From 1e461f3fb714667cf97e593eef48781b0f2e9b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:07:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Several bugs fixed in discriminate. Discriminate now works on inductive types with any number of left or right parameters. --- .../tactics/discriminationTactics.ml | 307 +++++------------- helm/software/matita/tests/discriminate.ma | 26 +- 2 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-) diff --git a/helm/software/components/tactics/discriminationTactics.ml b/helm/software/components/tactics/discriminationTactics.ml index 7c5df0d82..69739a4b0 100644 --- a/helm/software/components/tactics/discriminationTactics.ml +++ b/helm/software/components/tactics/discriminationTactics.ml @@ -306,8 +306,6 @@ let injection_tac = injection_tac ~first_time:true ~liftno:0 ~continuation:(fun ~liftno -> Tacticals.id_tac) ;; -exception TwoDifferentSubtermsFound of int - (* term ha tipo t1=t2; funziona solo se t1 e t2 hanno in testa costruttori diversi *) @@ -357,33 +355,69 @@ let discriminate'_tac ~term = in aux t1 t2 in - let mk_pattern turi typeno consno context left_args = + let mk_branches_and_outtype turi typeno consno context args = (* a list of "True" except for the element in position consno which * is "False" *) match fst (CicEnvironment.get_obj CicUniv.empty_ugraph turi) with - | C.InductiveDefinition (ind_type_list,_,nr_ind_params,_) -> - let _,_,_,constructor_list = List.nth ind_type_list typeno in + | C.InductiveDefinition (ind_type_list,_,paramsno,_) -> + let _,_,rty,constructor_list = List.nth ind_type_list typeno in let false_constr_id,_ = List.nth constructor_list (consno - 1) in - List.map - (fun (id,cty) -> - (* dubbio: e' corretto ridurre in questo context ??? *) - let red_ty = CicReduction.whd context cty in - let rec aux t k = - match t with - | C.Prod (_,_,target) when (k <= nr_ind_params) -> - CicSubstitution.subst (List.nth left_args (k-1)) - (aux target (k+1)) - | C.Prod (binder,source,target) when (k > nr_ind_params) -> - C.Lambda (binder, source, (aux target (k+1))) - | _ -> - if (id = false_constr_id) - then (C.MutInd(false_URI,0,[])) - else (C.MutInd(true_URI,0,[])) - in - (CicSubstitution.lift 1 (aux red_ty 1))) - constructor_list - | _ -> (* object is not an inductive definition *) - assert false + let branches = + List.map + (fun (id,cty) -> + (* dubbio: e' corretto ridurre in questo context ??? *) + let red_ty = CicReduction.whd context cty in + let rec aux t k = + match t with + | C.Prod (_,_,target) when (k <= paramsno) -> + CicSubstitution.subst (List.nth args (k-1)) + (aux target (k+1)) + | C.Prod (binder,source,target) when (k > paramsno) -> + C.Lambda (binder, source, (aux target (k+1))) + | _ -> + if (id = false_constr_id) + then (C.MutInd(false_URI,0,[])) + else (C.MutInd(true_URI,0,[])) + in + (CicSubstitution.lift 1 (aux red_ty 1))) + constructor_list in + let outtype = + let seed = ref 0 in + let rec mk_lambdas rev_left_args = + function + 0, args, C.Prod (_,so,ta) -> + C.Lambda + (C.Name (incr seed; "x" ^ string_of_int !seed), + so, + mk_lambdas rev_left_args (0,args,ta)) + | 0, args, C.Sort _ -> + let rec mk_rels = + function + 0 -> [] + | n -> C.Rel n :: mk_rels (n - 1) in + let argsno = List.length args in + C.Lambda + (C.Name "x", + (if argsno + List.length rev_left_args > 0 then + C.Appl + (C.MutInd (turi, typeno, []) :: + (List.map + (CicSubstitution.lift (argsno + 1)) + (List.rev rev_left_args)) @ + mk_rels argsno) + else + C.MutInd (turi,typeno,[])), + C.Sort C.Prop) + | 0, _, _ -> assert false (* seriously screwed up *) + | n, he::tl, C.Prod (_,_,ta) -> + mk_lambdas (he::rev_left_args)(n-1,tl,CicSubstitution.subst he ta) + | n,_,_ -> + assert false (* we should probably reduce in some context *) + in + mk_lambdas [] (paramsno, args, rty) + in + branches, outtype + | _ -> assert false in let discriminate'_tac ~term status = let (proof, goal) = status in @@ -393,14 +427,14 @@ let discriminate'_tac ~term = CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context term CicUniv.empty_ugraph in match termty with - | (C.Appl [(C.MutInd (equri, 0, [])) ; tty ; t1 ; t2]) - when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI equri -> - let turi,typeno,exp_named_subst,left_args = + | C.Appl [(C.MutInd (equri, 0, [])) ; tty ; t1 ; t2] + when LibraryObjects.is_eq_URI equri -> + let turi,typeno,exp_named_subst,args = match tty with | (C.MutInd (turi,typeno,exp_named_subst)) -> turi,typeno,exp_named_subst,[] - | (C.Appl (C.MutInd (turi,typeno,exp_named_subst)::left_args)) -> - turi,typeno,exp_named_subst,left_args + | (C.Appl (C.MutInd (turi,typeno,exp_named_subst)::args)) -> + turi,typeno,exp_named_subst,args | _ -> fail "not a discriminable equality" in let consno = @@ -408,43 +442,32 @@ let discriminate'_tac ~term = | Some consno -> consno | None -> fail "discriminating terms are structurally equal" in - let pattern = mk_pattern turi typeno consno context left_args in - let (proof',goals') = - ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic - (EliminationTactics.elim_type_tac - (C.MutInd (false_URI, 0, []))) - status + let branches,outtype = + mk_branches_and_outtype turi typeno consno context args in - (match goals' with - | [goal'] -> - let _,metasenv',_,_ = proof' in - let _,context',gty' = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal' metasenv' in - ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic - (T.then_ - ~start: - (ReductionTactics.change_tac - ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern (Some gty')) - (fun _ m u -> - C.Appl [ - C.Lambda ( C.Name "x", tty, - C.MutCase (turi, typeno, - (C.Lambda ((C.Name "x"), - (CicSubstitution.lift 1 tty), - (C.Sort C.Prop))), - (C.Rel 1), pattern)); - t2 ], m, u)) - ~continuation: - (T.then_ - ~start: - (EqualityTactics.rewrite_simpl_tac - ~direction:`RightToLeft - ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern None) - term) - ~continuation: - (IntroductionTactics.constructor_tac ~n:1))) - (proof',goal') - | [] -> fail "ElimType False left no goals" - | _ -> fail "ElimType False left more than one goal") + ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic + (T.then_ + ~start:(EliminationTactics.elim_type_tac (C.MutInd (false_URI, 0, []))) + ~continuation: + (T.then_ + ~start: + (ReductionTactics.change_tac + ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern None) + (fun _ m u -> + C.Appl [ + C.Lambda ( C.Name "x", tty, + C.MutCase (turi, typeno, outtype, (C.Rel 1), branches)); + t2 ], + m, u)) + ~continuation: + (T.then_ + ~start: + (EqualityTactics.rewrite_simpl_tac + ~direction:`RightToLeft + ~pattern:(ProofEngineTypes.conclusion_pattern None) + term) + ~continuation: + (IntroductionTactics.constructor_tac ~n:1)))) status | _ -> fail "not an equality" in ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (discriminate'_tac ~term) @@ -458,155 +481,3 @@ let discriminate_tac ~term = status in ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic (discriminate_tac ~term) - -(* DISCRIMINTATE SENZA INJECTION - -exception TwoDifferentSubtermsFound of (Cic.term * Cic.term * int) - -let discriminate_tac ~term status = - let module C = Cic in - let module U = UriManager in - let module P = PrimitiveTactics in - let module T = Tacticals in - let (proof, goal) = status in - let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in - let _,context,_ = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in - let termty = (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context term) in - match termty with - (C.Appl [(C.MutInd (equri, 0, [])) ; tty ; t1 ; t2]) - when (U.eq equri (U.uri_of_string "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/eq.ind")) - or (U.eq equri (U.uri_of_string "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic_Type/eqT.ind")) -> ( - match tty with - (C.MutInd (turi,typeno,exp_named_subst)) - | (C.Appl (C.MutInd (turi,typeno,exp_named_subst)::_)) -> - - let (t1',t2',consno2') = (* bruuutto: uso un eccezione per terminare con successo! buuu!! :-/ *) - try - let rec traverse t1 t2 = -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX t1 " ^ CicPp.ppterm t1)) ; -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX t2 " ^ CicPp.ppterm t2)) ; - match t1,t2 with - ((C.MutConstruct (uri1,typeno1,consno1,exp_named_subst1)), - (C.MutConstruct (uri2,typeno2,consno2,exp_named_subst2))) - when (uri1 = uri2) && (typeno1 = typeno2) && (consno1 = consno2) && (exp_named_subst1 = exp_named_subst2) -> - t1,t2,0 - | ((C.Appl ((C.MutConstruct (uri1,typeno1,consno1,exp_named_subst1))::applist1)), - (C.Appl ((C.MutConstruct (uri2,typeno2,consno2,exp_named_subst2))::applist2))) - when (uri1 = uri2) && (typeno1 = typeno2) && (consno1 = consno2) && (exp_named_subst1 = exp_named_subst2) -> - let rec traverse_list l1 l2 = - match l1,l2 with - [],[] -> t1,t2,0 - | hd1::tl1,hd2::tl2 -> traverse hd1 hd2; traverse_list tl1 tl2 - | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: i 2 termini hanno in testa lo stesso costruttore, ma applicato a un numero diverso di termini. possibile???") - in traverse_list applist1 applist2 - - | ((C.MutConstruct (uri1,typeno1,consno1,exp_named_subst1)), - (C.MutConstruct (uri2,typeno2,consno2,exp_named_subst2))) - | ((C.MutConstruct (uri1,typeno1,consno1,exp_named_subst1)), - (C.Appl ((C.MutConstruct (uri2,typeno2,consno2,exp_named_subst2))::_))) - | ((C.Appl ((C.MutConstruct (uri1,typeno1,consno1,exp_named_subst1))::_)), - (C.MutConstruct (uri2,typeno2,consno2,exp_named_subst2))) - | ((C.Appl ((C.MutConstruct (uri1,typeno1,consno1,exp_named_subst1))::_)), - (C.Appl ((C.MutConstruct (uri2,typeno2,consno2,exp_named_subst2))::_))) - when (consno1 <> consno2) || (exp_named_subst1 <> exp_named_subst2) -> - raise (TwoDifferentSubtermsFound (t1,t2,consno2)) - | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: not a discriminable equality") - in traverse t1 t2 - with (TwoDifferentSubtermsFound (t1,t2,consno2)) -> (t1,t2,consno2) - in -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX consno2' " ^ (string_of_int consno2'))) ; - if consno2' = 0 - then raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: Discriminating terms are structurally equal") - else - - let pattern = - (* a list of "True" except for the element in position consno2' which is "False" *) - match fst(CicEnvironment.get_obj turi - CicUniv.empty_ugraph) with - C.InductiveDefinition (ind_type_list,_,nr_ind_params) -> -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX nth " ^ (string_of_int (List.length ind_type_list)) ^ " " ^ (string_of_int typeno))) ; - let _,_,_,constructor_list = (List.nth ind_type_list typeno) in -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX nth " ^ (string_of_int (List.length constructor_list)) ^ " " ^ (string_of_int consno2'))) ; - let false_constr_id,_ = List.nth constructor_list (consno2' - 1) in -debug_print (lazy "XXXX nth funzionano ") ; - List.map - (function (id,cty) -> - let red_ty = CicReduction.whd context cty in (* dubbio: e' corretto ridurre in questo context ??? *) - let rec aux t k = - match t with - C.Prod (_,_,target) when (k <= nr_ind_params) -> - aux target (k+1) - | C.Prod (binder,source,target) when (k > nr_ind_params) -> - C.Lambda (binder,source,(aux target (k+1))) - | _ -> - if (id = false_constr_id) - then (C.MutInd (U.uri_of_string "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/False.ind") 0 []) - else (C.MutInd (U.uri_of_string "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/True.ind") 0 []) - in aux red_ty 1 - ) - constructor_list - | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: object is not an Inductive Definition: it's imposible") - in - - let (proof',goals') = - EliminationTactics.elim_type_tac - ~term:(C.MutInd (U.uri_of_string "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/False.ind") 0 [] ) - status - in - (match goals' with - [goal'] -> - let _,metasenv',_,_ = proof' in - let _,context',gty' = - CicUtil.lookup_meta goal' metasenv' - in - T.then_ - ~start: - (P.change_tac - ~what:gty' - ~with_what: - (C.Appl [ - C.Lambda ( - C.Name "x", tty, - C.MutCase ( - turi, typeno, - (C.Lambda ((C.Name "x"),tty,(C.Sort C.Prop))), - (C.Rel 1), pattern - ) - ); - t2'] - ) - ) - ~continuation: - ( -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX rewrite<-: " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' (C.Appl [(C.MutInd (equri,0,[])) ; tty ; t1' ; t2'])))); -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX rewrite<-: " ^ CicPp.ppterm (C.Appl [(C.MutInd (equri,0,[])) ; tty ; t1' ; t2']))) ; -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX equri: " ^ U.string_of_uri equri)) ; -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tty : " ^ CicPp.ppterm tty)) ; -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tt1': " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t1'))) ; -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tt2': " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t2'))) ; -if (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t1') <> tty then debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tt1': " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t1'))) ; -if (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t2') <> tty then debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tt2': " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t2'))) ; -if (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t1') <> (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t2') - then debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tt1': " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' - metasenv' context' t1'))) ; debug_print (lazy ("XXXX tt2': " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' t2'))) ; - - let termty' = ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting ~equality:(==) ~what:t1 ~with_what:t1' ~where:termty in - let termty'' = ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting ~equality:(==) ~what:t2 ~with_what:t2' ~where:termty' in - -debug_print (lazy ("XXXX rewrite<- " ^ CicPp.ppterm term ^ " : " ^ CicPp.ppterm (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv' context' term))); - T.then_ - ~start:(EqualityTactics.rewrite_back_simpl_tac ~term:term) - ~continuation:(IntroductionTactics.constructor_tac ~n:1) - ) - (proof',goal') - | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: ElimType False left more (or less) than one goal") - ) - | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: not a discriminable equality") - ) - | _ -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Discriminate: not an equality") -;; - -*) - - - diff --git a/helm/software/matita/tests/discriminate.ma b/helm/software/matita/tests/discriminate.ma index d8e4bf2e2..f25061245 100644 --- a/helm/software/matita/tests/discriminate.ma +++ b/helm/software/matita/tests/discriminate.ma @@ -17,9 +17,14 @@ include "legacy/coq.ma". alias id "not" = "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/not.con". alias num (instance 0) = "natural number". alias symbol "eq" (instance 0) = "Coq's leibnitz's equality". +alias id "False" = "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/False.ind#xpointer(1/1)". +alias id "True" = "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/True.ind#xpointer(1/1)". +alias id "nat" = "cic:/Coq/Init/Datatypes/nat.ind#xpointer(1/1)". +alias id "bool" = "cic:/Coq/Init/Datatypes/bool.ind#xpointer(1/1)". inductive foo: Prop \def I_foo: foo. +alias num (instance 0) = "binary integer number". theorem stupid: 1 = 0 \to (\forall p:Prop. p \to not p). intros. @@ -31,10 +36,29 @@ inductive bar_list (A:Set): Set \def | bar_nil: bar_list A | bar_cons: A \to bar_list A \to bar_list A. -alias id "False" = "cic:/Coq/Init/Logic/False.ind#xpointer(1/1)". + theorem stupid2: \forall A:Set.\forall x:A.\forall l:bar_list A. bar_nil A = bar_cons A x l \to False. intros. discriminate H. qed. + +inductive dt (A:Type): Type \to Type \def + | k1: \forall T:Type. dt A T + | k2: \forall T:Type. \forall T':Type. dt A (T \to T'). + +theorem stupid3: + k1 False (False → True) = k2 False False True → False. + intros; + discriminate H. +qed. + +inductive dddt (A:Type): Type \to Type \def + | kkk1: dddt A nat + | kkk2: dddt A nat. + +theorem stupid4: kkk1 False = kkk2 False \to False. + intros; + discriminate H. +qed. \ No newline at end of file -- 2.39.2