S O))*m \lor n = S ((S(S O))*m).
 nqed.
 *)
 
-(************************** compare ****************************)
+(******************** ordering relations ************************)
+
+ninductive le (n:nat) : nat → Prop ≝
+  | le_n : le n n
+  | le_S : ∀ m:nat. le n m → le n (S m).
+
+interpretation "natural 'less or equal to'" 'leq x y = (le x y).
+
+interpretation "natural 'neither less nor equal to'" 'nleq x y = (Not (le x y)).
+
+ndefinition lt: nat → nat → Prop ≝
+λn,m:nat. S n ≤ m.
+
+interpretation "natural 'less than'" 'lt x y = (lt x y).
+
+interpretation "natural 'not less than'" 'nless x y = (Not (lt x y)).
+
+ndefinition ge: nat \to nat \to Prop \def
+\lambda n,m:nat.m \leq n.
+
+interpretation "natural 'greater or equal to'" 'geq x y = (ge x y).
+
+ndefinition gt: nat \to nat \to Prop \def
+\lambda n,m:nat.m<n.
+
+interpretation "natural 'greater than'" 'gt x y = (gt x y).
+
+interpretation "natural 'not greater than'" 'ngtr x y = (Not (gt x y)).
+
+ntheorem transitive_le : transitive nat le.
+#a; #b; #c; #leab; #lebc;nelim lebc;/2/;
+nqed.
+
+(*
+ntheorem trans_le: \forall n,m,p:nat. n \leq m \to m \leq p \to n \leq p
+\def transitive_le. *)
 
+ntheorem transitive_lt: transitive nat lt.
+#a; #b; #c; #ltab; #ltbc;nelim ltbc;/2/;nqed.
+
+(*
+theorem trans_lt: \forall n,m,p:nat. lt n m \to lt m p \to lt n p
+\def transitive_lt. *)
+
+ntheorem le_S_S: ∀n,m:nat. n ≤ m → S n ≤ S m.
+#n; #m; #lenm; nelim lenm; /2/; nqed.
+
+ntheorem le_O_n : ∀n:nat. O ≤ n.
+#n; nelim n; /2/; nqed.
+
+ntheorem le_n_Sn : ∀n:nat. n ≤ S n.
+/2/; nqed.
+
+ntheorem le_pred_n : ∀n:nat. pred n ≤ n.
+#n; nelim n; //; nqed.
+
+ntheorem monotonic_pred: monotonic ? le pred.
+#n; #m; #lenm; nelim lenm; /2/; nqed.
+
+ntheorem le_S_S_to_le : ∀n,m:nat. S n ≤ S m → n ≤ m.
+/2/; nqed.
+
+(*
+nchange with (pred (S n) ≤ pred (S m));
+nelim leSS; apply le_n.apply (trans_le ? (pred n1)).assumption.
+apply le_pred_n.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_S_S_to_lt: \forall n,m. 
+  S n < S m \to n < m.
+intros. apply le_S_S_to_le. assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_to_lt_S_S: ∀n,m. n < m → S n < S m.
+intros;
+unfold lt in H;
+apply (le_S_S ? ? H).
+qed.
+
+theorem leS_to_not_zero : \forall n,m:nat. S n \leq m \to not_zero m.
+intros.elim H.exact I.exact I.
+qed.
+
+(* not le *)
+theorem not_le_Sn_O: \forall n:nat. S n \nleq O.
+intros.unfold Not.simplify.intros.apply (leS_to_not_zero ? ? H).
+qed.
+
+theorem not_le_Sn_n: \forall n:nat. S n \nleq n.
+intros.elim n.apply not_le_Sn_O.unfold Not.simplify.intros.cut (S n1 \leq n1).
+apply H.assumption.
+apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_pred: \forall n,m. 
+  O < n \to n < m \to pred n < pred m. 
+apply nat_elim2
+  [intros.apply False_ind.apply (not_le_Sn_O ? H)
+  |intros.apply False_ind.apply (not_le_Sn_O ? H1)
+  |intros.simplify.unfold.apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption
+  ]
+qed.
+
+theorem S_pred: \forall n:nat.lt O n \to eq nat n (S (pred n)).
+intro.elim n.apply False_ind.exact (not_le_Sn_O O H).
+apply eq_f.apply pred_Sn.
+qed.
+
+theorem le_pred_to_le:
+ ∀n,m. O < m → pred n ≤ pred m → n ≤ m.
+intros 2;
+elim n;
+[ apply le_O_n
+| simplify in H2;
+  rewrite > (S_pred m);
+  [ apply le_S_S;
+    assumption
+  | assumption
+  ]
+].
+qed.
+
+theorem le_to_le_pred:
+ ∀n,m. n ≤ m → pred n ≤ pred m.
+intros 2;
+elim n;
+[ simplify;
+  apply le_O_n
+| simplify;
+  elim m in H1 ⊢ %;
+  [ elim (not_le_Sn_O ? H1)
+  | simplify;
+    apply le_S_S_to_le;
+    assumption
+  ]
+].
+qed.
+
+(* le to lt or eq *)
+theorem le_to_or_lt_eq : \forall n,m:nat. 
+n \leq m \to n < m \lor n = m.
+intros.elim H.
+right.reflexivity.
+left.unfold lt.apply le_S_S.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem Not_lt_n_n: ∀n. n ≮ n.
+intro;
+unfold Not;
+intro;
+unfold lt in H;
+apply (not_le_Sn_n ? H).
+qed.
+
+(* not eq *)
+theorem lt_to_not_eq : \forall n,m:nat. n<m \to n \neq m.
+unfold Not.intros.cut ((le (S n) m) \to False).
+apply Hcut.assumption.rewrite < H1.
+apply not_le_Sn_n.
+qed.
+
+(*not lt*)
+theorem eq_to_not_lt: \forall a,b:nat.
+a = b \to a \nlt b.
+intros.
+unfold Not.
+intros.
+rewrite > H in H1.
+apply (lt_to_not_eq b b)
+[ assumption
+| reflexivity
+]
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_n_m_to_not_lt_m_Sn: ∀n,m. n < m → m ≮ S n.
+intros;
+unfold Not;
+intro;
+unfold lt in H;
+unfold lt in H1;
+generalize in match (le_S_S ? ? H);
+intro;
+generalize in match (transitive_le ? ? ? H2 H1);
+intro;
+apply (not_le_Sn_n ? H3).
+qed.
+
+(* le vs. lt *)
+theorem lt_to_le : \forall n,m:nat. n<m \to n \leq m.
+simplify.intros.unfold lt in H.elim H.
+apply le_S. apply le_n.
+apply le_S. assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_S_to_le : \forall n,m:nat. n < S m \to n \leq m.
+simplify.intros.
+apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem not_le_to_lt: \forall n,m:nat. n \nleq m \to m<n.
+intros 2.
+apply (nat_elim2 (\lambda n,m.n \nleq m \to m<n)).
+intros.apply (absurd (O \leq n1)).apply le_O_n.assumption.
+unfold Not.unfold lt.intros.apply le_S_S.apply le_O_n.
+unfold Not.unfold lt.intros.apply le_S_S.apply H.intros.apply H1.apply le_S_S.
+assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_to_not_le: \forall n,m:nat. n<m \to m \nleq n.
+unfold Not.unfold lt.intros 3.elim H.
+apply (not_le_Sn_n n H1).
+apply H2.apply lt_to_le. apply H3.
+qed.
+
+theorem not_lt_to_le: \forall n,m:nat. Not (lt n m) \to le m n.
+simplify.intros.
+apply lt_S_to_le.
+apply not_le_to_lt.exact H.
+qed.
+
+theorem le_to_not_lt: \forall n,m:nat. le n m \to Not (lt m n).
+intros.unfold Not.unfold lt.
+apply lt_to_not_le.unfold lt.
+apply le_S_S.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem not_eq_to_le_to_lt: ∀n,m. n≠m → n≤m → n<m.
+intros;
+elim (le_to_or_lt_eq ? ? H1);
+[ assumption
+| elim (H H2)
+].
+qed.
+
+(* le elimination *)
+theorem le_n_O_to_eq : \forall n:nat. n \leq O \to O=n.
+intro.elim n.reflexivity.
+apply False_ind.
+apply not_le_Sn_O;
+[2: apply H1 | skip].
+qed.
+
+theorem le_n_O_elim: \forall n:nat.n \leq O \to \forall P: nat \to Prop.
+P O \to P n.
+intro.elim n.
+assumption.
+apply False_ind.
+apply  (not_le_Sn_O ? H1).
+qed.
+
+theorem le_n_Sm_elim : \forall n,m:nat.n \leq S m \to 
+\forall P:Prop. (S n \leq S m \to P) \to (n=S m \to P) \to P.
+intros 4.elim H.
+apply H2.reflexivity.
+apply H3. apply le_S_S. assumption.
+qed.
+
+(* le and eq *)
+lemma le_to_le_to_eq: \forall n,m. n \le m \to m \le n \to n = m.
+apply nat_elim2
+  [intros.apply le_n_O_to_eq.assumption
+  |intros.apply sym_eq.apply le_n_O_to_eq.assumption
+  |intros.apply eq_f.apply H
+    [apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption
+    |apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption
+    ]
+  ]
+qed.
+
+(* lt and le trans *)
+theorem lt_O_S : \forall n:nat. O < S n.
+intro. unfold. apply le_S_S. apply le_O_n.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_to_le_to_lt: \forall n,m,p:nat. lt n m \to le m p \to lt n p.
+intros.elim H1.
+assumption.unfold lt.apply le_S.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem le_to_lt_to_lt: \forall n,m,p:nat. le n m \to lt m p \to lt n p.
+intros 4.elim H.
+assumption.apply H2.unfold lt.
+apply lt_to_le.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_S_to_lt: \forall n,m. S n < m \to n < m.
+intros.
+apply (trans_lt ? (S n))
+  [apply le_n|assumption]
+qed.
+
+theorem ltn_to_ltO: \forall n,m:nat. lt n m \to lt O m.
+intros.apply (le_to_lt_to_lt O n).
+apply le_O_n.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_SO_n_to_lt_O_pred_n: \forall n:nat.
+(S O) \lt n \to O \lt (pred n).
+intros.
+apply (ltn_to_ltO (pred (S O)) (pred n) ?).
+ apply (lt_pred (S O) n);
+ [ apply (lt_O_S O) 
+ | assumption
+ ]
+qed.
+
+theorem lt_O_n_elim: \forall n:nat. lt O n \to 
+\forall P:nat\to Prop. (\forall m:nat.P (S m)) \to P n.
+intro.elim n.apply False_ind.exact (not_le_Sn_O O H).
+apply H2.
+qed.
+
+(* other abstract properties *)
+theorem antisymmetric_le : antisymmetric nat le.
+unfold antisymmetric.intros 2.
+apply (nat_elim2 (\lambda n,m.(n \leq m \to m \leq n \to n=m))).
+intros.apply le_n_O_to_eq.assumption.
+intros.apply False_ind.apply (not_le_Sn_O ? H).
+intros.apply eq_f.apply H.
+apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption.
+apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem antisym_le: \forall n,m:nat. n \leq m \to m \leq n \to n=m
+\def antisymmetric_le.
+
+theorem le_n_m_to_lt_m_Sn_to_eq_n_m: ∀n,m. n ≤ m → m < S n → n=m.
+intros;
+unfold lt in H1;
+generalize in match (le_S_S_to_le ? ? H1);
+intro;
+apply antisym_le;
+assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem decidable_le: \forall n,m:nat. decidable (n \leq m).
+intros.
+apply (nat_elim2 (\lambda n,m.decidable (n \leq m))).
+intros.unfold decidable.left.apply le_O_n.
+intros.unfold decidable.right.exact (not_le_Sn_O n1).
+intros 2.unfold decidable.intro.elim H.
+left.apply le_S_S.assumption.
+right.unfold Not.intro.apply H1.apply le_S_S_to_le.assumption.
+qed.
+
+theorem decidable_lt: \forall n,m:nat. decidable (n < m).
+intros.exact (decidable_le (S n) m).
+qed.
+
+(* well founded induction principles *)
+
+theorem nat_elim1 : \forall n:nat.\forall P:nat \to Prop. 
+(\forall m.(\forall p. (p \lt m) \to P p) \to P m) \to P n.
+intros.cut (\forall q:nat. q \le n \to P q).
+apply (Hcut n).apply le_n.
+elim n.apply (le_n_O_elim q H1).
+apply H.
+intros.apply False_ind.apply (not_le_Sn_O p H2).
+apply H.intros.apply H1.
+cut (p < S n1).
+apply lt_S_to_le.assumption.
+apply (lt_to_le_to_lt p q (S n1) H3 H2).
+qed.
+
+(* some properties of functions *)
+
+definition increasing \def \lambda f:nat \to nat. 
+\forall n:nat. f n < f (S n).
+
+theorem increasing_to_monotonic: \forall f:nat \to nat.
+increasing f \to monotonic nat lt f.
+unfold monotonic.unfold lt.unfold increasing.unfold lt.intros.elim H1.apply H.
+apply (trans_le ? (f n1)).
+assumption.apply (trans_le ? (S (f n1))).
+apply le_n_Sn.
+apply H.
+qed.
+
+theorem le_n_fn: \forall f:nat \to nat. (increasing f) 
+\to \forall n:nat. n \le (f n).
+intros.elim n.
+apply le_O_n.
+apply (trans_le ? (S (f n1))).
+apply le_S_S.apply H1.
+simplify in H. unfold increasing in H.unfold lt in H.apply H.
+qed.
+
+theorem increasing_to_le: \forall f:nat \to nat. (increasing f) 
+\to \forall m:nat. \exists i. m \le (f i).
+intros.elim m.
+apply (ex_intro ? ? O).apply le_O_n.
+elim H1.
+apply (ex_intro ? ? (S a)).
+apply (trans_le ? (S (f a))).
+apply le_S_S.assumption.
+simplify in H.unfold increasing in H.unfold lt in H.
+apply H.
+qed.
+
+theorem increasing_to_le2: \forall f:nat \to nat. (increasing f) 
+\to \forall m:nat. (f O) \le m \to 
+\exists i. (f i) \le m \land m <(f (S i)).
+intros.elim H1.
+apply (ex_intro ? ? O).
+split.apply le_n.apply H.
+elim H3.elim H4.
+cut ((S n1) < (f (S a)) \lor (S n1) = (f (S a))).
+elim Hcut.
+apply (ex_intro ? ? a).
+split.apply le_S. assumption.assumption.
+apply (ex_intro ? ? (S a)).
+split.rewrite < H7.apply le_n.
+rewrite > H7.
+apply H.
+apply le_to_or_lt_eq.apply H6.
+qed.
+*)